IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In a CI run I think one of these `ostree show` commands is failing.
While that output would be useful, the actual `err.txt` usually
has what we want too.
There's a lot of historical baggage associated with GPG verification
and `ostree pull` versus `ostree pull-local`. In particular nowadays,
if you use a `file://` remote things are transparently optimized
to e.g. use reflinks if available.
So for anyone who doesn't trust the "remote" repository, you should
really go through through the regular
`ostree remote add --sign-verify=X file://`
path for example.
Having a mechanism to say "turn on signapi verification" *without*
providing keys goes back into the "global state" debate I brought
up in https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2080
It's just much cleaner architecturally if there is exactly one
path to find keys: from a remote config.
So here in contrast to the GPG code, for `pull-local` we explictily
disable signapi validation, and the `ostree_repo_pull()` API just
surfaces flags to disable it, not enable it.
For the same reason as https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2094.
What we care most about is that the new commit we pull is newer than the
one we're currently sitting on, not necessarily that it's newer than the
branch itself, which it might not be if e.g. we're trying to deploy a
commit older than the tip but still newer than the deployment (via
`--override-commit`).
The way `timestamp-check` works might be too restrictive in some
situations. Essentially, we need to support the case where users want to
pull an older commit than the current tip, but while still guaranteeing
that it is newer than some even older commit.
This will be used in Fedora CoreOS. For more information see:
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2094https://github.com/coreos/fedora-coreos-tracker/issues/481
In https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1827712
some OpenShift CI is seeing `/boot` being unmounted before
`ostree-finalize-staged.service` runs or completes.
We finally tracked this down to a bug elsewhere, but
I think we should add this because it clearly shows
our requirements.
Previously in the pull code, every time we went to verify
a commit we would re-initialize an `OstreeSign` instance
of each time, re-parse the remote configuration
and re-load its public keys etc.
In most cases this doesn't matter really because we're
pulling one commit, but if e.g. pulling a commit with
history would get a bit silly.
This changes things so that the pull code initializes the
verifiers once, and reuses them thereafter.
This is continuing towards changing the code to support
explicitly configured verifiers, xref
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2080
This cleans up the verification code; it was weird how
we'd get the list of known names and then try to create
an instance from it (and throw an error if that failed, which
couldn't happen).
Per https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2080#issuecomment-623614483
A huge benefit of ed25519 (and ECC in general) is that keys are very
short - short enough that it's completely reasonable to inline
them into a command line argument.
And I think that's a good model; it makes the keys very visible.
For example, someone could easily copy-paste a commandline
argument from a webpage (secured via TLS) that says to run
`ostree remote add --sign-verify=ed25519=inline:KEY`.
With just `After=` we'll still try to run in the scenario
where `sysroot.mount` fails because the rootfs didn't appear.
And this will end up spewing an error which can confuse people
into thinking something is wrong at the ostree level.
This has come up numerous times w/{Fedora,RHEL} CoreOS, most
recently while looking at
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1803130
I think we should encourage removing the writable bits from
executables. This has happened to me:
https://thomask.sdf.org/blog/2019/11/09/take-care-editing-bash-scripts.html
And not having the writable bit may help prevent hardlink
corruption with OSTree in some cases.
We can't do this by default, but add a convenient CLI flag
for it.
The GI scanner decides if an `enum` is really a `bitfield` if it finds
any values that have left shifts. With an `enumeration`, the
introspecting language may error or convert to a different type if the
user tries to combine values. Change all Flags `enum`s to use
left-shifted values so that they're represented as `bitfield`s in the
GIR.
The primary bug here is that you can't combine `REFS_ONLY` and
`NO_PRUNE` when calling `OSTree.Repo.prune()` from an introspected
language.
This is an IABI break since the typelib will change from `enumeration`
to `bitfield`. `OstreeRepoImportFlags` is internal but the change is
included here to prepare for a subsequent name that would require bit
shifting to operate correctly as a flag.
Explicitly expose functions for querying the metadata format
and key name used by OstreeSign object:
- ostree_sign_metadata_format
- ostree_sign_metadata_key
This allows to use the same metadata format and key name
by 3-rd party applications using signapi.
Signed-off-by: Denis Pynkin <denis.pynkin@collabora.com>
Clarify where metadata are stored exactly in the `bare-user` case.
Make the first sentence of `bare-user` and `bare-user-only` paragraph
symetric to make it easier to jump to the right paragraph for readers
in a hury. Stree out that `bare-user-only` may loose metadata.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@toradex.com>
Extend the object type documentation with file endings used for the
individual type. Also clarify in which situation content type objects
are used and why they do not match the SHA256 hash today.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@toradex.com>
Today `archive-z2` is still used as the default string to indicate
a `archive` type repository. Make clear that this is the way it is
intended. Otherwise users might think they use an no longer supported
OSTree repository since the mode string is still `archive-z2`.
Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner <stefan.agner@toradex.com>
Same motivation as
https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/2060
I tried `InaccessiblePaths=/var` first and was very sad to find
out we have one tiny exception that breaks it. Otherwise it'd
be so elegant. Maybe in the future we split out that one thing
to a separate `ostree-finalized-stage-var.service` that's just
`ExecStart=/bin/rm -vf /var/.updated` and is otherwise
`ProtectSystem=strict` etc.
All of the underlying libostree APIs have supported passing `NULL`
for a merge deployment for...a long time. But we never plumbed
it up into the CLI.
Add a `--no-merge` option to aid people who want to do a "factory reset":
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1793
I've only noticed this by inspection. But I think it's possible for
`cleanup_txn_dir` to get called with the `staging-...-lock` file since
it matches the prefix.
Make the checking here stronger by verifying that it's a directory. If
it's not a directory (lockfile), then follow the default pruning expiry
logic so that we still cleanup stray lockfiles eventually.
