IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
I was planning to change some of the object loading code in the
future, so here's some porting.
Note that I rewrote `_ostree_repo_has_loose_object()` since it
used an error return across multiple functions.
Honestly I'm not sure about this `TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY()` business...
in reality we're going to end up with a ton of code linked in
process that doesn't do it. Unix sucks =( But I'm keeping
what was there out of consistency.
Closes: #809
Approved by: jlebon
This did a `closedir` in the `goto out` section before, but it
turns out more nicely if we follow the usual pattern of doing
the `open(O_DIRECTORY)` in the callee function and handle `ENOENT`
there.
Closes: #809
Approved by: jlebon
This is a variant of the efforts in https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/741
Working on `rpm-ostree livefs`, I realized though I needed to just
check out *new* files directly into the live `/etc` (and possibly
delete obsolete files).
The way the current `/etc` merge works is fundamentally different from
that. So my plan currently is to probably do something like:
- Compute diff
- Check out each *new* file individually (as a copy)
- Optionally delete obsolete files
Also, a few other things become more important - in the current deploy code, we
copy all of the files, then relabel them. But we shouldn't expose to *live*
systems the race conditions of doing that, plus we should only relabel files we
checked out.
By converting the deploy's /etc code to use this, we fix the same TODO item
there around atomically having the label set up as we create files. And further,
if we kill the `/var` relabeling which I think is unnecessary since Anaconda
does it, we could delete large chunks of code there.
In the implementation, there are two types of things: regular files, and
symlinks. For regular files, in the `O_TMPFILE` case, we have the ability to
do *everything* atomically (including SELinux labeling) before linking it into
place. So let's just use that. For symlinks, we use `setfscreatecon()`.
Closes: #797
Approved by: jlebon
Our container-driven tests can't e.g. test SELinux sanely, and
have to support being run as root *and* non-root too.
Use redhat-ci to provision a VM and run tests directly there. These are
installed tests too.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/806Closes: #807
Approved by: jlebon
This could be shared more easily with e.g. rpm-ostree, but what I'm currently
working on is installed, privileged (potentially destructive, i.e. VM) tests
that will source this separately from the current `libtest.sh`. That does work
installed, but in practice is oriented around unit (uninstalled, unprivileged)
tests.
Closes: #807
Approved by: jlebon
We really have an astonishing variety of similar functions which write files and
symlinks. I was working on a different PR and the duplication between the
union-mode and add-mode/none-mode checkout functions bothered me.
I realized that the "handle EEXIST" tri-state maps directly to the
`GLnxLinkTmpfileReplaceMode`, so deduping things makes even more sense.
Closes: #801
Approved by: jlebon
I was reading a strace the other day and noticed we were loading the same
`.dirmeta` object many times. Unlike the other object types, `.dirmeta` objects
don't accumulate much over time; there are only so many directory metadata types.
(Without SELinux involved it'd probably be 5-6 I'd guess offhand).
For `fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/docker-host` there are currently 34 `.dirmeta` in
the tree.
But how many times during a checkout did we load those 34 dirmeta objects?
With a quick strace:
```
$ strace -s 2048 -f -o strace.log ostree --repo=repo-build checkout -U fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/docker-host host-test-checkout
$ grep dirmeta strace.log | wc -l
7165
```
After, as you'd expect, we just loaded `34` from disk. We do
6 system calls (`openat+fstat+fstat+read+read+close`) per dirmeta,
so we dropped a total of 42780 system calls - which is about 20% of the total
system calls made.
`perf record` tells me that we're spending ~40 of our time in the kernel during
a checkout, so reducing syscall traffic helps. Though most of that appears to be
in the VFS and XFS layers for `linkat` (which isn't surprising).
So how much did perf improve? Well, on my workstation, I get a lot of
fluctuation in timing, sometimes by 30%, so this was well within the noise. But
it's well worth speeding up checkout, and I think this optimization will shine
more as we improve performance elsewhere.
Closes: #795
Approved by: jlebon
These are leftovers from the packfile code and should have been
deleted in commit: 2a0601efc7
I noticed this now since I wanted to add a new type of caching.
Closes: #795
Approved by: jlebon
I never really liked the term "osname". I feel "stateroot" is a *lot* clearer,
since the osname/stateroot mostly just holds `/var`. Further it avoids the `os`
prefix which is already overloaded.
Some of the existing docs already talked about "operating system state", which
further reinforces this.
There's *lot* more things than this which reference the term "osname", but I
don't want to change *everything* yet in this patch in case we decide to do
something different - this just gets the highlights.
