IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This was really straightforward to implement, and is useful
for dev/test scenarios mainly like we have in rpm-ostree at least.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1113Closes: #1114
Approved by: jlebon
(Note this PR was reverted in <https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/902>;
this version should be better)
Using `${sysroot}` to mean the physical storage root: We don't want to write to
`${sysroot}/etc/ostree/remotes.d`, since nothing will read it, and really
`${sysroot}` should just have `/ostree` (ideally). Today the Anaconda rpmostree
code ends up writing there. Fix this by adding a notion of "physical" sysroot.
We determine whether the path is physical by checking for `/sysroot`, which
exists in deployment roots (and there shouldn't be a `${sysroot}/sysroot`).
In order to unit test this, I added a `--sysroot` argument to `remote add`.
However, doing this better would require reworking the command line parsing for
the `remote` argument to support specifying `--repo` or `--sysroot`, and I
didn't quite want to do that yet in this patch.
This second iteration of this patch fixes the bug we hit the first time;
embarassingly enough I broke `ostree remote list` finding system remotes.
The fix is to have `ostree_repo_open()` figure out whether it's the same
as `/ostree/repo` for now.
Down the line...we might consider having the `ostree remote` command line itself
instatiate an `OstreeSysroot` by default, but this maximizes compatibility; we
just have to pay a small cost that `ostree` usage outside of that case like
`ostree static-delta` in a releng Jenkins job or whatever will do this `stat()`
too.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/892Closes: #1008
Approved by: mbarnes
When we [switched to using checkout + force_copy](e8efd1c8dc),
a side effect that went unnoticed at the time is that we started
setting directory mtimes to zero.
See the below bug where we long ago set the file times to zero, which got fixed,
so let's not regress things by setting the directory times to zero either. (Even
though AFAICS GNU tar doesn't complain about those)
This semantic is somewhat "overloaded" onto `force_copy`, but it avoids adding
yet another boolean; we don't have that many reserved boolean slots left. I
can't really think of many good use cases for `force_copy` *other* than the
`/etc` merge anyways.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1229160
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/995Closes: #997
Approved by: jlebon
And in general, if for some reason we can't write `user.` xattrs, provide an
error immediately rather than doing it during a later pull. This way the failure
cause is a lot more obvious.
Related: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/991Closes: #993
Approved by: jlebon
For ostree-as-host, we're the superuser, so we'll blow past
any reserved free space by default. While deltas have size
metadata, if one happens to do a loose fetch, we can fill
up the disk.
Another case is flatpak: the system helper has similar concerns
here as ostree-as-host, and for `flatpak --user`, we also
want to be nice and avoid filling up the user's quota.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/962Closes: #987
Approved by: jlebon
I only checked the test passed, I didn't read the output closely, and
made it succeed without testing anything.
Fix the absolute/relative `/etc` references.
Closes: #937
Approved by: jlebon
The code here tried to truncate the string to the previous length,
but that doesn't work when recursing, since further calls change the
length.
What actually ended up happening was the string would get corrupted
after the first level of recursion.
Closes: #936
Approved by: jlebon
These at the moment aren't in a container, and may need space. In the future
overlay2 will help here, we can more easily extend the rootfs.
Closes: #840
Approved by: jlebon
`test-pull-many.sh` is was just too slow to be a unit test. Generating
a bunch of files via shell is slow, the delta generation is slow, etc.
Every developer doesn't need to run it every time.
Somewhat address this by converting it into our installed test framework, which
moves it out of the developer fast paths. Another advantage to this is
that we can simply reuse the FAH tree content rather than synthesizing
new bits each time.
Closes: #840
Approved by: jlebon
Our container-driven tests can't e.g. test SELinux sanely, and
have to support being run as root *and* non-root too.
Use redhat-ci to provision a VM and run tests directly there. These are
installed tests too.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/806Closes: #807
Approved by: jlebon
