IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Followup to https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/2463
One thing I noticed here is we lost usage of `build-check.sh`
which also invokes `clang`, which doesn't speak `-fanalyzer`
and would be broken by this if we try to enable `build-check.sh`
again. But that can come later.
In general, we're probably going to need to change most of our
`g_return_if_fail` to `g_assert`. The analyzer flags that
the function can return `NULL`, but the caller isn't prepared for
this.
In practice, let's abort.
In general, we're probably going to need to change most of our
`g_return_if_fail` to `g_assert`. The analyzer flags that
the function can return `NULL`, but the caller isn't prepared for
this.
In practice, let's abort.
In general, we're probably going to need to change most of our
`g_return_if_fail` to `g_assert`. The analyzer flags that
the function can return `NULL`, but the caller isn't prepared for
this.
In practice, let's abort.
In general, we're probably going to need to change most of our
`g_return_if_fail` to `g_assert`. The analyzer flags that
the function can return `NULL`, but the caller isn't prepared for
this.
In practice, let's abort.
This defines `OstreeRepoAutoTransaction` as a boxed type, in order
to support auto-generating bindings for it.
That first requires adding internal reference-counting to it, to
allow freely copying/freeing references to a single transaction guard.
This rewords errors and log messages in the functions which take care
of preparing sysroot in initramfs.
Depending on the boot flow, it is possible to reach this logic
with a sysroot mounted (unexpectedly) as read-only.
In that case, let's clearly point out the problematic mountpoint.
This enhances the auto-transaction logic, augmenting the scope of a
transaction guard.
It allows committing or aborting a transaction through its guard.
It also supports tracking the completion status of a transaction
guard, avoiding double commits/aborts, while retaining the auto-cleanup
logic.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945274 is an issue where a privileged
kubernetes daemonset is writing a socket into `/etc`. This makes ostree upgrades barf.
Now, they should clearly move it to `/run`. However, one option is for us to
just ignore it instead of erroring out. Some brief investigation shows that
e.g. `git add somesocket` is a silent no-op, which is an argument in favor of ignoring it.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2446
This is nicer than having the caller parse the commit
object, or indirect via the `OstreeRepoFile*` object of the root.
Will be used in ostree-rs-ext around tar parsing.
This is part of `OstreeCommitModifier`, but I'm not using
that in some of the ostree-ext Rust code.
It just makes more sense as a direct policy API, where it should
have been in the first place. There's already support for
setting a policy object on a commit modifier, so that's all the
old API needs to do now.
There's a general Unix philosophy that "silence is golden".
However, when one is explicitly invoking an error check it's nice
to see explicit success.
We already print various statistics, so ending with a happy
note has no extra cost.
The logic for `--selinux-policy` ended up in the `--tree=dir`
path, but there's no reason for that. Fix the imported
labeling with `--tree=tar`. Prep for use with containers.
We had this bug because the previous logic was trying to avoid
duplicating the code for generic `--selinux-policy` and
the case of `--selinux-policy-from-base --tree=dir`.
It's a bit more code, but it's cleaner if we dis-entangle them.
Having to touch a global test counter when adding tests is
a recipe for conflicts between PRs.
The TAP protocol allows *ending* with the expected number of
tests, so the best way to do this is to have an explicit
API like our `tap_ok` which bumps a counter, then end with `tap_end`.
I ported one test as a demo.
