IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Will debug at some point but for now let's
unblock other things.
```
/usr/bin/ld: /var/tmp/checkout/target/release/libbupsplit_rs.a(bupsplit_rs-db7d02fa07221ce3.bupsplit_rs0.rust-cgu.o): undefined reference to symbol 'dladdr@@GLIBC_2.2.5'
```
Closes: #1387
Approved by: jlebon
Let's do a new release with the locking preview, the http2 disable options and
other misc bugfixes to close out the year.
Closes: #1386
Approved by: jlebon
See discussion in https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=791622
This is what e.g. systemd, the Linux kernel, and lots of other projects do. It's
astonishingly hard to reliably get right; the optimization IMO only really
matters for truly high performance inner loops, but if you're doing
that kind of stuff today you're probably doing it on a GPU anyways.
Closes: #1384
Approved by: pwithnall
We had this basically forced on in the CLI; down the line I'd really like to
make this an API option to commit or so, but given that we found a use case in
the rpm-ostree test suite for "unbound" commits, let's support creating them
from the cmdline.
See: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/1379Closes: #1380
Approved by: jlebon
It'd all be really nice if there was some sort of `O_TMPFILE` for symlinks, but
anyways the way we were doing a generic "make temp file than rename" actually
defeats some of the point of `O_TMPFILE`. It's now fully safe to do "copy to
self", so let's do that for regfiles.
Closes: #1378
Approved by: jlebon
Today the rpm-ostree test suite uses `refs --create` to save
commits. I think this is a legitimate use case, and other
people may be doing something similar.
On the other hand, I think we should probably be changing the rpm-ostree test
suite to create "unbound" commits. But let's be maximially compatible here since
we hit a real-world case where something needed to change.
Closes: #1379
Approved by: pwithnall
For the [rpm-ostree jigdo ♲📦](https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/1081) work.
We're basically doing "pull" via a non-libostree mechanism, and this
should be fully supported. As I mentioned earlier we should try to
have `ostree-repo-pull.c` only use public APIs; this gets us closer
to that.
Closes: #1376
Approved by: jlebon
I want some time to play with this more with different callers and work through
test scenarios. Let's disable the locking by default for now, but make it easy
to enable.
Closes: #1375
Approved by: jlebon
libtest-core.sh tries to clear the locale to a UTF-8 supporting C
locale, either by setting it to C.UTF-8 (preferred) or just C.
Some systems, like Fedora 26, use the locale name C.utf8, rather than
C.UTF-8. Support that too.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Closes: #1347
Approved by: cgwalters
Typically you’d use --branch and --bind-ref together to add additional
bindings as well as creating a main --branch for the commit. However,
you might also want to occasionally use --orphan --bind-ref to create a
commit with bindings for one or more refs, but not actually create any
of those refs pointing to the commit (you might create them as a later
step).
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Closes: #1347
Approved by: cgwalters
This new option verifies that the refs listed in the ref-bindings for
each commit all point to that commit (i.e. there aren’t multiple commits
listing the same ref in their ref-bindings, and there aren’t any commits
with non-empty ref-bindings which aren’t pointed at by a ref).
This is useful when generating a new repository from scratch, but not
useful when adding new commits to an existing repository (since the old
commits will still, correctly, have ref-bindings from when the refs
pointed at them). That’s why it has to be enabled explicitly using
--verify-back-refs, rather than being on by default.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Closes: #1347
Approved by: cgwalters
Try and clarify what happens with the prefixes, and that they always
return refspecs.
I’m still not 100% sure this is right.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Closes: #1347
Approved by: cgwalters
It seems ostree_repo_list_refs() can return refspecs as hash table keys,
as well as just ref names. Handle that by parsing them before trying to
use them as ref names.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Closes: #1347
Approved by: cgwalters
Since an OSTree client will refuse to pull from a remote which it has
locally configured with a collection ID, if the commit on that remote
has incorrect or missing bindings, we’d better verify them as part of
fsck.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Closes: #1347
Approved by: cgwalters
It will be used by the fsck utility in future. We could expose it
publicly in future too, if needed.
