1
0
mirror of git://sourceware.org/git/lvm2.git synced 2024-12-21 13:34:40 +03:00
lvm2/lib/datastruct/str_list.c

254 lines
5.2 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
/*
2004-03-30 23:35:44 +04:00
* Copyright (C) 2003-2004 Sistina Software, Inc. All rights reserved.
* Copyright (C) 2004-2012 Red Hat, Inc. All rights reserved.
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
*
2004-03-30 23:35:44 +04:00
* This file is part of LVM2.
*
* This copyrighted material is made available to anyone wishing to use,
* modify, copy, or redistribute it subject to the terms and conditions
* of the GNU Lesser General Public License v.2.1.
2004-03-30 23:35:44 +04:00
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU Lesser General Public License
2004-03-30 23:35:44 +04:00
* along with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation,
* Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA 02110-1301 USA
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
*/
#include "lib/misc/lib.h"
#include "lib/datastruct/str_list.h"
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
struct dm_list *str_list_create(struct dm_pool *mem)
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
{
struct dm_list *sl;
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
if (!(sl = dm_pool_alloc(mem, sizeof(struct dm_list)))) {
log_errno(ENOMEM, "str_list allocation failed");
return NULL;
}
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
dm_list_init(sl);
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
return sl;
}
cleanup: consolidate lv_layout and lv_role reporting This patch makes the keyword combinations found in "lv_layout" and "lv_role" much more understandable - there were some ambiguities for some of the combinations which lead to confusion before. Now, the scheme used is: LAYOUTS ("how the LV is laid out"): =================================== [linear] (all segments have number of stripes = 1) [striped] (all segments have number of stripes > 1) [linear,striped] (mixed linear and striped) raid (raid layout always reported together with raid level, raid layout == image + metadata LVs underneath that make up raid LV) [raid,raid1] [raid,raid10] [raid,raid4] [raid,raid5] (exact sublayout not specified during creation - default one used - raid5_ls) [raid,raid5,raid5_ls] [raid,raid5,raid6_rs] [raid,raid5,raid5_la] [raid,raid5,raid5_ra] [raid6,raid] (exact sublayout not specified during creation - default one used - raid6_zr) [raid,raid6,raid6_zr] [raid,raid6,raid6_nc] [raid,raid6,raid6_ns] [mirror] (mirror layout == log + image LVs underneath that make up mirror LV) thin (thin layout always reported together with sublayout) [thin,sparse] (thin layout == allocated out of thin pool) [thin,pool] (thin pool layout == data + metadata volumes underneath that make up thin pool LV, not supposed to be used for direct use!!!) [cache] (cache layout == allocated out of cache pool in conjunction with cache origin) [cache,pool] (cache pool layout == data + metadata volumes underneath that make up cache pool LV, not supposed to be used for direct use!!!) [virtual] (virtual layout == not hitting disk underneath, currently this layout denotes only 'zero' device used for origin,thickorigin role) [unknown] (either error state or missing recognition for such layout) ROLES ("what's the purpose or use of the LV - what is its role"): ================================================================= - each LV has either of these two roles at least: [public] (public LV that users may use freely to write their data to) [public] (public LV that users may use freely to write their data to) [private] (private LV that LVM maintains; not supposed to be directly used by user to write his data to) - and then some special-purpose roles in addition to that: [origin,thickorigin] (origin for thick-style snapshot; "thick" as opposed to "thin") [origin,multithickorigin] (there are more than 2 thick-style snapshots for this origin) [origin,thinorigin] (origin for thin snapshot) [origin,multithinorigin] (there are more than 2 thin snapshots for this origin) [origin,extorigin] (external origin for thin snapshot) [origin,multiextoriginl (there are more than 2 thin snapshots using this external origin) [origin,cacheorigin] (cache origin) [snapshot,thicksnapshot] (thick-style snapshot; "thick" as opposed to "thin") [snapshot,thinsnapshot] (thin-style snapshot) [raid,metadata] (raid metadata LV) [raid,image] (raid image LV) [mirror,image] (mirror image LV) [mirror,log] (mirror log LV) [pvmove] (pvmove LV) [thin,pool,data] (thin pool data LV) [thin,pool,metadata] (thin pool metadata LV) [cache,pool,data] (cache pool data LV) [cache,pool,metadata] (cache pool metadata LV) [pool,spare] (pool spare LV - common role of LV that makes it used for both thin and cache repairs)
