buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
# include <config.h>
# include "internal.h"
# include "testutils.h"
2012-12-04 16:04:07 +04:00
# include "virbuffer.h"
2012-12-12 22:06:53 +04:00
# include "viralloc.h"
2013-04-03 14:36:23 +04:00
# include "virstring.h"
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
2013-06-07 19:10:28 +04:00
# define VIR_FROM_THIS VIR_FROM_NONE
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
struct testInfo {
int doEscape ;
} ;
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
static int testBufInfiniteLoop ( const void * data )
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
{
virBuffer bufinit = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
virBufferPtr buf = & bufinit ;
char * addstr = NULL , * bufret = NULL ;
int ret = - 1 ;
const struct testInfo * info = data ;
2019-03-26 20:02:06 +03:00
int len ;
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
virBufferAddChar ( buf , ' a ' ) ;
/*
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
* Infinite loop used to trigger if :
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
* ( strlen + 1 > 1000 ) & & ( strlen = = buf - size - buf - use - 1 )
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
* which was the case after the above addchar at the time of the bug .
* This test is a bit fragile , since it relies on virBuffer internals .
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
*/
2019-03-26 20:02:06 +03:00
len = buf - > size - buf - > use - 1 ;
if ( virAsprintf ( & addstr , " %*s " , len , " a " ) < 0 )
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
goto out ;
if ( info - > doEscape )
virBufferEscapeString ( buf , " %s " , addstr ) ;
else
2011-04-30 20:34:49 +04:00
virBufferAsprintf ( buf , " %s " , addstr ) ;
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
ret = 0 ;
2014-03-25 10:53:44 +04:00
out :
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
bufret = virBufferContentAndReset ( buf ) ;
if ( ! bufret ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Buffer had error set " ) ;
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
VIR_FREE ( addstr ) ;
VIR_FREE ( bufret ) ;
return ret ;
}
2019-10-14 15:45:03 +03:00
static int testBufAutoIndent ( const void * data G_GNUC_UNUSED )
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
{
virBuffer bufinit = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
virBufferPtr buf = & bufinit ;
const char expected [ ] =
" 1 \n 2 \n 3 \n 4 \n 5 \n 6 \n 7 \n & \n 8 \n 9 \n 10 \n ' 11' \n " ;
char * result = NULL ;
int ret = 0 ;
if ( virBufferGetIndent ( buf , false ) ! = 0 | |
virBufferGetIndent ( buf , true ) ! = 0 ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Wrong indentation " ) ;
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
virBufferAdjustIndent ( buf , 3 ) ;
2012-06-08 23:50:23 +04:00
if ( STRNEQ ( virBufferCurrentContent ( buf ) , " " ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Wrong content " ) ;
2012-06-08 23:50:23 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
if ( virBufferGetIndent ( buf , false ) ! = 3 | |
virBufferGetIndent ( buf , true ) ! = 3 | |
virBufferError ( buf ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Wrong indentation " ) ;
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
virBufferAdjustIndent ( buf , - 2 ) ;
if ( virBufferGetIndent ( buf , false ) ! = 1 | |
virBufferGetIndent ( buf , true ) ! = 1 | |
virBufferError ( buf ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Wrong indentation " ) ;
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
virBufferAdjustIndent ( buf , - 3 ) ;
if ( virBufferGetIndent ( buf , false ) ! = - 1 | |
virBufferGetIndent ( buf , true ) ! = - 1 | |
virBufferError ( buf ) ! = - 1 ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Usage error not flagged " ) ;
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
virBufferFreeAndReset ( buf ) ;
if ( virBufferGetIndent ( buf , false ) ! = 0 | |
virBufferGetIndent ( buf , true ) ! = 0 | |
virBufferError ( buf ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Reset didn't clear indentation " ) ;
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
virBufferAdjustIndent ( buf , 2 ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( buf , " 1 " ) ;
2013-09-25 18:31:18 +04:00
if ( virBufferError ( buf ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Buffer had error " ) ;
