IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Scenario:
$ vgs -o+vg_mda_copies
VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree #VMdaCps
fedora 1 2 0 wz--n- 9.51g 0 unmanaged
vg 16 9 0 wz--n- 1.94g 1.83g 2
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Rahead
lvol6 vg Vwi-a-tz-- 1.00g pool lvol5 0.00 auto
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Before this patch:
$vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies -S 'vg_mda_copies < unmanaged'
VG #VMdaCps
vg 2
Problem:
Reserved values can be only used with exact match = or !=, not <,<=,>,>=.
In the example above, the "unamanaged" is internally represented as
18446744073709551615, but this should be ignored while not comparing
field directly with "unmanaged" reserved name with = or !=. Users
should not be aware of this internal mapping of the reserved value
name to its internal value and hence it doesn't make sense for such
reserved value to take place in results of <,<=,> and >=.
There's no order defined for reserved values!!! It's a special
*reserved* value that is taken out of the usual value range
of that type.
This is very similar to what we have already fixed with
2f7f6932dc, but it's the other way round
now - we're using reserved value name in selection criteria now
(in the patch 2f7f693, we had concrete value and we compared it
with the reserved value). So this patch completes patch 2f7f693.
This patch also fixes this problem:
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7 -S 'read_ahead > 32k'
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Data% Rahead
lvol6 vg Vwi-a-tz-- 1.00g pool lvol5 0.00 auto
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Problem:
In the example above, the internal reserved value "auto" is in the
range of selection "> 32k" - it shouldn't match as well. Here the
"auto" is internally represented as MAX_DBL and of course, numerically,
MAX_DBL > 256k. But for users, the reserved value should be uncomparable
to any number so the mapping of the reserved value name to its interna
value is transparent to users. Again, there's no order defined for
reserved values and hence it should never match if using <,<=,>,>=
operators.
This is actually exactly the same problem as already described in
2f7f6932dc, but that patch failed for
size field types because of incorrect internal representation used.
With this patch applied, both problematic scenarios mentioned
above are fixed now:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies -S 'vg_mda_copies < unmanaged'
(blank)
$ lvs -o+read_ahead vg/lvol6 vg/lvol7 -S 'read_ahead > 32k'
LV VG Attr LSize Pool Origin Rahead
lvol7 vg Vwi---tz-k 1.00g pool lvol6 256.00k
Dop unused value assignments.
Unknown is detected via other combination
(!linear && !striped).
Also change the log_error() message into a warning,
since the function is not really returning error,
but still keep the INTERNAL_ERROR.
Ret value is always set later.
The new dm_report_object_is_selected fn makes it possible to opt whether the
object reported should be displayed on output or not. Also, in addition to
that, it makes it possible to save the result of selection (either 0 or 1).
So dm_report_object_is_selected is simply more general form of object
reporting fn - combinations now allow for:
dm_report_object_is_selected(rh, object, 1, NULL):
This is exactly the original dm_report_object fn and it's fully equal
to it.
dm_report_object_is_selected(rh, object, 0, selected):
Do not display the result on output, but save info whether the object
is selected or not in 'selected' variable.
dm_report_object_is_selected(rh, object, 1, selected):
Display the result on output (if it passes selection criteria) and save
whether the object is selected or not in 'selected' variable.
dm_report_object(rh, object, 0, NULL):
This combination is not allowed - it will end up with internal error.
We're either interested in selection status or we want to display the
result on output or both, but never nothing of the two.
Support error_if_no_space feature for thin pools.
Report more info about thinpool status:
(out_of_data (D), metadata_read_only (M), failed (F) also as health
attribute.)
API for seg reporting is breaking internal lvm coding - it cannot
use vgmem mem pool for allocation of reported value.
So use separate pool instead of 'vgmem' for non vg related allocations
Add consts for many function params - but still many other are left
for now as non-const - needs deeper level of change even on libdm side.
We only checked global per-report-type reserved values for compatibility
with selection code. This patch also adds a check for per-report-field
reserved values. This avoids problems where unsupported report type is
used as reserved value which could cause hard to debug problems
otherwise. So this additional check stops from registering unsupported
and unhandled per-field reserved values.
Registerting such unsupported reserved value is a programmatic error,
so report internal error in this case to stop us from making a mistake
here in the future or even today where STR_LIST fields can't have
reserved values yet.
Under certain circumstances, the selection code can segfault:
$ vgs --select 'pv_name=~/dev/sda' --unbuffered vg0
VG #PV #LV #SN Attr VSize VFree
vg0 6 3 0 wz--n- 744.00m 588.00m
Segmentation fault (core dumped)
The problem here is the use of --ubuffered together with regex used in
selection criteria. If the report output is not buffered, each row is
discarded as soon as it is reported. The bug is in the use of report
handle's memory - in the example above, what happens is:
1) report handle is initialized together with its memory pool
2) selection tree is initialized from selection criteria string
(using the report handle's memory pool!)
2a) this also means the regex is initialized from report handle's mem pool
3) the object (row) is reported
3a) any memory needed for output is intialized out of report handle's mem pool
3b) selection criteria matching is executed - if the regex is checked the
very first time (for the very first row reported), some more memory
allocation happens as regex allocates internal structures "on-demand",
it's allocating from report handle's mem pool (see also step 2a)
4) the report output is executed
5) the object (row) is discarded, meaning discarding all the mem pool
memory used since step 3.
