IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
New tests to add checking for '100%' in-sync at start of "recover"
process (it shouldn't happen, but I've seen it before). Also,
check status over the whole cycle of various sync processes ("resync"
and "recover").
First test in this file checks whether 'aa' is ever spotted during
a "recover" operation (it should not be). More tests should follow
in this file to look for oddities in status output - especially as
it relates to the sync_ratio, dev_health, and sync_action fields.
For the test clean-up, I was providing too many devices to the first
command - possibly allowing it to allocate in the wrong place. I was
also not providing a device for the second command - virtually ensuring
the test was not performing correctly at times.
This patch ensures that under normal conditions (i.e. not during repair
operations) that users are prevented from removing devices that would
cause data loss.
When a RAID1 is undergoing its initial sync, it is ok to remove all but
one of the images because they have all existed since creation and
contain all the data written since the array was created. OTOH, if the
RAID1 was created as a result of an up-convert from linear, it is very
important not to let the user remove the primary image (the source of
all the data). They should be allowed to remove any devices they want
and as many as they want as long as one original (primary) device is left
during a "recover" (aka up-convert).
This fixes bug 1461187 and includes the necessary regression tests.
Two of the sync actions performed by the kernel (aka MD runtime) are
"resync" and "recover". The "resync" refers to when an entirely new array
is going through the process of initializing (or resynchronizing after an
unexpected shutdown). The "recover" is the process of initializing a new
member device to the array. So, a brand new array with all new devices
will undergo "resync". An array with replaced or added sub-LVs will undergo
"recover".
These two states are treated very differently when failures happen. If any
device is lost or replaced while "resync", there are no worries. This is
because any writes created from the inception of the array have occurred to
all the devices and can be safely recovered. Even though non-initialized
portions will still be resync'ed with uninitialized data, it is ok. However,
if a pre-existing device is lost (aka, the original linear device in a
linear -> raid1 convert) during a "recover", data loss can be the result.
Thus, writes are errored by the kernel and recovery is halted. The failed
device must be restored or removed. This is the correct behavior.
Unfortunately, we were treating an up-convert from linear as a "resync"
when we should have been treating it as a "recover". This patch
removes the special case for linear upconvert. It allows each new image
sub-LV to be marked with a rebuild flag and treats the array as 'in-sync'.
This has the correct effect of causing the upconvert to be treated as a
"recover" rather than a "resync". There is no need to flag these two states
differently in LVM metadata, because they are already considered differently
by the kernel RAID metadata. (Any activation/deactivation will properly
resume the "recover" process and not a "resync" process.)
We make this behavior change based on the presense of dm-raid target
version 1.9.0+.
Code path missed validation of lvcreate --cachepool argument.
If the non cache-pool LV was passed in, code has still continued
further work and failed later on internal error. Validate this
condition at right place now.
With recent updates for thin pool monitoring in version 169
we lost multiple WARNINGs to be printed in syslog, when
pool crossed 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%.
Restore this logic as we want to keep user informed more
then just once when 80% boundary is passed.
If the device size does not match the size requested
by --setphysicalvolumesize, then prompt the user.
Make the pvcreate checking/prompting code handle
multiple prompts for the same device, since the
new prompt can be in addition to the existing
prompt when the PV is in a VG.
