mirror of
git://sourceware.org/git/lvm2.git
synced 2024-12-21 13:34:40 +03:00
libdm: fix condition
When we switch supported_reserved_types_with_range to const gcc repots this problem: warning: ‘and’ of mutually exclusive equal-tests is always 0 !(iter->type & supported_reserved_types_with_range))) { It's not clear from the history what was the actual intention of this internal error test, let's assume the check wanted to make sure that when DM_REPORT_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE_RANGE is set, some other fields from supported_reserved_types_with_range set are also selected.
This commit is contained in:
parent
9b2f9d64c0
commit
2a1e200f7a
@ -2589,7 +2589,8 @@ static int _check_reserved_values_supported(const struct dm_report_field_type fi
|
||||
if (iter->type & DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_MASK) {
|
||||
if (!(iter->type & supported_reserved_types) ||
|
||||
((iter->type & DM_REPORT_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE_RANGE) &&
|
||||
!(iter->type & supported_reserved_types_with_range))) {
|
||||
!(iter->type & (supported_reserved_types_with_range &
|
||||
~DM_REPORT_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE_RANGE)))) {
|
||||
log_error(INTERNAL_ERROR "_check_reserved_values_supported: "
|
||||
"global reserved value for type 0x%x not supported",
|
||||
iter->type);
|
||||
@ -2600,7 +2601,8 @@ static int _check_reserved_values_supported(const struct dm_report_field_type fi
|
||||
field = &fields[field_res->field_num];
|
||||
if (!(field->flags & supported_reserved_types) ||
|
||||
((iter->type & DM_REPORT_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE_RANGE) &&
|
||||
!(iter->type & supported_reserved_types_with_range))) {
|
||||
!(iter->type & (supported_reserved_types_with_range &
|
||||
~DM_REPORT_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE_RANGE)))) {
|
||||
log_error(INTERNAL_ERROR "_check_reserved_values_supported: "
|
||||
"field-specific reserved value of type 0x%x for "
|
||||
"field %s not supported",
|
||||
|
@ -2587,7 +2587,8 @@ static int _check_reserved_values_supported(const struct dm_report_field_type fi
|
||||
if (iter->type & DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_MASK) {
|
||||
if (!(iter->type & supported_reserved_types) ||
|
||||
((iter->type & DM_REPORT_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE_RANGE) &&
|
||||
!(iter->type & supported_reserved_types_with_range))) {
|
||||
!(iter->type & (supported_reserved_types_with_range &
|
||||
~DM_REPORT_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE_RANGE)))) {
|
||||
log_error(INTERNAL_ERROR "_check_reserved_values_supported: "
|
||||
"global reserved value for type 0x%x not supported",
|
||||
iter->type);
|
||||
@ -2598,7 +2599,8 @@ static int _check_reserved_values_supported(const struct dm_report_field_type fi
|
||||
field = &fields[field_res->field_num];
|
||||
if (!(field->flags & supported_reserved_types) ||
|
||||
((iter->type & DM_REPORT_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE_RANGE) &&
|
||||
!(iter->type & supported_reserved_types_with_range))) {
|
||||
!(iter->type & (supported_reserved_types_with_range &
|
||||
~DM_REPORT_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE_RANGE)))) {
|
||||
log_error(INTERNAL_ERROR "_check_reserved_values_supported: "
|
||||
"field-specific reserved value of type 0x%x for "
|
||||
"field %s not supported",
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user