IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The lvchange-raid[456].sh test checks that mismatches can be detected
properly. It does this by writing garbage to the back half of one of
the legs directly. When performing a "check" or "repair" of mismatches,
MD does a good job going directly to disk and bypassing any buffers that
may prevent it from seeing mismatches. However, in the case of RAID4/5/6
we have the stripe cache to contend with and this is not bypassed. Thus,
mismatches which have /just/ happened to an area that now populates the
stripe cache may be overlooked. This isn't a serious issue, however,
because the stripe cache is short-lived and reasonably small. So, while
there may be a small window of time between the disk changing underneath
the RAID array and when you run a "check"/"repair" - causing a mismatch
to be missed - that would be no worse than if a user had simply run a
"check" a few seconds before the disk changed. IOW, it simply isn't worth
making a fuss over dropping the stripe cache before beginning a "check" or
"repair" (which we actually did attempt to do a while back).
So, to get the test running smoothly, we simply deactivate and reactivate
the LV to force the stripe cache to be dropped and then proceed. We could
just as easily wait a few seconds for the stripe cache to empty also.
When a "recover" is just starting for a RAID LV, it is possible to get
"idle" for the sync action if the status is issued quickly enough. This
is fine, the MD thread just hasn't gotten things going yet. However,
the /need/ for a "recover" should be marked in md->recovery and it would
be simple enough to fix the kernel so this doesn't happen. May eventually
want a separate bug for this, but for now it fits with RHBZ 1507719.
There are two known bugs in the lvconvert-raid-status-validation.sh
test. The first one I consider to be more of an annoyance (1507719).
The second one I consider to be more serious (1507729).
RHBZ 1507719 simply documents the fact that the three RAID status
fields may not always be coherent due to the way they are set and
unset when the MD thread is shutting down and starting up. For
example, the sync ratio may be 100% but the sync action may not
yet have switched to "idle" and the health characters may not yet
all be 'A's (i.e. the devices set to InSync).
RHBZ 1507729 is more serious. The sync ratio can be 100% for a
short period of time after upconverting linear -> RAID1. It is
reset to 0 once the MD sync thread gets to work on it. It does
this because, technically, the array /is/ in-sync if the new
devices are excluded - i.e. the data is 100% available and
consistent. I'm not sure what to do about this problem, but we'd
much rather not have this state that looks exactly like the
end of the process when the sync ratio is 100% because the
"recover" process finished, but the sync action and health
characters haven't been updated yet. Put simply, the problem
is that we can't tell if a sync is starting or finished based
on the status output.
Preload reiserfs module for the case, fs is present/compiled for a
kernel but it's not present in memory.
Size reducition needs --yes confirmation to preceed for reiserfs.
Correct reported message when thin snapshot has been already merged.
So lvm2 is no longer reporting "Mergins of snapshot X will occur..."
(even with swapped names).
the bug in LUKS grow/shrink decision in fsadm was
masked due to fact that default LVM2 extent size
was larger than LUKS1 default data offset for dm-crypt
mapping. The new test address this bug.
Fix code checking that the 2nd mda which is at the end of disk really
fits the available free space and avoid any DA and MDA interleaving when
we already have DA preallocated. This mainly applies when we're restoring
a PV from VG backup using pvcreate --restorefile where we may already have
some DA preallocated - this means the PV was in a VG before with already
allocated space from it (the LVs were created). Hence we need to avoid
stepping into DA - the MDA can never ever be inside in such case!
The code responsible for this calculation was already in
_text_pv_add_metadata_area fn, but it had a bug in the calculation where
we subtracted one more sector by mistake and then the code could still
incorrectly allocate the MDA inside existing DA. The patch also renames
the variable in the code so it doesn't confuse us in future.
Also, if the 2nd mda doesn't fit, don't silently continue with just 1
MDA (at the start of the disk). If 2nd mda was requested and we can't
create that due to unavailable space, error out correctly (the patch
also adds a test to shell/pvcreate-operation.sh for this case).
Add missing get_devs.
When $7 is not given use empty string.
See if we can live with less RAM disk for PVs.
Drop limitation on single core as presence 1.12 should address this.
Possible misspelling: FAILED_MIXED_STR may not be assigned, but FAIL_MIXED_STR is.
Possible misspelling: FAILED_MULTI_STR may not be assigned, but FAIL_MULTI_STR is.
Possible misspelling: FAILED_BLACK_STR may not be assigned, but FAIL_BLACK_STR is.
New tests to add checking for '100%' in-sync at start of "recover"
process (it shouldn't happen, but I've seen it before). Also,
check status over the whole cycle of various sync processes ("resync"
and "recover").
First test in this file checks whether 'aa' is ever spotted during
a "recover" operation (it should not be). More tests should follow
in this file to look for oddities in status output - especially as
it relates to the sync_ratio, dev_health, and sync_action fields.
For the test clean-up, I was providing too many devices to the first
command - possibly allowing it to allocate in the wrong place. I was
also not providing a device for the second command - virtually ensuring
the test was not performing correctly at times.
This patch ensures that under normal conditions (i.e. not during repair
operations) that users are prevented from removing devices that would
cause data loss.
When a RAID1 is undergoing its initial sync, it is ok to remove all but
one of the images because they have all existed since creation and
contain all the data written since the array was created. OTOH, if the
RAID1 was created as a result of an up-convert from linear, it is very
important not to let the user remove the primary image (the source of
all the data). They should be allowed to remove any devices they want
and as many as they want as long as one original (primary) device is left
during a "recover" (aka up-convert).
This fixes bug 1461187 and includes the necessary regression tests.
Two of the sync actions performed by the kernel (aka MD runtime) are
"resync" and "recover". The "resync" refers to when an entirely new array
is going through the process of initializing (or resynchronizing after an
unexpected shutdown). The "recover" is the process of initializing a new
member device to the array. So, a brand new array with all new devices
will undergo "resync". An array with replaced or added sub-LVs will undergo
"recover".
These two states are treated very differently when failures happen. If any
device is lost or replaced while "resync", there are no worries. This is
because any writes created from the inception of the array have occurred to
all the devices and can be safely recovered. Even though non-initialized
portions will still be resync'ed with uninitialized data, it is ok. However,
if a pre-existing device is lost (aka, the original linear device in a
linear -> raid1 convert) during a "recover", data loss can be the result.
Thus, writes are errored by the kernel and recovery is halted. The failed
device must be restored or removed. This is the correct behavior.
Unfortunately, we were treating an up-convert from linear as a "resync"
when we should have been treating it as a "recover". This patch
removes the special case for linear upconvert. It allows each new image
sub-LV to be marked with a rebuild flag and treats the array as 'in-sync'.
This has the correct effect of causing the upconvert to be treated as a
"recover" rather than a "resync". There is no need to flag these two states
differently in LVM metadata, because they are already considered differently
by the kernel RAID metadata. (Any activation/deactivation will properly
resume the "recover" process and not a "resync" process.)
We make this behavior change based on the presense of dm-raid target
version 1.9.0+.
Code path missed validation of lvcreate --cachepool argument.
If the non cache-pool LV was passed in, code has still continued
further work and failed later on internal error. Validate this
condition at right place now.
