IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
New tests to add checking for '100%' in-sync at start of "recover"
process (it shouldn't happen, but I've seen it before). Also,
check status over the whole cycle of various sync processes ("resync"
and "recover").
First test in this file checks whether 'aa' is ever spotted during
a "recover" operation (it should not be). More tests should follow
in this file to look for oddities in status output - especially as
it relates to the sync_ratio, dev_health, and sync_action fields.
For the test clean-up, I was providing too many devices to the first
command - possibly allowing it to allocate in the wrong place. I was
also not providing a device for the second command - virtually ensuring
the test was not performing correctly at times.
This patch ensures that under normal conditions (i.e. not during repair
operations) that users are prevented from removing devices that would
cause data loss.
When a RAID1 is undergoing its initial sync, it is ok to remove all but
one of the images because they have all existed since creation and
contain all the data written since the array was created. OTOH, if the
RAID1 was created as a result of an up-convert from linear, it is very
important not to let the user remove the primary image (the source of
all the data). They should be allowed to remove any devices they want
and as many as they want as long as one original (primary) device is left
during a "recover" (aka up-convert).
This fixes bug 1461187 and includes the necessary regression tests.
Two of the sync actions performed by the kernel (aka MD runtime) are
"resync" and "recover". The "resync" refers to when an entirely new array
is going through the process of initializing (or resynchronizing after an
unexpected shutdown). The "recover" is the process of initializing a new
member device to the array. So, a brand new array with all new devices
will undergo "resync". An array with replaced or added sub-LVs will undergo
"recover".
These two states are treated very differently when failures happen. If any
device is lost or replaced while "resync", there are no worries. This is
because any writes created from the inception of the array have occurred to
all the devices and can be safely recovered. Even though non-initialized
portions will still be resync'ed with uninitialized data, it is ok. However,
if a pre-existing device is lost (aka, the original linear device in a
linear -> raid1 convert) during a "recover", data loss can be the result.
Thus, writes are errored by the kernel and recovery is halted. The failed
device must be restored or removed. This is the correct behavior.
Unfortunately, we were treating an up-convert from linear as a "resync"
when we should have been treating it as a "recover". This patch
removes the special case for linear upconvert. It allows each new image
sub-LV to be marked with a rebuild flag and treats the array as 'in-sync'.
This has the correct effect of causing the upconvert to be treated as a
"recover" rather than a "resync". There is no need to flag these two states
differently in LVM metadata, because they are already considered differently
by the kernel RAID metadata. (Any activation/deactivation will properly
resume the "recover" process and not a "resync" process.)
We make this behavior change based on the presense of dm-raid target
version 1.9.0+.
Code path missed validation of lvcreate --cachepool argument.
If the non cache-pool LV was passed in, code has still continued
further work and failed later on internal error. Validate this
condition at right place now.
- Must reread all objects as PVs might be removed.
- Never consider testsuite provided PVs nested, or tearDown fails to
remove any outstanding VGs on them.
With recent updates for thin pool monitoring in version 169
we lost multiple WARNINGs to be printed in syslog, when
pool crossed 80%, 85%, 90%, 95%, 100%.
Restore this logic as we want to keep user informed more
then just once when 80% boundary is passed.
If the device size does not match the size requested
by --setphysicalvolumesize, then prompt the user.
Make the pvcreate checking/prompting code handle
multiple prompts for the same device, since the
new prompt can be in addition to the existing
prompt when the PV is in a VG.
When metadata LV size was over DM_THIN_MAX_METADATA_SIZE sectors,
the info() routine was incorrectly trying to match bigger size,
while we do never pass any bigger device.
Fixing a case, where lvs should be displaying status for metadata
LV with 16GB size.
Reshape check failed when regionsize changed and current raid type
was provided with no other change requested (stripes or stripesize).
E.g. "lvconvert --type raid6 --regionsize 256K" on a raid6 LV
with != 256K regionsize.
Enable --type in test script.
Use only selected paths for finding .so in builddir.
So if builddir constains some embeded subdirs with some more
occurences of project (i.e. 'make rpm' build subdir)
those library paths will not get into list.
lvconvert should not leak 'error' device.
(This patch is not fix the problem, just makes it more easily visible
instead of more confusing 'clvmd' trace).
Since we want to test different cache policies with profiles mq&smq
raise version to 1.8.
TODO: maybe split in more tests so older targets can test here as well.
