IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This patch modifies some not yet used test data so that the adding a test using
this data is a clean patch and not an addition of huge file with some
adjustments in small files that will be hidden in the middle of that commit.
These changes include:
- Add system dir in vircaps2xmldata/linux-caches
Back when data for systems with resctrl support were added they had the
/sys/fs/system directory put into a system/ subdir of the test and
/sys/fs/resctrl in a resctrl/ subdir of that test. However, if we also want a
negative test for the resctrl (requesting allocation on a system that does not
support resctrl), we need one a test case with any sensible (with cache info)
system/ subdir and no resctrl/ one. Easiest way is to add a
system -> . symlink into existing test case.
- Change default group schemata for linux-resctrl and linux-resctrl-cdp
That way we can fit some allocation in.
- Remove one cache from resctrl-skx's schemata and make some room for
allocations
That system already has only one cache, so that file was wrong anyway. We
have a version with 2 caches already (linux-resctrl-skx-twocaches), so this
will also add variety to future tests.
- Add some empty allocation for resctrl-skx
Just to have slightly more coverage and variety. We can be sure nothing bad
happens if such allocation exists in case we have that in the tests.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
On some platforms the number of bits in the cbm_mask might not be
divisible by 4 (and not even by 2), so we need to properly count the
bits. Similar file, min_cbm_bits, is properly parsed and used, but if
the number is greater than one, we lose the information about
granularity when reporting the data in capabilities. For that matter
always report granularity, but if it is not the same as the minimum,
add that information in there as well.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>