IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In many files there are header comments that contain an Author:
statement, supposedly reflecting who originally wrote the code.
In a large collaborative project like libvirt, any non-trivial
file will have been modified by a large number of different
contributors. IOW, the Author: comments are quickly out of date,
omitting people who have made significant contribitions.
In some places Author: lines have been added despite the person
merely being responsible for creating the file by moving existing
code out of another file. IOW, the Author: lines give an incorrect
record of authorship.
With this all in mind, the comments are useless as a means to identify
who to talk to about code in a particular file. Contributors will always
be better off using 'git log' and 'git blame' if they need to find the
author of a particular bit of code.
This commit thus deletes all Author: comments from the source and adds
a rule to prevent them reappearing.
The Copyright headers are similarly misleading and inaccurate, however,
we cannot delete these as they have legal meaning, despite being largely
inaccurate. In addition only the copyright holder is permitted to change
their respective copyright statement.
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Our HACKING guide forbids these.
There's no point in exempting these from the spacing check
if their existence is against our coding style.
Note that the non-usage of these comments itself is not enforced
by syntax check, probably because of the need to implement a C parser.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Recent patches added indentation checks that discovered some cosmetic
issues at the cost of making this check last as long as the rest of
syntax-check combined on my system. Also, they're moving closer
to us implementing yet another C parser (docs/apibuild.py being the
other one).
Revert the following commits:
commit 11e1f11dd3
syntax-check: Check for incorrect indentation in function body
commit 2585a79e32
build-aux:check-spacing: Introduce a new rule to check misaligned stuff in parenthesises
commit a033182f04
build-aux:check-spacing: Add wrapper function of CheckCurlyBrackets
commit 6225626b6f
build-aux:check-spacing: Add wrapper function of CheckWhiteSpaces
commit c3875129d9
build-aux:check-spacing: Add wrapper function of KillComments
commit e995904c56
build-aux:check-spacing: Add wrapper function of CheckFunctionBody
commit 11e1f11dd3
syntax-check: Check for incorrect indentation in function body
This brings the speed of the script to a tolerable level and lets it
focus on the more visible issues.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Erik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
This patch introduces a new rule to check misaligned stuff in parenthesis:
1. For misaligned arguments of function
2. For misaligned conditions of [if|while|switch|...]
There're too much misalignment, so it adds a temporary filter which
permits 'src/util' now. It _should_ be removed as soon as fixing all.
Signed-off-by: Shi Lei <shi_lei@massclouds.com>
This patch add syntax-check rule for incorrect indentation and blank
first line in function body by changing check-spacing.pl.
For efficiency, it only checks the first line of function body.
But it's enough for most cases.
Signed-off-by: Shi Lei <shi_lei@massclouds.com>
This is particularly useful on operating systems that don't ship
Perl as part of the base system (eg. FreeBSD) while still working
just as well as it did before on Linux.
In one case (src/rpc/genprotocol.pl) the interpreter path was
missing altogether.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
We do not need a separate check forbidding whitespace
after the opening parenthesis after a keyword -
we forbid it after all of them.
The only allowed whitespace after an opening parenthesis
is a newline, tune the regex to reflect that.
Instead of matching multiple characters before the parenthesis,
only check for a single whitespace, which is much less cpu-intensive.
This only matches a few dozen of places where they are on an separate
line, filter out those with a separate regex.
