1
1
mirror of https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable.git synced 2024-10-31 16:21:11 +03:00
systemd-stable/namedev.c

856 lines
21 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

/*
* namedev.c
*
* Userspace devfs
*
* Copyright (C) 2003 Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
*
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
* Free Software Foundation version 2 of the License.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
* with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
* 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
*
*/
#include <stddef.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <string.h>
#include <stdio.h>
#include <fcntl.h>
#include <ctype.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>
#include <sys/stat.h>
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has no sysinfo(). o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices. All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it. o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add the changed name to the db to match with the remove event. NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too? o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all the functions used for node creation. o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too. Can we change the name? o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution and used it in udev-test.pl. udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the scripts here too? o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause 'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to print the major/minor values. o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
#include <sys/sysinfo.h>
#include "libsysfs/sysfs/libsysfs.h"
#include "list.h"
#include "udev.h"
#include "udev_lib.h"
#include "udev_version.h"
#include "logging.h"
#include "namedev.h"
2004-11-12 08:32:19 +03:00
#include "udev_db.h"
static struct sysfs_attribute *find_sysfs_attribute(struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct sysfs_device *sysfs_device, char *attr);
LIST_HEAD(config_device_list);
LIST_HEAD(perm_device_list);
/* compare string with pattern (supports * ? [0-9] [!A-Z]) */
static int strcmp_pattern(const char *p, const char *s)
{
if (s[0] == '\0') {
while (p[0] == '*')
p++;
return (p[0] != '\0');
}
switch (p[0]) {
case '[':
{
int not = 0;
p++;
if (p[0] == '!') {
not = 1;
p++;
}
while ((p[0] != '\0') && (p[0] != ']')) {
int match = 0;
if (p[1] == '-') {
if ((s[0] >= p[0]) && (s[0] <= p[2]))
match = 1;
p += 3;
} else {
match = (p[0] == s[0]);
p++;
}
if (match ^ not) {
while ((p[0] != '\0') && (p[0] != ']'))
p++;
if (p[0] == ']')
return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
}
}
}
break;
case '*':
if (strcmp_pattern(p, s+1))
return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s);
return 0;
case '\0':
if (s[0] == '\0') {
return 0;
}
break;
default:
if ((p[0] == s[0]) || (p[0] == '?'))
return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
break;
}
return 1;
}
static struct perm_device *find_perm(char *name)
{
struct perm_device *perm;
list_for_each_entry(perm, &perm_device_list, node) {
if (strcmp_pattern(perm->name, name))
continue;
return perm;
}
return NULL;
}
static mode_t get_default_mode(void)
{
mode_t mode = 0600; /* default to owner rw only */
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
if (strlen(default_mode_str) != 0)
mode = strtol(default_mode_str, NULL, 8);
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
return mode;
}
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
static char *get_default_owner(void)
{
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
if (strlen(default_owner_str) == 0)
strfieldcpy(default_owner_str, "root");
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
return default_owner_str;
}
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
static char *get_default_group(void)
{
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
if (strlen(default_group_str) == 0)
strfieldcpy(default_group_str, "root");
2004-01-22 11:54:52 +03:00
return default_group_str;
}
/* extract possible {attr} and move str behind it */
static char *get_format_attribute(char **str)
{
char *pos;
char *attr = NULL;
if (*str[0] == '{') {
pos = strchr(*str, '}');
if (pos == NULL) {
dbg("missing closing brace for format");
return NULL;
}
pos[0] = '\0';
attr = *str+1;
*str = pos+1;
dbg("attribute='%s', str='%s'", attr, *str);
}
return attr;
}
/* extract possible format length and move str behind it*/
static int get_format_len(char **str)
{
int num;
char *tail;
if (isdigit(*str[0])) {
num = (int) strtoul(*str, &tail, 10);
if (num > 0) {
*str = tail;
dbg("format length=%i", num);
return num;
} else {
dbg("format parsing error '%s'", *str);
}
}
return -1;
}
/** Finds the lowest positive N such that <name>N isn't present in
* $(udevroot) either as a file or a symlink.
