IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This patch adds support for time values used in reporting fields.
The raw values are always stored as number of seconds since epoch.
The support that comes with this patch is the basic one which allows
only for recognition of strictly formatted date and time in selection
criteria (the format follows a subset of formats defined by ISO 8601):
date time timezone
date:
YYYY-MM-DD (or shortly YYYYMMDD)
YYYY-MM (shortly YYYYMM), auto DD=1
YYYY, auto MM=01 and DD=01
time:
hh:mm:ss (or shortly hhmmss)
hh:mm (or shortly hhmm), auto ss=0
hh (or shortly hh), auto mm=0, auto ss=0
timezone (always with + or - sign):
+hh:mm or -hh:mm (or shortly +hhmm or -hhmm)
+hh or -hh
Or directly the time (number of seconds) since Epoch (1970-01-01 00:00:00 UTC)
when the number value is prefixed by "@":
@number_of_seconds_since_epoch
This patch also adds aliases for comparison operators
used together with time values which are more intuitive
to use:
since (as alias for >=)
after (as alias for >)
until (as alias for <=)
before (as alias for <)
For example:
$ lvmconfig --type full report/time_format
time_format="%Y-%m-%d %T %z %Z [%s]"
$ lvs -o name,time vg
LV Time
lvol0 2015-06-28 21:25:41 +0200 CEST [1435519541]
lvol1 2015-06-30 03:25:43 +0200 CEST [1435627543]
lvol2 2015-04-26 14:52:20 +0200 CEST [1430052740]
lvol3 2015-06-30 14:52:23 +0200 CEST [1435668743]
$ lvs vg -o name,time -S 'time since "2015-04-26 15:00" && time until "2015-06-30"'
LV Time
lvol0 2015-06-28 21:25:41 +0200 CEST [1435519541]
lvol1 2015-06-30 03:25:43 +0200 CEST [1435627543]
lvol3 2015-06-30 14:52:23 +0200 CEST [1435668743]
$ lvs vg -o name,time -S 'time since "2015-04-26 15:00" && time until "2015-06-30 6:00"'
LV Time
lvol0 2015-06-28 21:25:41 +0200 CEST [1435519541]
lvol1 2015-06-30 03:25:43 +0200 CEST [1435627543]
$ lvs vg -o name,time -S 'time since @1435519541'
LV Time
lvol0 2015-06-28 21:25:41 +0200 CEST [1435519541]
lvol1 2015-06-30 03:25:43 +0200 CEST [1435627543]
lvol3 2015-06-30 14:52:23 +0200 CEST [1435668743]
This is basic time recognition support that is directly a part of
libdevmapper. Recognition of more free-form expressions will be a
part of subsequent patches.
This patch allows for registration and recognition of reserved
values which are ranges, so they're composed of two values actually
to denote the lower and upper bound for the range (stored as an array
with exactly two items to define the boundaries).
Also, this patch allows for flagging reserved values as named-only
which means that such values are not strictly reserved. The strictly
reserved values are reserved values as used before this patch.
Distinction between strictly-reserved and named-only values
is clearly visible with comparisons. Normally, strictly reserved
value is not accounted for if we do "greater than" or "lower than"
comparisons, for example:
1 2 3 ....
|
abc
- we have "abc" as reserved value for field with value "2"
- the value reported for the field is "abc" (or "2", it doesn't matter here)
- the selection we're processing is -S 'field < abc'
- the result of the selection gives nothing as "abc" is strictly
reserved value (bound to "2") and there's no order defined for
it and it would only match if we directly compared the value
(so -S 'field = abc' would match)
With named-only values, the "abc" is named-only value for "2",
so selection -S 'field < abc" is the same as using -S 'field < 2'.
The "abc" is just an alias for some value so the value or its
assigned name can be used equally in selection criteria.
There are reports of unexplained ioctl failures when using dmeventd.
An explanation might be that the wrong value of errno is being used.
Change libdevmapper to store an errno set by from dm ioctl() directly
and provide it to the caller through a new dm_task_get_errno() function.
[Replaced f9510548667754d9209b232348ccd2d806c0f1d8]
Introduce new implmentation of dm_task_get_info() function
with support for reading internal_suspend.
.
This time it is done in a 'versioned' way.
We keep the old fashion dm_task_get_info(Base) to implement
the old behavior of 1.02.95 libdm code.
libdm version 1.02.96 introduced 'macro' wrapper
dm_task_get_info_with_deferred_remove with new implementation
of dm_task_get_info() - we cannot do anything else then to
provide compatible version of this symbol.
Now in version 1.02.97 we add new versioned implementation of
dm_task_get_info(DM_1_02_97) symbol.
This has the effect that i.e. rpm build will finaly resolve proper
dependency on a new symbol - so it will be no longer possible,
to build a new binary and use old library
(rpm -q --provides will show libdevmapper.so.1.02(DM_1_02_97)(64bit))
Also the history is now tracked. If a new function is added (or
reimplemented), it needs to be placed in proper file,
so it could be exported with right versioning symbol.
File .exported_symbols.Base should and any existing older DM
should be treated as read-only after a release.
Also - only libdm has been currently enhanced with versioned .Base
file, as soon as other libs (liblvm, libdevmapper-event) needs changes
they should also get their exported symbol files - meanwhile
make.tmpl handles both cases.
