IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
In the storage PR I was trying to do a `pull-local` of the whole
`/ostree/repo` on the system, which ended up triggering a `g_critical()`
in the collections code, since we tried to parse a remote-prefixed ref
`fedora:fedora/26/x86_64/atomic-host` as a ref.
I'm not sure offhand what our behavior in this case *should* be. I
think git only clones local refs, but I need to check.
This corner case arises only with `pull-local`. But in any case,
while we were previously saying this is programmer error, since it's
so easy to pass various unchecked input into the pull machinery,
make invalid refs an explicit error.
Closes: #992
Approved by: jlebon
Previously, `ostree pull` was silent if not on a tty. I don't
see a reason not to print the final status line at least. This
is prep for more work in the test suite, so I can write assertions
on the output.
But it should also be nicer for people who e.g. do an `ostree pull` in a Jenkins
job or whatever.
Closes: #981
Approved by: jlebon
The `-z2` is annoying now since it's really a legacy; we've long
since supported typing `archive`. Convert the docs fully and
explain that.
Also do some (but not all) of the tests just to encourage newer tests to use
`archive` too.
Closes: #980
Approved by: jlebon
We're hitting this in flathub, where we have a bunch of local builds,
but we also mirror a few refs from the gnome runtime repo into it.
Its fixable by re-doing the summary, but for a short time the
wrong version is visible.
Fixes https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/846Closes: #935
Approved by: cgwalters
For the flatpak PR: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/pull/849
It's really more convenient if this works for HTTP pulls as well, since flatpak
does various types of pulling, and we can just set the flag everywhere.
Further, we might as well reject the content as early as possible.
Closes: #930
Approved by: alexlarsson
This is an option which is intended mostly for flatpak;
see: https://github.com/flatpak/flatpak/issues/845
We're adding an option for pulling into *all*
repo modes that has an effect similar to the `bare-user-only`
change from https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/909
This way one can pull content into e.g. a root-owned `bare` repository and
ensure that there aren't any setuid or world-writable files.
Closes: #926
Approved by: alexlarsson
If somehow a repo has gpg verification on but doesn't have signatures
present for the existing commit, ostree would error out if it needs to
scan the commit object (e.g. if there are no updates available).
An instance of this is currently happening in Fedora AH, in which
signatures are not shipped in the ISO due to filesystem restrictions.
Another possible scenario is if a content provider switches from not
signing commits to signing them; even if older commits are retroactively
signed, clients' local commit objects would error out if they needed
scanning.
This patch adds a check to ensure that we always attempt to fetch the
detached metadata and wait for its result (whether it exists or not)
before moving on to scan their corresponding commit objects.
See also: https://github.com/projectatomic/rpm-ostree/issues/630Closes: #873
Approved by: cgwalters
I think the majority of OSTree usage calls pull with refs, not
explicit commits. We even added special "override syntax" with
`@` (e.g. `ostree pull foo@ab12c34`) as a hybrid.
However, some users may want to still pull explicit commits
for whatever reason. The old static delta logic looked at
the previous commit of the ref. However, in https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/710
we enhanced the logic to look at all local commits.
It's now a lot more natural to teach the delta logic
to support revisions, e.g. `ostree pull someorigin ab12c34`.
This also fixes the problem that before, `--require-static-deltas`
was completely ignored when processing revisions.
This is a nontrivial refactoring of the logic, but the end
result feels a lot more readable to me.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/783Closes: #787
Approved by: cgwalters
There are a lot of things suboptimal about this approach, but
on the other hand we need to get our CI back up and running.
The basic approach is to - in the test suite, detect if we're on overlayfs. If
so, set a flag in the repo, which gets picked up by a few strategic places in
the core to turn on "ignore xattrs".
I also had to add a variant of this for the sysroot work.
The core problem here is while overlayfs will let us read and
see the SELinux labels, it won't let us write them.
Down the line, we should improve this so that we can selectively ignore e.g.
`security.*` attributes but not `user.*` say.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/758Closes: #759
Approved by: jlebon
In https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/408, we disabled the use of
static deltas when mirroring. Later,
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/506 loosened this up again so
that we could use static deltas when mirroring into bare{-user} repos.
However, the issue which originally spurrred #408 is even more generic
than that: we want to avoid static deltas for any archive repo, not just
when doing a mirror pull. This patch tightens this up, and also
relocates the decision code to make it easier to read.