2013-09-25 18:31:18 +04:00
return - 1 ;
}
2012-06-08 23:50:23 +04:00
if ( STRNEQ ( virBufferCurrentContent ( buf ) , " 1 " ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Wrong content " ) ;
2012-06-08 23:50:23 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
if ( virBufferGetIndent ( buf , false ) ! = 2 | |
virBufferGetIndent ( buf , true ) ! = 0 ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Wrong indentation " ) ;
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
virBufferAddLit ( buf , " \n " ) ;
virBufferAdd ( buf , " " " 2 \n " , - 1 ) ; /* Extra "" appeases syntax-check */
virBufferAddChar ( buf , ' 3 ' ) ;
virBufferAddChar ( buf , ' \n ' ) ;
virBufferAsprintf ( buf , " %d " , 4 ) ;
virBufferAsprintf ( buf , " %c " , ' \n ' ) ;
virBufferStrcat ( buf , " 5 " , " \n " , " 6 \n " , NULL ) ;
virBufferEscapeString ( buf , " %s \n " , " 7 " ) ;
virBufferEscapeString ( buf , " %s \n " , " & " ) ;
virBufferEscapeSexpr ( buf , " %s " , " 8 \n " ) ;
virBufferURIEncodeString ( buf , " 9 " ) ;
virBufferAddChar ( buf , ' \n ' ) ;
virBufferEscapeShell ( buf , " 10 " ) ;
virBufferAddChar ( buf , ' \n ' ) ;
virBufferEscapeShell ( buf , " 11 " ) ;
virBufferAddChar ( buf , ' \n ' ) ;
2013-09-25 18:31:18 +04:00
if ( virBufferError ( buf ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Buffer had error " ) ;
2013-09-25 18:31:18 +04:00
return - 1 ;
}
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
result = virBufferContentAndReset ( buf ) ;
if ( ! result | | STRNEQ ( result , expected ) ) {
2016-05-26 18:01:51 +03:00
virTestDifference ( stderr , expected , result ) ;
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
ret = - 1 ;
}
VIR_FREE ( result ) ;
return ret ;
}
2019-10-14 15:45:03 +03:00
static int testBufTrim ( const void * data G_GNUC_UNUSED )
virBuffer: add way to trim back extra text
I'm tired of writing:
bool sep = false;
while (...) {
if (sep)
virBufferAddChar(buf, ',');
sep = true;
virBufferAdd(buf, str);
}
This makes it easier, allowing one to write:
while (...)
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%s,", str);
virBufferTrim(buf, ",", -1);
to trim any remaining comma.
* src/util/buf.h (virBufferTrim): Declare.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferTrim): New function.
* tests/virbuftest.c (testBufTrim): Test it.
2012-05-19 02:36:59 +04:00
{
virBuffer bufinit = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
virBufferPtr buf = NULL ;
char * result = NULL ;
const char * expected = " a,b " ;
int ret = - 1 ;
2013-06-18 19:52:00 +04:00
virBufferTrim ( buf , " " , 0 ) ;
virBuffer: add way to trim back extra text
I'm tired of writing:
bool sep = false;
while (...) {
if (sep)
virBufferAddChar(buf, ',');
sep = true;
virBufferAdd(buf, str);
}
This makes it easier, allowing one to write:
while (...)
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%s,", str);
virBufferTrim(buf, ",", -1);
to trim any remaining comma.
* src/util/buf.h (virBufferTrim): Declare.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferTrim): New function.
* tests/virbuftest.c (testBufTrim): Test it.
2012-05-19 02:36:59 +04:00
buf = & bufinit ;
virBufferAddLit ( buf , " a; " ) ;
2013-06-18 19:52:00 +04:00
virBufferTrim ( buf , " " , 0 ) ;
virBufferTrim ( buf , " " , - 1 ) ;
virBufferTrim ( buf , NULL , 1 ) ;
virBufferTrim ( buf , NULL , 5 ) ;
virBufferTrim ( buf , " a " , 2 ) ;
virBuffer: add way to trim back extra text
I'm tired of writing:
bool sep = false;
while (...) {
if (sep)
virBufferAddChar(buf, ',');
sep = true;
virBufferAdd(buf, str);
}
This makes it easier, allowing one to write:
while (...)
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%s,", str);
virBufferTrim(buf, ",", -1);
to trim any remaining comma.
* src/util/buf.h (virBufferTrim): Declare.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferTrim): New function.
* tests/virbuftest.c (testBufTrim): Test it.
2012-05-19 02:36:59 +04:00
virBufferAddLit ( buf , " ,b,, " ) ;
2019-10-24 10:05:49 +03:00
virBufferTrim ( buf , NULL , - 1 ) ;
2013-06-18 19:52:00 +04:00
virBufferTrim ( buf , " b " , - 1 ) ;
virBufferTrim ( buf , " b,, " , 1 ) ;
virBufferTrim ( buf , " , " , - 1 ) ;
virBuffer: add way to trim back extra text
I'm tired of writing:
bool sep = false;
while (...) {
if (sep)
virBufferAddChar(buf, ',');
sep = true;
virBufferAdd(buf, str);
}
This makes it easier, allowing one to write:
while (...)
