IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This solves the problem of administrators creating accounts for users
that then do not know their initial password (without the administrator
sending it to them via some other channel).
* add topic models and unit tests
* fix comments
* fix comment
* add the UI to show or add topics for a repo
* show topics on repositories list
* fix test
* don't show manage topics link when no permission
* use green basic as topic label
* fix topic label color
* remove trace content
* remove debug function
I wanted navigation to the page "first" and the page
"last" of the pages of commits. I discovered this
has already been implemented in one of the templates.
Signed-off-by: Tan Pheng Heong <phtan90@gmail.com>
Modify the call to ping the database to fail gracefully if the
database has not yet been configured by the end user, such as
after a clean install. This allows /healthcheck to return a 200
with a modified status message instead of causing a PANIC.
Signed-off-by: Evan Sherwood <evan@sherwood.io>
* Add size column to attachment
Migrate attachments by calculating file sizes
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Calculate attachment size on creation
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Log error instead of returning error
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
New Feature:
* Repository struct field for IsFsckEnabled (default true of course)
* Admin Settings section on repo options page, accessible only by
admin users
Possible Enhancements:
* There's no way to force running health checks on all repos
regardless of their IsFsckEnabled setting. This would be useful if
there were an admin API or dashboard button to run fsck immediately.
Issue: https://github.com/go-gitea/gitea/issues/1712
Signed-off-by: Allen Wild <allenwild93@gmail.com>
Why:
* We are using self-signed ssl certificates for internal services, which results in failures when gitea tries to communicate through webhooks with these. We would like to enable gitea to be able to use these certificates without having to build custom docker images.
How
* We add the internal certificates to /usr/local/share/ca-certificates on the host
* We read-only mount /usr/local/share/ca-certificates from the host to /usr/local/share/ca-certificates in the container
* We do a update-ca-certificates in the alpine container before starting gitea
This should have no consequence for users that do not have the need to handle self-signed certificates, as update-ca-certificates should be idempotent.
The choice regarding which forms should or should not trigger a warning
is subjective. I tried to be consistent and not warn about forms that:
- run an action, rather than edit data: search, send an email.
- delete data: a warning about losing data would be confusing
Note that forms on sign-in pages were already ignored (using a selector,
rather than an explicit class on the form element).
Fixes#3698.
* Improve release page ui by adding size
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
* Add documentation to a.MustSize()
Signed-off-by: Jonas Franz <info@jonasfranz.software>
