mirror of
git://sourceware.org/git/lvm2.git
synced 2024-12-22 17:35:59 +03:00
scan: md metadata version 0.90 is at the end of disk
commit de28637
scan: use full md filter when md 1.0 devices are present
missed the fact that md superblock version 0.90 also puts
metadata at the end of the device, so the full md filter
needs to be used when either 0.90 or 1.0 is present.
This commit is contained in:
parent
fe1cabfa34
commit
0e42ebd6d4
@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ int dev_is_md_with_end_superblock(struct dev_types *dt, struct device *dev)
|
||||
log_very_verbose("Device %s %s is %s.",
|
||||
dev_name(dev), attribute, version_string);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!strcmp(version_string, "1.0"))
|
||||
if (!strcmp(version_string, "1.0") || !strcmp(version_string, "0.90"))
|
||||
return 1;
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ extern int use_full_md_check;
|
||||
* 3. use udev to detect components
|
||||
*
|
||||
* mode 1 will not detect and exclude components of md devices
|
||||
* that use superblock version 1.0 which is at the end of the device.
|
||||
* that use superblock version 0.9 or 1.0 which is at the end of the device.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* mode 2 will detect these, but mode 2 doubles the i/o done by label
|
||||
* scan, since there's a read at both the start and end of every device.
|
||||
@ -60,11 +60,11 @@ extern int use_full_md_check;
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - the command is pvcreate/vgcreate/vgextend, which format new
|
||||
* devices, and if the user ran these commands on a component
|
||||
* device of an md device 1.0, then it would cause problems.
|
||||
* device of an md device 0.9 or 1.0, then it would cause problems.
|
||||
* FIXME: this would only really need to scan the end of the
|
||||
* devices being formatted, not all devices.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* - it sees an md device on the system using version 1.0.
|
||||
* - it sees an md device on the system using version 0.9 or 1.0.
|
||||
* The point of this is just to avoid displaying md components
|
||||
* from the 'pvs' command.
|
||||
* FIXME: the cost (double i/o) may not be worth the benefit
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user