1
0
mirror of git://sourceware.org/git/lvm2.git synced 2024-12-21 13:34:40 +03:00
Commit Graph

289 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Zdenek Kabelac
f5e265a07f cache: use LV_PENDING_DELETE 2014-11-10 22:05:49 +01:00
Zdenek Kabelac
2e0c926d56 cleanup: API get/set fixes 2014-11-10 22:05:48 +01:00
Zdenek Kabelac
6c32ced657 cleanup: use lv_is_pool
Use lv_is_pool() to detect both pool versions.
2014-11-03 14:19:34 +01:00
Zdenek Kabelac
ca9482b276 cache: report stats for cache volumes usage
Show some stats with 'lvs'
Display same info for active cache volume and cache-pool.

data% - #used cache blocks/#total cache blocks
meta% - #used metadata blocks/#total metadata blocks
copy% - #dirty/#used cache blocks

TODO: maybe there is a better mapping
 - should be seen as first-try-and-see.
2014-11-03 14:19:33 +01:00
Zdenek Kabelac
7f35d42a99 thin: reporting of thin volumes simplified
Simplify reporting of percentage.
Allows easier support for more types.

Move testing of device availability into activate.c
2014-11-03 14:19:32 +01:00
Zdenek Kabelac
5bdf48b489 tools: refactor reporter code
Use new libdm macro DM_LIST_HEAD_INIT().
Embeded 'free' segment type (so it's not needed in the list)
Drop assignments of 0,NULL since they are defaults.
2014-10-24 16:39:31 +02:00
Zdenek Kabelac
9411c19b31 segments: introduce lvseg_name
Instead of segtype->ops->name()  introduce lvseg_name().

This also allows us to leave name() function 'empty' for default
return of segtype->name.

TODO: add functions for rest of ops->
2014-10-24 16:39:30 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
9351dca863 report: fix selection on {vg,lv}_permissions fields to properly match selection criteria
There was a bug in value and their synonym definition for these two fields
causing selections on these fields to not work correctly - nothing matched
against vg/lv_permissions fields even if selection criteria should have
matched.

Scenario:
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg
  LV    LPerms
  lvol0 read-only
  lvol1 writeable

Before this patch:

$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=read-only'
(blank)
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=writeable
(blank)

With this patch applied:

$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=read-only'
  LV    LPerms
  lvol0 read-only
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=writeable'
  LV    LPerms
  lvol1 writeable

Also synonyms match correctly now:
$ lvs -o name,lv_permissions vg -S 'permissions=rw'
  LV    LPerms
  lvol1 writeable
2014-10-23 15:03:04 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
4b611bb816 report: lv_permissions: display read-only/read-only-override instead of blank when LV is not writeable
Before this patch:
$ lvs -o name,lv_attr,lv_permissions
  LV    Attr       LPerms
  root  -wi-ao---- writeable
  swap  -wi-ao---- writeable
  lvol0 -Ri-a-----
  lvol1 -ri-a-----
  lvol2 -wi-a----- writeable
  lvol3 -ri-------

With this patch applied:
$ lvs -o name,lv_attr,lv_permissions
  LV    Attr       LPerms
  root  -wi-ao---- writeable
  swap  -wi-ao---- writeable
  lvol0 -Ri-a----- read-only-override
  lvol1 -ri-a----- read-only
  lvol2 -wi-a----- writeable
  lvol3 -ri------- read-only

("read-only-override" is displayed if the "writeable" permission
is overriden based on "activation/read_only_volume_list" lvm.conf
setting)
2014-10-23 10:18:29 +02:00
David Teigland
f1a000a477 toollib: Rewrite process_each_pv.
Process PVs by iterating through VGs, then iterating through
devices if the command needs to process non-PV devices.
The process_single function can always use the VG and PV args.

[Committed by agk with cosmetic changes and tweaks.]
2014-10-07 01:15:43 +01:00
David Teigland
17ab39f743 cache: include cache mode in vg metadata and display
The cache mode of a new cache pool is always explicitly
included in the vg metadata.  If a cache mode is not
specified on the command line, the cache mode is taken
from lvm.conf allocation/cache_pool_cachemode, which
defaults to "writethrough".

