1
0
mirror of git://sourceware.org/git/lvm2.git synced 2024-12-22 17:35:59 +03:00
Commit Graph

15 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Peter Rajnoha
f4e56b2829 cleanup: consolidate lv_layout and lv_role reporting
This patch makes the keyword combinations found in "lv_layout" and
"lv_role" much more understandable - there were some ambiguities
for some of the combinations which lead to confusion before.

Now, the scheme used is:

LAYOUTS ("how the LV is laid out"):
===================================
[linear] (all segments have number of stripes = 1)

[striped] (all segments have number of stripes > 1)

[linear,striped] (mixed linear and striped)

raid (raid layout always reported together with raid level, raid layout == image + metadata LVs underneath that make up raid LV)
  [raid,raid1]
  [raid,raid10]
  [raid,raid4]
  [raid,raid5] (exact sublayout not specified during creation - default one used - raid5_ls)
    [raid,raid5,raid5_ls]
    [raid,raid5,raid6_rs]
    [raid,raid5,raid5_la]
    [raid,raid5,raid5_ra]
  [raid6,raid] (exact sublayout not specified during creation - default one used - raid6_zr)
    [raid,raid6,raid6_zr]
    [raid,raid6,raid6_nc]
    [raid,raid6,raid6_ns]

[mirror] (mirror layout == log + image LVs underneath that make up mirror LV)

thin (thin layout always reported together with sublayout)
  [thin,sparse] (thin layout == allocated out of thin pool)
  [thin,pool] (thin pool layout == data + metadata volumes underneath that make up thin pool LV, not supposed to be used for direct use!!!)

[cache] (cache layout == allocated out of cache pool in conjunction with cache origin)
  [cache,pool] (cache pool layout == data + metadata volumes underneath that make up cache pool LV, not supposed to be used for direct use!!!)

[virtual] (virtual layout == not hitting disk underneath, currently this layout denotes only 'zero' device used for origin,thickorigin role)

[unknown] (either error state or missing recognition for such layout)

ROLES ("what's the purpose or use of the LV - what is its role"):
=================================================================
- each LV has either of these two roles at least:  [public] (public LV that users may use freely to write their data to)

  [public] (public LV that users may use freely to write their data to)
  [private] (private LV that LVM maintains; not supposed to be directly used by user to write his data to)

- and then some special-purpose roles in addition to that:

  [origin,thickorigin] (origin for thick-style snapshot; "thick" as opposed to "thin")
  [origin,multithickorigin] (there are more than 2 thick-style snapshots for this origin)
  [origin,thinorigin] (origin for thin snapshot)
  [origin,multithinorigin] (there are more than 2 thin snapshots for this origin)
  [origin,extorigin] (external origin for thin snapshot)
  [origin,multiextoriginl (there are more than 2 thin snapshots using this external origin)
  [origin,cacheorigin] (cache origin)

  [snapshot,thicksnapshot] (thick-style snapshot; "thick" as opposed to "thin")
  [snapshot,thinsnapshot] (thin-style snapshot)

  [raid,metadata] (raid metadata LV)
  [raid,image] (raid image LV)

  [mirror,image] (mirror image LV)
  [mirror,log] (mirror log LV)
  [pvmove] (pvmove LV)

  [thin,pool,data] (thin pool data LV)
  [thin,pool,metadata] (thin pool metadata LV)

  [cache,pool,data] (cache pool data LV)
  [cache,pool,metadata] (cache pool metadata LV)

  [pool,spare] (pool spare LV - common role of LV that makes it used for both thin and cache repairs)
2014-08-25 16:14:40 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
e8bbcda2a3 Add lv_layout_and_type fn, lv_layout and lv_type reporting fields.
The lv_layout and lv_type fields together help with LV identification.
We can do basic identification using the lv_attr field which provides
 very condensed view. In contrast to that, the new lv_layout and lv_type
fields provide more detialed information on exact layout and type used
for LVs.

For top-level LVs which are pure types not combined with any
other LV types, the lv_layout value is equal to lv_type value.

For non-top-level LVs which may be combined with other types,
the lv_layout describes the underlying layout used, while the
lv_type describes the use/type/usage of the LV.

These two new fields are both string lists so selection (-S/--select)
criteria can be defined using the list operators easily:
  [] for strict matching
  {} for subset matching.

