shaba/systemd-stable
1
1
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/systemd/systemd-stable.git synced 2024-10-31 16:21:11 +03:00
Code
9172c95c77
systemd-stable/namedev.h

99 lines
2.4 KiB
C
Raw Normal View History

[PATCH] Initial namedev parsing of config files .permission parsing works, .config needs more work.
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
/*
* namedev.h
*
* Userspace devfs
*
[PATCH] move get_pair to udev_config.c because udevinfo doesn't need all of namedev.o
2004-01-27 06:21:58 +03:00
* Copyright (C) 2003,2004 Greg Kroah-Hartman <greg@kroah.com>
[PATCH] Initial namedev parsing of config files .permission parsing works, .config needs more work.
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
*
* This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
* Free Software Foundation version 2 of the License.
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the GNU
* General Public License for more details.
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
* with this program; if not, write to the Free Software Foundation, Inc.,
* 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
*
*/
#ifndef NAMEDEV_H
#define NAMEDEV_H
[PATCH] udevdb prototype Here's an "idea" of what I had in mind for udevdb. Let me preface the code with a few remarks: 1) I was expecting to write this udevdb for udev to keep track of devices. I was planning an external package that depends upon udev to provide an external API to the udevdb database. The calls for the interface would be read only access. Not sure how you want to do packaging, if having a separate package is ok or having it included in udev. 2) I created it as it is because udev isn't a daemon. So, the open database call doesn't take any parameters. My plan was to create a udevdb_init function that took arguments for initializing the db to start, where you could specify in memory only or a file location. This can all be filled in. 3) I hacked the Makefile to get it to work. Not sure how you'd want that in the future. 4) This assumes TDB has been installed elsewhere, you would need to edit your Makefile and point it to the header and library locations. How do you want to do TDB in udev? Do you want to just reference it and make udev dependent on that package being installed. Or should we do what samba does and include a limited tdb version in udev? 5) Again, I hacked udev into your existing code. In the future, I'd probably make a function around the filling out the udevice before calling the store command. Didn't know if you wanted to change your add device function to use struct udevice rather than having everything separate. 6) Not sure what we should include in the udevice structure that's stored by udev. I made a stab at a first shot - we can add and remove of course, this was a first pass. I've come to realize - with you including libsysfs in udev, the "external" interface that references udevdb could make use of getting information from through libsysfs from sysfs and doesn't need to be in udevdb. 7) I could write a namedevdb for namedev's device management if you wanted.
2003-08-06 10:57:23 +04:00
#include "udev.h"
[PATCH] make struct config_device contain a struct device_attr instead of duplicating the mess.
2003-07-24 02:56:56 +04:00
#include "list.h"
[PATCH] Clean up the namedev interface a bit, making the code smaller...
2003-07-19 16:06:55 +04:00
struct sysfs_class_device;
[PATCH] support DRIVER as a rule key Match with a rule against a device with a specific kernel driver.
2004-11-13 07:21:12 +03:00
#define BUS_SIZE 32
#define FILE_SIZE 64
#define VALUE_SIZE 128
#define ID_SIZE 64
#define PLACE_SIZE 64
#define DRIVER_SIZE 64
#define PROGRAM_SIZE 128
[PATCH] udev - create all partitions of blockdevice Here is the first try to create all partitons of a blockdevice, since removable media devices may need to acces the expected partition to revalidate the media. It uses the attribute syntax introduced with the last %s{file} patch. I'm using this with my multi-slot-flash-card-reader: SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-SMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="smartmedia" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-CFC ", NAME{all_partitions}="compactflash" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MSC ", NAME{all_partitions}="memorystick" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="multimedia" and I get: tree /udev/ /udev/ |-- memorystick |-- memorystick1 |-- memorystick10 |-- memorystick11 |-- memorystick12 |-- memorystick13 |-- memorystick14 |-- memorystick15 |-- memorystick2 |-- memorystick3 |-- memorystick4 |-- memorystick5 |-- memorystick6 |-- memorystick7 |-- memorystick8 |-- memorystick9 |-- multimedia |-- multimedia1 |-- multimedia10 |-- multimedia11 |-- multimedia12 |-- multimedia13 |-- multimedia14 |-- multimedia15 |-- multimedia2 |-- multimedia3 |-- multimedia4 |-- multimedia5 |-- multimedia6 |-- multimedia7 |-- multimedia8 |-- multimedia9 ... If needed, we can make the number of partions to create adjustable with the attribute?
2004-02-17 08:44:28 +03:00
#define FIELD_BUS "BUS"
#define FIELD_SYSFS "SYSFS"
#define FIELD_ID "ID"
#define FIELD_PLACE "PLACE"
#define FIELD_PROGRAM "PROGRAM"
#define FIELD_RESULT "RESULT"
#define FIELD_KERNEL "KERNEL"
[PATCH] support SUBSYSTEM as a rule key This should make it easier to catch e.g all block or net devices with a single rule.
2004-11-12 08:52:55 +03:00
#define FIELD_SUBSYSTEM "SUBSYSTEM"
[PATCH] support DRIVER as a rule key Match with a rule against a device with a specific kernel driver.