The cache mode can be displayed with lvs -o+cachemode.
2014-10-02 11:17:41 -05:00
Alasdair G Kergon
979be63f25 mirrors: Fix checks for mirror/raid/pvmove LVs.
Try to enforce consistent macro usage along these lines:

lv_is_mirror - mirror that uses the original dm-raid1 implementation
               (segment type "mirror")
lv_is_mirror_type - also includes internal mirror image and log LVs

lv_is_raid - raid volume that uses the new dm-raid implementation
             (segment type "raid")
lv_is_raid_type - also includes internal raid image / log / metadata LVs

lv_is_mirrored - LV is mirrored using either kernel implementation
                 (excludes non-mirror modes like raid5 etc.)

lv_is_pvmove - internal pvmove volume
2014-09-16 00:13:46 +01:00
Alasdair G Kergon
2360ce3551 cleanup: Use lv_is_ macros.
Use lv_is_* macros throughout the code base, introducing
lv_is_pvmove, lv_is_locked, lv_is_converting and lv_is_merging.

lv_is_mirror_type no longer includes pvmove.
2014-09-15 21:33:53 +01:00
Zdenek Kabelac
2a0ec5d396 cleanup: drop duplicate const
No need to specify 'const' twice in these cases.
2014-08-29 13:11:34 +02:00
Alasdair G Kergon
8b8d21f873 pre-release 2014-08-26 16:34:14 +01:00
Peter Rajnoha
2d344c2e45 report: use dm_report_field_string_list_unordered for reporting lv_layout and lv_role fields
This makes it a bit more readable since we can report more general
layouts/roles first and keywords describing the LV more precisely
afterwards in the list.
2014-08-25 16:11:40 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
993f8d1b3f refactor: rename 'lv_type' field to 'lv_role'
The 'lv_type' field name was a bit misleading. Better one is 'lv_role'
since this fields describes what's the actual use of the LV currently -
its 'role'.
2014-08-25 16:11:40 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
e8bbcda2a3 Add lv_layout_and_type fn, lv_layout and lv_type reporting fields.
The lv_layout and lv_type fields together help with LV identification.
We can do basic identification using the lv_attr field which provides
 very condensed view. In contrast to that, the new lv_layout and lv_type
fields provide more detialed information on exact layout and type used
for LVs.

For top-level LVs which are pure types not combined with any
other LV types, the lv_layout value is equal to lv_type value.

For non-top-level LVs which may be combined with other types,
the lv_layout describes the underlying layout used, while the
lv_type describes the use/type/usage of the LV.

These two new fields are both string lists so selection (-S/--select)
criteria can be defined using the list operators easily:
  [] for strict matching
  {} for subset matching.

For example, let's consider this:

$ lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type
  LV                    VG     Attr       Layout       Type
  [lvol1_pmspare]       vg     ewi------- linear       metadata,pool,spare
  pool                  vg     twi-a-tz-- pool,thin    pool,thin
  [pool_tdata]          vg     rwi-aor--- level10,raid data,pool,thin
  [pool_tdata_rimage_0] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tdata_rimage_1] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tdata_rimage_2] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tdata_rimage_3] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tdata_rmeta_0]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tdata_rmeta_1]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tdata_rmeta_2]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tdata_rmeta_3]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tmeta]          vg     ewi-aor--- level1,raid  metadata,pool,thin
  [pool_tmeta_rimage_0] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tmeta_rimage_1] vg     iwi-aor--- linear       image,raid
  [pool_tmeta_rmeta_0]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  [pool_tmeta_rmeta_1]  vg     ewi-aor--- linear       metadata,raid
  thin_snap1            vg     Vwi---tz-k thin         snapshot,thin
  thin_snap2            vg     Vwi---tz-k thin         snapshot,thin
  thin_vol1             vg     Vwi-a-tz-- thin         thin
  thin_vol2             vg     Vwi-a-tz-- thin         multiple,origin,thin

Which is a situation with thin pool, thin volumes and thin snapshots.
We can see internal 'pool_tdata' volume that makes up thin pool has
actually a level10 raid layout and the internal 'pool_tmeta' has
level1 raid layout. Also, we can see that 'thin_snap1' and 'thin_snap2'
are both thin snapshots while 'thin_vol1' is thin origin (having
multiple snapshots).

