IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In git worktrees, `.git` is not a directory but a regular file
containing the path to the real git directory. This was causing us to
not use `git describe` in the versioning info, which is really useful to
sanity check that you're running the code you think you're running. Fix
this by just checking that a `.git` entry exists.
Closes: #1102
Approved by: cgwalters
The jigdo work is turning into "partial unified core 🌐" (mostly due to SELinux,
but that's an aside); we made a change here previously to avoid using
the journal if `uid != 0`, but it's more correct to check whether or
not we're already using the journal.
Concretely this fixes calling `rpmostree_context_assemble_tmprootfs()` as uid 0
inside my dev container, running `rpm-ostree compose commit2jigdo`.
Closes: #1084
Approved by: jlebon
Needed for unified core work for the treecompose side; there
`/var` may not actually be on the same mount as the repo.
Do what we do in a ton of other places (and should probably push
into ostree somehow): allocate a tmpdir in `${repo}/tmp`.
Closes: #1095
Approved by: jlebon
The maintainer can't apparently be bothered to review my patch,
and we don't need the `%post` anyways - and this is now blocking
my jigdo work.
Closes: #1092
Approved by: jlebon
We have a *lot* of experimental functionality. I think the
`override` bits are fleshed out enough now that we can lift
the `ex` designation. For example, jlebon fixed SELinux
labeling in the presence of override-replace.
Closes: #1089
Approved by: jlebon
The `ex container` path was already doing this - lower the logic
into the core so I can use it for the jigdo path. I think it's just
clearer as well even for the sysroot pkglayering path.
Closes: #1083
Approved by: jlebon
Rather than passing it to the assemble functions.
Prep for jigdo work. I'm trying to move more logic
from the system upgrader path to the core, since some of
it is needed for jigdo and "unified core".
Closes: #1083
Approved by: jlebon
We already called the `workaround_selinux_cross_labeling_recurse()`
in the postprocessing path, there's no need to do it again during
commit.
Just making this change as I was going to do some SePolicy stuff
for the [jigdo work](https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1081)
and stumbled again into the ugly mess that is the cross-labeling
hack.
Closes: #1082
Approved by: jlebon
Added unit tests for rpm-ostree ex kargs --delete,
--append and --replace.
Also exposed two getter functions for kargs table
and array so people can retrieve information from
kargs.
Also includes a minor fix for a bug caught by the unit
test.
Closes: #1013
Approved by: cgwalters
Refined a bit for the previous written kargs test.( mainly for
checking kargs after rollback )
Added tests for import-proc-cmdline and deploy-index option
Closes: #1013
Approved by: cgwalters
Refactor the similar code portion from delete option into
a new function, and reuse it in the replace logic.
Add the replace functionality to allow kernel arguments
replacement. Now support two different types of replacement:
1: replace by key=value when there is only one key existing
e.g we have 'hi=hello' as our one of the arguments (hi only has
one value associated with it) , and 'rpm-ostree ex kargs --replace hi=new'
will replace the value and change hi=hello into hi=new.
2: replace by key=value=new_value for all other replacements
( this will work for swapping single value pair too !)
Some tests for rpm-ostree ex kargs --replace are added
for future regression.
Closes: #1013
Approved by: cgwalters
Tests are introduced in this commit to test the basic
functionality for rpm-ostree ex kargs --append,
and rpm-ostree ex kargs --delete.
Those tests are added for future regression.
Closes: #1013
Approved by: cgwalters
Some new functions are added to handle delete operations
for kargs. We are now able to do the following delete operations kargs:
1: delete by key, if there is only one value associated with the key
we directly remove it
2: delete by key=value, it will find that specific key/value pair
and remove it from the kernel arguments
Similar to append functionality introduced, delete will
also create a new pending deployment that is rollbackable
Closes: #1013
Approved by: cgwalters
API functions from ostree-kernel-args.c
are copied to libpriv. The append functionality
reuses _ostree_kernel_args_append_argv() for
collecting added kernel arguments.
Also added handlation in rpm-ostree upgrader
to allow deployments happen with kernel arguments.
Now, the user is able to add kernel arguments via
'rpm-ostree ex kargs --append key=value'
or 'rpm-ostree ex kargs --append key' if they
want to have an empty value with key.
The user is also able to display the current
kernel arguments via 'rpm-ostree ex kargs'
In addition, this functionality will create a pending deployment,
and will update the conf file in /boot/loader/entries/ostree-$osname-0.conf upon success.
Closes: #1013
Approved by: cgwalters
This is initial groundwork for https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/594.
This commit sets up most of the required
front end logic( arg parsing, transaction handling), and will
be used in the following commits.
There is nothing really fancy in this commit, as most of the code
shares the similar style between other dbus related commands.
Closes: #1013
Approved by: cgwalters
This is a revisit of a PR for client-side layering: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/1072
Here though we're doing this by default for server-side composes.
