2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
/*
2004-03-30 23:35:44 +04:00
* Copyright ( C ) 2003 - 2004 Sistina Software , Inc . All rights reserved .
2012-02-08 16:52:58 +04:00
* Copyright ( C ) 2004 - 2012 Red Hat , Inc . All rights reserved .
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
*
2004-03-30 23:35:44 +04:00
* This file is part of LVM2 .
*
* This copyrighted material is made available to anyone wishing to use ,
* modify , copy , or redistribute it subject to the terms and conditions
2007-08-21 00:55:30 +04:00
* of the GNU Lesser General Public License v .2 .1 .
2004-03-30 23:35:44 +04:00
*
2007-08-21 00:55:30 +04:00
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
2004-03-30 23:35:44 +04:00
* along with this program ; if not , write to the Free Software Foundation ,
* Inc . , 59 Temple Place , Suite 330 , Boston , MA 02111 - 1307 USA
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
*/
# ifndef _LVM_STR_LIST_H
# define _LVM_STR_LIST_H
2012-01-26 02:26:33 +04:00
struct dm_list ;
struct dm_pool ;
2008-11-04 01:14:30 +03:00
struct dm_list * str_list_create ( struct dm_pool * mem ) ;
int str_list_add ( struct dm_pool * mem , struct dm_list * sll , const char * str ) ;
Add lv_layout_and_type fn, lv_layout and lv_type reporting fields.
The lv_layout and lv_type fields together help with LV identification.
We can do basic identification using the lv_attr field which provides
very condensed view. In contrast to that, the new lv_layout and lv_type
fields provide more detialed information on exact layout and type used
for LVs.
For top-level LVs which are pure types not combined with any
other LV types, the lv_layout value is equal to lv_type value.
For non-top-level LVs which may be combined with other types,
the lv_layout describes the underlying layout used, while the
lv_type describes the use/type/usage of the LV.
These two new fields are both string lists so selection (-S/--select)
criteria can be defined using the list operators easily:
[] for strict matching
{} for subset matching.
For example, let's consider this:
$ lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type
LV VG Attr Layout Type
[lvol1_pmspare] vg ewi------- linear metadata,pool,spare
pool vg twi-a-tz-- pool,thin pool,thin
[pool_tdata] vg rwi-aor--- level10,raid data,pool,thin
[pool_tdata_rimage_0] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid
[pool_tdata_rimage_1] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid
[pool_tdata_rimage_2] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid
[pool_tdata_rimage_3] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_0] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_1] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_2] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_3] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin
[pool_tmeta_rimage_0] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid
[pool_tmeta_rimage_1] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid
[pool_tmeta_rmeta_0] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tmeta_rmeta_1] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
thin_snap1 vg Vwi---tz-k thin snapshot,thin
thin_snap2 vg Vwi---tz-k thin snapshot,thin
thin_vol1 vg Vwi-a-tz-- thin thin
thin_vol2 vg Vwi-a-tz-- thin multiple,origin,thin
Which is a situation with thin pool, thin volumes and thin snapshots.
We can see internal 'pool_tdata' volume that makes up thin pool has
actually a level10 raid layout and the internal 'pool_tmeta' has
level1 raid layout. Also, we can see that 'thin_snap1' and 'thin_snap2'
are both thin snapshots while 'thin_vol1' is thin origin (having
multiple snapshots).
Such reporting scheme provides much better base for selection criteria
in addition to providing more detailed information, for example:
$ lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type=metadata'
LV VG Attr Layout Type
[lvol1_pmspare] vg ewi------- linear metadata,pool,spare
[pool_tdata_rmeta_0] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_1] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_2] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_3] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin
[pool_tmeta_rmeta_0] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
[pool_tmeta_rmeta_1] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid
(selected all LVs which are related to metadata of any type)
lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type={metadata,thin}'
LV VG Attr Layout Type
[pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin
(selected all LVs which hold metadata related to thin)
lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type={thin,snapshot}'
LV VG Attr Layout Type
thin_snap1 vg Vwi---tz-k thin snapshot,thin
thin_snap2 vg Vwi---tz-k thin snapshot,thin
(selected all LVs which are thin snapshots)
lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'layout=raid'
LV VG Attr Layout Type
[pool_tdata] vg rwi-aor--- level10,raid data,pool,thin
[pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin
(selected all LVs with raid layout, any raid layout)
lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'layout={raid,level1}'
LV VG Attr Layout Type
[pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin
(selected all LVs with raid level1 layout exactly)
And so on...
2014-08-13 12:03:45 +04:00
int str_list_add_no_dup_check ( struct dm_pool * mem , struct dm_list * sll , const char * str ) ;
2012-02-08 16:52:58 +04:00
void str_list_del ( struct dm_list * sll , const char * str ) ;
2008-11-04 01:14:30 +03:00
int str_list_match_item ( const struct dm_list * sll , const char * str ) ;
2010-11-11 15:32:33 +03:00
int str_list_match_list ( const struct dm_list * sll , const struct dm_list * sll2 , const char * * tag_matched ) ;
2008-11-04 01:14:30 +03:00
int str_list_lists_equal ( const struct dm_list * sll , const struct dm_list * sll2 ) ;
int str_list_dup ( struct dm_pool * mem , struct dm_list * sllnew ,
const struct dm_list * sllold ) ;
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
# endif