Scenario:
$ vgs -o+vg_mda_copies
VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree #VMdaCps
fedora 1 2 0 wz--n- 9.51g 0 unmanaged
vg 16 9 0 wz--n- 1.94g 1.83g 2
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Rahead
lvol6 vg Vwi-a-tz-- 1.00g pool lvol5 0.00 auto
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Before this patch:
$vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies -S 'vg_mda_copies < unmanaged'
VG #VMdaCps
vg 2
Problem:
Reserved values can be only used with exact match = or !=, not <,<=,>,>=.
In the example above, the "unamanaged" is internally represented as
18446744073709551615, but this should be ignored while not comparing
field directly with "unmanaged" reserved name with = or !=. Users
should not be aware of this internal mapping of the reserved value
name to its internal value and hence it doesn't make sense for such
reserved value to take place in results of <,<=,> and >=.
There's no order defined for reserved values!!! It's a special
*reserved* value that is taken out of the usual value range
of that type.
This is very similar to what we have already fixed with
2f7f6932dc, but it's the other way round
now - we're using reserved value name in selection criteria now
(in the patch 2f7f693, we had concrete value and we compared it
with the reserved value). So this patch completes patch 2f7f693.
This patch also fixes this problem:
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7 -S 'read_ahead > 32k'
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Rahead
lvol6 vg Vwi-a-tz-- 1.00g pool lvol5 0.00 auto
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Problem:
In the example above, the internal reserved value "auto" is in the
range of selection "> 32k" - it shouldn't match as well. Here the
"auto" is internally represented as MAX_DBL and of course, numerically,
MAX_DBL > 256k. But for users, the reserved value should be uncomparable
to any number so the mapping of the reserved value name to its interna
value is transparent to users. Again, there's no order defined for
reserved values and hence it should never match if using <,<=,>,>=
operators.
This is actually exactly the same problem as already described in
2f7f6932dc, but that patch failed for
size field types because of incorrect internal representation used.
With this patch applied, both problematic scenarios mentioned
above are fixed now:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies -S 'vg_mda_copies < unmanaged'
(blank)
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7 -S 'read_ahead > 32k'
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Rahead
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
The new dm_report_object_is_selected fn makes it possible to opt whether the
object reported should be displayed on output or not. Also, in addition to
that, it makes it possible to save the result of selection (either 0 or 1).
So dm_report_object_is_selected is simply more general form of object
reporting fn - combinations now allow for:
dm_report_object_is_selected(rh, object, 1, NULL):
This is exactly the original dm_report_object fn and it's fully equal
to it.
dm_report_object_is_selected(rh, object, 0, selected):
Do not display the result on output, but save info whether the object
is selected or not in 'selected' variable.
dm_report_object_is_selected(rh, object, 1, selected):
Display the result on output (if it passes selection criteria) and save
whether the object is selected or not in 'selected' variable.
dm_report_object(rh, object, 0, NULL):
This combination is not allowed - it will end up with internal error.
We're either interested in selection status or we want to display the
result on output or both, but never nothing of the two.
Support error_if_no_space feature for thin pools.
Report more info about thinpool status:
(out_of_data (D), metadata_read_only (M), failed (F) also as health
attribute.)
Add new dm_report_compact_fields function to cause report outout
(dm_report_output) to ignore fields which don't have any value set
in any of the rows reported. This provides support for compact report
output where only fields which have something to report are displayed.
The dm_report_set_output_selection was not implemented in the end -
we have dm_report_init_with_selection instead. This is just a remnant
from development code that got into libdevmapper.h by mistake.
Support new PASSTHROUGH 'feature' flag.
Add dm_config_node to pass in policy args.
Really use origin_uuid instead of using extra call
to pass seg_areas.
Switch to 64bit feature flag bit set so there is
enough space in future for new bits...
When transaction_id is set 0 for thin-pool, libdm avoids validation
of thin-pool, unless there are real messages to be send to thin-pool.
This relaxes strict policy which always required to know
in front transaction_id for the kernel target.
It now allows to activate thin-pool with any transaction_id
(when transaction_id is passed in)
It is now upto application to validate transaction_id from life
thin-pool volume with transaction_id within it's own metadata.
Some values are reserved for special purpose like 'undefined', 'unmanaged' etc.
When using >, <, >= and < comparison operators where the range is considered,
do not include reserved values as proper values in this range which
would otherwise result in not so obvious criteria match (as the reserved value is
actually transparent for the user). It's incorrect.
Example scenario:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2
VG #VMdaCps
vg1 1
vg2 unmanaged
The "unmanaged" is actually mapped onto reserved value
18446744073709551615 (2^64 - 1) internally.
Such reseved value is already caught on selection criteria input
properly:
$ vgs -o name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies=18446744073709551615'
Numeric value 18446744073709551615 found in selection is reserved.
However, we still need to fix situaton where the reserved value may be
included in resulting range:
Before this patch:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies >= 1'
VG #VMdaCps
vg1 1
vg2 unmanaged
With this patch applied:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies >= 1'
VG #VMdaCps
vg1 1
From the examples above, we can see that without this patch applied,
the vg_mda_copies >= 1 also matched the reserved value 18446744073709551615
(which is represented by the "unamanged" string on report). When
applying the operators, such values must be skipped! They're meant to
be matched only against their string representation only, e.g.:
$ vgs -o name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies=unmanaged'
VG #VMdaCps
vg2 unmanaged
...or any synonyms:
$ vgs -o name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies=undefined'
VG #VMdaCps
vg2 unmanaged