Closes: #715
Approved by: cgwalters
It's just simpler, and I'm not sure people are going to care
much about the difference by default.
We already folded in the fallback sizes into the download totals, so folding in
the count makes things consistent; previously you could see e.g.
`3/3 parts, 100MB/150MB` and be confused.
Closes: #678
Approved by: giuseppe
They are installed non-executable, which makes Debian's Lintian
packaging consistency check complain that #! is only useful
in executable scripts. But in fact they are not useful to execute
directly (they rely on setup being done in the script that sources
them), so just chmod them -x.
Closes: #652
Approved by: cgwalters
This is a migration from the origin version. It's
nicer to have it in the remote, since that's what one
needs to change. Then tools don't need to mess with
the origin file.o
In fact in this scenario one can keep the "media source" like
`file:///install/repo` or whatever, since conceptually that's where it
came from. We're just providing a better error.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/626Closes: #627
Approved by: jlebon
We should just download the commit objects directly, as it's
obviously a lot more efficient than deltas.
I had to generate a summary file in more places in the tests,
since once created, it needs to be updated.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/528Closes: #566
Approved by: jlebon
We don't presently support this, since the static delta code assumes
it can just `mmap()` file objects. We could at some point implement
this, but for now just skip executing deltas when doing
`archive -> archive` mirroring.
I noticed this when trying to mirror a repo in Jenkins in
[CAHC](https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel).
Closes: #408
Approved by: giuseppe
OSTree's code for testing predates the `glib-tap.mk` making its
way into GLib. Let's switch to it, as it provides a number
of advantages.
By far the biggest advantage is that `make check` can start to run
most of the tests *in addition* to having them work installed.
This commit keeps the installed tests working, but `make check` turns
out to be really broken because...our TAP usage has bitrotted to say
the least. Fix that all up.
Do some hacks so that the tests work uninstalled as well - in
particular, `glib-tap.mk` and the bits encoded into
`g_test_build_filename()` assume *recursive* Automake (blah). Work
around that by creating a symlink when installed to loop back.
One of the design goals with deltas was not just wire efficiency,
but also having all the data up front about how much data would
be transferred before starting.
Let's expose that better by adding a `dry-run` option to the pull API.
This requires static deltas to be useful. Basically we simply call
the progress callback once with the data from the superblock.
For a production release repository, most OS vendors would want
to just always use static deltas. Add the ability for the pulls to
require it.
(I think I'll also add a summary key for this actually in addition,
so the repo manager can force it too)
I don't know why we didn't do this a long time ago. This extends the
pull API to allow grabbing a specific commit, and will set the branch
to it. There's some support for this in the deploy engine, but there
are a lot of reasons to support it for raw pulls (such as subset
mirroring cases).
In fact I'm thinking we should also have the override-version logic
here too.
NOTE: One thing I debated here is inventing a new syntax on the
command line. Git doesn't seem to have this functionality (probably
because it'd be rarely used). The '@' character at least doesn't
conflict with anything.
Anyways, I wanted this for some other test cases. Without this,
writing tests that go between different commits is more awkward as one
must generate the content in one repo, then pull downstream, then
generate more content, then pull again. But now I can just keep track
of commit IDs and do exactly what I want without synchronizing the
tests.
I noticed in the static deltas tests, there were some tests that
should have been under `-o pipefail` to ensure we properly propagate
errors.
There were a few places where we were referencing undefined variables.
Overall, this is clearly a good idea IMO.
And add a syntax rule to avoid this in future.
Fixed by:
sed -i -e 's|^ostree |${CMD_PREFIX} ostree |g' tests/*.sh
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
It's always been suboptimal to have both pull and pull-local; as we go
beyond the raw object data into things like deltas and summary files,
the logic to perform e.g. mirroring should only be in one place.
This will be used by Pulp's OSTree content plugin at least to perform
promotions.
There's several use cases for calling into ostree itself to do
mirroring, instead of using bare rsync. For example, it's a bit more
efficient as it doesn't require syncing the objects/ directory.
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728351
This uses gpgv for verification against DATADIR/ostree/pubring.gpg by
default. The keyring can be overridden by specifying OSTREE_GPG_HOME.
Add a unit test for commit signing with gpg key and verifying on pull;
to implement this we ship a test GPG key generated with no password
for Ostree Tester <test@test.com>.
Change all of the existing tests to disable GPG verification.