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%s,", str);
virBufferTrim(buf, ",", -1);
to trim any remaining comma.
* src/util/buf.h (virBufferTrim): Declare.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferTrim): New function.
* tests/virbuftest.c (testBufTrim): Test it.
2012-05-19 02:36:59 +04:00
2013-09-25 18:31:18 +04:00
if ( virBufferError ( buf ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Buffer had error " ) ;
2013-09-25 18:31:18 +04:00
return - 1 ;
}
virBuffer: add way to trim back extra text
I'm tired of writing:
bool sep = false;
while (...) {
if (sep)
virBufferAddChar(buf, ',');
sep = true;
virBufferAdd(buf, str);
}
This makes it easier, allowing one to write:
while (...)
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%s,", str);
virBufferTrim(buf, ",", -1);
to trim any remaining comma.
* src/util/buf.h (virBufferTrim): Declare.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferTrim): New function.
* tests/virbuftest.c (testBufTrim): Test it.
2012-05-19 02:36:59 +04:00
result = virBufferContentAndReset ( buf ) ;
if ( ! result | | STRNEQ ( result , expected ) ) {
2016-05-26 18:01:51 +03:00
virTestDifference ( stderr , expected , result ) ;
virBuffer: add way to trim back extra text
I'm tired of writing:
bool sep = false;
while (...) {
if (sep)
virBufferAddChar(buf, ',');
sep = true;
virBufferAdd(buf, str);
}
This makes it easier, allowing one to write:
while (...)
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%s,", str);
virBufferTrim(buf, ",", -1);
to trim any remaining comma.
* src/util/buf.h (virBufferTrim): Declare.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferTrim): New function.
* tests/virbuftest.c (testBufTrim): Test it.
2012-05-19 02:36:59 +04:00
goto cleanup ;
}
ret = 0 ;
2014-03-25 10:53:44 +04:00
cleanup :
virBuffer: add way to trim back extra text
I'm tired of writing:
bool sep = false;
while (...) {
if (sep)
virBufferAddChar(buf, ',');
sep = true;
virBufferAdd(buf, str);
}
This makes it easier, allowing one to write:
while (...)
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%s,", str);
virBufferTrim(buf, ",", -1);
to trim any remaining comma.
* src/util/buf.h (virBufferTrim): Declare.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferTrim): New function.
* tests/virbuftest.c (testBufTrim): Test it.
2012-05-19 02:36:59 +04:00
virBufferFreeAndReset ( buf ) ;
VIR_FREE ( result ) ;
return ret ;
}
2019-10-14 15:45:03 +03:00
static int testBufAddBuffer ( const void * data G_GNUC_UNUSED )
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
{
virBuffer buf1 = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
virBuffer buf2 = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
virBuffer buf3 = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
int ret = - 1 ;
char * result = NULL ;
const char * expected = \
" A long time ago, in a galaxy far, \n " \
2017-11-03 15:09:47 +03:00
" far away... \n " \
" It is a period of civil war. \n " \
" Rebel spaceships, striking \n " \
" from a hidden base, have won \n " \
" their first victory against \n " \
" the evil Galactic Empire. \n " \
" During the battle, rebel \n " \
" spies managed to steal secret \n " \
" plans to the Empire's \n " \
" ultimate weapon, the DEATH \n " \
" STAR, an armored space \n " \
" station with enough power to \n " \
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
" destroy an entire planet. \n " ;
if ( virBufferUse ( & buf1 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " buf1 already in use " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
if ( virBufferUse ( & buf2 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " buf2 already in use " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
if ( virBufferUse ( & buf3 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " buf3 already in use " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
virBufferAdjustIndent ( & buf1 , 2 ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf1 , " A long time ago, in a galaxy far, \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf1 , " far away... \n " ) ;
virBufferAdjustIndent ( & buf2 , 4 ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf2 , " It is a period of civil war. \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf2 , " Rebel spaceships, striking \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf2 , " from a hidden base, have won \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf2 , " their first victory against \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf2 , " the evil Galactic Empire. \n " ) ;
