1
0
mirror of https://gitlab.com/libvirt/libvirt-python.git synced 2025-08-02 04:21:59 +03:00

virStream: Use larger buffer for sendAll/recvAll methods

There are four methods which receive/send entire stream
(sendAll(), recvAll(), sparseSendAll() and sparseRecvAll()). All
these have an intermediary buffer which is either filled by
incoming stream and passed to a user provided callback to handle
the data, or the other way round - user fills it with data they
want to send and the buffer is handed over to virStream.

But the buffer is incredibly small which leads to smaller packets
being sent and thus increased overhead. What we can do is to use
the same buffer as their C counterparts do (e.g.
virStreamSendAll()) - they all use VIR_NET_MESSAGE_LEGACY_PAYLOAD_MAX
long buffer (which is the maximum size of a stream packet we
send) - this is almost exactly 256KiB (it's 256KiB - 24B for the
header).

Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
Michal Privoznik
2020-07-03 12:30:00 +02:00
parent 11bb65bff3
commit d0ac75bb9c
2 changed files with 10 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
return os.write(fd, buf)
"""
while True:
got = self.recv(1024*64)
got = self.recv(virStorageVol.streamBufSize)
if got == -2:
raise libvirtError("cannot use recvAll with "
"nonblocking stream")
@ -74,7 +74,7 @@
"""
while True:
try:
got = handler(self, 1024*64, opaque)
got = handler(self, virStorageVol.streamBufSize, opaque)
except:
e = sys.exc_info()[1]
try:
@ -189,7 +189,7 @@
# actually allocate the hole
"""
while True:
want = 64 * 1024
want = virStorageVol.streamBufSize
got = self.recvFlags(want, VIR_STREAM_RECV_STOP_AT_HOLE)
if got == -2:
raise libvirtError("cannot use sparseRecvAll with "
@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
self.abort()
continue
want = 64 * 1024
want = virStorageVol.streamBufSize
if (want > sectionLen):
want = sectionLen