IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
While the 'raid1/10' segment types were being handled inadvertently
by '_move_mirrors()', the parity RAIDs were not being properly checked
to ensure that the user had specified all necessary PVs when moving
them. Thus, internal errors were being triggered when only part of
a RAID LV was moved to the new VG. I've added a new function,
'_move_raid()', which properly checks over any affected RAID LVs and
ensures that all the necessary PVs are being moved.
vgsplit of RAID volumes was problematic because the metadata area
and data areas were always on the same PVs. This problem is similar
to one that was just fixed for mirrors that had log and images sharing
a PV (commit 9ac858f). We can now add RAID LVs to the tests for
vgsplit.
Note that there still seems to be an issue when specifying an
incomplete set of PVs when moving RAID LVs.
Given a named mirror LV, vgsplit will look for the PVs that compose it
and move them to a new VG. It does this by first looking at the log
and then the legs. If the log is on the same device as one of the mirror
images, a problem occurs. This is because the PV is moved to the new VG
as the log is processed and thus cannot be found in the current VG when
the image is processed. The solution is to check and see if the PV we are
looking for has already been moved to the new VG. If so, it is not an
error.
Since the kill may take various amount of time,
(especially when running with valgrind)
check it's really pvmoved LV.
Restore initial restart of clvmd - it's currently
broken at various moments - basically killed lvm2
command may leave clvmd and confusing state leading
to reports of internal errors.
TODO:
It seems commit 7e685e6c70
has changed the old logic, when 'pvs device_name' used
to work. (regression from 2.02.104)
Currently put in extra pvscan.
