IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
SPDX License List is a list of (common) open source
licenses that can be referred to by a “short identifier”.
It has several advantages compared to the common "license header texts"
usually found in source files.
Some of the advantages:
* It is precise; there is no ambiguity due to variations in license header
text
* It is language neutral
* It is easy to machine process
* It is concise
* It is simple and can be used without much cost in interpreted
environments like java Script, etc.
* An SPDX license identifier is immutable.
* It provides simple guidance for developers who want to make sure the
license for their code is respected
See http://spdx.org for further reading.
Signed-off-by: Marcus Folkesson <marcus.folkesson@gmail.com>
Closes: #1439
Approved by: cgwalters
Our CI uses default Docker, which has SELinux labeling but is rather
evil in returning `EOPNOTSUPP` to any attempts to set `security.selinux`,
even if to the same value.
The previous fire 🔥 for this was: https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/759
The `bare` repo mode really only makes sense as uid 0, so our installed
test framework is a good match for this. However, the unit tests *do*
work in a privileged container even as non-root, and *also* should
work on SELinux-disabled systems. So let's teach the test framework
how to skip in those situations.
I tested this both in a priv container (my default builder) and an unpriv
container (like our CI).
At the same time, start executing the `test-basic.sh` from an installed test,
so we get better coverage than before.
This is just the start - all of the sysroot tests really need the
same treatment.
Closes: #1217
Approved by: jlebon
Conceptually `ostree-repo-pull.c` should be be written using
just public APIs; we theoretically support building without HTTP
for people who just want to use the object store portion and
do their own fetching.
We have some nontrivial behaviors in the pull layer though; one
of those is the "bareuseronly" verification. Make a new internal
API that accepts flags, move it into `commit.c`. This
is prep for further work in changing object import to support
reflinks.
Closes: #1193
Approved by: jlebon
We don't want to skip the entire test, because the whole point of
bare-user-only is that it works in the absence of xattrs; but we do
need to skip this last stage, which explicitly uses a bare-user
repository.
Signed-off-by: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Closes: #1120
Approved by: cgwalters
Thinking about the problem of flatpak converting from `bare-user` to `bare-user-only`
"in place" by creating a new repo and doing a `pull-local`, I realized
that we can optimize this process by doing hardlinks for both metadata
and regular files. The repo formats are *almost* compatible, the
exception being symlinks.
An earlier patch caused us to do hardlinks for metadata, this patch takes things
to the next step and special cases this specific conversion. In this case we
need to parse the source object to determine whether or not it's a symlink.
Closes: #922
Approved by: alexlarsson
See https://github.com/ostreedev/ostree/pull/909 for more information on the
rationale. Basically there's no reason for flatpak (which uses `bare-user-only`)
to have world-writable dirs. Particularly with the presence of the system
helper.
An approach I considered instead was to parse and validate directory metadata
objects at commit time. We still may do that in addition; for file objects we *had*
to do it that way because the actual files would be laid down suid. But directories
live only as inert `.dirmeta` objects until we do a checkout (i.e. `mkdir()`), so
we can solve the problem at checkout time.
Closes: #914
Approved by: alexlarsson
These exist in the wild for flatpak, and aren't really a problem. The canonical
permissions are still either `0755` or `0644`, we just support the additional
writable bit for the group (i.e. extend the set to include `0775` and `0664`)
now to avoid breaking some flatpak content.
Closes: #913
Approved by: alexlarsson
We didn't have coverage of this before, and adding the test infrastructure will
help ensure we have coverage for more changes here.
Closes: #913
Approved by: alexlarsson
This is somewhat complicated by such repos only properly supporting
some subset of file metadata (uid/gid 0, etc). We fix this by
always commiting with filters that make it work.
Closes: #750
Approved by: cgwalters