Closes: #794
Approved by: jlebon
This is intended to be used for copying `/usr/etc` → `/etc` for
deployments.
A TODO here is to use `glnx_file_copy_at()` if the repo mode allows
it - then we'd use reflinks if available.
Closes: #804
Approved by: jlebon
There aren't many users of `g_file_enumerator_iterate()` left - those
remaining are usually good candidates for porting. There's some more
porting to do in this file; a mix of trivial and harder. This
one is a good candidate for an individual commit.
Closes: #803
Approved by: jlebon
I plan to make some future changes here, and wanted to do this
first.
Random side note; how about converting the do/while loops for `EINTR` to
`TEMP_FAILURE_RETRY()`? We're very inconsistent about that...
Closes: #792
Approved by: jlebon
This could help others who want to integrate with other init
systems/initramfs.
Commit-message-by: Colin Walters <walters@verbum.org>
Closes: #784
Approved by: cgwalters
`perf record ostree checkout ...` for a bare-user repo was telling
me we were spending a good 13% of our time in the depchain of `ot_lgexattrat()`.
The problem here is that traversing the `/proc` path turns out to be
somewhat expensive - there are LSM (SELinux) checks, etc.
For regular files, opening and just getting the xattr, then closing is still
quite cheap. For symlinks, we'll always need to open anyways.
This appears to shave about ~0.1 seconds off of a checkout of
`fedora-atomic/25/x86_64/docker-host` on my workstation.
Oh, and this was the last user of `ot_lgexattrat()` so we can kill it, which is
nice - the xattr code should really live in libglnx.
Closes: #796
Approved by: jlebon
This is only about 40%, and mostly simpler functions. It's
nice to switch to `g_autoptr(GMatchInfo)` instead of our inline version.
I decided to add more usage of `ot_transfer_out_value()`, though it'd
be nice to try to have a copy of that in libglnx (or possibly glib).
Closes: #791
Approved by: jlebon
This commit won't actually *be* 2017.5 since due to the way our infrastructure
works, we still want to increment git master to 2017.5.
See https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/800Closes: #800
Approved by: jlebon
Logic error introduced after refactoring; we hoisted the
`is_bare_user_symlink` variable to the top, but its computation
below. But the `is_bare` symlink depended on it.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/798Closes: #799
Approved by: jlebon
I think the majority of OSTree usage calls pull with refs, not
explicit commits. We even added special "override syntax" with
`@` (e.g. `ostree pull foo@ab12c34`) as a hybrid.
However, some users may want to still pull explicit commits
for whatever reason. The old static delta logic looked at
the previous commit of the ref. However, in https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/710
we enhanced the logic to look at all local commits.
It's now a lot more natural to teach the delta logic
to support revisions, e.g. `ostree pull someorigin ab12c34`.
This also fixes the problem that before, `--require-static-deltas`
was completely ignored when processing revisions.
This is a nontrivial refactoring of the logic, but the end
result feels a lot more readable to me.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/783Closes: #787
Approved by: cgwalters
Previously we'd assert and dump core if one used `checkout -H` without
`-U` on a bare-user repo, because we'd hit the bare-user symlink case.
Rework the code to handle this, and add tests. I hit this when I was going to
suggest to someone to use `-H` to ensure they were getting hardlinks.
Closes: #779
Approved by: jlebon
Testing a fetch of `fedora-atomic/.../docker-host` from
an nginx instance over `https://127.0.0.1` using Fedora 25
versions. Average over 3 runs:
Before: ~24.6 seconds
After: ~19 seconds
Speedup: ~30%
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/778Closes: #780
Approved by: jlebon
In particular the 26-variable monster 👹 in `install_deployment_kernel()` is
slain🗡. I didn't touch every function here, trying to keep things gradual.
Closes: #781
Approved by: jlebon
It was reported that in the range request handling, we called `remove_pending()`
twice (once in processing it, and once potentially in the local_error cleanup),
and this could be viewed as a use-after-free. However, right now the range
cleanup and `local_error` being set are mututally exclusive.
Further, the task object already holds a strong reference, so I observed the
refcount was 2. For both of these reasons, there is no use-after-free in
practice.
Reported-By: "Siddharth Sharma" <siddharth@redhat.com>
Closes: #774
Approved by: jlebon
I was planning to change one here, decided to do a conversion
of some of the simpler functions in this file to keep up momentum.
