1
0
mirror of https://gitlab.gnome.org/GNOME/libxml2.git synced 2025-03-19 14:50:07 +03:00

I'm slightly time warped...

- doc/xml.html: oops corrected dates s/2000/2001
Daniel
This commit is contained in:
Daniel Veillard 2001-02-26 20:10:45 +00:00
parent 8730c561c9
commit ec70e917b9
2 changed files with 60 additions and 60 deletions

View File

@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
Mon Feb 26 22:09:45 CET 2001 Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
* doc/xml.html: oops corrected dates s/2000/2001
Mon Feb 26 12:48:35 CET 2001 Daniel Veillard <Daniel.Veillard@imag.fr>
* valid.c: new patch from Gary Pennington

View File

@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01 Transitional//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/loose.dtd">
<html>
<head>
<title>The XML C library for Gnome</title>
@ -78,8 +80,8 @@ structured documents/data.</p>
<li>It is written in plain C, making as few assumptions as possible, and
sticking closely to ANSI C/POSIX for easy embedding. Works on
Linux/Unix/Windows, ported to a number of other platforms.</li>
<li>Basic support for HTTP and FTP client allowing aplications to fetch remote
resources</li>
<li>Basic support for HTTP and FTP client allowing aplications to fetch
remote resources</li>
<li>The design is modular, most of the extensions can be compiled out.</li>
<li>The internal document repesentation is as close as possible to the <a
href="http://www.w3.org/DOM/">DOM</a> interfaces.</li>
@ -239,7 +241,7 @@ you want to test those</p>
docs</li>
</ul>
<h3>2.3.2: Feb 24 2000</h3>
<h3>2.3.2: Feb 24 2001</h3>
<ul>
<li>chasing XPath bugs, found a bunch, completed some TODO</li>
<li>fixed a Dtd parsing bug</li>
@ -247,7 +249,7 @@ you want to test those</p>
<li>ID/IDREF support partly rewritten by Gary Pennington</li>
</ul>
<h3>2.3.1: Feb 15 2000</h3>
<h3>2.3.1: Feb 15 2001</h3>
<ul>
<li>some XPath and HTML bug fixes for XSLT</li>
<li>small extension of the hash table interfaces for DOM gdome2
@ -255,7 +257,7 @@ you want to test those</p>
<li>A few bug fixes</li>
</ul>
<h3>2.3.0: Feb 8 2000 (2.2.12 was on 25 Jan but I didn't kept track)</h3>
<h3>2.3.0: Feb 8 2001 (2.2.12 was on 25 Jan but I didn't kept track)</h3>
<ul>
<li>Lots of XPath bug fixes</li>
<li>Add a mode with Dtd lookup but without validation error reporting for
@ -273,7 +275,7 @@ you want to test those</p>
<li>optimisation patch from Bjorn Reese</li>
</ul>
<h3>2.2.11: Jan 4 2000</h3>
<h3>2.2.11: Jan 4 2001</h3>
<ul>
<li>bunch of bug fixes (memory I/O, xpath, ftp/http, ...)</li>
<li>added htmlHandleOmittedElem()</li>
@ -666,9 +668,8 @@ href="http://cvs.gnome.org/lxr/source/libxslt/ChangeLog">Changelog</a></p>
<h2>An overview of libxml architecture</h2>
<p>Libxml is made of multiple components; some of them are optional,
and most of
the block interfaces are public. The main components are:</p>
<p>Libxml is made of multiple components; some of them are optional, and most
of the block interfaces are public. The main components are:</p>
<ul>
<li>an Input/Output layer</li>
<li>FTP and HTTP client layers (optional)</li>
@ -801,11 +802,11 @@ SAX.characters( , 1)
SAX.endElement(EXAMPLE)
SAX.endDocument()</pre>
<p>Most of the other interfaces of libxml are based on the DOM
tree-building facility, so nearly everything up to the end of this document
presupposes the use of the standard DOM tree build. Note that the DOM tree
itself is built by a set of registered default callbacks, without internal
specific interface.</p>
<p>Most of the other interfaces of libxml are based on the DOM tree-building
facility, so nearly everything up to the end of this document presupposes the
use of the standard DOM tree build. Note that the DOM tree itself is built by
a set of registered default callbacks, without internal specific
interface.</p>
<h2><a name="library">The XML library interfaces</a></h2>
@ -877,17 +878,15 @@ int xmlParseChunk (xmlParserCtxtPtr ctxt,
}
}</pre>
<p>The HTML parser embedded into libxml also has a push
interface; the functions are just prefixed by "html" rather than "xml".</p>
<p>The HTML parser embedded into libxml also has a push interface; the
