IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The two liblvm functions that return a list of vgnames and vguuids use
cmd->mem to allocate the list. Make it clear to the caller that this
memory will be freed when the LVM handle is freed.
Clean up and clarify the return value of the functions. In the
case of a memory allocation error, add a couple log_errnos to the internal
code, and make it clear that memory allocation returns a NULL pointer.
If there are no VGs in the system, the list returned is an empty list.
Make a note of the fact that currently we return hidden VG names, how
these can be detected (always start with "#"), and that they should
not be used.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
For liblvm 'get' functions, we should share code with the reporting functions.
This means we need common code to return the values for the fields.
In this patch we refactor a few of the fields needed in liblvm.
Unfortunately, for the simple fields that do derefernces of structure
members (for example, vg_extent_count), we cannot call the common function
from the reporting infrastructure without more refactoring. The reason is
that the dereference of the simple fields is done deep inside the reporting
code (to get the generic "data" pointer), and the display function is a
generic 'size32' function. We can fix these issues later with more
refactoring.
Should be no functional change and the testsuite should cover any possible
regressions. The only fields in the report affected by this patch are:
vg_size, vg_free, and pv_mda_count.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
After some refactorings, we can now move the bulk of _lvcreate into the
internal library, and we can call from liblvm. In the future, we should
refactor lv_create_single further, probably by segtype, to reduce the
size of struct lvcreate_params. For now this is a reasonable refactor
and allows us to re-use the function from liblvm.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
The implicit pvcreate require either moving the ORPHAN_VG lock outside
pvcreate_single or somehow having the function know or detect whether
the ORPHAN_VG lock is already held.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Passing NULL for pvcreate parameters gives you default parameters for
pvcreate_single.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
In preparation for implicit pvcreate during vgcreate / vgextend,
move bulk of pvcreate logic inside library.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
We must hold the VG_ORPHAN lock until we commit to disk. Otherwise,
we risk a race condition on vgcreate / vgextend. Reverts the following
commit:
commit 72a41480ba
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Jul 10 20:09:21 2009 +0000
Move orphan lock obtain/release inside vg_extend().
With this change we now have vgcreate/vgextend liblvm functions.
Note that this changes the lock order of the following functions as the
orphan lock is now obtained first. With our policy of non-blocking
second locks, this should not be a problem.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
These messages are unnecessary in the set functions. We check for this
condition and print a message in the vgchange tool but not the library
functions.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
When converting to the new liblvm functions, the vgcreate code path
changed to create a new vg, then set values. As a result of this
change, and the fact that we give a user a message if they try to
set the same value of a VG attribute (extent_size, alloc_policy, etc),
you'll see these 2 extraneous "is already" messages with vgcreate:
tools/lvm vgcreate vg2 /dev/loop2
Physical extent size of VG vg2 is already 4.00 MB
Volume group allocation policy is already normal
Volume group "vg2" successfully created
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Since we are using errno values, we should use '0' as a default value
which indicates a non-error, rather than defining some made-up default
value that is not defined in errno. If we need to deviate from errno
values, this will most likely indicate a flaw in our design.
Add prototypes for lvm_errno and lvm_errmsg inside lvm.h and provide
a basic description of their function. This fixes a couple compile
warnings.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
We provide a lock type that behaves like no_locking, but is not
clustered. Moreover, it also forbids any write locks. This magically (and
consistently) prevents use of clustered VGs, or changing local VGs with
--ignorelockingfailure. As a bonus, we can remove the special hacks in a few
places. Of course, people looking for trouble can always set their locking_type
to 0 to override.
Define the 5 main liblvm objects to be the pv, vg, lv, lvseg, and pvseg.
We need handles defined to all these objects in order for liblvm to be
equivalent to the reporting commands pvs, vgs, and lvs.
- move vg_t, lv_t, and pv_t from metadata-exported.h into lvm.h
- move lv_segment and pv_segment forward declarations into lvm.h
- add lvseg_t and pvseg_t to lvm.h
NOTE: We currently have an inconsistency in handle definitions.
lvm_t is defined as a pointer, while these other handles are just
structures. We should pick one scheme and be consistent - perhaps
define all handles as pointers (this is what I've seen elsewhere).
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
The checks for RESIZEABLE_VG should now be inside the various functions that
have to do such operations.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Remove READ_REQUIRE_RESIZEABLE flag from vgsplit similar to the removal from
vgextend. Move the check inside the functions that actually move pvs from
one vg structure to another. Should be no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
In the future we may export these functions or something like them in liblvm
For now this helps in cleaning up the checks for RESIZEABLE since we can
use the internal library function vg_bad_status_bits.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Move the check for the RESIZEABLE flag inside the vg_extend function.
When we consolidated the vg locking, reading, and status flag checking,
we tied the check for the RESIZEABLE flag to the vg_read() call. The problem
with this is you cannot know what other APIs the application my or may not
call after a vg_read() call. Thus the READ_REQUIRE_RESIZEABLE flag is not
really ideal - ideally we should be checking for this flag on a specific
operation, not inside the vg_read() call. This patch moves one check inside
the library.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
xlate64 produces unsigned long long type, but PRIu64 is defined
to accept argument unsigned long type (on 64-bit machines).
On existing machines, both types have the same size, so it works,
but it is still wrong and produces a warning.
Fix it by using a cast to uint64_t --- according to the standard,
PRIu64 argument matches type uint64_t.
Signed-off-by: Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>
With this change we now have vgcreate/vgextend liblvm functions.
Note that this changes the lock order of the following functions as the
orphan lock is now obtained first. With our policy of non-blocking
second locks, this should not be a problem.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Move the vg orphan lock inside vg_remove_single, now a complete liblvm
function. Note that this changes the order of the locks - originally
VG_ORPHAN was obtained first, then the vgname lock. With the current
policy of non-blocking second locks, this could mean we get a failure
obtaining the orphan lock. In the case of a vg with lvs being removed,
this could result in the lvs being removed but not the vg. Such a
scenario could have happened prior though with a different failure.
Other tools were examined for side-effects, and no major problems
were noted.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