Closes: #776
Approved by: jlebon
I was working on `rpm-ostree livefs` which does some ostree-based
filesystem diffs, and noticed that we were ending up with `/proc`
not being labeled in our base trees.
Reading the selinux-policy source, indeed we have:
```
/proc -d <<none>>
/proc/.* <<none>>
```
This dates pretty far back. We really don't want unlabeled
content in ostree. In this case it's mostly OK since the kernel
will assign a label, but again *everything* should be labeled via
OSTree so that it's all consistent, which will fix `ostree diff`.
Notably, `/proc` is the *only* file path that isn't covered when composing a
Fedora Atomic Host. So I added a hack here to hardcode it (although I'm a bit
uncertain about whether it should really be `proc_t` on disk before systemd
mounts or not).
Out of conservatism, I made this a flag, so if we hit issues down the line, we
could easily change rpm-ostree to stumble on as it did before.
Closes: #768
Approved by: jlebon
Being bitten by lack of PR testing here. There are two bugs:
- First and foremost, I forgot that GObject will call the property setters with
the defaults. This meant we were getting both path="/var/tmp/blah" and fd=-1,
and we were accepting -1 as a fd, which then got converted into AT_FDCWD
which was wrong.
- Since these properties are construct only and mutually exclusive, don't
try to handle one resetting the other. Assert that exactly one of them is set.
Closes: #769
Approved by: jlebon
This is inspired by the [Coccinelle](http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) usage
in systemd. I also took it a bit further and added infrastructure
to have spatches which should never apply. This acts as a blacklist.
The reason to do the latter is that coccinelle is *way* more powerful than the
regular expresssions we have in `make syntax-check`.
I started with blacklisting `g_error_free()` directly. The reason that's bad is
it leaves a dangling pointer.
Closes: #754
Approved by: jlebon
I happened to read this file and realized there's a lot of cruft left over from
the time when I liked `GFile` and `malloc()`ing like 50 times just to make a
pathname string. Delete it.
Closes: #767
Approved by: jlebon
Actually trying to use this in rpm-ostree, it kept returning successfully when I
didn't expect it to... The first conditional was always succeeding even when I
was asking for a newer minor.
Closes: #766
Approved by: jlebon
I'd like to do this in rpm-ostree at least. Originally I was looking at porting
to `G_DECLARE_FINAL_TYPE` but eh, this is easier for now and won't bump our GLib
dependency which might matter for our embedded users.
For now I just did a few replacements in the `remote` command line. A full port
can come as we do other code cleanups.
This will actually break the flatpak build right now, but
that's easy to fix. And we concluded in e.g.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95065#c5
it's a bug for downstream projects to do that.
Closes: #756
Approved by: jlebon
I didn't touch everything since at least `commit_loose_object_trusted`
does this:
```
out:
if (G_UNLIKELY (error && *error))
g_prefix_error (error, "Writing object %s.%s: ", checksum, ostree_object_type_to_string (objtype));
```
Which...it'd be interesting to make into an autocleanup. But for now just
keeping up with converting things bit by bit.
Closes: #761
Approved by: jlebon
In [this commit](6ce80f9685)
for some reason I added a `sepolicy` member to the sysroot. I
have no idea why I did that, and it's conceptually wrong
since the policy is specific to a *deployment*.
This bit me when I was working on [a pull request](https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/763)
elsewhere, since at that point it was `NULL`.
We already pass around the sepolicy in the deployment code, so just stop caching
it.
Closes: #764
Approved by: jlebon
(Also rename the other CI contexts to be more consistent)
We pass this right now. I just noticed an instance of this in bwrap, and I think
we should be trying to match the RPM build baseline.
Closes: #765
Approved by: jlebon
I was playing around in a FAH vagrant box, and hit:
```
Receiving delta parts: 3/4 453.2 kB/s 1.8 MB/145.8 MB
error: opcode set-read-source: No such file object b6e54ba3471b9c116ce6b9bfbf9e55fec60d35cfdb9ae5ae1ee219af02a591b7
```
This is because this host version doesn't yet have
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/710
which incidentally fixed this for the case where the OS vendor is using
summary files.
Some organizations may not be using summary files - at least we still try to
support that case. So let's copy the logic very recently added in that commit to
handle the legacy case too.
No new tests since this is a nice-to-have - we really do
expect people to be using summary files now.
Closes: #739
Approved by: jlebon
This is somewhat complicated by such repos only properly supporting
some subset of file metadata (uid/gid 0, etc). We fix this by
always commiting with filters that make it work.
Closes: #750
Approved by: cgwalters