2014-08-25 12:02:32 +04:00
static int _str_list_add_no_dup_check(struct dm_pool *mem, struct dm_list *sll, const char *str, int as_first)
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
{
struct dm_str_list *sln;
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
2008-01-30 16:19:47 +03:00
if (!str)
return_0;
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
if (!(sln = dm_pool_alloc(mem, sizeof(*sln))))
2008-01-30 16:19:47 +03:00
return_0;
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
sln->str = str;
cleanup: consolidate lv_layout and lv_role reporting This patch makes the keyword combinations found in "lv_layout" and "lv_role" much more understandable - there were some ambiguities for some of the combinations which lead to confusion before. Now, the scheme used is: LAYOUTS ("how the LV is laid out"): =================================== [linear] (all segments have number of stripes = 1) [striped] (all segments have number of stripes > 1) [linear,striped] (mixed linear and striped) raid (raid layout always reported together with raid level, raid layout == image + metadata LVs underneath that make up raid LV) [raid,raid1] [raid,raid10] [raid,raid4] [raid,raid5] (exact sublayout not specified during creation - default one used - raid5_ls) [raid,raid5,raid5_ls] [raid,raid5,raid6_rs] [raid,raid5,raid5_la] [raid,raid5,raid5_ra] [raid6,raid] (exact sublayout not specified during creation - default one used - raid6_zr) [raid,raid6,raid6_zr] [raid,raid6,raid6_nc] [raid,raid6,raid6_ns] [mirror] (mirror layout == log + image LVs underneath that make up mirror LV) thin (thin layout always reported together with sublayout) [thin,sparse] (thin layout == allocated out of thin pool) [thin,pool] (thin pool layout == data + metadata volumes underneath that make up thin pool LV, not supposed to be used for direct use!!!) [cache] (cache layout == allocated out of cache pool in conjunction with cache origin) [cache,pool] (cache pool layout == data + metadata volumes underneath that make up cache pool LV, not supposed to be used for direct use!!!) [virtual] (virtual layout == not hitting disk underneath, currently this layout denotes only 'zero' device used for origin,thickorigin role) [unknown] (either error state or missing recognition for such layout) ROLES ("what's the purpose or use of the LV - what is its role"): ================================================================= - each LV has either of these two roles at least: [public] (public LV that users may use freely to write their data to) [public] (public LV that users may use freely to write their data to) [private] (private LV that LVM maintains; not supposed to be directly used by user to write his data to) - and then some special-purpose roles in addition to that: [origin,thickorigin] (origin for thick-style snapshot; "thick" as opposed to "thin") [origin,multithickorigin] (there are more than 2 thick-style snapshots for this origin) [origin,thinorigin] (origin for thin snapshot) [origin,multithinorigin] (there are more than 2 thin snapshots for this origin) [origin,extorigin] (external origin for thin snapshot) [origin,multiextoriginl (there are more than 2 thin snapshots using this external origin) [origin,cacheorigin] (cache origin) [snapshot,thicksnapshot] (thick-style snapshot; "thick" as opposed to "thin") [snapshot,thinsnapshot] (thin-style snapshot) [raid,metadata] (raid metadata LV) [raid,image] (raid image LV) [mirror,image] (mirror image LV) [mirror,log] (mirror log LV) [pvmove] (pvmove LV) [thin,pool,data] (thin pool data LV) [thin,pool,metadata] (thin pool metadata LV) [cache,pool,data] (cache pool data LV) [cache,pool,metadata] (cache pool metadata LV) [pool,spare] (pool spare LV - common role of LV that makes it used for both thin and cache repairs)
2014-08-25 12:02:32 +04:00
if (as_first)
dm_list_add_h(sll, &sln->list);
else
dm_list_add(sll, &sln->list);
2003-09-18 00:35:57 +04:00
return 1;
}
2003-10-16 00:01:12 +04:00