Such reporting scheme provides much better base for selection criteria
in addition to providing more detailed information, for example:

$ lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type=metadata'
LV                   VG   Attr       Layout      Type
[lvol1_pmspare]      vg   ewi------- linear      metadata,pool,spare
[pool_tdata_rmeta_0] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_1] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_2] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tdata_rmeta_3] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tmeta]         vg   ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin
[pool_tmeta_rmeta_0] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid
[pool_tmeta_rmeta_1] vg   ewi-aor--- linear      metadata,raid

(selected all LVs which are related to metadata of any type)

lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type={metadata,thin}'
LV           VG   Attr       Layout      Type
[pool_tmeta] vg   ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin

(selected all LVs which hold metadata related to thin)

lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'type={thin,snapshot}'
LV         VG   Attr       Layout     Type
thin_snap1 vg   Vwi---tz-k thin       snapshot,thin
thin_snap2 vg   Vwi---tz-k thin       snapshot,thin

(selected all LVs which are thin snapshots)

lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'layout=raid'
LV           VG   Attr       Layout       Type
[pool_tdata] vg   rwi-aor--- level10,raid data,pool,thin
[pool_tmeta] vg   ewi-aor--- level1,raid  metadata,pool,thin

(selected all LVs with raid layout, any raid layout)

lvs -a -o name,vg_name,lv_attr,layout,type -S 'layout={raid,level1}'
  LV           VG   Attr       Layout      Type
  [pool_tmeta] vg   ewi-aor--- level1,raid metadata,pool,thin

(selected all LVs with raid level1 layout exactly)

And so on...
2014-08-15 14:50:38 +02:00
Alasdair G Kergon
e94442bffa report: Remove lv_volume_type field.
Like lv_target_type, this field needs reworking.
2014-08-05 02:04:16 +01:00
Alasdair G Kergon
50961f43d0 report: Remove lv_target_type field.
This field is too complicated to be useful on its own and either needs
redefining or splitting up into multiple fields.
2014-07-22 20:57:57 +01:00
Peter Rajnoha
fd5912762b report: display 'unknown' value for lv_active_remotely field if the LV is also active locally
Currently, we can't determine whether the LV is active remotely
or not in that case.
2014-07-11 11:56:50 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
c9ae21798e report: display 'unknown' value for active/active_locally/active_remotely/active_exclusively if info bypassed
Before the patch:

$ lvs -o name,active vg/lvol1 --driverloaded n
  WARNING: Activation disabled. No device-mapper interaction will beattempted.
  LV    Active
  lvol1 active

With this patch applied:
$ lvs -o name,active vg/lvol1 --driverloaded n
  WARNING: Activation disabled. No device-mapper interaction will be attempted.
  LV    Active
  lvol1 unknown

The same for active_{locally,remotely,exclusively} fields.
Also, rename headings for these fields (ActLocal/ActRemote/ActExcl).
2014-07-11 11:15:06 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
52af0dfbc0 report: display 'unknown' value for LVSINFO fields if unable to get info
If the lv_info call fails for whatever reason/INFO dm ioctl fails or
the dm driver communication is disabled (--driverloaded n), make
sure we always display "unknown" for LVSINFO fields as that's exactly
what happens - we don't know the state.

Before the patch:

$ lvs -o name,device_open --driverloaded n
  WARNING: Activation disabled. No device-mapper interaction will be attempted.
  Command failed with status code 5.

With this patch applied:

$ lvs -o name,device_open --driverloaded n
  WARNING: Activation disabled. No device-mapper interaction will be attempted.
  LV        DevOpen
  lvol1        unknown
2014-07-11 10:18:59 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
3063b48602 report: also report linear and striped for lv_target_type 2014-07-10 16:41:42 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
d169ff1e03 conf: add report/list_item_separator lvm.conf option
For example:

$ lvm dumpconfig report/list_item_separator
list_item_separator=","

$ lvs -o name,tags vg/lvol1
  LV    LV Tags
  lvol1 a,x,y

$ lvm dumpconfig report/list_item_separator
list_item_separator=":"