virBufferAdjustIndent ( & buf3 , 2 ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf3 , " During the battle, rebel \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf3 , " spies managed to steal secret \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf3 , " plans to the Empire's \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf3 , " ultimate weapon, the DEATH \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf3 , " STAR, an armored space \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf3 , " station with enough power to \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf3 , " destroy an entire planet. \n " ) ;
if ( ! virBufferUse ( & buf1 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Error adding to buf1 " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
if ( ! virBufferUse ( & buf2 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Error adding to buf2 " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
if ( ! virBufferUse ( & buf3 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Error adding to buf3 " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
virBufferAddBuffer ( & buf2 , & buf3 ) ;
if ( ! virBufferUse ( & buf2 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " buf2 cleared mistakenly " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
if ( virBufferUse ( & buf3 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " buf3 is not clear even though it should be " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
virBufferAddBuffer ( & buf1 , & buf2 ) ;
if ( ! virBufferUse ( & buf1 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " buf1 cleared mistakenly " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
if ( virBufferUse ( & buf2 ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " buf2 is not clear even though it should be " ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
result = virBufferContentAndReset ( & buf1 ) ;
if ( STRNEQ_NULLABLE ( result , expected ) ) {
2016-05-26 18:01:51 +03:00
virTestDifference ( stderr , expected , result ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
ret = 0 ;
cleanup :
virBufferFreeAndReset ( & buf1 ) ;
virBufferFreeAndReset ( & buf2 ) ;
VIR_FREE ( result ) ;
return ret ;
}
2019-04-18 14:59:15 +03:00
static int
2019-10-14 15:45:03 +03:00
testBufAddBuffer2 ( const void * opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED )
2019-04-18 14:59:15 +03:00
{
2019-10-15 15:47:50 +03:00
g_auto ( virBuffer ) buf1 = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
g_auto ( virBuffer ) buf2 = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
2019-04-18 14:59:15 +03:00
/* Intent of this test is to demonstrate a memleak that happen with
* virBufferAddBuffer */
virBufferAddLit ( & buf1 , " Hello world! \n " ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf2 , " Hello world! \n " ) ;
/* Intentional usage error */
virBufferAdjustIndent ( & buf2 , - 2 ) ;
virBufferAddBuffer ( & buf1 , & buf2 ) ;
if ( virBufferCurrentContent ( & buf1 ) | |
! virBufferCurrentContent ( & buf2 ) ) {
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " Unexpected buffer content " ) ;
return - 1 ;
}
return 0 ;
}
2015-03-24 12:53:29 +03:00
struct testBufAddStrData {
const char * data ;
const char * expect ;
} ;
static int
2019-10-14 15:45:03 +03:00
testBufAddStr ( const void * opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED )
2015-03-24 12:53:29 +03:00
{
const struct testBufAddStrData * data = opaque ;
virBuffer buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
char * actual ;
int ret = - 1 ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf , " <c> \n " ) ;
virBufferAdjustIndent ( & buf , 2 ) ;
virBufferAddStr ( & buf , data - > data ) ;
virBufferAdjustIndent ( & buf , - 2 ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf , " </c> " ) ;
if ( ! ( actual = virBufferContentAndReset ( & buf ) ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " buf is empty " ) ;
2015-03-24 12:53:29 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
if ( STRNEQ_NULLABLE ( actual , data - > expect ) ) {
2019-05-03 11:31:02 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " testBufAddStr(): Strings don't match: " ) ;
2016-05-26 18:01:51 +03:00
virTestDifference ( stderr , data - > expect , actual ) ;
2015-03-24 12:53:29 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
ret = 0 ;
cleanup :
VIR_FREE ( actual ) ;
return ret ;
}
virBuffer: add way to trim back extra text
I'm tired of writing:
bool sep = false;
while (...) {
if (sep)
virBufferAddChar(buf, ',');
sep = true;
virBufferAdd(buf, str);
}
This makes it easier, allowing one to write:
while (...)
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%s,", str);
virBufferTrim(buf, ",", -1);
to trim any remaining comma.
* src/util/buf.h (virBufferTrim): Declare.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferTrim): New function.
* tests/virbuftest.c (testBufTrim): Test it.
