IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
There's nothing with such element id. The last mention was removed in
2818359075
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
In our meson scripts, we use configure_file(copy:true) to copy
files from srcdir into builddir. However, as of meson-0.64.0,
this is deprecated [1] in favor of using:
fs = import('fs')
fs.copyfile(in, out)
Except, the submodule's new method wasn't introduced until
0.64.0. And since we can't bump the minimal meson version we
require, we have to work with both: new and old versions.
Now, the fun part: fs.copyfile() is not a drop in replacement as
it returns different type (a custom_target object). This is
incompatible with places where we store the configure_file()
retval in a variable to process it further.
While we could just replace 'copy:true' with a dummy
'configuration:...' (say 'configuration: configmake_conf') we
can't do that for binary files (like src/fonts/ or src/images/).
Therefore, places where we are not interested in the retval can
be switched to fs.copyfile() and places where we are interested
in the retval will just use a dummy 'configuration:'.
Except, src/network/meson.build. In here we not just copy the
file but also specify alternative install dir and that's not
something that fs.copyfile() can handle. Yet, using 'copy: true'
is viewed wrong [2].
1: https://mesonbuild.com/Release-notes-for-0-64-0.html#fscopyfile-to-replace-configure_filecopy-true
2: https://github.com/mesonbuild/meson/pull/10042
Signed-off-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
There is no markup equivalent for any of the <s/> or <del/> HTML tags, so this
is the only thing I came up with and it looks like it works.
Signed-off-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Docutils-0.17 switched to using <main> instead of a <div
class='document'> and <section> instead of <div class='section'>.
To ensure that our pages still work we need to slightly adapt our XSL
stylesheet to select the <main> tag properly and adapt the CSS to also
select the 'section' element instead of a class and to apply to a <main>
tag with the appropriate names.
Docutils-0.17 also changed to use 'h2' for section heading instead of
'h1'.
Note the styles applied to the 'main' element with certain id can't be
made more universal by just applying to the id itself, as in certain
cases (e.g. 'documentation') we also have sections with that name. This
was previously ensured by also matching the 'document' class which would
make it equal to the 'main' element.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Select direct 'h1' children of elements named 'knowledge-base' and
'documentation. It's simpler and will also work properly with
docutils-0.17 and later where we don't have a div with class 'document'
wrapping everything.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Ján Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Along with the conversion we need to adapt the stylesheets to apply to
the new document similarly to how we do that in the knowledge base.
Note that one visible difference is that now a 'Documentation' heading
is visible on top of the page.
Signed-off-by: Peter Krempa <pkrempa@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
We have a subdirectory specifically for CSS files now, so it makes
sense to have the stylesheet that defines fonts to be there too.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
This unclutters the top-level docs directory.
Signed-off-by: Andrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Daniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
