IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Some signatures are spread around the disk in several copies, mainly for
backup. Make libblkid to detect these extra copies - there was missing
"blkid_probe_step_back" fn call after successful wipe of previous signature
copy.
An example with FAT table which has copies:
$ mkfs.vfat /dev/sda1
Before this patch:
$ pvcreate /dev/sda1
WARNING: vfat signature detected on /dev/sda1 at offset 54. Wipe it? [y/n]: y
Wiping vfat signature on /dev/sda1.
Physical volume "/dev/sda1" successfully created
With this patch applied:
$ pvcreate /dev/sda1
WARNING: vfat signature detected on /dev/sda1 at offset 54. Wipe it? [y/n]: y
Wiping vfat signature on /dev/sda1.
WARNING: vfat signature detected on /dev/sda1 at offset 0. Wipe it? [y/n]: y
Wiping vfat signature on /dev/sda1.
WARNING: vfat signature detected on /dev/sda1 at offset 510. Wipe it? [y/n]: y
Wiping vfat signature on /dev/sda1.
Physical volume "/dev/sda1" successfully created
If lvmlockd is running, lvmetad is configured (use_lvmetad=1),
but lvmetad is not running, then commands will seg fault
when trying to send a message to lvmetad.
The difference is lvmetad being "active", not just "used".
We already have pv_count to report number of PVs that a VG has based
on metadata.
This patch exposes the information about how many of these PVs are
missing which is also useful information for a VG. Wwe could count
the sum of pv_missing reporting fields for each PV in the VG before,
but the new field is practical when reporting VG as a whole and there's
no need to process each PV from VG alone.
If 'vgcreate --shared' finds both sanlock and dlm are running,
print a more accurate error message:
"Found multiple lock managers, select one with --lock-type."
When neither is running, we still print:
"Failed to detect a running lock manager to select lock type."
Also, leave out the note about "circular buffer" which is
an internal imeplementation detail anyway and not quite
informational for users:
Before this patch:
$ vgcreate vg1 /dev/sda
VG vg1 metadata too large for circular buffer
Failed to write VG vg1.
With this patch applied:
$ vgcreate vg1 /dev/sda
VG vg1 metadata too large: size of metadata to write is 691 bytes while PV metadata area size on /dev/sda is 512 bytes.
Failed to write VG vg1.
Before this patch:
$ lvs -a -o name,layout,role test/lvmlock
LV Layout Role
[lvmlock] linear public
With this patch applied:
$ lvs -a -o name,layout,role test/lvmlock
LV Layout Role
[lvmlock] linear private,lockd,sanlock
Add metadata_devices and seg_metadata_le_ranges report fields.
Currently only defined for raid, but should probably be extended
to all other segment types that don't report all their device
usage in the 'devices' field.
When lvmetad_pvscan_vg() reads VG metadata from each PV,
it compares it to the last one to verify it matches.
If the VG metadata does not match on the PVs, an error
is printed and it fails to read the VG. In this error
case, use log_debug to show the differences between
the two unmatching copies of the metadata.
One host changes a VG, making the cached VG on another
host invalid. The other host then rereads the VG from
disk to get the latest copy. If the first host removed
a PV from the VG, the second host attempts to reread the
VG from old PV when rescanning. Reading the VG from the
removed PV fails, causing vg_read to return "VG not found".
The fix is to simply not fail when a VG is not found while
rereading a PV and continue without it.
(This doesn't happen if the second host happens to first
run a command like 'vgs' that triggers a global revalidation
of metadata.)
vgchange --lock-type iterates through LVs to ensure
no LVs are active before changing the lock type of
the VG, but the loop was not checking that an LV
actually has a lock before trying it, so it would
fail if the VG had any LVs that don't use locks,
e.g it would fail on a tmeta LV from a pool.
When using lvm shell, some structures which are cached in memory may be
reused. This happens for the struct label (a part of lvmcache_info
structure) when lvmetad is used in which case the PV scan is not
done that would normally overwrite these label structures in memory
and making them up-to-date.
This is all consequence of the fact that struct lvmcache_info and
struct label are not always assigned in the same part of the code.
For example, if lvmetad *is not* used, parts of the struct label are
reassigned in label_read fn while struct lvmcache_info is created
elsewhere. No part of the code reused struct label (and its "dev"
field) before calling label_read fn. That's why the real bug is
hidden when using lvm shell without lvmetad.
However, with lvmetad and lvm shell, the situation is a bit different.
The label_read fn is not called if lvmetad *is* used, hence the
struct label may have ended up not initialized properly.
There was missing assignment for the dev field in struct label
in _text_pv_write fn which caused this problem to appear in
lvm shell with lvmetad, for example:
Before this patch:
lvm> pvcreate /dev/sda
Physical volume "/dev/sda" successfully created
lvm> pvs /dev/sda
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
unknown device lvm2 --- 128.00m 128.00m
With this patch applied:
lvm> pvcreate /dev/sda
Physical volume "/dev/sda" successfully created
lvm> pvs /dev/sda
PV VG Fmt Attr PSize PFree
/dev/sda lvm2 --- 128.00m 128.00m
Also, this problem had not appeared before changes introduced
by commits e1a63905d1 through
3a6f91d713 which, among other
things, added proper label field type reporting. Before, label
reporting was the same as using struct physical_volume which
has its own dev field assigned and so this problem was not exposed.
When a command does a sequence of
vg_write + vg_commit + vg_write + vg_commit,
initialization of non-PV devices happens during the
first vg_write, and does not need to be repeated by
the second vg_write.
When creating a lockd VG, this sequence occurs because
the VG is first created, then the lockd data is created,
then the lockd data is then written to the VG metadata.