Signed-off-by: Philip Withnall <withnall@endlessm.com>
Closes: #1347
Approved by: cgwalters
Mostly adding this for use in test cases; it allows us to add e.g.
integers, and we need to deal with byteswapping those.
Someone mind also find it useful to add fully structured metadata, although most
of those users should be using a real language and not shell script.
Closes: #1372
Approved by: jlebon
In the non-`CONSUME` path for regfiles (which happens currently for
`bare-user`), we go to a lot of contortions to make an "object stream",
only to immediately parse it again.
Fixing this will also enable the `G_IS_FILE_DESCRIPTOR_BASED()` fast path in
commit, since the input stream will actually reference the file descriptor and
not be an `_OstreeChainInputStream`.
There's a slight concern here in that we're no longer checksumming *literally*
the object stream passed in for the stream case, but I mention in the comment,
the data should be the same, and if it's not somehow we're not adding risk,
since the checksum is still covering the data we actually care about.
Prep for further changes to break up the `write_content_object()` path into
separate paths for archive, as well as regfile vs symlink in non-archive.
Closes: #1371
Approved by: jlebon
A while ago I did `truncate -s 0 /path/to/repo/00/123.commit`, and expected a
checksum error, but I actually got a validation error due to us loading the
commit into a variant and trying to parse out the parent checksum, etc.
I first started by changing the `load_and_fsck_one_object()` function to
checksum before loading, but the problem is that we do a traverse of all objects
first. Fixing this is going to require an `OSTREE_REPO_COMMIT_TRAVER_FLAG_FSCK`
or something.
In the meantime at least though, let's add a public API to fsck a single object
which *does* checksum cleanly before parsing the object, and change the `fsck`
command to use it.
We then change the fsck binary to do this while iterating over the refs
and finding the commit object. This way we'll at least get a checksum
first for commit objects, even if not dirtree/dirmeta.
Closes: #1364
Approved by: jlebon
This commit fixes an infinite loop that happens if you try to list the
remotes of a repo that has a parent repo set. It also adds a unit test
to ensure the right behavior, which is that both the child remotes and
parent remotes are listed.
Closes: #1366
Approved by: cgwalters
One major thing we can do to speed up local commits is multithreading. In
preparation for that, split up the recursion function so that the subdirectory
case is separate from the content (regfile/symlink) case. Then for non-subdirs,
we can easily peel off worker threads and gather the final checksums and update
the mtree from the main thread.
The diff here looks large but it's pretty straightforward; amazingly this change
compiled the very first time I tried it!
Closes: #1365
Approved by: jlebon
This seems to work around
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1362
Though I'm not entirely sure why yet. But at least with this it'll be easier for
people to work around things locally.
Closes: #1368
Approved by: jlebon
Test that concurrent commits and prunes can succeed. Mostly this is a
check that the new locking works correctly and the concurrent processes
will properly wait until they've acquired the appropriate repository
lock.
Closes: #1343
Approved by: cgwalters
Add exclusive repository locking to all the pruning entry points. This
ensures that objects and deltas will not be removed while another
process is writing to the repository.
Closes: #1343
Approved by: cgwalters
Define an auto cleanup handler for use with repo locking. This is based
on the existing auto transaction cleanup. A wrapper for
ostree_repo_lock_push() is added with it. The intended usage is like so:
g_autoptr(OstreeRepoAutoLock) lock = NULL;
lock = ostree_repo_auto_lock_push (repo, lock_type, cancellable, error);
if (!lock)
return FALSE;
The functions and type are marked to be skipped by introspection since I
can't see them being usable from bindings.
Closes: #1343
Approved by: cgwalters
Currently ostree has no method of guarding against concurrent pruning.
When there are multiple repo writers, it's possible to have a pull or
commit race against a prune and end up with missing objects.