functions are just prefixed by "html" rather than "xml".</p>
<h3 id="Invoking2">Invoking the parser: the SAX interface</h3>
<p>The tree-building interface makes the parser
memory-hungry, first loading the document in memory and then building
the tree itself.
Reading a document without building the tree is possible using the SAX
interfaces (see SAX.h and <a
href="http://www.daa.com.au/~james/gnome/xml-sax/xml-sax.html">James
<p>The tree-building interface makes the parser memory-hungry, first loading
the document in memory and then building the tree itself. Reading a document
without building the tree is possible using the SAX interfaces (see SAX.h and
<a href="http://www.daa.com.au/~james/gnome/xml-sax/xml-sax.html">James
Henstridge's documentation</a>). Note also that the push interface can be
limited to SAX: just use the two first arguments of
<code>xmlCreatePushParserCtxt()</code>.</p>
@ -961,10 +960,11 @@ elements:</p>
<dl>
<dt><code>xmlNodePtr xmlStringGetNodeList(xmlDocPtr doc, const xmlChar
*value);</code></dt>
<dd><p>This function takes an "external" string and converts it to one text
node or possibly to a list of entity and text nodes. All non-predefined
entity references like &amp;Gnome; will be stored internally as entity
nodes, hence the result of the function may not be a single node.</p>
<dd><p>This function takes an "external" string and converts it to one
text node or possibly to a list of entity and text nodes. All
non-predefined entity references like &amp;Gnome; will be stored
internally as entity nodes, hence the result of the function may not be
a single node.</p>
</dd>
</dl>
<dl>
@ -1117,19 +1117,19 @@ equality operation at the user level.</p>
root element of their document as the default namespace. Then they don't need
to use the prefix in the content but we will have a basis for future semantic
refinement and merging of data from different sources. This doesn't increase
the size of the XML output significantly, but significantly increases its value
in the long-term. Example:</p>
the size of the XML output significantly, but significantly increases its
value in the long-term. Example:</p>
<pre>&lt;mydoc xmlns="http://mydoc.example.org/schemas/"&gt;
&lt;elem1&gt;...&lt;/elem1&gt;
&lt;elem2&gt;...&lt;/elem2&gt;
&lt;/mydoc&gt;</pre>
<p>The namespace value has to be an absolute URL, but the URL doesn't
have to point to any existing resource on the Web. It will bind all the
element and atributes with that URL. I suggest to use an URL within a domain
you control, and that the URL should contain some kind of version information
if possible. For example, <code>"http://www.gnome.org/gnumeric/1.0/"</code> is
a good namespace scheme.</p>
<p>The namespace value has to be an absolute URL, but the URL doesn't have to
point to any existing resource on the Web. It will bind all the element and
atributes with that URL. I suggest to use an URL within a domain you control,
and that the URL should contain some kind of version information if possible.
For example, <code>"http://www.gnome.org/gnumeric/1.0/"</code> is a good
namespace scheme.</p>
<p>Then when you load a file, make sure that a namespace carrying the
version-independent prefix is installed on the root element of your document,
@ -1169,13 +1169,11 @@ found within your document, what is the formal shape of your document tree (by
defining the allowed content of an element, either text, a regular expression
for the allowed list of children, or mixed content i.e. both text and
children). The DTD also defines the allowed attributes for all elements and
the types of the attributes. For more detailed information,
I suggest that you read
the related parts of the XML specification, the examples found under
gnome-xml/test/valid/dtd and any of the
large number of books available on XML. The
dia example in gnome-xml/test/valid should be both simple and complete enough
to allow you to build your own.</p>
the types of the attributes. For more detailed information, I suggest that you
read the related parts of the XML specification, the examples found under
