1
0
mirror of git://sourceware.org/git/lvm2.git synced 2024-12-22 17:35:59 +03:00
Commit Graph

7 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
David Teigland
3bcc6c7e60 tests: drop lvmetad bits 2018-09-10 11:49:11 -05:00
David Teigland
595196bc29 tests: enable lvmlockd for passing tests 2018-05-30 09:25:45 -05:00
Zdenek Kabelac
e55bae2b2c tests: use bash 2017-07-10 14:23:53 +02:00
David Teigland
f54253d396 tests: add SKIP_WITH_LVMLOCKD
to all tests that don't already used vgcreate $SHARED
2016-02-23 09:28:48 -06:00
Zdenek Kabelac
fcbef05aae doc: change fsf address
Hmm rpmlint suggest fsf is using a different address these days,
so lets keep it up-to-date
2016-01-21 12:11:37 +01:00
Peter Rajnoha
fccb1bb276 report: make devices, metadata_devices, seg_pe_ranges and seg_metadata_le_ranges fields consistent
There are two basic groups of fields for LV segment device reporting:
  - related to LV segment's devices: devices and seg_pe_ranges
  - related to LV segment's metadata devices: metadata_devices and seg_metadata_le_ranges

The devices and metadata_devices report devices in this format:
    "device_name(extent_start)"

The seg_pe_ranges and seg_metadata_le_ranges report devices in
this format:
    "device_name:extent_start-extent_end"

This patch reverts partly what commit 7f74a99502
(v 2.02.140) introduced in this area - it added [] for
hidden devices to mark them for all four fields mentioned above.

We won't be marking hidden devices in devices and metadata_devices
fields.

The seg_metadata_le_ranges field will have hidden devices marked -
it's new enough that we don't need to care about compatibility much
yet.

The seg_pe_ranges is old enough that we shouldn't be changing this
one - so we're reverting to not marking hidden devices here.
Instead, there's going to be a new field "seg_le_ranges" which
is going to replace the seg_pe_ranges and it will mark hidden devices -
this is going to be introduced in a patch later.

So in the end we'll end up with:

   (LV segment's devices)
   devices field with "device_name(extent_start)" format, not marking hidden devices
   seg_pe_ranges field with "device_name:extent_start-extent_end" format, not marking hidden devices (deprecated, new seg_le_ranges should be used instead for standardized format)
   seg_le_ranges field with "device_name:extent_start-extent_end" format, marking hidden devices

   (LV segment's metadata devices)
   metadata_devices field with "device_name:extent_start-extent_end" format, not marking hidden devices
   seg_metadata_le_ranges field with "device_name:extent_start-extent_end" format, marking hidden devices

Also, both seg_le_ranges and seg_metadata_le_ranges will honour the
report/list_item_separator setting which can be used to configure
the delimiter used for list items.

So, to sum it up, we will recommend using the new seg_le_ranges and
seg_metadata_le_ranges fields because they display devices with
standard extent range format, they can mark hidden devices and they
honour the report/list_item_separator setting.

We'll be keeping devices,seg_pe_ranges and metadata_devices fields
for compatibility.
2016-01-19 14:30:20 +01:00
Peter Rajnoha
1417ed304b cleanup: rename 'invisible devices' to 'hidden devices' 2016-01-13 15:22:46 +01:00