2012-05-19 02:36:59 +04:00
2015-03-30 13:41:40 +03:00
static int
2019-10-14 15:45:03 +03:00
testBufEscapeStr ( const void * opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED )
2015-03-30 13:41:40 +03:00
{
const struct testBufAddStrData * data = opaque ;
virBuffer buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
char * actual ;
int ret = - 1 ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf , " <c> \n " ) ;
virBufferAdjustIndent ( & buf , 2 ) ;
virBufferEscapeString ( & buf , " <el>%s</el> \n " , data - > data ) ;
virBufferAdjustIndent ( & buf , - 2 ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf , " </c> " ) ;
if ( ! ( actual = virBufferContentAndReset ( & buf ) ) ) {
2015-04-23 20:38:00 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " buf is empty " ) ;
2015-03-30 13:41:40 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
if ( STRNEQ_NULLABLE ( actual , data - > expect ) ) {
2019-05-03 11:31:02 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " testBufEscapeStr(): Strings don't match: " ) ;
2016-05-26 18:01:51 +03:00
virTestDifference ( stderr , data - > expect , actual ) ;
2015-03-30 13:41:40 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
ret = 0 ;
cleanup :
VIR_FREE ( actual ) ;
return ret ;
}
2017-05-12 15:26:09 +03:00
static int
testBufEscapeRegex ( const void * opaque )
{
const struct testBufAddStrData * data = opaque ;
virBuffer buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
char * actual ;
int ret = - 1 ;
virBufferEscapeRegex ( & buf , " %s " , data - > data ) ;
if ( ! ( actual = virBufferContentAndReset ( & buf ) ) ) {
2019-02-21 18:26:44 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " testBufEscapeRegex: buf is empty " ) ;
2017-05-12 15:26:09 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
if ( STRNEQ_NULLABLE ( actual , data - > expect ) ) {
2019-05-03 11:31:02 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " testBufEscapeRegex: Strings don't match: " ) ;
2017-05-12 15:26:09 +03:00
virTestDifference ( stderr , data - > expect , actual ) ;
goto cleanup ;
}
ret = 0 ;
cleanup :
VIR_FREE ( actual ) ;
return ret ;
}
2017-03-09 19:02:19 +03:00
static int
2019-10-14 15:45:03 +03:00
testBufSetIndent ( const void * opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED )
2017-03-09 19:02:19 +03:00
{
virBuffer buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
char * actual ;
int ret = - 1 ;
virBufferSetIndent ( & buf , 11 ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf , " test \n " ) ;
virBufferSetIndent ( & buf , 2 ) ;
virBufferAddLit ( & buf , " test2 \n " ) ;
if ( ! ( actual = virBufferContentAndReset ( & buf ) ) )
goto cleanup ;
if ( STRNEQ ( actual , " test \n test2 \n " ) ) {
2019-05-03 11:31:02 +03:00
VIR_TEST_DEBUG ( " testBufSetIndent: expected indent not set " ) ;
2017-03-09 19:02:19 +03:00
goto cleanup ;
}
ret = 0 ;
cleanup :
VIR_FREE ( actual ) ;
return ret ;
}
2019-02-21 18:37:50 +03:00
/* Result of this shows up only in valgrind or similar */
static int
2019-10-14 15:45:03 +03:00
testBufferAutoclean ( const void * opaque G_GNUC_UNUSED )
2019-02-21 18:37:50 +03:00
{
2019-10-15 15:47:50 +03:00
g_auto ( virBuffer ) buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER ;
2019-02-21 18:37:50 +03:00
virBufferAddLit ( & buf , " test test test \n " ) ;
return 0 ;
}
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
static int
2011-04-29 20:21:20 +04:00
mymain ( void )
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
{
int ret = 0 ;
2017-11-03 15:09:47 +03:00
# define DO_TEST(msg, cb, data) \
do { \
struct testInfo info = { data } ; \
if ( virTestRun ( " Buf: " msg , cb , & info ) < 0 ) \
ret = - 1 ; \
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
} while ( 0 )
DO_TEST ( " EscapeString infinite loop " , testBufInfiniteLoop , 1 ) ;
DO_TEST ( " VSprintf infinite loop " , testBufInfiniteLoop , 0 ) ;
2011-10-21 01:48:47 +04:00
DO_TEST ( " Auto-indentation " , testBufAutoIndent , 0 ) ;
virBuffer: add way to trim back extra text
I'm tired of writing:
bool sep = false;
while (...) {
if (sep)
virBufferAddChar(buf, ',');
sep = true;
virBufferAdd(buf, str);
}
This makes it easier, allowing one to write:
while (...)
virBufferAsprintf(buf, "%s,", str);
virBufferTrim(buf, ",", -1);
to trim any remaining comma.
* src/util/buf.h (virBufferTrim): Declare.
* src/util/buf.c (virBufferTrim): New function.
* tests/virbuftest.c (testBufTrim): Test it.
