IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
I find "libOSTree" awkward to type and really to look at. Let's be nicer on
people's pinky fingers and eyes and drop it all down to lowercase.
Closes: #1093
Approved by: jlebon
Add meta-updater and QtOTA, and delete OpenEmbedded since it's implied by the
first two. Merge rpm-ostree + Atomic Host since they're close. Clarify
gnome-continuous a bit.
Closes: #700
Approved by: jlebon
There are many motivating factors. The biggest is simply that at a practical
level, the command line is not sufficient to build a real system. The docs say
that it's a demo for the library. Let's make that more obvious, so people don't
try to use `ostree admin upgrade` for their real systems, and also don't use
e.g. `ostree commit` on the command line outside of test suites/quick hacking.
This change will also help clarify the role of rpm-ostree, which we will likely
be renamed to "nts". Then use of the term "ostree" will become much clearer. And
similarly for other people writing upgraders, they can say they use libostree.
I didn't try to change all of the docs and code at once, because it's going to
lead to conflicts.
The next big steps are:
- Rename the github repo (github will inject a redirect)
- Look at supporting a build where we don't do `ostree admin`, or at least
it's only built for tests. We may want to split it off as a separate binary
or so? That way people with their own upgraders don't need to ship it.
Closes: #659
Approved by: jlebon
I was going through the new version of the docs and noticed a few
problems. Mostly URLs that aren't linked, extra whitespace, and a few
mis-spellings.
I ran the files through `aspell check` and made some manual changes
myself.
These changes were tested locally with `mkdocs serve`
I don't much like Docbook (and am considering converting the man pages
too), but let's start with the manual.
I looked at various documentation generators (there are a lot), and
I had a few requirements:
- Markdown
- Packaged in Fedora
- Suitable for upload to a static webserver
`mkdocs` seems to fit the bill.
I'd like to migrate content from the GNOME wiki, as frankly the wiki
is crap. Markdown in git is better in every way.
Start by fleshing out the README.md to be more useful.