*
* @param name Name to check for
* @return 0 if <name> didn't exist and N otherwise.
*/
static int find_free_number(struct udevice *udev, const char *name)
{
char filename[NAME_SIZE];
int num = 0;
struct udevice db_udev;
strfieldcpy(filename, name);
while (1) {
dbg("look for existing node '%s'", filename);
memset(&db_udev, 0x00, sizeof(struct udevice));
2004-11-12 08:32:19 +03:00
if (udev_db_get_device_byname(&db_udev, filename) != 0) {
dbg("free num=%d", num);
return num;
}
num++;
if (num > 1000) {
info("find_free_number gone crazy (num=%d), aborted", num);
return -1;
}
snprintf(filename, NAME_SIZE, "%s%d", name, num);
filename[NAME_SIZE-1] = '\0';
}
}
static void apply_format(struct udevice *udev, char *string, size_t maxsize,
struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev,
struct sysfs_device *sysfs_device)
{
char temp[NAME_SIZE];
char temp2[NAME_SIZE];
char *tail;
char *pos;
char *attr;
int len;
int i;
char c;
char *spos;
char *rest;
int slen;
struct sysfs_attribute *tmpattr;
unsigned int next_free_number;
pos = string;
while (1) {
pos = strchr(pos, '%');
if (pos == NULL)
break;
pos[0] = '\0';
tail = pos+1;
len = get_format_len(&tail);
c = tail[0];
strfieldcpy(temp, tail+1);
tail = temp;
dbg("format=%c, string='%s', tail='%s'",c , string, tail);
attr = get_format_attribute(&tail);
switch (c) {
case 'b':
if (strlen(udev->bus_id) == 0)
break;
strfieldcatmax(string, udev->bus_id, maxsize);
dbg("substitute bus_id '%s'", udev->bus_id);
break;
case 'k':
if (strlen(udev->kernel_name) == 0)
break;
strfieldcatmax(string, udev->kernel_name, maxsize);
dbg("substitute kernel name '%s'", udev->kernel_name);
break;
case 'n':
if (strlen(udev->kernel_number) == 0)
break;
strfieldcatmax(string, udev->kernel_number, maxsize);
dbg("substitute kernel number '%s'", udev->kernel_number);
break;
case 'm':
strintcatmax(string, udev->minor, maxsize);
dbg("substitute minor number '%u'", udev->minor);
break;
case 'M':
strintcatmax(string, udev->major, maxsize);
dbg("substitute major number '%u'", udev->major);
break;
case 'c':
if (strlen(udev->program_result) == 0)
break;
/* get part part of the result string */
i = 0;
if (attr != NULL)
i = strtoul(attr, &rest, 10);
if (i > 0) {
foreach_strpart(udev->program_result, " \n\r", spos, slen) {
i--;
if (i == 0)
break;
}
if (i > 0) {
dbg("requested part of result string not found");
break;
}
if (rest[0] == '+')
strfieldcpy(temp2, spos);
else
strfieldcpymax(temp2, spos, slen+1);
strfieldcatmax(string, temp2, maxsize);
dbg("substitute part of result string '%s'", temp2);
} else {
strfieldcatmax(string, udev->program_result, maxsize);
dbg("substitute result string '%s'", udev->program_result);
}
break;
case 's':
if (attr != NULL) {
tmpattr = find_sysfs_attribute(class_dev, sysfs_device, attr);
if (tmpattr == NULL) {
dbg("sysfa attribute '%s' not found", attr);
break;
}
/* strip trailing whitespace of matching value */
if (isspace(tmpattr->value[strlen(tmpattr->value)-1])) {
i = len = strlen(tmpattr->value);
while (i > 0 && isspace(tmpattr->value[i-1]))
i--;
if (i < len) {
tmpattr->value[i] = '\0';
dbg("remove %i trailing whitespace chars from '%s'",
len - i, tmpattr->value);
}
}
strfieldcatmax(string, tmpattr->value, maxsize);
dbg("substitute sysfs value '%s'", tmpattr->value);
} else {
dbg("missing attribute");
}
break;
case '%':
strfieldcatmax(string, "%", maxsize);
pos++;
break;
case 'e':
next_free_number = find_free_number(udev, string);
if (next_free_number > 0) {
sprintf(temp2, "%d", next_free_number);
strfieldcatmax(string, temp2, maxsize);
}
break;
default:
dbg("unknown substitution type '%%%c'", c);
break;
}
/* truncate to specified length */
if (len > 0)
pos[len] = '\0';
strfieldcatmax(string, tail, maxsize);
}
}
static void fix_kernel_name(struct udevice *udev)
{
char *temp = udev->kernel_name;
while (*temp != 0x00) {
/* Some block devices have a ! in their name,
* we need to change that to / */
if (*temp == '!')
