IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
I think originally I had envisioned this as `ostree.version`, but at the last
minute we changed it to just `version`. That's what all of the code uses, so
let's fix the docs.
Closes: #638
Approved by: paulvt
I was confused while reading the docs how this could work, since in at
least the Fedora/CentOS/RHEL distros, they're named e.g.
initramfs-`uname -r`-$checksum.
Closes: #529
Approved by: cgwalters
Quoting Dan Nicholson in
<https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/330#issuecomment-245499099>
mtime of 0 has been the semantics of ostree deployments from basically
the beginning of the project. We (and others, see
flatpak/flatpak@b5204c9) rely on that fact when generating trees.
In particular, this affects caches that use the mtime of the
associated file or directory to determine if the cache is valid. By
arbitrarily changing the mtime of the files to something else, all
the caches we setup in the build are now invalidated. Preseeding
caches is really important to the user experience as it avoids
having the user wait while they're regenerated on first run.
Now, we could change our build infrastructure to preset all the
mtimes to 1 to match this change, but what does that do for our
existing users who are on an ostree that deploys with mtimes of 0?
We could just revert this change at Endless (and the associated one
in Flatpak), and that would be fine for our users. However, if we
point non-Endless users to our apps, they'll have the great
experience of waiting 10 seconds the first time they launch it while
the fontconfig cache is rebuilt unnecessarily.
Closes: #495
Approved by: jlebon
In particular, NixOS has changed somewhat, and Conda is worth
looking at. Also it seems reasonable to mention rpm-ostree /
Gnome Continuous.
Closes: #331
Approved by: cgwalters
1 is a better choice than 0 because some programs use 0
as a special value; for example, GNU Tar warns of an
"implausibly old timestamp" with 0.
Closes: #330
Approved by: cgwalters
A few links in the docs had the Markdown syntax swapped like:
(link title)[link url]
Just cleaned up those. Verified via `mkdocs serve`
Closes: #297
Approved by: cgwalters
Just keeping my promise to write more documentation. There could be a
lot more to write here, but I'm trying to get a start done.
Closes: #222
Approved by: jlebon
I'd like to encourage people to make OSTree-managed systems more
strictly read-only in multiple places. Ideally everywhere is
read-only normally besides `/var/`, `/tmp/`, and `/run`.
`/boot` is a good example of something to make readonly. Particularly
now that there's work on the `admin unlock` verb, we need to protect
the system better against things like `rpm -Uvh kernel.rpm` because
the RPM-packaged kernel won't understand how to do OSTree right.
In order to make this work of course, we *do* need to remount `/boot`
as writable when we're doing an upgrade that changes the kernel
configuration. So the strategy is to detect whether it's read-only,
and if so, temporarily mount read-write, then remount read-only when
the upgrade is done.
We can generalize this in the future to also do `/etc` (and possibly
`/sysroot/ostree/` although that gets tricky).
One detail: In order to detect "is this path a mountpoint" is
nontrivial - I looked at copying the systemd code, but the right place
is to use `libmount` anyways.
This content currently lives here:
<https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/OSTree/RelatedProjects>. Moving it
into the manual in Markdown:
- Makes it look better
- It's more useful alongside the rest of the docs
- Is much less crummy in general than the GNOME wiki
I was going through the new version of the docs and noticed a few
problems. Mostly URLs that aren't linked, extra whitespace, and a few
mis-spellings.
I ran the files through `aspell check` and made some manual changes
myself.
These changes were tested locally with `mkdocs serve`
I don't much like Docbook (and am considering converting the man pages
too), but let's start with the manual.
I looked at various documentation generators (there are a lot), and
I had a few requirements:
- Markdown
- Packaged in Fedora
- Suitable for upload to a static webserver
`mkdocs` seems to fit the bill.
