IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Full changes
- Fix vgextend error path when lock_vol(VG_ORPHANS) fails
- Move lock_vol(VG_ORPHANS) before archive(vg) - safe & simpler error paths
- Remove legacy comment/code that no longer applies
Found in review - Milan Broz <mbroz@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Adds pe_align_offset to 'struct physical_volume'; is initialized with
set_pe_align_offset(). After pe_start is established pe_align_offset is
added to it.
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
After some refactorings, we can now move the bulk of _lvcreate into the
internal library, and we can call from liblvm. In the future, we should
refactor lv_create_single further, probably by segtype, to reduce the
size of struct lvcreate_params. For now this is a reasonable refactor
and allows us to re-use the function from liblvm.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
The main _lvcreate function should deal with extents - the 'size' parameter
is just an intermediate step.
Should be no functional change.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Create a new structure, lvcreate_cmdline_params, to store parameters only
relevant for the cmdline, not the library call to lvcreate.
Should be no functional change.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Move extents calculation adjustments into their own local functions
right after we read the vg. This calculation really is not part of
the LV create function but is rather an adjustment to the parameters
based on what is given on the cmdline. So we move it outside the main
_lvcreate.
Should be no functional change.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
A couple simple refactorings of _lvcreate - should be no functional change.
Move tags_ARG parsing into _lvcreate_params. Also use lp->voriginsize
instread of arg_count(). These refactorings make it easier to move the
bulk of _lvcreate into the library.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
The implicit pvcreate require either moving the ORPHAN_VG lock outside
pvcreate_single or somehow having the function know or detect whether
the ORPHAN_VG lock is already held.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
In preparation for implicit pvcreate during vgcreate / vgextend,
move bulk of pvcreate logic inside library.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
We must hold the VG_ORPHAN lock until we commit to disk. Otherwise,
we risk a race condition on vgcreate / vgextend. Reverts the following
commit:
commit 72a41480ba
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Date: Fri Jul 10 20:09:21 2009 +0000
Move orphan lock obtain/release inside vg_extend().
With this change we now have vgcreate/vgextend liblvm functions.
Note that this changes the lock order of the following functions as the
orphan lock is now obtained first. With our policy of non-blocking
second locks, this should not be a problem.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
We provide a lock type that behaves like no_locking, but is not
clustered. Moreover, it also forbids any write locks. This magically (and
consistently) prevents use of clustered VGs, or changing local VGs with
--ignorelockingfailure. As a bonus, we can remove the special hacks in a few
places. Of course, people looking for trouble can always set their locking_type
to 0 to override.
In _process_one_vg, we should never proceed if the VG read fails with certain
conditions. If we cannot allocate or construct the volume_group structure,
we should not proceed - this is true regardless of the tool calling the
iterator. In other cases, when the volume group structure is constructed but
there is some error (PVs missing, metadata corrupted, etc), some tools may
want to process the VG while others may not.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
In vg_backup_single, we should error out if we vg_read_error(vg) and the
error code we received was anything other than FAILED_INCONSISTENT.
Original code contained an error because C operator precedence.
Note - this was part of the vg_read() so no WHATS_NEW entry neceesary.
Author: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Remove READ_REQUIRE_RESIZEABLE flag from vgsplit similar to the removal from
vgextend. Move the check inside the functions that actually move pvs from
one vg structure to another. Should be no functional change.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
In the future we may export these functions or something like them in liblvm
For now this helps in cleaning up the checks for RESIZEABLE since we can
use the internal library function vg_bad_status_bits.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Move the check for the RESIZEABLE flag inside the vg_extend function.
When we consolidated the vg locking, reading, and status flag checking,
we tied the check for the RESIZEABLE flag to the vg_read() call. The problem
with this is you cannot know what other APIs the application my or may not
call after a vg_read() call. Thus the READ_REQUIRE_RESIZEABLE flag is not
really ideal - ideally we should be checking for this flag on a specific
operation, not inside the vg_read() call. This patch moves one check inside
the library.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@redhat.com>
Orphan lock is now obtained second and released first, and all tools
are consistent in this regard.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
With this change we now have vgcreate/vgextend liblvm functions.
Note that this changes the lock order of the following functions as the
orphan lock is now obtained first. With our policy of non-blocking
second locks, this should not be a problem.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
Move the vg orphan lock inside vg_remove_single, now a complete liblvm
function. Note that this changes the order of the locks - originally
VG_ORPHAN was obtained first, then the vgname lock. With the current
policy of non-blocking second locks, this could mean we get a failure
obtaining the orphan lock. In the case of a vg with lvs being removed,
this could result in the lvs being removed but not the vg. Such a
scenario could have happened prior though with a different failure.
Other tools were examined for side-effects, and no major problems
were noted.
Signed-off-by: Dave Wysochanski <dwysocha@redhat.com>