$ lvs -o name,tags vg/lvol1
  LV    LV Tags
  lvol1 ay
2014-07-10 16:18:45 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
e2448bb0dc report: report LV's zero field as binary field
Like other binary fields we already have:

$ lvs -o name,zero vg/lvx vg/pool vg/pool1
  LV    Zero
  lvx   unknown
  pool
  pool1    zero

$ lvs -o name,zero vg/lvx vg/pool vg/pool1 --binary
  LV    Zero
  lvx     -1
  pool     0
  pool1    1
2014-07-10 15:25:01 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
e31ec38d8e report: reserved value: description for undefined value 2014-07-10 13:42:16 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
175de52ded cleanup: also use values.h for final dm_report_reserved_value array composition 2014-07-10 13:37:40 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
f598aa38ae cleanup: report reserved value macros 2014-07-10 11:54:37 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
a4e798bd30 report: add values.h for per-field reserved value declaration 2014-07-10 09:41:21 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
46ea315f09 report: also recognize 'yes'/'no' for selection criteria on binary fields
We have 1/"descriptive word"/"yes" for 1 and 0/"no" for 0.
For example (the new recognized values are "yes" and "no"):

$ lvs -o name,device_open fedora vg/lvol1 vg/lvol2
  LV    DevOpen
  root        open
  swap        open
  lvol1       open
  lvol2

$ lvs -o name,device_open fedora vg/lvol1 vg/lvol2 -S 'device_open=open'
  LV    DevOpen
  root        open
  swap        open
  lvol1       open

$ lvs -o name,device_open fedora vg/lvol1 vg/lvol2 -S 'device_open=1'
  LV    DevOpen
  root        open
  swap        open
  lvol1       open

$ lvs -o name,device_open fedora vg/lvol1 vg/lvol2 -S 'device_open=yes'
  LV    DevOpen
  root        open
  swap        open
  lvol1       open

$ lvs -o name,device_open fedora vg/lvol1 vg/lvol2 -S 'device_open=0'
  LV    DevOpen
  lvol2

$ lvs -o name,device_open fedora vg/lvol1 vg/lvol2 -S 'device_open=no'
  LV    DevOpen
  lvol2
2014-07-09 15:57:05 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
c1bed36b67 cleanup: move _lvactive_disp and _thinzero_disp under 'attribute' display functions
So all attribute reporting functions are all in one section of code
for quick orientation (all these functions are defined in the order
of their attribute character displayed in pv/vg/lv_attr field).
2014-07-09 15:57:05 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
bccc2bef33 report: add lv_active_{locally,remotely,exclusively} LV reporting fields
lv_active_{locally,remotely,exclusively} display the original
"lv_active" field in a more separate way so that we can create
selection criteria in a binary-based form (yes/no).
2014-07-09 15:57:05 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
b6ac8819f6 report: 'whether' -> 'set if' in field description 2014-07-09 15:57:05 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
ccab185aa7 cleanup: use macros for definition of reporting/selection reserved values
The macros for reserved value definition makes the process a bit easier,
but there's still a place for improvement and make this even more
transparent. We can optimize and provide better automatism here later on.
2014-07-09 15:55:54 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
1a05862732 report: report unknown/-1 for binary fields with unknown value
Also respect --binary arg and/or report/binary_values_as_numeric
when displaying unknown values. If textual form is used, use "unknown",
if numeric value is used, use "-1" (which we already use to denote
unknown numeric values in other reports like lv_kernel_major and
lv_kernel_minor).
2014-07-08 16:16:02 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
7021c8f1a4 report: define reserved values/synonyms for some attribute fields
All binary attr fields have synonyms so selection criteria can use
either 0/1 or words to match against the field value (base type
for these binary fields is numeric one - DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER
so words are registered as reserved values):

pv_allocatable          - "allocatable"
pv_exported             - "exported"
pv_missing              - "missing"

vg_extendable           - "extendable"
vg_exported             - "exported"
vg_partial              - "partial"
vg_clustered            - "clustered"

lv_initial_image_sync   - "initial image sync", "sync"
lv_image_synced_names   - "image synced", "synced"
lv_merging_names        - "merging"
lv_converting_names     - "converting"
lv_allocation_locked    - "allocation locked", "locked"
lv_fixed_minor          - "fixed minor", "fixed"
lv_merge_failed         - "merge failed", "failed"