For example, let's consider this:

$ lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type
  LV                    VG     Attr       Layout       Type
  [lvol1_pmspare]       vg     ewi------- linear       metadata,pool,spare
  pool                  vg     twi-a-tz-- pool,thin    pool,thin
  [pool_tdata]          vg     rwi-aor--- level10,raid data,pool,thin
  [pool_tdata_rimage_0] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tdata_rimage_1] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tdata_rimage_2] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tdata_rimage_3] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tdata_rmeta_0]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tdata_rmeta_1]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tdata_rmeta_2]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tdata_rmeta_3]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tmeta]          vg     ewi-aor--- level1,raid  metadata,pool,thin
  [pool_tmeta_rimage_0] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tmeta_rimage_1] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tmeta_rmeta_0]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tmeta_rmeta_1]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  thin_snap1            vg     Vwi---tz-k thin         snapshot,thin
  thin_snap2            vg     Vwi---tz-k thin         snapshot,thin
  thin_vol1             vg     Vwi-a-tz-- thin         thin
  thin_vol2             vg     Vwi-a-tz-- thin         multiple,origin,thin

Which is a situation with thin pool, thin volumes and thin snapshots.
We can see internal 'pool_tdata' volume that makes up thin pool has
actually a level10 raid layout and the internal 'pool_tmeta' has
level1 raid layout. Also, we can see that 'thin_snap1' and 'thin_snap2'
are both thin snapshots while 'thin_vol1' is thin origin (having
multiple snapshots).

Such reporting scheme provides much better base for selection criteria
in addition to providing more detailed information, for example:

$ lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type=metadata'
LV                   VG   Attr       Layout      Type
[lvol1_pmspare]      vg   ewi------- linear      metadata,pool,spare
[pool_tdata_rmeta_0] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_1] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_2] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_3] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tmeta]         vg   ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin
[pool_tmeta_rmeta_0] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tmeta_rmeta_1] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid

(selected all LVs which are related to metadata of any type)

lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type={metadata,thin}'
LV           VG   Attr       Layout      Type
[pool_tmeta] vg   ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin

(selected all LVs which hold metadata related to thin)

lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type={thin,snapshot}'
LV         VG   Attr       Layout     Type
thin_snap1 vg   Vwi---tz-k thin       snapshot,thin
thin_snap2 vg   Vwi---tz-k thin       snapshot,thin

(selected all LVs which are thin snapshots)

lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'layout=raid'
LV           VG   Attr       Layout       Type
[pool_tdata] vg   rwi-aor--- level10,raid data,pool,thin
[pool_tmeta] vg   ewi-aor--- level1,raid  metadata,pool,thin

(selected all LVs with raid layout, any raid layout)

lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'layout={raid,level1}'
  LV           VG   Attr       Layout      Type
  [pool_tmeta] vg   ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin

(selected all LVs with raid level1 layout exactly)

And so on...
2014-08-15 14:50:38 +02:00
Zdenek Kabelac
30a81e5989 cleanup: self compilable headers 2013-12-12 13:28:19 +01:00
Zdenek Kabelac
462835faa0 Switch to return void
List delete cannot fail, so there is no reason to test for error.
2012-02-08 12:52:58 +00:00
Zdenek Kabelac
64dff85ce4 Preserve const for char pointer
Keep char pointers 'const'  (introduced with cling commit).
2010-11-11 12:32:33 +00:00
Alasdair Kergon
eb82bd0525 Extend cling allocation policy to recognise PV tags (cling_by_tags).
Add allocation/cling_tag_list to lvm.conf.
2010-11-09 12:34:40 +00:00
Alasdair Kergon
2c44337bd5 Right, a simple build (without options) is working again. 2008-11-03 22:14:30 +00:00
Alasdair Kergon
be6845999b Fix inconsistent licence notices: executables are GPLv2; libraries LGPLv2.1. 2007-08-20 20:55:30 +00:00
Jim Meyering
08c9ff434b Add "const" attributes where possible: first cut. 2007-08-07 09:06:05 +00:00
Alasdair Kergon
2262b32057 Use hash, bitset, malloc, pool from libdevmapper. 2005-10-16 23:03:59 +00:00
Alasdair Kergon
6606c3ae81 Update copyright notices. 2004-03-30 19:35:44 +00:00
Alasdair Kergon
5071196631 More str_list fns. 2004-03-08 15:23:01 +00:00
Alasdair Kergon
ac21f47034 more str_list fns 2003-10-15 20:04:29 +00:00
Alasdair Kergon
13057fe53f str_list_del 2003-10-15 20:01:12 +00:00
Alasdair Kergon
aa37899857 Extract some common functions. 2003-09-17 20:35:57 +00:00