There are a few reasons to do this; first, I'm seeing an issue
in some of our Jenkins jobs for Fedora that hit "mirror roulette"
and end up creating commits that "revert" to older versions temporarily.
While I've [certainly pitched](https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/IMPE6KCRBHCEJH5VBE6ZFIRLPAD743JT/) this as a feature, I think
we really want something like `--force-older-timestamp` - basically
error out if the timestamps on one or more input repos were older.
Not doing that in this patch, but it paves the way to do so.
Second, I'd like to use this data in the `ostree.source-title`
metadata key down the line. Something like:
`└ rpmmd: fedora-26 (20170310), fedora-26-updates (20171101)`
(This could be a lot nicer if we drive versioning in to the rpm-md repo info,
and e.g. there's some friendly "week number" style versioning for the updates
repo now that it's batched...for now we have timestamps)
For CentOS/RHELAH this gets interesting and potentially more verbose,
to the point where we may want to render it more explicitly.
But anyways, let's do this now, as it will be useful even without
an explicit rendering, since users can do e.g. `ostree show` on
a base commit hash to dump the data.
I had a concern that some users may not want to emit this metadata;
they can currently do `--add-metadata-string rpmostree.rpmmd-repos ''`
and that will "win".
Closes: #1079
Approved by: jlebon
Now that there's a new libostree out, let's cut one here too, since we have a
fair bit accumulated, and I think it'd be good to have the oustanding kargs PR
to soak in master for a bit after landing.
Closes: #1080
Approved by: jlebon
Related to: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/49
We want to support "name binding" per client system, rather than
having a hardcoded mapping in our tree. Currently if e.g. a new
daemon is added as a dependency (or as part of e.g. systemd) it's
easy to silently miss it.
This is prep for doing that binding client side consistently, which is what we
do with package layering.
Closes: #1077
Approved by: jlebon
We won't have done the postprocessing, so `/usr/lib/passwd` won't exist. Trying
to use `compose install` with current fedora-atomic failed (I *really* should
have tested that at least manually with the final patchset). Add `check-passwd`
to the test suite so this gets coverage too.
Closes: #1076
Approved by: jlebon
This is a cleanup I was going to do before, but had dropped. It's a general
followup to the `compose` rework; there's not much point to having a high level
wrapper, given that we generally need to do some postprocessing. Inline it into
the `ex container` code, which makes the core more "core".
Closes: #1074
Approved by: jlebon
I got a critical from an nonexistent `DESTDIR` in `rpm-ostree compose install`.
(I'm probably going to do a patch to add `rpmostree_command_invocation_set_exit_code()`
so the "exit 77" case can use that and everything else can `s/return EXIT_FAILURE/return FALSE/`
and we'll be free of these bugs)
Closes: #1075
Approved by: jlebon
Related to: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/774
We aren't yet trying to render this in any way on the client side, but let's
start capturing the timestamp data now so that we can make use of it later
in e.g. `rpm-ostree status -v`.
Closes: #1072
Approved by: jlebon
Right now `rpm-ostree compose tree` is very prescriptive about how things work.
Trying to add anything that isn't an RPM is absolutely fighting the system. Our
postprocessing system *enforces* no network access (good for reproducibilty, but
still prescriptive).
There's really a logical split between three phases:
- install: "build a rootfs that installs packages"
- postprocess: "run magical ostree postprocessing like kernel"
- commit: "commit result to ostree"
So there are two high level flows I'd like to enable here. First is to allow
people to do *arbitrary* postprocessing between `install` and `commit`. For
example, run Ansible and change `/etc`. This path basically is like what we have
today with `postprocess-script.sh`, except the builder can do anything they want
with network access enabled.
Going much farther, this helps us support a "build with Dockerfile" style flow.
We can then provide tooling to extract the container image, and combine
`postprocess` and `commit`.
Or completely the other way - if for example someone wants to use `rpm-ostree
compose install`, they could tar up the result as a Docker/OCI image. That's now
easier; an advantage of this flow over e.g. `yum --installroot` is the "change
detection" code we have.
Related issues/PRs:
- https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/96
- https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/471
One disadvantage of this approach right now is that if one *does* go for
the split approach, we lose the "input hash" metadata for example. And
down the line, I'd like to add even more metadata, like the input rpm repos,
which could also be rendered on the client side.
But, I think we can address that later by e.g. caching the metadata in a file in
the install root and picking it back up or something.
Closes: #1039
Approved by: jlebon
Depends: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/1296
As I mention in the commit there, I see two uses for this in rpm-ostree; first
in our test suite, and second for OCI-built image imports.
I also took a step further here and inject an `original-origin` metadata
key, though we aren't actually using that yet. The problem I'm trying
to solve there is that repeated `make vmoverlay` starts chaining things up,
but that gets very confusing. I think we should always have `vmoverlay` unwind
back to the base ref. (Or at least do that by default)
Closes: #1069
Approved by: jlebon
In another PR I did the manual bridging of commit metadata to deployment
property, but that's annoying. Let's just bridge all commit metadata.
