1
0
mirror of git://sourceware.org/git/lvm2.git synced 2024-12-30 17:18:21 +03:00

filters: clarify some parts of md filter

Rename some functions to be consistent with the return values,
and add some comments about how it works.
This commit is contained in:
David Teigland 2018-05-22 14:07:13 -05:00
parent 3c9ed33f83
commit 61583281e5

View File

@ -20,13 +20,77 @@
#define MSG_SKIPPING "%s: Skipping md component device"
static int _ignore_md(struct device *dev, int full)
/*
* The purpose of these functions is to ignore md component devices,
* e.g. if /dev/md0 is a raid1 composed of /dev/loop0 and /dev/loop1,
* lvm wants to deal with md0 and ignore loop0 and loop1. md0 should
* pass the filter, and loop0,loop1 should not pass the filter so lvm
* will ignore them.
*
* (This is assuming lvm.conf md_component_detection=1.)
*
* If lvm does *not* ignore the components, then lvm will read lvm
* labels from the md dev and from the component devs, and will see
* them all as duplicates of each other. LVM duplicate resolution
* will then kick in and keep the md dev around to use and ignore
* the components.
*
* It is better to exclude the components as early as possible during
* lvm processing, ideally before lvm even looks for labels on the
* components, so that duplicate resolution can be avoided. There are
* a number of ways that md components can be excluded earlier than
* the duplicate resolution phase:
*
* - When external_device_info_source="udev", lvm discovers a device is
* an md component by asking udev during the initial filtering phase.
* However, lvm's default is to not use udev for this. The
* alternative is "native" detection in which lvm tries to detect
* md components itself.
*
* - When using native detection, lvm's md filter looks for the md
* superblock at the start of devices. It will see the md superblock
* on the components, exclude them in the md filter, and avoid
* handling them later in duplicate resolution.
*
* - When using native detection, lvm's md filter will not detect
* components when the md device has an older superblock version that
* places the superblock at the end of the device. This case will
* fall back to duplicate resolution to exclude components.
*
* A variation of the description above occurs for lvm commands that
* intend to create new PVs on devices (pvcreate, vgcreate, vgextend).
* For these commands, the native md filter also reads the end of all
* devices to check for the odd md superblocks.
*
* (The reason that external_device_info_source is not set to udev by
* default is that there have be issues with udev not being promptly
* or reliably updated about md state changes, causing the udev info
* that lvm uses to be occasionally wrong.)
*/
/*
* Returns 0 if:
* the device is an md component and it should be ignored.
*
* Returns 1 if:
* the device is not md component and should not be ignored.
*
* The actual md device will pass this filter and should be used,
* it is the md component devices that we are trying to exclude
* that will not pass.
*/
static int _passes_md_filter(struct device *dev, int full)
{
int ret;
/*
* When md_component_dectection=0, don't even try to skip md
* components.
*/
if (!md_filtering())
return 1;
ret = dev_is_md(dev, NULL, full);
if (ret == -EAGAIN) {
@ -36,6 +100,9 @@ static int _ignore_md(struct device *dev, int full)
return 1;
}
if (ret == 0)
return 1;
if (ret == 1) {
if (dev->ext.src == DEV_EXT_NONE)
log_debug_devs(MSG_SKIPPING, dev_name(dev));
@ -54,16 +121,16 @@ static int _ignore_md(struct device *dev, int full)
return 1;
}
static int _ignore_md_lite(struct dev_filter *f __attribute__((unused)),
struct device *dev)
static int _passes_md_filter_lite(struct dev_filter *f __attribute__((unused)),
struct device *dev)
{
return _ignore_md(dev, 0);
return _passes_md_filter(dev, 0);
}
static int _ignore_md_full(struct dev_filter *f __attribute__((unused)),
struct device *dev)
static int _passes_md_filter_full(struct dev_filter *f __attribute__((unused)),
struct device *dev)
{
return _ignore_md(dev, 1);
return _passes_md_filter(dev, 1);
}
static void _destroy(struct dev_filter *f)
@ -91,9 +158,9 @@ struct dev_filter *md_filter_create(struct cmd_context *cmd, struct dev_types *d
*/
if (cmd->use_full_md_check)
f->passes_filter = _ignore_md_full;
f->passes_filter = _passes_md_filter_full;
else
f->passes_filter = _ignore_md_lite;
f->passes_filter = _passes_md_filter_lite;
f->destroy = _destroy;
f->use_count = 0;