IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Implied by QEMU >= 1.2.0.
Delete this one first, because QEMU_CAPS_NODEFCONFIG is only used
when QEMU_CAPS_NO_USER_CONFIG is unsupported.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
We require QEMU >= 1.5.0, assume every QEMU supports it.
Sadly that does not let us trivially drop qemuMonitor's
priv->monJSON bool, because of qemuDomainQemuAttach.
Signed-off-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Commit 10c73bf1 fixed a bug that I had introduced back in commit
70249927 - if a vhost-scsi device had no manually assigned PCI
address, one wouldn't be assigned automatically. There was a slight
problem with the logic of the fix though - in the case of domains with
pcie-root (e.g. those with a q35 machinetype),
qemuDomainDeviceCalculatePCIConnectFlags() will attempt to determine
if the host-side PCI device is Express or legacy by examining sysfs
based on the host-side PCI address stored in
hostdev->source.subsys.u.pci.addr, but that part of the union is only
valid for PCI hostdevs, *not* for SCSI hostdevs. So we end up trying
to read sysfs for some probably-non-existent device, which fails, and
the function virPCIDeviceIsPCIExpress() returns failure (-1).
By coincidence, the return value is being examined as a boolean, and
since -1 is true, we still end up assigning the vhost-scsi device to
an Express slot, but that is just by chance (and could fail in the
case that the gibberish in the "hostside PCI address" was the address
of a real device that happened to be legacy PCI).
Since (according to Paolo Bonzini) vhost-scsi devices appear just like
virtio-scsi devices in the guest, they should follow the same rules as
virtio devices when deciding whether they should be placed in an
Express or a legacy slot. That's accomplished in this patch by
returning early with virtioFlags, rather than erroneously using
hostdev->source.subsys.u.pci.addr. It also adds a test case for PCIe
to assure it doesn't get broken in the future.