gnome-xml/test/valid/dtd and any of the large number of books available on
XML. The dia example in gnome-xml/test/valid should be both simple and
complete enough to allow you to build your own.</p>
<p>A word of warning, building a good DTD which will fit the needs of your
application in the long-term is far from trivial; however, the extra level of
@ -1206,8 +1204,8 @@ core.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.w3.org/DOM/">DOM</a> stands for the <em>Document Object
Model</em>; this is an API for accessing XML or HTML structured documents.
Native support for DOM in Gnome is on the way (module gnome-dom), and will
be based on gnome-xml. This will be a far cleaner interface to manipulate XML
Native support for DOM in Gnome is on the way (module gnome-dom), and will be
based on gnome-xml. This will be a far cleaner interface to manipulate XML
files within Gnome since it won't expose the internal structure. DOM defines a
set of IDL (or Java) interfaces allowing you to traverse and manipulate a
document. The DOM library will allow accessing and modifying "live" documents
@ -1290,15 +1288,14 @@ base</a>:</p>
&lt;/gjob:Helping&gt;</pre>
<p>While loading the XML file into an internal DOM tree is a matter of calling
only a couple of functions, browsing the tree to gather the ata and
generate the internal structures is harder, and more error prone.</p>
only a couple of functions, browsing the tree to gather the ata and generate
the internal structures is harder, and more error prone.</p>
<p>The suggested principle is to be tolerant with respect to the input
structure. For example, the ordering of the attributes is not significant,
the XML specification is clear about it. It's also usually a good idea not to
depend on the order of the children of a given node, unless it really
makes things harder. Here is some code to parse the information for a
person:</p>
structure. For example, the ordering of the attributes is not significant, the
XML specification is clear about it. It's also usually a good idea not to
depend on the order of the children of a given node, unless it really makes
things harder. Here is some code to parse the information for a person:</p>
<pre>/*
* A person record
*/
@ -1354,10 +1351,9 @@ DEBUG("parsePerson\n");
application set of data and test that the element and attributes you're
analyzing actually pertains to your application space. This is done by a
simple equality test (cur-&gt;ns == ns).</li>
<li>To retrieve text and attributes value, you can use the
function <em>xmlNodeListGetString</em> to gather all the text and entity
reference nodes generated by the DOM output and produce an single text
string.</li>
<li>To retrieve text and attributes value, you can use the function
<em>xmlNodeListGetString</em> to gather all the text and entity reference
nodes generated by the DOM output and produce an single text string.</li>
</ul>
<p>Here is another piece of code used to parse another level of the
@ -1414,11 +1410,11 @@ DEBUG("parseJob\n");
return(ret);
}</pre>
<p>Once you are used to it, writing this kind of code is quite
simple, but boring. Ultimately, it could be possble to write stubbers taking
either C data structure definitions, a set of XML examples or an XML DTD and
produce the code needed to import and export the content between C data and
XML storage. This is left as an exercise to the reader :-)</p>
<p>Once you are used to it, writing this kind of code is quite simple, but
boring. Ultimately, it could be possble to write stubbers taking either C data
structure definitions, a set of XML examples or an XML DTD and produce the
code needed to import and export the content between C data and XML storage.
This is left as an exercise to the reader :-)</p>
<p>Feel free to use <a href="example/gjobread.c">the code for the full C
parsing example</a> as a template, it is also available with Makefile in the
@ -1450,6 +1446,6 @@ Gnome CVS base under gnome-xml/example</p>
<p><a href="mailto:Daniel.Veillard@w3.org">Daniel Veillard</a></p>
<p>$Id: xml.html,v 1.68 2001/02/24 17:48:53 veillard Exp $</p>
<p>$Id: xml.html,v 1.69 2001/02/26 07:31:12 veillard Exp $</p>
</body>
</html>