IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
There was only one `IsRepositoryExist` function, it did: `has && isDir`
However it's not right, and it would cause 500 error when creating a new
repository if the dir exists.
Then, it was changed to `has || isDir`, it is still incorrect, it
affects the "adopt repo" logic.
To make the logic clear:
* IsRepositoryModelOrDirExist
* IsRepositoryModelExist
Change all license headers to comply with REUSE specification.
Fix#16132
Co-authored-by: flynnnnnnnnnn <flynnnnnnnnnn@github>
Co-authored-by: John Olheiser <john.olheiser@gmail.com>
Fix#19513
This PR introduce a new db method `InTransaction(context.Context)`,
and also builtin check on `db.TxContext` and `db.WithTx`.
There is also a new method `db.AutoTx` has been introduced but could be used by other PRs.
`WithTx` will always open a new transaction, if a transaction exist in context, return an error.
`AutoTx` will try to open a new transaction if no transaction exist in context.
That means it will always enter a transaction if there is no error.
Co-authored-by: delvh <dev.lh@web.de>
Co-authored-by: 6543 <6543@obermui.de>
* Move access and repo permission to models/perm/access
* fix test
* fix git test
* Move functions sequence
* Some improvements per @KN4CK3R and @delvh
* Move issues related code to models/issues
* Move some issues related sub package
* Merge
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Fix test
* Rename some files
* Some refactors related repository model
* Move more methods out of repository
* Move repository into models/repo
* Fix test
* Fix test
* some improvements
* Remove unnecessary function
* Use a standalone struct name for Organization
* recover unnecessary change
* make the code readable
* Fix template failure
* Fix template failure
* Move HasMemberWithUserID to org
* Fix test
* Remove unnecessary user type check
* Fix test
Co-authored-by: wxiaoguang <wxiaoguang@gmail.com>
* Nicely handle missing user in collaborations
It is possible to have a collaboration in a repository which refers to a no-longer
existing user. This causes the repository transfer to fail with an unusual error.
This PR makes `repo.getCollaborators()` nicely handle the missing user by ghosting
the collaboration but also adds consistency check. It also adds an
Access consistency check.
Fix#17044
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
Co-authored-by: KN4CK3R <admin@oldschoolhack.me>
* DBContext is just a Context
This PR removes some of the specialness from the DBContext and makes it context
This allows us to simplify the GetEngine code to wrap around any context in future
and means that we can change our loadRepo(e Engine) functions to simply take contexts.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* fix unit tests
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* another place that needs to set the initial context
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* avoid race
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* change attachment error
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* Add info about list endpoints to CONTRIBUTING.md
* Let all list endpoints return X-Total-Count header
* Add TODOs for GetCombinedCommitStatusByRef
* Fix models/issue_stopwatch.go
* Rrefactor models.ListDeployKeys
* Introduce helper func and use them for SetLinkHeader related func
* Retry rename on lock induced failures
Due to external locking on Windows it is possible for an
os.Rename to fail if the files or directories are being
used elsewhere.
This PR simply suggests retrying the rename again similar
to how we handle the os.Remove problems.
Fix#16427
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* resolve CI fail
Co-authored-by: techknowlogick <techknowlogick@gitea.io>
* Fix Migration 176 yet again
Whilst creating a test for v176 in the migrations_test PR
it has become clear that this was still wrong.
This is now fixed. Genuinely.
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* and fix repo transfer
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
There is a serious issue with the v176 migration where there is a mistaken missing
label_id selection.
*introduced by #14912*
Signed-off-by: Andrew Thornton <art27@cantab.net>
* chore: rewrite format.
* chore: update format
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
* chore: update format
Signed-off-by: Bo-Yi Wu <appleboy.tw@gmail.com>
* chore: Adjacent parameters with the same type should be grouped together
* chore: update format.
* Never add labels not from this repository or organisation and remove org labels on transfer
Prevent the addition of labels from outside of the repository or
organisation and remove organisation labels on transfer.
Related #14908
* switch to use sql
* subquery alias
* once more around the merry go round
* fix api problem
* make repo as "pending transfer" if on transfer start doer has no right to create repo in new destination
* if new pending transfer ocured, create UI & Mail notifications