*temp = '/';
++temp;
}
}
static int execute_program(struct udevice *udev, const char *path, char *value, int len)
{
int retval;
int count;
int status;
int fds[2];
pid_t pid;
char *pos;
char arg[PROGRAM_SIZE];
char *argv[(PROGRAM_SIZE / 2) + 1];
int i;
strfieldcpy(arg, path);
i = 0;
if (strchr(path, ' ')) {
pos = arg;
while (pos != NULL) {
if (pos[0] == '\'') {
/* don't separate if in apostrophes */
pos++;
argv[i] = strsep(&pos, "\'");
while (pos && pos[0] == ' ')
pos++;
} else {
argv[i] = strsep(&pos, " ");
}
dbg("arg[%i] '%s'", i, argv[i]);
i++;
}
argv[i] = NULL;
dbg("execute '%s' with parsed arguments", arg);
} else {
argv[0] = arg;
argv[1] = udev->subsystem;
argv[2] = NULL;
dbg("execute '%s' with subsystem '%s' argument", arg, argv[1]);
}
retval = pipe(fds);
if (retval != 0) {
dbg("pipe failed");
return -1;
}
pid = fork();
switch(pid) {
case 0:
[PATCH] namedev.c whitespace + debug text cleanup here is mainly a whitespace cleanup for namedev.c. I changed the dbg_parse() output a bit for better readability: current: Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:07.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:07.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:0b.0' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:0b.0' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='2-1.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: device id '2-1.1' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0 becomes: Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '2-1.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: found id '2-1.1', 'video0' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
2003-11-21 05:37:01 +03:00
/* child */
/* dup2 write side of pipe to STDOUT */
dup2(fds[1], STDOUT_FILENO);
retval = execv(arg, argv);
info(FIELD_PROGRAM " execution of '%s' failed", path);
exit(1);
case -1:
dbg("fork failed");
return -1;
default:
[PATCH] namedev.c whitespace + debug text cleanup here is mainly a whitespace cleanup for namedev.c. I changed the dbg_parse() output a bit for better readability: current: Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:07.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:07.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:0b.0' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:0b.0' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='2-1.1' Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: device id '2-1.1' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0 becomes: Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '2-1.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1' Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: found id '2-1.1', 'video0' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
2003-11-21 05:37:01 +03:00
/* parent reads from fds[0] */
close(fds[1]);
retval = 0;
i = 0;
while (1) {
count = read(fds[0], value + i, len - i-1);
if (count <= 0)
break;
i += count;
if (i >= len-1) {
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg("result len %d too short", len);
retval = -1;
break;
}
}
if (count < 0) {
dbg("read failed with '%s'", strerror(errno));
retval = -1;
}
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has no sysinfo(). o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices. All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it. o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add the changed name to the db to match with the remove event. NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too? o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all the functions used for node creation. o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too. Can we change the name? o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution and used it in udev-test.pl. udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the scripts here too? o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause 'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to print the major/minor values. o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
if (i > 0 && value[i-1] == '\n')
i--;
value[i] = '\0';
dbg("result is '%s'", value);
close(fds[0]);
waitpid(pid, &status, 0);
if (!WIFEXITED(status) || (WEXITSTATUS(status) != 0)) {
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg("exec program status 0x%x", status);
retval = -1;
}
}
return retval;
}
static struct sysfs_attribute *find_sysfs_attribute(struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct sysfs_device *sysfs_device, char *attr)
{
struct sysfs_attribute *tmpattr = NULL;
char *c;
dbg("look for device attribute '%s'", attr);