This adds a file based repo locking mechanism. The intention is to take
a shared lock when writing objects and an exclusive lock when deleting
them. In order to make use of the locking throughout the library in a
fine grained fashion, the lock acts recursively with a stack of lock
states. If the lock becomes exclusive, it will stay in that state until
the stack is unwound past the initial exclusive push. The file locking
is similar to GLnxLockFile in that it uses open file descriptor locks
but falls back to flock when needed.
The lock also attempts to be thread safe by storing the lock state in
thread local storage with GPrivate. This means that each thread will
have an independent lock for each repository it opens. There are some
drawbacks to that, but it seemed impossible to manage the lock state
coherently in the face of multithreaded access.
The API is a push/pop interface in accordance with the recursive nature
of the locking. The push interface uses an enum that's translated to
LOCK_SH or LOCK_EX as needed. Both interfaces use an internal timeout
field to decide whether to manage the lock in a blocking or non-blocking
fashion. The intention is to allow ostree applications as well as
administrators to control this timeout. For now, the default is a 30
second timeout.
Note that the timeout is handled synchronously in thread since the lock
is maintained in thread local storage. I.e., the thread that acquires
the lock needs to be the same thread that runs the operation. There may
be a way to offer an asynchronous version, but it's not clear exactly
how that would work since it would likely involve a separate thread that
invokes a callback when the locking operation completes.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=759442Closes: #1343
Approved by: cgwalters
I was getting a bare `error: Creating temp file: No such file or directory` when
debugging `test-concurrency.py`; with this I get
`error: Writing content object: Creating temp file: No such file or directory`
which helps me pin it down.
Closes: #1343
Approved by: cgwalters
For rpm-ostree I'd like to do importing in parallel with threads; the code is
*almost* ready for that except today it calls
`ostree_repo_transaction_set_ref()`.
Looking at the code, there's really a "transaction" struct here,
not just stats. Let's lift that struct out, and move the refs
into it under the existing lock.
Clarify the documentation around multithreading for various functions.
Closes: #1358
Approved by: jlebon
Time to cut a new release, we've got the libcurl cleanup ordering patch which
several people have hit, along with safe early fixes for tmpdir cleanup. Let's
try to land the locking PR early next cycle.
Closes: #1359
Approved by: jlebon
I was seeing the `Writing OSTree commit...` phase of rpm-ostree
being very slow lately. This turns out to be more fallout from
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/1170
AKA commit: 8fe4536
Loading the xattrs is slow on my system (F27AW, XFS+LVM, NVMe). I haven't fully
traced through why, but AIUI at least on XFS the xattrs are often stored outside
of the inode so it's a little bit like doing an `open()+read()`. Plus there's
the LSM overhead, etc.
The thing is that for rpm-ostree's package layering use case, we
basically always want to treat the on-disk state as canonical. (There's
a subtle case here if one does overrides for something that contains
policy but we'll fix that).
Anyways, so we're in a state now where we do the slow but correct thing by
default, which seems sane. But let's allow the app to opt-in to telling us
"really trust devino". The difference between a `stat()` + hash table lookup
versus the full xattr load on my test case of `rpm-ostree install
./tree-1.7.0-10.fc27.x86_64.rpm` is absolutely dramatic; consistently on the
order of 10s without this support, and <1s with (800ms).
Closes: #1357
Approved by: jlebon
This squashes the last race condition I was actively hitting while running
`test-concurrency.py` in a loop. The race is when process A finds a tmpdir to
reuse, and goes to lock it. Meanwhile process B deletes it and unlocks the lock.
Process A then succeeds at grabbing a lock, but the tmpdir is deleted.
Closes: #1352
Approved by: dbnicholson
Previously we'd delete the tmpdir in `rename_pending_loose_objects()`
but do the unlock inside `ostree_repo_commit_transaction()`. Move
them into the same place in the latter function for consistency.
Doesn't fix anything, just a cleanup while reading the code and
working on `test-concurrency.py`.
Closes: #1352
Approved by: dbnicholson
