IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This is the new Fedora kernel standard layout; it has the advantage
of being in `/usr` like `/usr/lib/ostree-boot`, but it's not OSTree
specific.
Further, I think in practice forcing tree builders to compute the checksum is an
annoying stumbling block; since we already switched to e.g. computing checksums
always when doing pulls, the cost of doing another checksum for the
kernel/initramfs is tiny. The "bootcsum" becomes more of an internal
implementation detail.
Now, there is a transition; my current thought for this is that rpm-ostree will
change to default to injecting into both `/usr/lib/ostree-boot` and
`/usr/lib/modules`, and stop doing `/boot`, then maybe next year say we drop the
`/usr/lib/ostree-boot` by default.
A twist here is that the default Fedora kernel RPM layout (and what's in
rpm-ostree today) includes a kernel but *not* an initramfs in
`/usr/lib/modules`. If we looked only there, we'd just find the kernel. So we
need to look in both, and then special case this - pick the legacy layout if we
have `/usr/lib/modules` but not an initramfs.
While here, rework the code to have an `OstreeKernelLayout` struct which makes
dealing with all of the variables nicer.
Closes: #1079
Approved by: jlebon
I never really liked the term "osname". I feel "stateroot" is a *lot* clearer,
since the osname/stateroot mostly just holds `/var`. Further it avoids the `os`
prefix which is already overloaded.
Some of the existing docs already talked about "operating system state", which
further reinforces this.
There's *lot* more things than this which reference the term "osname", but I
don't want to change *everything* yet in this patch in case we decide to do
something different - this just gets the highlights.
Closes: #794
Approved by: jlebon
I was confused while reading the docs how this could work, since in at
least the Fedora/CentOS/RHEL distros, they're named e.g.
initramfs-`uname -r`-$checksum.
Closes: #529
Approved by: cgwalters
I was going through the new version of the docs and noticed a few
problems. Mostly URLs that aren't linked, extra whitespace, and a few
mis-spellings.
I ran the files through `aspell check` and made some manual changes
myself.
These changes were tested locally with `mkdocs serve`
I don't much like Docbook (and am considering converting the man pages
too), but let's start with the manual.
I looked at various documentation generators (there are a lot), and
I had a few requirements:
- Markdown
- Packaged in Fedora
- Suitable for upload to a static webserver
`mkdocs` seems to fit the bill.