/* try to find the attribute in the class device directory */
tmpattr = sysfs_get_classdev_attr(class_dev, attr);
if (tmpattr)
goto attr_found;
/* look in the class device directory if present */
if (sysfs_device) {
tmpattr = sysfs_get_device_attr(sysfs_device, attr);
if (tmpattr)
goto attr_found;
}
return NULL;
attr_found:
c = strchr(tmpattr->value, '\n');
if (c != NULL)
c[0] = '\0';
dbg("found attribute '%s'", tmpattr->path);
return tmpattr;
}
static int compare_sysfs_attribute(struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct sysfs_device *sysfs_device, struct sysfs_pair *pair)
{
struct sysfs_attribute *tmpattr;
int i;
int len;
if ((pair == NULL) || (pair->file[0] == '\0') || (pair->value == '\0'))
return -ENODEV;
tmpattr = find_sysfs_attribute(class_dev, sysfs_device, pair->file);
if (tmpattr == NULL)
return -ENODEV;
/* strip trailing whitespace of value, if not asked to match for it */
if (! isspace(pair->value[strlen(pair->value)-1])) {
i = len = strlen(tmpattr->value);
while (i > 0 && isspace(tmpattr->value[i-1]))
i--;
if (i < len) {
tmpattr->value[i] = '\0';
dbg("remove %i trailing whitespace chars from '%s'",
len - i, tmpattr->value);
}
}
dbg("compare attribute '%s' value '%s' with '%s'",
pair->file, tmpattr->value, pair->value);
if (strcmp_pattern(pair->value, tmpattr->value) != 0)
return -ENODEV;
dbg("found matching attribute '%s' with value '%s'",
pair->file, pair->value);
return 0;
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int match_sysfs_pairs(struct config_device *dev, struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct sysfs_device *sysfs_device)
{
struct sysfs_pair *pair;
int i;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
for (i = 0; i < MAX_SYSFS_PAIRS; ++i) {
pair = &dev->sysfs_pair[i];
if ((pair->file[0] == '\0') || (pair->value[0] == '\0'))
break;
if (compare_sysfs_attribute(class_dev, sysfs_device, pair) != 0) {
dbg("sysfs attribute doesn't match");
return -ENODEV;
}
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
return 0;
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int match_id(struct config_device *dev, struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct sysfs_device *sysfs_device)
{
char path[SYSFS_PATH_MAX];
char *temp = NULL;
/* we have to have a sysfs device for ID to work */
if (!sysfs_device)
return -ENODEV;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
strfieldcpy(path, sysfs_device->path);
temp = strrchr(path, '/');
temp++;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg("search '%s' in '%s', path='%s'", dev->id, temp, path);
if (strcmp_pattern(dev->id, temp) != 0)
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
return -ENODEV;
else
return 0;
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int match_place(struct config_device *dev, struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct sysfs_device *sysfs_device)
{
char path[SYSFS_PATH_MAX];
int found;
char *temp = NULL;
/* we have to have a sysfs device for PLACE to work */
if (!sysfs_device)
return -ENODEV;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
found = 0;
strfieldcpy(path, sysfs_device->path);
temp = strrchr(path, '/');
dbg("search '%s' in '%s', path='%s'", dev->place, temp, path);
if (strstr(temp, dev->place) != NULL) {
found = 1;
} else {
*temp = 0x00;
temp = strrchr(path, '/');
dbg("search '%s' in '%s', path='%s'", dev->place, temp, path);
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
if (strstr(temp, dev->place) != NULL)
found = 1;
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
if (!found) {
dbg("place doesn't match");
return -ENODEV;
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
return 0;
}
static int match_rule(struct config_device *dev, struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev, struct udevice *udev, struct sysfs_device *sysfs_device)
{
while (1) {
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching bus value */
if (dev->bus[0] != '\0') {
if (sysfs_device == NULL) {
dbg("device has no bus");
goto try_parent;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
dbg("check for " FIELD_BUS " dev->bus='%s' sysfs_device->bus='%s'", dev->bus, sysfs_device->bus);
if (strcmp_pattern(dev->bus, sysfs_device->bus) != 0) {
dbg(FIELD_BUS " is not matching");
goto try_parent;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg(FIELD_BUS " matches");
}
}
/* check for matching kernel name */
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
if (dev->kernel[0] != '\0') {
dbg("check for " FIELD_KERNEL " dev->kernel='%s' class_dev->name='%s'", dev->kernel, class_dev->name);
if (strcmp_pattern(dev->kernel, class_dev->name) != 0) {