For example, these three are all equivalent:

$ lvs -o name,fixed_minor -S 'fixed_minor=fixed'
  LV    FixMin
  lvol8 fixed minor

$ lvs -o name,fixed_minor -S 'fixed_minor="fixed minor"'
  LV    FixMin
  lvol8 fixed minor

$ lvs -o name,fixed_minor -S 'fixed_minor=1'
  LV    FixMin
  lvol8 fixed minor

The same with binary output - it has no effect on this functionality:

$ lvs -o name,fixed_minor --binary -S 'fixed_minor=fixed'
  LV    FixMin
  lvol8          1

$ lvs -o name,fixed_minor --binary -S 'fixed_minor="fixed
minor"'
  LV    FixMin
  lvol8          1

[1] f20/~ # lvs -o name,fixed_minor --binary -S 'fixed_minor=1'
  LV    FixMin
  lvol8          1
2014-07-04 15:50:50 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
da545ce3b4 tools: add --binary arg to pvs,vgs,lvs and {pv,vg,lv}display -C and report/binary_values_as_numeric lvm.conf option
The --binary option, if used, causes all the binary values reported
in reporting commands to be displayed as "0" or "1" instead of descriptive
literal values (value "unknown" is still used for values that could not be
determined).

Also, add report/binary_values_as_numeric lvm.conf option with the same
functionality as the --binary option (the --binary option prevails
if both --binary cmd option and report/binary_values_as_numeric lvm.conf
option is used at the same time). The report/binary_values_as_numeric is
also profilable.

This makes it easier to use and check lvm reporting command output in scripts.
2014-07-04 15:40:17 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
d2af4f84c9 report: add separate fields for PV/VG/LV attributes
Physical Volume Fields:
  pv_allocatable         - Whether this device can be used for allocation.
  pv_exported            - Whether this device is exported.
  pv_missing             - Whether this device is missing in system.

Volume Group Fields:
  vg_permissions         - VG permissions.
  vg_extendable          - Whether VG is extendable.
  vg_exported            - Whether VG is exported.
  vg_partial             - Whether VG is partial.
  vg_allocation_policy   - VG allocation policy.
  vg_clustered           - Whether VG is clustered.

Logical Volume Fields:
  lv_volume_type         - LV volume type.
  lv_initial_image_sync  - Whether mirror/RAID images underwent initial resynchronization.
  lv_image_synced        - Whether mirror/RAID image is synchronized.
  lv_merging             - Whether snapshot LV is being merged to origin.
  lv_converting          - Whether LV is being converted.
  lv_allocation_policy   - LV allocation policy.
  lv_allocation_locked   - Whether LV is locked against allocation changes.
  lv_fixed_minor         - Whether LV has fixed minor number assigned.
  lv_merge_failed        - Whether snapshot merge failed.
  lv_snapshot_invalid    - Whether snapshot LV is invalid.
  lv_target_type         - Kernel target type the LV is related to.
  lv_health_status       - LV health status.
  lv_skip_activation     - Whether LV is skipped on activation.

Logical Volume Info Fields
  lv_permissions         - LV permissions.
  lv_suspended           - Whether LV is suspended.
  lv_live_table          - Whether LV has live table present.
  lv_inactive_table      - Whether LV has inactive table present.
  lv_device_open         - Whether LV device is open.
2014-07-04 15:40:17 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
4b9b1f2319 refactor: use new LVSINFO report type for lv_kernel_{major,minor,read_ahead} field 2014-07-04 15:40:17 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
ecb2be5d16 reporter: add separate LVSINFO report type
LVSINFO is exactly the same as existing LVS report type,
but it has the "struct lvinfo" populated in addition for
use - this is useful for fields that display the status
of the LV device itself (e.g. suspended state, tables
present/missing...).

Currently, such properties are reported within the "lv_attr"
field so separation is unnecessary - the "lvinfo" call
to populate the "struct lvinfo" is directly a part of the
field reporting function - _lvstatus_disp/lv_attr_dup.

