IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Since the usability problem were fixed, we can use this function.
Cleanup orphan LVs with TEMPORARY flags
(reduces couple blkid error reports, but couple of them
is still left...)
Since cache segment is purely virtual mapping, it has nothing for
discard. Discardable is cache origin here which is now
properly removed on 'delete' phase.
Plain lv_empty() call needs to only detach cache origin and leave
origin unchanged.
This test for LV name restriction check name of device is below 128
chars (which is enforced by dm target).
Thus it should not count with device name.
(Though the test for PATH_MAX size should be probably also added,
but this is runtime test, since theoretically devpath might differ in cluster)
It's unclear why we should prohibit use of -v output.
So reenable (like with other 'display' tools)
But -c -m is really unsupported - return invalid cmd.
Sort order for -C|--columns as with other options,
and use short capital name as the first (as with other options).
Also drop multiple reference for pvs/lvs/vgs, since now
the text for -C is really close to referrence of lvm anyway.
TODO:
It seems commit 7e685e6c70
has changed the old logic, when 'pvs device_name' used
to work. (regression from 2.02.104)
Currently put in extra pvscan.
Drop unused passed cmd pointer from function.
TODO:
We have two similar functions (though not identical)
lv_manip.c: for_each_sub_lv()
metadata.c: _lv_each_dependency()
They seem to not always match - we should probably convert
to use only a single function.
Use proper vgmem memory pool for allocation of LV name in the vg
and check if new renamed LV is a valid name.
TODO: validation should really use also VG name, othewise we are not
able to tell "vgname-lvname" will be valid.
