shaba/lvm2
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of git://sourceware.org/git/lvm2.git synced 2025-03-10 16:58:47 +03:00
Code Releases Activity

report: display 'unknown' value for lv_active_remotely field if the LV is also active locally

Browse Source 
Currently, we can't determine whether the LV is active remotely
or not in that case.
This commit is contained in:
Peter Rajnoha 2014-07-11 11:56:50 +02:00
parent c9ae21798e
commit fd5912762b
1 changed files with 22 additions and 1 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

23
lib/report/report.c
View File

@ -1478,7 +1478,28 @@ static int _lvactiveremotely_disp(struct dm_report *rh, struct dm_pool *mem,
if (vg_is_clustered(lv->vg)) { if (vg_is_clustered(lv->vg)) {
lv = lv_lock_holder(lv); lv = lv_lock_holder(lv);
active_remotely = lv_is_active_but_not_locally(lv); /* FIXME: It seems we have no way to get this info correctly
* with current interface - we'd need to check number
* of responses from the cluster:
* - if number of nodes that responded == 1
* - and LV is active on local node
* ..then we may say that LV is *not* active remotely.
*
* Otherwise ((responses > 1 && LV active locally) ||
* (responses == 1 && LV not active locally)), it's
* active remotely.
*
* We have this info, but hidden underneath the
* locking interface (locking_type.query_resource fn).
*
* For now, let's use 'unknown' for remote status if
* the LV is found active locally until we find a way to
* smuggle the proper information out of the interface.
*/
if (lv_is_active_locally(lv))
return _binary_undef_disp(rh, mem, field, private);
else
active_remotely = lv_is_active_but_not_locally(lv);
} else } else
active_remotely = 0; active_remotely = 0;