dbg(FIELD_KERNEL " is not matching");
goto try_parent;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg(FIELD_KERNEL " matches");
}
}
/* check for matching subsystem */
if (dev->subsystem[0] != '\0') {
dbg("check for " FIELD_SUBSYSTEM " dev->subsystem='%s' class_dev->name='%s'", dev->subsystem, class_dev->name);
if (strcmp_pattern(dev->subsystem, udev->subsystem) != 0) {
dbg(FIELD_SUBSYSTEM " is not matching");
goto try_parent;
} else {
dbg(FIELD_SUBSYSTEM " matches");
}
}
/* check for matching driver */
if (dev->driver[0] != '\0') {
dbg("check for " FIELD_DRIVER " dev->driver='%s' sysfs_device->driver_name='%s'", dev->driver, sysfs_device->driver_name);
if (strcmp_pattern(dev->driver, sysfs_device->driver_name) != 0) {
dbg(FIELD_DRIVER " is not matching");
goto try_parent;
} else {
dbg(FIELD_DRIVER " matches");
}
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching bus id */
if (dev->id[0] != '\0') {
dbg("check " FIELD_ID);
if (match_id(dev, class_dev, sysfs_device) != 0) {
dbg(FIELD_ID " is not matching");
goto try_parent;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg(FIELD_ID " matches");
}
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching place of device */
if (dev->place[0] != '\0') {
dbg("check " FIELD_PLACE);
if (match_place(dev, class_dev, sysfs_device) != 0) {
dbg(FIELD_PLACE " is not matching");
goto try_parent;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg(FIELD_PLACE " matches");
}
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching sysfs pairs */
if (dev->sysfs_pair[0].file[0] != '\0') {
dbg("check " FIELD_SYSFS " pairs");
if (match_sysfs_pairs(dev, class_dev, sysfs_device) != 0) {
dbg(FIELD_SYSFS " is not matching");
goto try_parent;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg(FIELD_SYSFS " matches");
}
}
/* execute external program */
if (dev->program[0] != '\0') {
char program[PROGRAM_SIZE];
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg("check " FIELD_PROGRAM);
strfieldcpy(program, dev->program);
apply_format(udev, program, sizeof(program), class_dev, sysfs_device);
if (execute_program(udev, program, udev->program_result, NAME_SIZE) != 0) {
dbg(FIELD_PROGRAM " returned nonzero");
goto try_parent;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg(FIELD_PROGRAM " returned successful");
}
}
/* check for matching result of external program */
if (dev->result[0] != '\0') {
dbg("check for " FIELD_RESULT
" dev->result='%s', udev->program_result='%s'",
dev->result, udev->program_result);
if (strcmp_pattern(dev->result, udev->program_result) != 0) {
dbg(FIELD_RESULT " is not matching");
goto try_parent;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
} else {
dbg(FIELD_RESULT " matches");
}
}
/* Yeah, we matched! */
return 0;
try_parent:
dbg("try parent sysfs device");
sysfs_device = sysfs_get_device_parent(sysfs_device);
if (sysfs_device == NULL)
return -ENODEV;
dbg("sysfs_device->path='%s'", sysfs_device->path);
dbg("sysfs_device->bus_id='%s'", sysfs_device->bus_id);
dbg("sysfs_device->bus='%s'", sysfs_device->bus);
}
}
int namedev_name_device(struct udevice *udev, struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev)
{
struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev_parent;
struct sysfs_device *sysfs_device = NULL;
struct config_device *dev;
struct perm_device *perm;
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has no sysinfo(). o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices. All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it. o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add the changed name to the db to match with the remove event. NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too? o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all the functions used for node creation. o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too. Can we change the name? o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution and used it in udev-test.pl. udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the scripts here too? o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause 'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to print the major/minor values. o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
struct sysinfo info;
char *pos;
udev->mode = 0;
dbg("class_dev->name='%s'", class_dev->name);
/* Figure out where the "device"-symlink is at. For char devices this will
* always be in the class_dev->path. On block devices, only the main block
* device will have the device symlink in it's path. All partition devices
* need to look at the symlink in its parent directory.
