IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
This reworks the var-mount destructive test in order to properly use
the datadir for the current stateroot instead of a duplicated one.
In turn, it ensures that the resulting `var.mount` after reboot is
correctly pointing to the same location which hosted `/var` on the
previous boot.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1945274 is an issue where a privileged
kubernetes daemonset is writing a socket into `/etc`. This makes ostree upgrades barf.
Now, they should clearly move it to `/run`. However, one option is for us to
just ignore it instead of erroring out. Some brief investigation shows that
e.g. `git add somesocket` is a silent no-op, which is an argument in favor of ignoring it.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2446
The logic for `--selinux-policy` ended up in the `--tree=dir`
path, but there's no reason for that. Fix the imported
labeling with `--tree=tar`. Prep for use with containers.
We had this bug because the previous logic was trying to avoid
duplicating the code for generic `--selinux-policy` and
the case of `--selinux-policy-from-base --tree=dir`.
It's a bit more code, but it's cleaner if we dis-entangle them.
Having to touch a global test counter when adding tests is
a recipe for conflicts between PRs.
The TAP protocol allows *ending* with the expected number of
tests, so the best way to do this is to have an explicit
API like our `tap_ok` which bumps a counter, then end with `tap_end`.
I ported one test as a demo.
This will be helpful for the "ostree native container" work in
https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree-rs-ext/
Basically in order to reuse GPG/signapi verification, we need
to support adding a remote, even though it can't be used via
`ostree pull`. (At least, not until we merge ostree-rs-ext into ostree, but
even then I think the principle stands)
We're waaay overdue for this, it's been the default
in rpm-ostree for years, and solves several important bugs
around not capturing `/etc` while things are running.
Also, `ostree admin upgrade --stage` (should) become idempotent.
Closes: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2389
There are some existing issues around fsck in unprivileged bare mode,
so this test does not really work at the moment. Leaving it as a FIXME
for the moment.
It cannot work to use `--no-xattrs` when SELinux is enabled
because we get a `security.selinux` attribute on created files
regardless. So just skip this test if true.
Also add some `ostree fsck`s in here which helped me debug
this.
We have a bunch of APIs to do GPG verification of a commit,
but that doesn't generalize to signapi. Further, they
require the caller to check the signature status explicitly
which seems like a trap.
This much higher level API works with both GPG and signapi.
The intention is to use this in things that are doing "external
pulls" like the ostree-ext tar import support. There we will
get the commitmeta from the tarball and we want to verify it
at the same time we import the commit.
As pointed out in the original review, `gpg-list-keys` fits better
alongside the existing `gpg-import`.
Changes were done with:
```
git grep -l list-gpg-keys | xargs sed -i 's/list-gpg-keys/gpg-list-keys/'
for src in $(git ls-files '*list-gpg-keys*'); do
dst=${src/list-gpg-keys/gpg-list-keys}
git mv "$src" "$dst"
done
```
Some distributions set this during build in order to have reproducible
builds from the same source code: for example, Debian uses the date
from debian/changelog.
However, some of our tests assume that `ostree commit` will result in
a commit with the current date/time, and SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH breaks that
assumption. Unset it for our build-time tests.
Resolves: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/issues/2405
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
This provides a wrapper for the `ostree_repo_remote_get_gpg_keys`
function to show the GPG keys associated with a remote. This is
particularly useful for validating that GPG key updates have been
applied. Tests are added, which checks the
`ostree_repo_remote_get_gpg_keys` API by extension.
If we fail as a result of `set -x`, It's often not completely obvious
which command failed or how. Use a trap on ERR to show the command that
failed, and its exit status.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@collabora.com>
[Originally from bubblewrap commits c5c999a7 "tests: test --userns"
and 3e5fe1bf "tests: Better error message if assert_files_equal fails";
separated into this commit by Simon McVittie.]
We struggled for a long time with enablement of our "internal units",
trying to follow the philosophy that units should only be enabled
by explicit preset.
See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1451458
and https://github.com/coreos/rpm-ostree/pull/1482
etc.
And I just saw chat (RH internal on a proprietary system sadly) where
someone hit `ostree-remount.service` not being enabled in CentOS8.
Thinking about this more, I realized we've shipped a systemd generator
for a long time and while its only role until now was to generate `var.mount`,
but by using it to force on our internal units, we don't require
people to deal with presets anymore.
Basically we're inverting things so that "if ostree= is on the kernel
cmdline, then enable our units" and not "enable our units, but have
them use ConditionKernelCmdline=ostree to skip".
Drop the weird gyrations we were doing around `ostree-finalize-staged.path`
too; forking `systemctl start` is just asking for bugs.
So after this, hopefully we won't ever again have to think about
distribution presets and our units.
This will be ignored, so let's make it very clear
people are doing something wrong. Motivated by a bug
in a build pipeline that injected `/var/lib/rpm` into an ostree
commit which ended up crashing rpm-ostree because it was an empty db
which it wasn't expecting.
It *also* turns out rpm-ostree is incorrectly dumping content in the
deployment `/var` today, which is another bug.
The semantics of multiple process locking are covered by
test-concurrency.py, but the semantics of the repository locking from a
single process aren't handled there.
This checks how the repository locking is handled from a single thread
with one OstreeRepo, a single thread with multiple OstreeRepos, and
multiple threads sharing an OstreeRepo.
If there's a locking issue in this test, then it's likely not going to
resolve after a few seconds of serializing access. Lower the default 30
second lock timeout to 5 seconds to prevent the test from hanging
unnecessarily.
This simplifies the lock state management considerably since the
previously pushed type doesn't need to be tracked. Instead, 2 counters
are kept to track how many times each lock type has been pushed. When
the number of exclusive locks drops to 0, the lock transitions back to
shared.
In gnupg 2.3.0[1], if a primary key is expired and a subkey does not
have an expiration or its expiration is older than the primary key, the
subkey's expiration will be reported as the primary's. Previously a
subkey without an expiration would not report one regardless of the
primary key's expiration.
This caused a regression in a test setting an expiration on a primary
key. The test was checking that the subkey was not expired by asserting
that there was no `Key expired` line in the signature verification
output. With gnupg 2.3.0+, it will show as expired, causing the test to
fail.
Remove the assertion since it's not consistent across gnupg versions. In
practice we don't care whether the subkey is considered expired or not
as long as the signature verification fails when the primary key is
expired.
1. https://dev.gnupg.org/T3343Fixes: #2359
Previous to this we'd trip an assertion `abort()` deep in the curl code if e.g.
a user did `ostree remote add foo htttp://...` etc.
Motivated by considering supporting "external remotes" where code outside
ostree does a pull, but we want to reuse the signing verification infrastructure.
