bdf3cda8db
One question I often have when looking at the output of `status -a`: ``` AvailableUpdate: Version: 29.20181202.0 (2018-12-02T08:37:50Z) Commit: dece5737a087d5c6038efdb86cb4512f867082ccfc6eb0fa97b2734c1f6d99c3 GPGSignature: Valid signature by 5A03B4DD8254ECA02FDA1637A20AA56B429476B4 SecAdvisories: FEDORA-2018-042156f164 Unknown net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-3.fc29.x86_64 FEDORA-2018-87ba0312c2 Moderate kernel-4.19.5-300.fc29.x86_64 FEDORA-2018-87ba0312c2 Moderate kernel-core-4.19.5-300.fc29.x86_64 FEDORA-2018-87ba0312c2 Moderate kernel-modules-4.19.5-300.fc29.x86_64 FEDORA-2018-87ba0312c2 Moderate kernel-modules-extra-4.19.5-300.fc29.x86_64 FEDORA-2018-f467c36c2b Moderate git-core-2.19.2-1.fc29.x86_64 Diff: 67 upgraded, 1 removed, 16 added ``` is "How serious and relevant are these advisories to me? How soon should I reboot?". For the packages that I'm most familiar with, e.g. `kernel` and `git-core`, I usually look up the advisory and check why it was marked as a security update, mentioned CVEs, and how those affect me. The updateinfo metadata includes a wealth of information that could be useful here. In Fedora, CVEs treated by the security response team result in RHBZs, which end up attached to the advisories and thus make it into that metadata. This patch tries to reduce friction in answering some of those questions above by checking for those CVEs and printing a short description in the output of `status -a`. Example: ``` AvailableUpdate: Version: 29.20181202.0 (2018-12-02T08:37:50Z) Commit: dece5737a087d5c6038efdb86cb4512f867082ccfc6eb0fa97b2734c1f6d99c3 GPGSignature: Valid signature by 5A03B4DD8254ECA02FDA1637A20AA56B429476B4 SecAdvisories: FEDORA-2018-042156f164 Unknown net-snmp-libs-1:5.8-3.fc29.x86_64 CVE-2018-18065 CVE-2018-18066 net-snmp: various flaws [fedora-all] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1637573 FEDORA-2018-87ba0312c2 Moderate kernel-4.19.5-300.fc29.x86_64 FEDORA-2018-87ba0312c2 Moderate kernel-core-4.19.5-300.fc29.x86_64 FEDORA-2018-87ba0312c2 Moderate kernel-modules-4.19.5-300.fc29.x86_64 FEDORA-2018-87ba0312c2 Moderate kernel-modules-extra-4.19.5-300.fc29.x86_64 CVE-2018-16862 kernel: cleancache: Infoleak of deleted files after reuse of old inodes https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1649017 CVE-2018-19407 kernel: kvm: NULL pointer dereference in vcpu_scan_ioapic in arch/x86/kvm/x86.c https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1652656 FEDORA-2018-f467c36c2b Moderate git-core-2.19.2-1.fc29.x86_64 CVE-2018-19486 git: Improper handling of PATH allows for commands to executed from current directory https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1653143 Diff: 67 upgraded, 1 removed, 16 added ``` Including the CVE name and RHBZ link also makes it easier to look for more details if desired. Closes: #1695 Approved by: rfairley |
||
---|---|---|
.. | ||
check | ||
common | ||
compose-tests | ||
composedata | ||
ex-container-tests | ||
gpghome | ||
manual | ||
utils | ||
vmcheck | ||
compose | ||
ex-container | ||
README.md |
Tests are divided into three groups:
-
Tests in the
check
directory are non-destructive and uninstalled. Some of the tests require root privileges. Usemake check
to run these. -
The
composecheck
tests currently require uid 0 capabilities - the default in Docker, or you can run them via a user namespace. They are non-destructive, but are installed.To use them, you might do a
make && sudo make install
inside a Docker container.Then invoke
./tests/compose
. Alternatively of course, you can simply run the tests on a host system or in an existing container, without doing a build.Note: This is intentionally not a
Makefile
target because it doesn't require building and doesn't use uninstalled binaries. -
Tests in the
vmcheck
directory are oriented around using Vagrant. Usemake vmcheck
to run them. See alsoHACKING.md
in the top directory.
The common
directory contains files used by multiple
tests. The utils
directory contains helper utilities
required to run the tests.