cleanup: consolidate lv_layout and lv_role reporting This patch makes the keyword combinations found in "lv_layout" and "lv_role" much more understandable - there were some ambiguities for some of the combinations which lead to confusion before. Now, the scheme used is: LAYOUTS ("how the LV is laid out"): =================================== [linear] (all segments have number of stripes = 1) [striped] (all segments have number of stripes > 1) [linear,striped] (mixed linear and striped) raid (raid layout always reported together with raid level, raid layout == image + metadata LVs underneath that make up raid LV) [raid,raid1] [raid,raid10] [raid,raid4] [raid,raid5] (exact sublayout not specified during creation - default one used - raid5_ls) [raid,raid5,raid5_ls] [raid,raid5,raid6_rs] [raid,raid5,raid5_la] [raid,raid5,raid5_ra] [raid6,raid] (exact sublayout not specified during creation - default one used - raid6_zr) [raid,raid6,raid6_zr] [raid,raid6,raid6_nc] [raid,raid6,raid6_ns] [mirror] (mirror layout == log + image LVs underneath that make up mirror LV) thin (thin layout always reported together with sublayout) [thin,sparse] (thin layout == allocated out of thin pool) [thin,pool] (thin pool layout == data + metadata volumes underneath that make up thin pool LV, not supposed to be used for direct use!!!) [cache] (cache layout == allocated out of cache pool in conjunction with cache origin) [cache,pool] (cache pool layout == data + metadata volumes underneath that make up cache pool LV, not supposed to be used for direct use!!!) [virtual] (virtual layout == not hitting disk underneath, currently this layout denotes only 'zero' device used for origin,thickorigin role) [unknown] (either error state or missing recognition for such layout) ROLES ("what's the purpose or use of the LV - what is its role"): ================================================================= - each LV has either of these two roles at least: [public] (public LV that users may use freely to write their data to) [public] (public LV that users may use freely to write their data to) [private] (private LV that LVM maintains; not supposed to be directly used by user to write his data to) - and then some special-purpose roles in addition to that: [origin,thickorigin] (origin for thick-style snapshot; "thick" as opposed to "thin") [origin,multithickorigin] (there are more than 2 thick-style snapshots for this origin) [origin,thinorigin] (origin for thin snapshot) [origin,multithinorigin] (there are more than 2 thin snapshots for this origin) [origin,extorigin] (external origin for thin snapshot) [origin,multiextoriginl (there are more than 2 thin snapshots using this external origin) [origin,cacheorigin] (cache origin) [snapshot,thicksnapshot] (thick-style snapshot; "thick" as opposed to "thin") [snapshot,thinsnapshot] (thin-style snapshot) [raid,metadata] (raid metadata LV) [raid,image] (raid image LV) [mirror,image] (mirror image LV) [mirror,log] (mirror log LV) [pvmove] (pvmove LV) [thin,pool,data] (thin pool data LV) [thin,pool,metadata] (thin pool metadata LV) [cache,pool,data] (cache pool data LV) [cache,pool,metadata] (cache pool metadata LV) [pool,spare] (pool spare LV - common role of LV that makes it used for both thin and cache repairs)
2014-08-25 12:02:32 +04:00
int str_list_add_no_dup_check(struct dm_pool *mem, struct dm_list *sll, const char *str)
{
return _str_list_add_no_dup_check(mem, sll, str, 0);
}
int str_list_add_h_no_dup_check(struct dm_pool *mem, struct dm_list *sll, const char *str)
{
return _str_list_add_no_dup_check(mem, sll, str, 1);
}
Add lv_layout_and_type fn, lv_layout and lv_type reporting fields. The lv_layout and lv_type fields together help with LV identification. We can do basic identification using the lv_attr field which provides very condensed view. In contrast to that, the new lv_layout and lv_type fields provide more detialed information on exact layout and type used for LVs. For top-level LVs which are pure types not combined with any other LV types, the lv_layout value is equal to lv_type value. For non-top-level LVs which may be combined with other types, the lv_layout describes the underlying layout used, while the lv_type describes the use/type/usage of the LV. These two new fields are both string lists so selection (-S/--select) criteria can be defined using the list operators easily: [] for strict matching {} for subset matching. For example, let's consider this: $ lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type LV VG Attr Layout Type [lvol1_pmspare] vg ewi------- linear metadata,pool,spare pool vg twi-a-tz-- pool,thin pool,thin [pool_tdata] vg rwi-aor--- level10,raid data,pool,thin [pool_tdata_rimage_0] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid [pool_tdata_rimage_1] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid [pool_tdata_rimage_2] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid [pool_tdata_rimage_3] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid [pool_tdata_rmeta_0] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tdata_rmeta_1] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tdata_rmeta_2] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tdata_rmeta_3] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin [pool_tmeta_rimage_0] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid [pool_tmeta_rimage_1] vg iwi-aor--- linear image,raid [pool_tmeta_rmeta_0] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tmeta_rmeta_1] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid thin_snap1 vg Vwi---tz-k thin snapshot,thin thin_snap2 vg Vwi---tz-k thin snapshot,thin thin_vol1 vg Vwi-a-tz-- thin thin thin_vol2 vg Vwi-a-tz-- thin multiple,origin,thin Which is a situation with thin pool, thin volumes and thin snapshots. We can see internal 'pool_tdata' volume that makes up thin pool has actually a level10 raid layout and the internal 'pool_tmeta' has level1 raid layout. Also, we can see that 'thin_snap1' and 'thin_snap2' are both thin snapshots while 'thin_vol1' is thin origin (having multiple snapshots). Such reporting scheme provides much better base for selection criteria in addition to providing more detailed information, for example: $ lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type=metadata' LV VG Attr Layout Type [lvol1_pmspare] vg ewi------- linear metadata,pool,spare [pool_tdata_rmeta_0] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tdata_rmeta_1] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tdata_rmeta_2] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tdata_rmeta_3] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin [pool_tmeta_rmeta_0] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid [pool_tmeta_rmeta_1] vg ewi-aor--- linear metadata,raid (selected all LVs which are related to metadata of any type) lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type={metadata,thin}' LV VG Attr Layout Type [pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin (selected all LVs which hold metadata related to thin) lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type={thin,snapshot}' LV VG Attr Layout Type thin_snap1 vg Vwi---tz-k thin snapshot,thin thin_snap2 vg Vwi---tz-k thin snapshot,thin (selected all LVs which are thin snapshots) lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'layout=raid' LV VG Attr Layout Type [pool_tdata] vg rwi-aor--- level10,raid data,pool,thin [pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin (selected all LVs with raid layout, any raid layout) lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'layout={raid,level1}' LV VG Attr Layout Type [pool_tmeta] vg ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin (selected all LVs with raid level1 layout exactly) And so on...
2014-08-13 12:03:45 +04:00
int str_list_add(struct dm_pool *mem, struct dm_list *sll, const char *str)
{
if (!str)
return_0;
/* Already in list? */
if (str_list_match_item(sll, str))
return 1;
return str_list_add_no_dup_check(mem, sll, str);
}
2015-03-26 21:30:37 +03:00
/* Add contents of sll2 to sll */
int str_list_add_list(struct dm_pool *mem, struct dm_list *sll, struct dm_list *sll2)
{
struct dm_str_list *sl;
if (!sll2)
return_0;
dm_list_iterate_items(sl, sll2)
if (!str_list_add(mem, sll, sl->str))
return_0;
return 1;
}
void str_list_del(struct dm_list *sll, const char *str)
2003-10-16 00:01:12 +04:00
{
struct dm_list *slh, *slht;
2003-10-16 00:01:12 +04:00
dm_list_iterate_safe(slh, slht, sll)
if (!strcmp(str, dm_list_item(slh, struct dm_str_list)->str))
2016-04-29 21:47:15 +03:00
dm_list_del(slh);
}
void str_list_wipe(struct dm_list *sll)
{
struct dm_list *slh, *slht;
dm_list_iterate_safe(slh, slht, sll)
dm_list_del(slh);
2003-10-16 00:01:12 +04:00
}
int str_list_dup(struct dm_pool *mem, struct dm_list *sllnew,
const struct dm_list *sllold)
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
{
struct dm_str_list *sl;
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
dm_list_init(sllnew);
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
dm_list_iterate_items(sl, sllold) {
2008-01-30 16:19:47 +03:00
if (!str_list_add(mem, sllnew, dm_pool_strdup(mem, sl->str)))
return_0;
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
}
return 1;
}
/*
* Is item on list?