2012-05-19 02:36:59 +04:00
DO_TEST ( " Trim " , testBufTrim , 0 ) ;
2015-02-19 12:56:58 +03:00
DO_TEST ( " AddBuffer " , testBufAddBuffer , 0 ) ;
2019-04-18 14:59:15 +03:00
DO_TEST ( " AddBuffer2 " , testBufAddBuffer2 , 0 ) ;
2017-03-09 19:02:19 +03:00
DO_TEST ( " set indent " , testBufSetIndent , 0 ) ;
2019-02-21 18:37:50 +03:00
DO_TEST ( " autoclean " , testBufferAutoclean , 0 ) ;
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
2017-11-03 15:09:47 +03:00
# define DO_TEST_ADD_STR(DATA, EXPECT) \
do { \
struct testBufAddStrData info = { DATA , EXPECT } ; \
if ( virTestRun ( " Buf: AddStr " , testBufAddStr , & info ) < 0 ) \
ret = - 1 ; \
2015-03-24 12:53:29 +03:00
} while ( 0 )
DO_TEST_ADD_STR ( " " , " <c> \n </c> " ) ;
DO_TEST_ADD_STR ( " <a/> " , " <c> \n <a/></c> " ) ;
DO_TEST_ADD_STR ( " <a/> \n " , " <c> \n <a/> \n </c> " ) ;
DO_TEST_ADD_STR ( " <b> \n <a/> \n </b> \n " , " <c> \n <b> \n <a/> \n </b> \n </c> " ) ;
2017-11-03 15:09:47 +03:00
# define DO_TEST_ESCAPE(data, expect) \
do { \
struct testBufAddStrData info = { data , expect } ; \
2016-05-26 18:01:50 +03:00
if ( virTestRun ( " Buf: EscapeStr " , testBufEscapeStr , & info ) < 0 ) \
2017-11-03 15:09:47 +03:00
ret = - 1 ; \
2015-03-30 13:41:40 +03:00
} while ( 0 )
DO_TEST_ESCAPE ( " <td></td><td></td> " ,
" <c> \n <el><td></td><td></td></el> \n </c> " ) ;
DO_TEST_ESCAPE ( " \007 \" && \" \x15 " ,
" <c> \n <el>"&&"</el> \n </c> " ) ;
DO_TEST_ESCAPE ( " ,,'..',, " ,
" <c> \n <el>,,'..',,</el> \n </c> " ) ;
DO_TEST_ESCAPE ( " \x01 \x01 \x02 \x03 \x05 \x08 " ,
" <c> \n <el></el> \n </c> " ) ;
2017-11-03 15:09:47 +03:00
# define DO_TEST_ESCAPE_REGEX(data, expect) \
do { \
struct testBufAddStrData info = { data , expect } ; \
if ( virTestRun ( " Buf: EscapeRegex " , testBufEscapeRegex , & info ) < 0 ) \
ret = - 1 ; \
2017-05-12 15:26:09 +03:00
} while ( 0 )
DO_TEST_ESCAPE_REGEX ( " noescape " , " noescape " ) ;
DO_TEST_ESCAPE_REGEX ( " ^$.|?*+()[]{} \\ " ,
" \\ ^ \\ $ \\ . \\ | \\ ? \\ * \\ + \\ ( \\ ) \\ [ \\ ] \\ { \\ } \\ \\ " ) ;
2014-03-17 13:38:38 +04:00
return ret = = 0 ? EXIT_SUCCESS : EXIT_FAILURE ;
buf: Fix possible infinite loop in EscapeString, VSnprintf
The current code will go into an infinite loop if the printf generated
string is >= 1000, AND exactly 1 character smaller than the amount of free
space in the buffer. When this happens, we are dropped into the loop body,
but nothing will actually change, because count == (buf->size - buf->use - 1),
and virBufferGrow returns unchanged if count < (buf->size - buf->use)
Fix this by removing the '- 1' bit from 'size'. The *nprintf functions handle
the NULL byte for us anyways, so we shouldn't need to manually accommodate
for it.
Here's a bug where we are actually hitting this issue:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=602772
v2: Eric's improvements: while -> if (), remove extra va_list variable,
make sure we report buffer error if snprintf fails
v3: Add tests/virbuftest which reproduces the infinite loop before this
patch, works correctly after
2010-09-01 21:51:35 +04:00
}
2017-03-29 17:45:42 +03:00
VIR_TEST_MAIN ( mymain )