*/
class_dev_parent = sysfs_get_classdev_parent(class_dev);
if (class_dev_parent != NULL) {
dbg("given class device has a parent, use this instead");
sysfs_device = sysfs_get_classdev_device(class_dev_parent);
} else {
sysfs_device = sysfs_get_classdev_device(class_dev);
}
if (sysfs_device) {
dbg("found devices device: path='%s', bus_id='%s', bus='%s'",
sysfs_device->path, sysfs_device->bus_id, sysfs_device->bus);
strfieldcpy(udev->bus_id, sysfs_device->bus_id);
strfieldcpy(udev->bus, sysfs_device->bus);
}
strfieldcpy(udev->kernel_name, class_dev->name);
fix_kernel_name(udev);
dbg("udev->kernel_name = '%s'", udev->kernel_name);
/* get kernel number */
pos = class_dev->name + strlen(class_dev->name);
while (isdigit(*(pos-1)))
pos--;
strfieldcpy(udev->kernel_number, pos);
dbg("kernel_number='%s'", udev->kernel_number);
/* look for a matching rule to apply */
list_for_each_entry(dev, &config_device_list, node) {
dbg("process rule");
if (match_rule(dev, class_dev, udev, sysfs_device) == 0) {
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
if (dev->name[0] == '\0' && dev->symlink[0] == '\0') {
info("configured rule in '%s' at line %i applied, '%s' is ignored",
dev->config_file, dev->config_line, udev->kernel_name);
return -1;
}
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
if (dev->symlink[0] != '\0') {
char temp[NAME_SIZE];
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
info("configured rule in '%s' at line %i applied, added symlink '%s'",
dev->config_file, dev->config_line, dev->symlink);
strfieldcpy(temp, dev->symlink);
apply_format(udev, temp, sizeof(temp), class_dev, sysfs_device);
if (udev->symlink[0] != '\0')
strfieldcat(udev->symlink, " ");
strfieldcat(udev->symlink, temp);
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
}
if (dev->name[0] != '\0') {
/* apply all_partitions flag only at a main block device */
if (dev->partitions > 0 &&
(udev->type != 'b' || udev->kernel_number[0] != '\0'))
continue;
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
info("configured rule in '%s' at line %i applied, '%s' becomes '%s'",
dev->config_file, dev->config_line, udev->kernel_name, dev->name);
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
strfieldcpy(udev->name, dev->name);
goto found;
}
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
/* no rule was found so we use the kernel name */
strfieldcpy(udev->name, udev->kernel_name);
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has no sysinfo(). o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices. All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it. o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add the changed name to the db to match with the remove event. NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too? o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all the functions used for node creation. o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too. Can we change the name? o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution and used it in udev-test.pl. udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the scripts here too? o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause 'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to print the major/minor values. o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
if (udev->type == 'n')
goto done;
else
goto perms;
found:
apply_format(udev, udev->name, sizeof(udev->name), class_dev, sysfs_device);
strfieldcpy(udev->config_file, dev->config_file);
udev->config_line = dev->config_line;
[PATCH] hmm, handle net devices with udev? Hmm, Arndt Bergmann sent a patch like this one a few weeks ago and I want to bring the question back, if we want to handle net device naming with udev. With this patch it is actually possible to specify something like this in udev.rules: KERNEL="dummy*", SYSFS{address}="00:00:00:00:00:00", SYSFS{features}="0x0", NAME="blind%n" KERNEL="eth*", SYSFS{address}="00:0d:60:77:30:91", NAME="private" and you will get: [root@pim udev.kay]# cat /proc/net/dev Inter-| Receive | Transmit face |bytes packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed lo: 1500 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 private: 278393 1114 0 0 0 0 0 0 153204 1468 0 0 0 0 0 0 sit0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 blind0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The udevinfo program is also working: [root@pim udev.kay]# ./udevinfo -a -p /sys/class/net/private looking at class device '/sys/class/net/private': SYSFS{addr_len}="6" SYSFS{address}="00:0d:60:77:30:91" SYSFS{broadcast}="ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff" SYSFS{features}="0x3a9" SYSFS{flags}="0x1003" SYSFS{ifindex}="2" SYSFS{iflink}="2" SYSFS{mtu}="1500" SYSFS{tx_queue_len}="1000" SYSFS{type}="1" follow