Now, with step 5) we have discarded the regex internal structures from step 3b.
When we execute reporting for another object (row), we're using the same
selection criteria (step 3b), but tihs is second time we're using the regex
and as such, it's already initialized completely. But the regex is missing the
internal structures now as they got discarded in step 5) from previous
object (row) reporting (because we're using "unbuffered" reporting).
To resolve this issue and to prevent any similar future issues where each
object/row memory is discarded after output (the unbuffered reporting) while
selection tree is global for all the object/rows, use separate memory pool
for report's selection.
This patch replaces "struct selection_node *selection_root" in struct
dm_report with new struct selection which contains both "selection_root"
and "mem" for separate mem pool used for selection.
We can change struct dm_report this way as it is not exposed via libdevmapper.
(This patch will have even more meaning for upcoming patches where selection
is used even for non-reporting commands where "internal" reporting and
selection criteria matching happens and where the internal reporting is
not buffered.)
Add new dm_report_compact_fields function to cause report outout
(dm_report_output) to ignore fields which don't have any value set
in any of the rows reported. This provides support for compact report
output where only fields which have something to report are displayed.
The dm_report_set_output_selection was not implemented in the end -
we have dm_report_init_with_selection instead. This is just a remnant
from development code that got into libdevmapper.h by mistake.
The order of the resulting tree is based on the first appearance of
sections. With no section repeats, the sections stay as listed in the
config file. Sections using the brace syntax 'section { key = value }' are
treated the same way: 'section { x = 1 } section { y = 2 }' is the same as
'section/x = 1 section/y = 2' is the same as 'section { x = 1 y = 2 }'
Do not use 'any' policy name as a value in config tree - so we stick
with 'policy_settings' and extra 'policy_name' for libdm params.
Update lvm2 API as well.
Example of supported metadata:
policy = "mq"
policy_settings {
migration_threshold = 2048
sequential_threshold = 512
random_threshold = 4
read_promote_adjustment = 10
}
Support new PASSTHROUGH 'feature' flag.
Add dm_config_node to pass in policy args.
Really use origin_uuid instead of using extra call
to pass seg_areas.
Switch to 64bit feature flag bit set so there is
enough space in future for new bits...
When transaction_id is set 0 for thin-pool, libdm avoids validation
of thin-pool, unless there are real messages to be send to thin-pool.
This relaxes strict policy which always required to know
in front transaction_id for the kernel target.
It now allows to activate thin-pool with any transaction_id
(when transaction_id is passed in)
It is now upto application to validate transaction_id from life
thin-pool volume with transaction_id within it's own metadata.
Some values are reserved for special purpose like 'undefined', 'unmanaged' etc.
When using >, <, >= and < comparison operators where the range is considered,
do not include reserved values as proper values in this range which
would otherwise result in not so obvious criteria match (as the reserved value is
actually transparent for the user). It's incorrect.
Example scenario:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2
VG #VMdaCps
vg1 1
vg2 unmanaged
The "unmanaged" is actually mapped onto reserved value
18446744073709551615 (2^64 - 1) internally.
Such reseved value is already caught on selection criteria input
properly:
$ vgs -o name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies=18446744073709551615'
Numeric value 18446744073709551615 found in selection is reserved.
However, we still need to fix situaton where the reserved value may be
included in resulting range:
Before this patch:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies >= 1'
VG #VMdaCps
vg1 1
vg2 unmanaged
With this patch applied:
$ vgs -o vg_name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies >= 1'
VG #VMdaCps
vg1 1
From the examples above, we can see that without this patch applied,
the vg_mda_copies >= 1 also matched the reserved value 18446744073709551615
(which is represented by the "unamanged" string on report). When
applying the operators, such values must be skipped! They're meant to
be matched only against their string representation only, e.g.:
$ vgs -o name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies=unmanaged'
VG #VMdaCps
vg2 unmanaged
...or any synonyms:
$ vgs -o name,vg_mda_copies vg1 vg2 -S 'vg_mda_copies=undefined'
VG #VMdaCps
vg2 unmanaged
This is probably better approach than 3880ca5eca.
If dm module is not loaded during dm_is_dm_major call, there are no
lines for dm in /proc/devices, of course. Normally, dm_is_dm_major
is called to check existing devices, hence if module is not loaded,
we can expect there's no DM device present at the same time so we
can directly return 0 here (meaning the major number being inspected
is not dm device's one).
See also https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1059711.
For dm_is_dm_major to determine whether the major number given as
an argument belongs to a DM device, libdm code needs to know what
the actual DM major is to do the comparison.
It may happen that the dm-mod module is not loaded during this
call and so for the completness let's try our best before we start
giving various errors - we can still make use of dm-mod autoloading,
though only since kernels 2.6.36 where this feature was introduced.
Commit 94786a3bbf introduced
another bug - since sscanf needs extra 1 byte for \0.
Since there is no easy way to do a macro evaluation for (PATH_MAX-1)
and string concatation of this number to get resulting (%4095s) - let's
go with easiest path and restore extra byte for 0.
Other option would be to prepare sscanf parsing string in runtime.
But lets resolve it when we look at PATH_MAX handling later...
Add extra safety detection for thin pool transaction id
and query pool status after confirmed message.
In case there is a missmatch, immeditelly abort further
processing.