With upcoming patches, we'd like the lv_attr field bits
to be separated into their own fields. To avoid calling
"lvinfo" fn as many times as there are fields requiring
the "lv_info" structure to be populated while reporting
one row related to one LV, we're separating former LVS
into LVS and LVSINFO report type. With this, there's
just one "lvinfo" call for one report row and LV reporting
fields will take the info needed from this struct then,
hence reusing it and not calling "lvinfo" fn on their own.
2014-07-04 15:40:17 +02:00
Alasdair G Kergon
137ed3081a report: Add lv_parent field.
Only defined for thin/cache/raid/mirror at this stage as it
relies on get_only_segment_using_this_lv().
2014-07-03 23:49:34 +01:00
Alasdair G Kergon
64ce3a8066 report: Add lv_dm_path and lv_full_name fields. 2014-07-02 17:24:05 +01:00
Peter Rajnoha
d09590c4b6 prop: update FIELD macro to accomodate the differentiation of number, size and percent field values
The differentiation of the original number field into number, size and
percent field types has been introduced with recent changes for report
selection support.
2014-06-17 18:14:57 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
51a86dc2f8 report: select: add support for percent selection 2014-06-17 16:27:21 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
cfed0d09e8 report: select: refactor: move percent handling code to libdm for reuse 2014-06-17 16:27:21 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
35c4e4489c report: select: add support for reserved value recognition in report selection string - add struct dm_report_reserved_value
Make dm_report_init_with_selection to accept an argument with an
array of reserved values where each element contains a triple:

  {dm report field type, reserved value, array of strings representing this value}

When the selection is parsed, we always check whether a string
representation of some reserved value is not hit and if it is,
we use the reserved value assigned for this string instead of
trying to parse it as a value of certain field type.

This makes it possible to define selections like:

   ... --select lv_major=undefined (or -1 or unknown or undef or whatever string representations are registered for this reserved value in the future)
   ... --select lv_read_ahead=auto
   ... --select vg_mda_copies=unmanaged

With this, each time the field value of certain type is hit
and when we compare it with the selection, we use the proper
value for comparison.

For now, register these reserved values that are used at the moment
(also more descriptive names are used for the values):

  const uint64_t _reserved_number_undef_64 = UINT64_MAX;
  const uint64_t _reserved_number_unmanaged_64 = UINT64_MAX - 1;
  const uint64_t _reserved_size_auto_64 = UINT64_MAX;

 {
  {DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER, _reserved_number_undef_64, {"-1", "undefined", "undef", "unknown", NULL}},
  {DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_NUMBER, _reserved_number_unmanaged_64, {"unmanaged", NULL}},
  {DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_SIZE, _reserved_size_auto_64, {"auto", NULL}},
  NULL
 }

Same reserved value of different field types do not collide.
All arrays are null-terminated.

The list of reserved values is automatically displayed within
selection help output:

  Selection operands
  ------------------
  ...

  Reserved values
  ---------------
    -1, undefined, undef, unknown   - Reserved value for undefined numeric value. [number]
    unmanaged                       - Reserved value for unmanaged number of metadata copies in VG. [number]
    auto                            - Reserved value for size that is automatically calculated. [size]

  Selection operators
  -------------------
  ...
2014-06-17 16:27:21 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
a6694cfc29 report: select: add DM_REPORT_FIELD_TYPE_STRING_LIST to make a difference between STRING and STRING_LIST
The {pv,vg,lv,seg}_tags and lv_modules fields are reported as string
lists using the new dm_report_field_string_list - so we just pass
the list to the fn that takes care of reporting and item sorting itself.
2014-06-17 16:27:20 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
5abdb52fdc report: select: refactor: move str_list to libdm
The list of strings is used quite frequently and we'd like to reuse
this simple structure for report selection support too. Make it part
of libdevmapper for general reuse throughout the code.

This also simplifies the LVM code a bit since we don't need to
include and manage lvm-types.h anymore (the string list was the
only structure defined there).
2014-06-17 16:27:20 +02:00
Peter Rajnoha
5b734a0ea1 report: select: add --select arg to pvs, vgs and lvs 2014-06-17 16:27:20 +02:00