*/
int str_list_match_item(const struct dm_list *sll, const char *str)
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
{
struct dm_str_list *sl;
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
dm_list_iterate_items(sl, sll)
2016-04-29 21:47:15 +03:00
if (!strcmp(str, sl->str))
return 1;
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
return 0;
}
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
/*
* Is at least one item on both lists?
* If tag_matched is non-NULL, it is set to the tag that matched.
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
*/
int str_list_match_list(const struct dm_list *sll, const struct dm_list *sll2, const char **tag_matched)
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
{
struct dm_str_list *sl;
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
dm_list_iterate_items(sl, sll)
if (str_list_match_item(sll2, sl->str)) {
if (tag_matched)
*tag_matched = sl->str;
return 1;
}
2003-10-16 00:04:29 +04:00
return 0;
}
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
/*
* Do both lists contain the same set of items?
*/
int str_list_lists_equal(const struct dm_list *sll, const struct dm_list *sll2)
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
{
struct dm_str_list *sl;
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
if (dm_list_size(sll) != dm_list_size(sll2))
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
return 0;
dm_list_iterate_items(sl, sll)
2016-04-29 21:47:15 +03:00
if (!str_list_match_item(sll2, sl->str))
return 0;
2004-03-08 18:23:01 +03:00
return 1;
}
char *str_list_to_str(struct dm_pool *mem, const struct dm_list *list,
const char *delim)
{
size_t delim_len = strlen(delim);
unsigned list_size = dm_list_size(list);
struct dm_str_list *sl;
char *str, *p;
size_t len = 0;
unsigned i = 0;
dm_list_iterate_items(sl, list)
len += strlen(sl->str);
if (list_size > 1)
len += ((list_size - 1) * delim_len);
str = dm_pool_alloc(mem, len+1);
if (!str) {
log_error("str_list_to_str: string allocation failed.");
return NULL;
}
str[len] = '\0';
p = str;
dm_list_iterate_items(sl, list) {
len = strlen(sl->str);
memcpy(p, sl->str, len);
p += len;
if (++i != list_size) {
memcpy(p, delim, delim_len);
p += delim_len;
}
}
return str;
}
struct dm_list *str_to_str_list(struct dm_pool *mem, const char *str,
const char *delim, int ignore_multiple_delim)
{
size_t delim_len = strlen(delim);
struct dm_list *list;
const char *p1, *p2, *next;
char *str_item;
size_t len;
if (!(list = str_list_create(mem))) {
log_error("str_to_str_list: string list allocation failed.");
return NULL;
}
2021-03-10 16:12:17 +03:00
p1 = str;
while (*p1) {
if (!(p2 = strstr(p1, delim)))
next = p2 = str + strlen(str);
else
next = p2 + delim_len;
len = p2 - p1;
str_item = dm_pool_alloc(mem, len+1);
if (!str_item) {
log_error("str_to_str_list: string list item allocation failed.");
goto bad;
}
memcpy(str_item, p1, len);
str_item[len] = '\0';
if (!str_list_add_no_dup_check(mem, list, str_item))
goto_bad;
if (ignore_multiple_delim) {
while (!strncmp(next, delim, delim_len))
next += delim_len;
}
p1 = next;
}
return list;
bad:
dm_pool_free(mem, list);
return NULL;
}