IF YOU WOULD LIKE TO GET AN ACCOUNT, please write an
email to Administrator. User accounts are meant only to access repo
and report issues and/or generate pull requests.
This is a purpose-specific Git hosting for
BaseALT
projects. Thank you for your understanding!
Только зарегистрированные пользователи имеют доступ к сервису!
Для получения аккаунта, обратитесь к администратору.
Much like the (optional) initramfs at
`/usr/lib/ostree-boot/initramfs-<SHA256>` or
`/usr/lib/modules/$kver/initramfs` you can now optionally include a
flattened devicetree (.dtb) file alongside the kernel at
`/usr/lib/ostree-boot/devicetree-<SHA256>` or
`/usr/lib/modules/$kver/devicetree`.
This is useful for embedded ARM systems which need the devicetree file
loaded by the bootloader for the kernel to discover and initialise
hardware. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Device_tree for more
information.
This patch was mostly produced by copy-pasting code for initramfs handling
and renaming `s/initramfs/devicetree/g`. It's not beautiful, but it is
fairly straightforward.
It may be useful to extend device-tree support in a number ways in the
future. Device trees dependant on many details of the hardware they
support. This makes them unlike kernels, which may support many different
hardware variants as long as the instruction-set matches. This means that
a ostree tree created with a device-tree in this manner will only boot on
a single model of hardware. This is sufficient for my purposes, but may
not be for others'.
I've tested this on my NVidia Tegra TK1 device which has u-boot running
in syslinux-compatible mode.
Closes: #1411
Approved by: cgwalters
Previously when initramfs-* was not found in a deployment's
boot directory, it was assumed that rootfs is prepared for
ostree booting by a kernel patch.
With this patch, the behaviour changes to be - if initramfs-*
is not found, assume that system is using a static
ostree-prepare-root as init process. Booting without initramfs
is a common use case on embedded systems. This approach is
also more convenient, than having to patch the kernel.
Closes: #1401
Approved by: cgwalters