the class device's "device" looking at the device chain at '/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:01.0': BUS="pci" ID="0000:02:01.0" SYSFS{class}="0x020000" SYSFS{detach_state}="0" SYSFS{device}="0x101e" SYSFS{irq}="11" SYSFS{subsystem_device}="0x0549" SYSFS{subsystem_vendor}="0x1014" SYSFS{vendor}="0x8086" The matching device will be renamed to the given name. The device name will not be put into the udev database, cause the kernel renames the device and the sysfs name disappears. I like it, cause it plugs in nicely. We have all the naming features and sysfs queries and walks inside of udev. The sysfs timing races are already solved and the management tools are working for net devices too. nameif can only match the MAC address now. udev can match any sysfs value of the device tree the net device is connected to. But right, net devices do not have device nodes :)
2004-03-25 10:19:39 +03:00
if (udev->type == 'n')
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has no sysinfo(). o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices. All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it. o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add the changed name to the db to match with the remove event. NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too? o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all the functions used for node creation. o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too. Can we change the name? o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution and used it in udev-test.pl. udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the scripts here too? o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause 'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to print the major/minor values. o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
goto done;
[PATCH] hmm, handle net devices with udev? Hmm, Arndt Bergmann sent a patch like this one a few weeks ago and I want to bring the question back, if we want to handle net device naming with udev. With this patch it is actually possible to specify something like this in udev.rules: KERNEL="dummy*", SYSFS{address}="00:00:00:00:00:00", SYSFS{features}="0x0", NAME="blind%n" KERNEL="eth*", SYSFS{address}="00:0d:60:77:30:91", NAME="private" and you will get: [root@pim udev.kay]# cat /proc/net/dev Inter-| Receive | Transmit face |bytes packets errs drop fifo frame compressed multicast|bytes packets errs drop fifo colls carrier compressed lo: 1500 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 1500 30 0 0 0 0 0 0 private: 278393 1114 0 0 0 0 0 0 153204 1468 0 0 0 0 0 0 sit0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 blind0: 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 The udevinfo program is also working: [root@pim udev.kay]# ./udevinfo -a -p /sys/class/net/private looking at class device '/sys/class/net/private': SYSFS{addr_len}="6" SYSFS{address}="00:0d:60:77:30:91" SYSFS{broadcast}="ff:ff:ff:ff:ff:ff" SYSFS{features}="0x3a9" SYSFS{flags}="0x1003" SYSFS{ifindex}="2" SYSFS{iflink}="2" SYSFS{mtu}="1500" SYSFS{tx_queue_len}="1000" SYSFS{type}="1" follow the class device's "device" looking at the device chain at '/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1e.0/0000:02:01.0': BUS="pci" ID="0000:02:01.0" SYSFS{class}="0x020000" SYSFS{detach_state}="0" SYSFS{device}="0x101e" SYSFS{irq}="11" SYSFS{subsystem_device}="0x0549" SYSFS{subsystem_vendor}="0x1014" SYSFS{vendor}="0x8086" The matching device will be renamed to the given name. The device name will not be put into the udev database, cause the kernel renames the device and the sysfs name disappears. I like it, cause it plugs in nicely. We have all the naming features and sysfs queries and walks inside of udev. The sysfs timing races are already solved and the management tools are working for net devices too. nameif can only match the MAC address now. udev can match any sysfs value of the device tree the net device is connected to. But right, net devices do not have device nodes :)
2004-03-25 10:19:39 +03:00
udev->partitions = dev->partitions;
udev->ignore_remove = dev->ignore_remove;
/* get permissions given in rule */
set_empty_perms(udev, dev->mode,
dev->owner,
dev->group);
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has no sysinfo(). o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices. All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it. o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add the changed name to the db to match with the remove event. NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too? o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all the functions used for node creation. o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too. Can we change the name? o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution and used it in udev-test.pl. udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the scripts here too? o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause 'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to print the major/minor values. o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
