IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
commit a125a3bb50 "lv_remove: reduce commits for removed LVs"
changed "lvremove <vgname>" from removing one LV at a time,
to removing all LVs in one vg write/commit. It also changed
the behavior if some of the LVs could not be removed, from
removing those LVs that could be removed, to removing nothing
if any LV could not be removed. This caused a regression in
shared VGs using sanlock, in which the on-disk lease was
removed for any LV that could be removed, even if the command
decided to remove nothing. This would leave LVs without a
valid ondisk lease, and "lock failed: error -221" would be
returned for any command attempting to lock the LV.
Fix this by not freeing the on-disk leases until after the
command has decided to go ahead and remove everything, and
has written the VG metadata.
Before the fix:
node1: lvchange -ay vg/lv1
node2: lvchange -ay vg/lv2
node1: lvs
lv1 test -wi-a----- 4.00m
lv2 test -wi------- 4.00m
node2: lvs
lv1 test -wi------- 4.00m
lv2 test -wi-a----- 4.00m
node1: lvremove -y vg/lv1 vg/lv2
LV locked by other host: vg/lv2
(lvremove removed neither of the LVs, but it freed
the lock for lv1, which could have been removed
except for the proper locking failure on lv2.)
node1: lvs
lv1 test -wi------- 4.00m
lv2 test -wi------- 4.00m
node1: lvremove -y vg/lv1
LV vg/lv1 lock failed: error -221
(The lock for lv1 is gone, so nothing can be done with it.)
6ab2a22fcf