Closes: #1069
Approved by: jlebon
Prep for split compose. The current Docker/OCI base images we
built at least for Fedora don't have this move done, so let's
ensure our postprocessing does it.
Closes: #1070
Approved by: jlebon
Prep for split compose. The Fedora base container image already empties
`/etc/machine-id`; let's handle that case rather than throwing an error. This
makes it easier to run our postprocessing on an image built on top of that base
image.
Closes: #1070
Approved by: jlebon
This is prep for split-compose. We have some options in the
treefile, like `boot_location` and `tmp-is-dir` etc. While those
are useful options, I don't want to force everyone using
`rpm-ostree compose postprocess` to write a treefile.
Change the code then to accept a `NULL` treefile to mean
"use the defaults".
Closes: #1070
Approved by: jlebon
Fixes a fsck issue that I saw while submitting another patch.
This is the second time in the last week I've fixed an issue like this; will
probably do a libostree patch to just turn it on by default for
`bare-user-only`, but let's fix this bug anyways.
Closes: #1071
Approved by: peterbaouoft
Switching to the `_CONSUME` flag revealed an "oh god how did I write that"
bug in the previous patch in https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/pull/1046
AKA commit: 334f0b89be
The way that actually fixed the bug before was because we were using
hardlink checkouts, and we were operating outside an `rofiles-fuse`
context, we simply directly changed the on-disk object mode.
But with the `_CONSUME` flag we started deleting the files as we write,
meaning that stopped working.
I *initially* wrote a patch to do the same split "prepare/processing/commit"
flow that treecompose and package layering do, but that can't really fix this
bug - we need to do it on import.
So do the chmod on import and drop the postprocessing bits.
Closes: #1067
Approved by: jlebon
Now that libglnx allows it, we can skip declaring a `struct stat` we
don't actually need just to check if a file exists.
Closes: #1066
Approved by: cgwalters
This is used for both `ex container` and client-side operations, but not most
uses of `compose tree` (which should go into `bare-user` or `archive`).
We'll circle back and do `bare-user` for `_CONSUME` in libostree though
soon.
Closes: #1065
Approved by: jlebon
Just noticed this FIXME while working on split compose. Use
the `#define` we have, and inline the duplicated function which
boils down to `g_variant_lookup()` - I simply changed `&s` to `s`
to inline the `strdup`.
Closes: #1064
Approved by: jlebon
An interesting behaviour arises from the new `--cache-only` option. We
would essentially consider two goals with the same exact pkglist as
different depending on whether a package came from a yum repo or our
pkgcache repo. This meant that `rpm-ostree upgrade` followed by
`rpm-ostree upgrade -C` was never detected as a no-op and always
resulted in a relayer.
This was due to the fact that the checksum libsolv calculated was based
on our chopped off pkgcache meta-RPMs. This of course won't match the
checksum from the repodata, which is of the whole RPM.
Thankfully, we already save the repodata checksum when unpacking RPMs.
This patch simply detects the case where we're trying to checksum a pkg
originating from the pkgcache, and reads in the saved repodata checksum
rather than the wrong libsolv-derived one.
Closes: #1049
Approved by: cgwalters
To complement the new `--cache-only` option, add a `--download-only`
option. This does exactly what it says: we download the ostree, download
and import packages, but don't actually commit & deploy. This can be
used to effectively prime a follow-up `--cache-only` operation that can
be done during a more convenient/safer maintenance window.
I debated naming the two options `--pull-only` and `--deploy-only` like
the ostree equivalents. Though "pull" felt like the wrong word given
that it's associated more with ostree pulling but rpm-ostree also
downloads & imports RPMs. As for `--deploy-only` vs `--cache-only`, it
seems like `--cache-only` is a more accurate description of the
functionality (i.e. rather than describing an action, it describes a
mode). I also considered `--no-download` to make the synergy with
`--download-only` more obvious. Maybe that's better? Naming is hard...
Closes: #713Closes: #1049
Approved by: cgwalters
Now that we have a strong notion of `cache-only` mode, make use of it
when performing an `uninstall` or `ex override remove/reset`.
Closes: #944Closes: #1049
Approved by: cgwalters
As Colin mentioned in #1035, the new `--cache-only` implemented only the
rpmmd half of the story. Here we complete that story by also ensuring
that when in cache-only mode, we don't download new ostree data nor new
packages. We try to complete the requested operation with what we have.
To do this, we add support for the same `SYNTHETIC` pull that was added
in ostree[1] so that we don't actually pull, but still perform timestamp
checking.
On the pkgcache side, we disable all remote repos and instead insert all
our cached RPMs into the `DnfSack`. Care is taken to still perform
SHA256 verification for local pkg installs/replacements.
[1] https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/642Closes: #687Closes: #1049
Approved by: cgwalters
Minor detail. We still need to support the `--pretty` flag, but it
doesn't do anything anymore, so let's just hide it to clean up the help
output.
Closes: #1060
Approved by: cgwalters