perms:
/* get permissions given in config file or set defaults */
perm = find_perm(udev->name);
if (perm != NULL) {
set_empty_perms(udev, perm->mode,
perm->owner,
perm->group);
}
set_empty_perms(udev, get_default_mode(),
get_default_owner(),
get_default_group());
dbg("name, '%s' is going to have owner='%s', group='%s', mode = %#o",
udev->name, udev->owner, udev->group, udev->mode);
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has no sysinfo(). o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices. All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it. o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add the changed name to the db to match with the remove event. NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too? o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all the functions used for node creation. o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too. Can we change the name? o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution and used it in udev-test.pl. udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the scripts here too? o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause 'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to print the major/minor values. o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
done:
/* store time of action */
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has no sysinfo(). o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices. All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it. o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add the changed name to the db to match with the remove event. NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too? o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all the functions used for node creation. o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too. Can we change the name? o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution and used it in udev-test.pl. udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the scripts here too? o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause 'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to print the major/minor values. o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
sysinfo(&info);
udev->config_uptime = info.uptime;
return 0;
}
int namedev_init(void)
{
int retval;
[PATCH] a bug in linefeed removal While I was adding pattern match to the LABEL method i hit a bug. We modify a string returned from libsysfs, so with every iteration is is truncated by one char: Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: dev->bus='scsi' sysfs_device->bus='scsi' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: look for device attribute 'vendor' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: xxx 'IBM-ESXS ' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: compare attribute 'vendor' value 'IBM-ESX' with '?IBM-ESXS' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: dev->bus='scsi' sysfs_device->bus='scsi' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: look for device attribute 'vendor' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: xxx 'IBM-ESX' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: compare attribute 'vendor' value 'IBM-ES' with 'IBM-ESXS?' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: dev->bus='scsi' sysfs_device->bus='scsi' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: look for device attribute 'vendor' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: xxx 'IBM-ES' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: compare attribute 'vendor' value 'IBM-E' with 'IBM-ES??' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: dev->bus='scsi' sysfs_device->bus='scsi' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: look for device attribute 'vendor' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: xxx 'IBM-E' Dec 4 02:27:16 pim udev[23307]: do_label: compare attribute 'vendor' value 'IBM-' with 'IBM-ESXSS' I changed the behavior to remove only the line feed. 03-bug-in-linefeed-removal.diff remove only the line feed from string not every last char
2003-12-05 06:21:27 +03:00
retval = namedev_init_rules();
if (retval)
return retval;
retval = namedev_init_permissions();
if (retval)
return retval;
dump_config_dev_list();
dump_perm_dev_list();
return retval;
}