IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
When there are duplicate devices for a PV, one device
is preferred and chosen to exist in the VG. The other
devices are not used by lvm, but are displayed by pvs
with a new PV attr "d", indicating that they are
unchosen duplicate PVs.
The "duplicate" reporting field is set to "duplicate"
when the PV is an unchosen duplicate, and that field
is blank for the chosen PV.
Fix reporting of Fail thin-pool target status
as attr[8] letter 'F'.
Report 'needs_check' status from thin-pool target via
attr field [4] (letter 'c'/'C'), and also via CheckNeeded field.
TODO: think about better name here?
TODO: lots of prop_not_implemented_set
For example:
$ pvs -o pv_name,vg_name,pv_in_use
PV VG InUse
/dev/sda vg used
/dev/sdb
/dev/sdc used
(sda is part of vg - it's used
sdb is not part of vg - it's not used
sdc is part of vg, but MDAs missing - it's used)
Thin pool discard mode set in metadata can be different from the one
actually used if any device underneath does not support that mode. Add
kernel_discard report field to make it possible to see this difference.
Recognize date and time specification within selection criteria
that is formulated in a more free-form way besides to the original
basic YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM format that libdevmapper supports.
Currently, this free-form format is recognized for lv_time field.
Users are able to use expressions from this set:
- weekday names ("Sunday" - "Saturday" or abbreviated as "Sun" - "Sat")
- labels for points in time ("noon", "midnight")
- labels for a day relative to current day ("today", "yesterday")
- points back in time with relative offset from today (N is a number)
( "N" "seconds"/"minutes"/"hours"/"days"/"weeks"/"years" "ago")
( "N" "secs"/"mins"/"hrs" ... "ago")
( "N" "s"/"m"/"h" ... "ago")
- time specification either in hh:mm:ss format or with AM/PM suffixes
- month names ("January" - "December" or abbreviated as "Jan" - "Dec")
For example:
$ date
Fri Jul 3 10:11:13 CEST 2015
$ lvmconfig --type full report/time_format
time_format="%a %Y-%m-%d %T %z %Z [%s]"
$ lvs
LV VG Time
lvol0 vg Fri 2014-08-22 21:25:41 +0200 CEST [1408735541]
lvol2 vg Sun 2015-04-26 14:52:20 +0200 CEST [1430052740]
root fedora Wed 2015-05-27 08:09:21 +0200 CEST [1432706961]
swap fedora Wed 2015-05-27 08:09:21 +0200 CEST [1432706961]
lvol1 vg Tue 2015-06-30 03:25:43 +0200 CEST [1435627543]
lvol3 vg Tue 2015-06-30 14:52:23 +0200 CEST [1435668743]
lvol6 vg Wed 2015-07-01 13:35:56 +0200 CEST [1435750556]
lvol4 vg Thu 2015-07-02 12:12:02 +0200 CEST [1435831922]
lvol5 vg Thu 2015-07-02 14:30:32 +0200 CEST [1435840232]
$ lvs -S 'time=yesterday'
LV VG Time
lvol4 vg Thu 2015-07-02 12:12:02 +0200 CEST [1435831922]
lvol5 vg Thu 2015-07-02 14:30:32 +0200 CEST [1435840232]
$ lvs -S 'time since "June 30"'
LV VG Time
lvol1 vg Tue 2015-06-30 03:25:43 +0200 CEST [1435627543]
lvol3 vg Tue 2015-06-30 14:52:23 +0200 CEST [1435668743]
lvol6 vg Wed 2015-07-01 13:35:56 +0200 CEST [1435750556]
lvol4 vg Thu 2015-07-02 12:12:02 +0200 CEST [1435831922]
lvol5 vg Thu 2015-07-02 14:30:32 +0200 CEST [1435840232]
$ lvs -S 'time since "noon June 30"'
LV VG Time
lvol3 vg Tue 2015-06-30 14:52:23 +0200 CEST [1435668743]
lvol6 vg Wed 2015-07-01 13:35:56 +0200 CEST [1435750556]
lvol4 vg Thu 2015-07-02 12:12:02 +0200 CEST [1435831922]
lvol5 vg Thu 2015-07-02 14:30:32 +0200 CEST [1435840232]
$ lvs -S 'time since "2 July 9AM"'
LV VG Time
lvol4 vg Thu 2015-07-02 12:12:02 +0200 CEST [1435831922]
lvol5 vg Thu 2015-07-02 14:30:32 +0200 CEST [1435840232]
$ lvs -S 'time since "2 July 1PM"'
LV VG Time
lvol5 vg Thu 2015-07-02 14:30:32 +0200 CEST [1435840232]
...and so on.
This patch allows for registration and recognition of reserved
values which are ranges, so they're composed of two values actually
to denote the lower and upper bound for the range (stored as an array
with exactly two items to define the boundaries).
Also, this patch allows for flagging reserved values as named-only
which means that such values are not strictly reserved. The strictly
reserved values are reserved values as used before this patch.
Distinction between strictly-reserved and named-only values
is clearly visible with comparisons. Normally, strictly reserved
value is not accounted for if we do "greater than" or "lower than"
comparisons, for example:
1 2 3 ....
|
abc
- we have "abc" as reserved value for field with value "2"
- the value reported for the field is "abc" (or "2", it doesn't matter here)
- the selection we're processing is -S 'field < abc'
- the result of the selection gives nothing as "abc" is strictly
reserved value (bound to "2") and there's no order defined for
it and it would only match if we directly compared the value
(so -S 'field = abc' would match)
With named-only values, the "abc" is named-only value for "2",
so selection -S 'field < abc" is the same as using -S 'field < 2'.
