IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
The original changes here apparently had the *idea* that `--static-deltas-only`
would be useful in general, but we never implemented that. The current
situation where it's ignored unless `--delete-commit` is specified is
very misleading and I can easily see it leading to data loss for people.
Let's error out until we have a chance to make it actually useful.
Related: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1479Closes: #1482
Approved by: giuseppe
I think this got changed in a refactor. We definitely want
to total up the amount of space that *would* be freed even
with `--no-prune` AKA `OSTREE_REPO_PRUNE_FLAGS_NO_PRUNE`.
It's actually a bit terrifying this is apparently the first test case for
the `--no-prune` option...
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1480Closes: #1483
Approved by: jlebon
SPDX License List is a list of (common) open source
licenses that can be referred to by a “short identifier”.
It has several advantages compared to the common "license header texts"
usually found in source files.
Some of the advantages:
* It is precise; there is no ambiguity due to variations in license header
text
* It is language neutral
* It is easy to machine process
* It is concise
* It is simple and can be used without much cost in interpreted
environments like java Script, etc.
* An SPDX license identifier is immutable.
* It provides simple guidance for developers who want to make sure the
license for their code is respected
See http://spdx.org for further reading.
Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Closes: #1439
Approved by: cgwalters
In 5c940987e7 / #646 we
added `--retain-branch-depth`; this adds a symmetric
`--only-branch` for the case where a repo owner just
wants to prune a specific branch.
The implementation here is pretty straightforward; we
just walk all refs and inject the equivalent of
`--retain-branch-depth=$ref=-1` if they're *not* in
`--only-branch`.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/1115Closes: #1127
Approved by: jlebon
In almost all places. There are just a few exceptions; one tricky bit for
example is that the repo config must still have `mode=archive-z2`, since
`archive` used to mean something else. (We could very likely just get rid of
that check, but eh, later).
I also added a test that one can still do `ostree repo init --mode=archive-z2`.
Closes: #1125
Approved by: jlebon
There are a lot of things suboptimal about this approach, but
on the other hand we need to get our CI back up and running.
The basic approach is to - in the test suite, detect if we're on overlayfs. If
so, set a flag in the repo, which gets picked up by a few strategic places in
the core to turn on "ignore xattrs".
I also had to add a variant of this for the sysroot work.
The core problem here is while overlayfs will let us read and
see the SELinux labels, it won't let us write them.
Down the line, we should improve this so that we can selectively ignore e.g.
`security.*` attributes but not `user.*` say.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/758Closes: #759
Approved by: jlebon
There are use cases for having a single repo with branches
with different lifecycles; a simple example of what I was
trying to do in CentOS Atomic Host work is have "stable"
and "devel" branches, were we want to prune devel, but
retain *all* of stable.
This patch is split into two parts - first we add a low level "delete all
objects not in this set" API, and change the current prune API
to use this.
Next, we move more logic into the "ostree prune" command. This paves the way for
demonstrating how more sophisticated algorithms/logic could be developed outside
of the ostree core.
Also, the --keep-younger-than logic already lived in the commandline, so it
makes sense to keep extending it there.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/604Closes: #646
Approved by: jlebon
When doing a prune, we should not try to delete objects in parent
repos, since it'll fail. There is a bigger discussion about the
semantics of `parent=` to be had, but this will fix trying to use
`ostree prune --repo=/ostree/repo/extensions/rpmostree/pkgcache`.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/467Closes: #471
Approved by: jlebon
I hit an error with [CAHC](https://wiki.centos.org/SpecialInterestGroup/Atomic/Devel)
where we were doing time-based pruning. `ostree summary -u` started failing,
and it took me a bit to realize it was because we were pruning
even the tip of old branches, which I was not at all expecting,
and I don't think users will too.
Perhaps in the future we could add some sort of --prune-ref-tips or
something if people wanted it, but I doubt it.
Closes: #445
Approved by: jlebon
Some autobuilder environments place the entire build chroot on tmpfs, so
even /var/tmp might not have this.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Closes: #232
Approved by: cgwalters
OSTree's code for testing predates the `glib-tap.mk` making its
way into GLib. Let's switch to it, as it provides a number
of advantages.
By far the biggest advantage is that `make check` can start to run
most of the tests *in addition* to having them work installed.
This commit keeps the installed tests working, but `make check` turns
out to be really broken because...our TAP usage has bitrotted to say
the least. Fix that all up.
Do some hacks so that the tests work uninstalled as well - in
particular, `glib-tap.mk` and the bits encoded into
`g_test_build_filename()` assume *recursive* Automake (blah). Work
around that by creating a symlink when installed to loop back.
I noticed in the static deltas tests, there were some tests that
should have been under `-o pipefail` to ensure we properly propagate
errors.
There were a few places where we were referencing undefined variables.
Overall, this is clearly a good idea IMO.
Use the parse-datetime module from gnulib, and adapt it to not require
other modules as portability is not really an issue for us.
DATE can be specified in different formats, such as: "-1 week", "last
monday", "1 week ago".
Include the generated .c file in the repository so to not add another
dependency to Bison.
Signed-off-by: Giuseppe Scrivano <gscrivan@redhat.com>
