IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
dm_tree_activate_children() callers.
Otherwise resume_lv and its variants can fail silently.
Catching these failures is especially important now that dm targets like
crypt and snapshot-merge can fail in .preresume
Signed-off-by: Mike Snitzer <snitzer@redhat.com>
These are no longer used by anyone. The dm_list defines are all in
libdevmapper.h and libdm/datastruct/list.c contains any function definitions.
There is some code in "old-tests" that still use this but this code is not
being maintained.
Thanks to Zdenek for spotting this.
This provides better support for environments where udev rules are installed
but udev_sync is not compiled in (however, using udev_sync is highly
recommended). It also provides consistent and expected functionality even
when '--noudevsync' option is used.
There is still requirement for kernel >= 2.6.31 for the flags to work though
(it uses DM cookies to pass the flags into the kernel and set them in udev
event environment that we can read in udev rules).
'last_rule' option has been removed from udev (version >= 147).
From now on, we require foreign rules to check and honor
ENV{DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG} instead. Foreign
rules should be skipped totally when this flag is set.
- we have these levels when the udev rules are processed:
10-dm.rules --> [11-dm-<subsystem>.rules] --> [12-dm-permissions.rules] -->
13-dm-disk.rules --> [...all the other foreign rules...] --> 95-dm-notify.rules
- each level can be disabled now by
DM_UDEV_DISABLE_{DM, SUBSYSTEM, DISK, OTHER}_RULES_FLAG
- add DM_UDEV_DISABLE_DM_RULES_FLAG to disable 10-dm.rules
- add DM_UDEV_DISABLE_OTHER_RULES_FLAG to disable all the other (non-dm) rules.
We cutoff these rules by using the 'last_rule', so this one should really be
used with great care and in well-founded situations. We use this for lvm's
hidden and layer devices now.
- add a parameter for add_dev_node, rm_dev_node and rename_dev_node so it's
possible to switch on/off udev checks
- use DM_UDEV_DISABLE_DM_RULES_FLAG and DM_UDEV_DISABLE_SUBSYSTEM_RULES_FLAG
if there's no cookie set and we have resume, remove and rename ioctl.
This could happen when someone uses the libdevmapper that is compiled with
udev_sync but the software does not make use of it. This way we can switch
off the rules and fallback to libdevmapper node creation so there's no
udev/libdevmapper race.
confuses me, so I've added a comment at the top of the function to
remind me of this.
I also found that 'mirror_emit_segment_line' was returning 0 (return_0)
on failure /and/ success. It now returns 1 for success and 0 for failure -
just like '_emit_areas_line' and its calling function, '_emit_segment_line'.
We don't have to call dm_cookie_supported with dm_udev_get_sync_support
this way. Also, it's necessary for the current code to work properly on
systems without cookie support (older kernels).
Eliminate dependency on outside library, since the same functionality
exists in our tree.
[It is important that the bitops work in the same way, as the bitmaps
must remain backwards compatible. I haven't tested every architecture,
but the x86* archs work. My test involved using the old ext2fsprogs
bitops, memcpy'ing the bits over to the LVM bitset array and ensuring
that only the bits set via the old methods were set.]