The "abc" is just an alias for some value so the value or its
assigned name can be used equally in selection criteria.
Scenario:
$ vgs -o+vg_mda_copies
VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree #VMdaCps
fedora 1 2 0 wz--n- 9.51g 0 unmanaged
vg 16 9 0 wz--n- 1.94g 1.83g 2
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Rahead
lvol6 vg Vwi-a-tz-- 1.00g pool lvol5 0.00 auto
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Before this patch:
$vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies -S 'vg_mda_copies < unmanaged'
VG #VMdaCps
vg 2
Problem:
Reserved values can be only used with exact match = or !=, not <,<=,>,>=.
In the example above, the "unamanaged" is internally represented as
18446744073709551615, but this should be ignored while not comparing
field directly with "unmanaged" reserved name with = or !=. Users
should not be aware of this internal mapping of the reserved value
name to its internal value and hence it doesn't make sense for such
reserved value to take place in results of <,<=,> and >=.
There's no order defined for reserved values!!! It's a special
*reserved* value that is taken out of the usual value range
of that type.
This is very similar to what we have already fixed with
2f7f6932dc, but it's the other way round
now - we're using reserved value name in selection criteria now
(in the patch 2f7f693, we had concrete value and we compared it
with the reserved value). So this patch completes patch 2f7f693.
This patch also fixes this problem:
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7 -S 'read_ahead > 32k'
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Rahead
lvol6 vg Vwi-a-tz-- 1.00g pool lvol5 0.00 auto
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Problem:
In the example above, the internal reserved value "auto" is in the
range of selection "> 32k" - it shouldn't match as well. Here the
"auto" is internally represented as MAX_DBL and of course, numerically,
MAX_DBL > 256k. But for users, the reserved value should be uncomparable
to any number so the mapping of the reserved value name to its interna
value is transparent to users. Again, there's no order defined for
reserved values and hence it should never match if using <,<=,>,>=
operators.
This is actually exactly the same problem as already described in
2f7f6932dc, but that patch failed for
size field types because of incorrect internal representation used.
With this patch applied, both problematic scenarios mentioned
above are fixed now:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies -S 'vg_mda_copies < unmanaged'
(blank)
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7 -S 'read_ahead > 32k'
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Rahead
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Rename original lv_error_when_full field to lv_when_full and also
convert it from binary field to string field displaying three
possible values: "error", "queueu" or "" (blank for undefined).
$ lvs vg/pool vg/pool1 vg/linear_lv -o+lv_when_full
LV VG Attr LSize Data% Meta% WhenFull
linear_lv vg -wi-a----- 4.00m
pool vg twi-aotz-- 4.00m 0.00 0.98 queue
pool1 vg twi-a-tz-- 4.00m 0.00 0.88 error
For -S|--select these synonyms are recognized:
"error" -> "error when full", "error if no space"
"queue" -> "queue when full", "queue if no space"
"" -> "undefined"
Support error_if_no_space feature for thin pools.
Report more info about thinpool status:
(out_of_data (D), metadata_read_only (M), failed (F) also as health
attribute.)
Use helper macros to handle reserved values and also define "undefined"
reserved value as:
FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE(cache_policy, cache_policy_undef, "", "", "undefined")
Which means:
- print "" if the cache_policy value is undefined (the first name for this reserved value is "")
- recognize "undefined" reserved name as synonym to ""
(so statements like "lvs -S cache_policy=undefined" are still recognized)
Avoid making a copy of the keyword which is already registered in
values.h for "unmanaged" (vg_mda_copies field) and "auto" reserved
value (lv_read_ahead field). Also use helper macros to handle these
reserved - this is the correct approach - just do not copy the same
thing again and do not mix it! The GET_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE and
GET_FIRST_RESERVED_NAME macros guarantees this - use it!
In addition to that, rename reserved values:
vg_mda_copies --> vg_mda_copies_unmanaged
lv_read_ahead --> lv_read_ahead_auto
So the field reserved values follows this scheme:
"<field_name>_<reserved_value_name>".
The same applies for type reserved values with this scheme:
"<report type name in lowercase>_<reserved_value_name>"
Add a comment about this scheme for others to follow as well
when adding new fields and their reserved values. This makes
it a bit easier to read the code then.
RESERVED(id) --> GET_TYPE_RESERVED_VALUE(id)
FIRST_NAME(id) --> GET_FIRST_RESERVED_NAME(id)
Also add GET_FIELD_RESERVED_VALUE(id) macro to get per-field reserved value.
This makes it much more readable and hopefully it'll make it
easier to use these helper macros when adding new reporting
fields with reserved values if needed.
There was a bug in value and their synonym definition for these two fields
causing selections on these fields to not work correctly - nothing matched
against vg/lv_permissions fields even if selection criteria should have
matched.
Scenario:
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg
LV LPerms
lvol0 read-only
lvol1 writeable
Before this patch:
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=read-only'
(blank)
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=writeable
(blank)
With this patch applied:
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=read-only'
LV LPerms
lvol0 read-only
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=writeable'
LV LPerms
lvol1 writeable
Also synonyms match correctly now:
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=rw'
LV LPerms
lvol1 writeable
Like other binary fields we already have:
$ lvs -o name,zero vg/lvx vg/pool vg/pool1
LV Zero
lvx unknown
pool
pool1 zero
$ lvs -o name,zero vg/lvx vg/pool vg/pool1 --binary
LV Zero
lvx -1
pool 0
pool1 1