N.B.: passthrough is also not supported with version 1.3
If SubLVs to be removed still exist after an image removing
conversion (i.e. "lvconvert --yes --force --stripes N "
with N < total stripes) any request to convert to a different
striped/raid* level has to be rejected until after those freed
SubLVs got removed by running the aforementioned lvconvert again.
Add tests to check conversion to striped/raid* gets rejected.
Enhance a test comment.
Related: rhbz1191935
Related: rhbz1366296
Adjust to final target version 1.10.1 supporting reshape
properly and to recently changed report field specifications
(e.g. rehape_len_le) to allow these tests to run.
Lower mirror region size to suite the tiny test VG.
Splitting off an image LV of a 2-legged
raid1 LV causes loss of resilience.
Ask user to avoid uninformed loss of all resilience.
Don't ask for N > 2 legged raid1 LVs.
Adjust tests.
During an ongoing reshape, the MD kernel runtime reads stripes relative
to data_offset and starts storing the reshaped stripes (with new raid
layout and/or new stripesize and/or new number of stripes) relative
to new_data_offset. This is to avoid writing over any data in place
which is non-atomic by nature and thus be recoverable without data loss
in the transition. MD uses the term out-of-place reshaping for it.
There's 2 other areas we don't have report capability for:
- number of data stripes vs. total stripes
(e.g. raid6 with 7 stripes toal has 5 data stripes)
- number of (rotating) parity/syndrome chunks
(e.g. raid6 with 7 stripes toal has 2 parity chunks; one
per stripe for P-Syndrome and another one for Q-Syndrome)
Thus, add the following reportable keys:
- reshape_len (in current units)
- reshape_len_le (in logical extents)
- data_offset (in sectors)
- new_data_offset ( " )
- data_stripes
- parity_chunks
Enhance lvchange-raid.sh, lvconvert-raid-reshape-linear_to_striped.sh,
lvconvert-raid-reshape-striped_to_linear.sh, lvconvert-raid-reshape.sh
and lvconvert-raid-takeover.sh to make use of new keys.
Related: rhbz834579
Related: rhbz1191935
Related: rhbz1191978
Add aforementioned but forgotten new test scripts
lvconvert-raid-reshape-linear_to_striped.sh,
lvconvert-raid-reshape-striped_to_linear.sh and
lvconvert-raid-reshape.sh
Those presume dm-raid target version 1.10.2
provided by a following kernel patch.
Related: rhbz834579
Related: rhbz1191935
Related: rhbz1191978
In order to support striped raid5/6/10 LV reshaping (change
of LV type, stripesize or number of legs), this patch
introduces the changes to call the reshaping infratructure
from lv_raid_convert().
Changes:
- add reshaping calls from lv_raid_convert()
- add command definitons for reshaping to tools/command-lines.in
- fix raid_rimage_extents()
- add 2 new test scripts lvconvert-raid-reshape-linear_to_striped.sh
and lvconvert-raid-reshape-striped_to_linear.sh to test
the linear <-> striped multi-step conversions
- add lvconvert-raid-reshape.sh reshaping tests
- enhance lvconvert-raid-takeover.sh with new raid10 tests
Related: rhbz834579
Related: rhbz1191935
Related: rhbz1191978
The MD kernel raid1 personality does no use any writemostly leg as the primary.
In case a previous linear LV holding data gets upconverted to
raid1 it becomes the primary leg of the new raid1 LV and a full
resynchronization is started to update the new legs.
No writemostly and/or writebehind setting may be allowed during
this initial, full synchronization period of this new raid1 LV
(using the lvchange(8) command), because that would change the
primary (i.e the previous linear LV) thus causing data loss.
lvchange has a bug not preventing this scenario.
Fix rejects setting writemostly and/or writebehind on resychronizing raid1 LVs.
Once we have status in the lvm2 metadata about the linear -> raid upconversion,
we may relax this constraint for other types of resynchronization
(e.g. for user requested "lvchange --resync ").
New lvchange-raid1-writemostly.sh test is added to the test suite.
Resolves: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=855895
When the test would need to try to write some large amount of data
we can give it 'zero' segments - for obvious reason such written data
can't be verified but in some test cases it doesn't really matter.
Usage follows 'error_dev' style.
For now test suite is not supporting any combination of
error/delay/zero segments so only 1 type could be used per PV.