2004-11-13 07:21:12 +03:00
#define FIELD_DRIVER "DRIVER"
[PATCH] udev - create all partitions of blockdevice Here is the first try to create all partitons of a blockdevice, since removable media devices may need to acces the expected partition to revalidate the media. It uses the attribute syntax introduced with the last %s{file} patch. I'm using this with my multi-slot-flash-card-reader: SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-SMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="smartmedia" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-CFC ", NAME{all_partitions}="compactflash" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MSC ", NAME{all_partitions}="memorystick" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="multimedia" and I get: tree /udev/ /udev/ |-- memorystick |-- memorystick1 |-- memorystick10 |-- memorystick11 |-- memorystick12 |-- memorystick13 |-- memorystick14 |-- memorystick15 |-- memorystick2 |-- memorystick3 |-- memorystick4 |-- memorystick5 |-- memorystick6 |-- memorystick7 |-- memorystick8 |-- memorystick9 |-- multimedia |-- multimedia1 |-- multimedia10 |-- multimedia11 |-- multimedia12 |-- multimedia13 |-- multimedia14 |-- multimedia15 |-- multimedia2 |-- multimedia3 |-- multimedia4 |-- multimedia5 |-- multimedia6 |-- multimedia7 |-- multimedia8 |-- multimedia9 ... If needed, we can make the number of partions to create adjustable with the attribute?
2004-02-17 08:44:28 +03:00
#define FIELD_NAME "NAME"
#define FIELD_SYMLINK "SYMLINK"
[PATCH] allow to specify node permissions in the rule This allows to set the permissions along with the rule. This is not a general replacement for the permissions config, but it may be easier sometimes for the user to specify the permissions along with the rule, cause the permissions config file wants the final node name to match, which seems sometimes a bit difficult to guess, if format % chars are used in the NAME field. Any value not given in the rule is still be read from the permissions file or set to the default. This one will also work: BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", NAME="my-%k", OWNER="$local" A few words to man page are also added and add_perm_dev() is moved into namedev_parse.c where it belongs to.
2004-03-11 09:35:37 +03:00
#define FIELD_OWNER "OWNER"
#define FIELD_GROUP "GROUP"
#define FIELD_MODE "MODE"
[PATCH] udev - create all partitions of blockdevice Here is the first try to create all partitons of a blockdevice, since removable media devices may need to acces the expected partition to revalidate the media. It uses the attribute syntax introduced with the last %s{file} patch. I'm using this with my multi-slot-flash-card-reader: SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-SMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="smartmedia" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-CFC ", NAME{all_partitions}="compactflash" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MSC ", NAME{all_partitions}="memorystick" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="multimedia" and I get: tree /udev/ /udev/ |-- memorystick |-- memorystick1 |-- memorystick10 |-- memorystick11 |-- memorystick12 |-- memorystick13 |-- memorystick14 |-- memorystick15 |-- memorystick2 |-- memorystick3 |-- memorystick4 |-- memorystick5 |-- memorystick6 |-- memorystick7 |-- memorystick8 |-- memorystick9 |-- multimedia |-- multimedia1 |-- multimedia10 |-- multimedia11 |-- multimedia12 |-- multimedia13 |-- multimedia14 |-- multimedia15 |-- multimedia2 |-- multimedia3 |-- multimedia4 |-- multimedia5 |-- multimedia6 |-- multimedia7 |-- multimedia8 |-- multimedia9 ... If needed, we can make the number of partions to create adjustable with the attribute?
2004-02-17 08:44:28 +03:00
#define ATTR_PARTITIONS "all_partitions"
[PATCH] add NAME{ignore_remove} attribute Some broken ide drivers are generating high event traffic, with add/remove events. With this attribute, it can be specified, that the node is always available. It may be used in conjunction with the new DRIVER= match to catch specific kernel device drivers.
2004-11-13 16:43:24 +03:00
#define ATTR_IGNORE_REMOVE "ignore_remove"
[PATCH] udev - create all partitions of blockdevice Here is the first try to create all partitons of a blockdevice, since removable media devices may need to acces the expected partition to revalidate the media. It uses the attribute syntax introduced with the last %s{file} patch. I'm using this with my multi-slot-flash-card-reader: SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-SMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="smartmedia" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-CFC ", NAME{all_partitions}="compactflash" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MSC ", NAME{all_partitions}="memorystick" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="multimedia" and I get: tree /udev/ /udev/ |-- memorystick |-- memorystick1 |-- memorystick10 |-- memorystick11 |-- memorystick12 |-- memorystick13 |-- memorystick14 |-- memorystick15 |-- memorystick2 |-- memorystick3 |-- memorystick4 |-- memorystick5 |-- memorystick6 |-- memorystick7 |-- memorystick8 |-- memorystick9 |-- multimedia |-- multimedia1 |-- multimedia10 |-- multimedia11 |-- multimedia12 |-- multimedia13 |-- multimedia14 |-- multimedia15 |-- multimedia2 |-- multimedia3 |-- multimedia4 |-- multimedia5 |-- multimedia6 |-- multimedia7 |-- multimedia8 |-- multimedia9 ... If needed, we can make the number of partions to create adjustable with the attribute?
2004-02-17 08:44:28 +03:00
#define PARTITIONS_COUNT 15
#define MAX_SYSFS_PAIRS 5
[PATCH] add ability to have up to 5 SYSFS_ file/value pairs for the LABEL rule.
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
[PATCH] dev_d.c file sorting and cleanup On Thu, Mar 25, 2004 at 02:52:13AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > Please have look if it still works for you, I only did a very quick > test. Here is a unified version, with all the functions moved to udev_lib.c. We have a generic function now, to call a given fnct(char *) for every file ending with a specific suffix, sorted in lexical order. We use it to execute the dev.d/ files and read our rules.d/ files. The binary should be a bit smaller now. I've also changed it, to not do the dev.d/ exec for net devices.
2004-03-27 12:21:46 +03:00
#define RULEFILE_SUFFIX ".rules"
[PATCH] udev - allow all files in a directory as the config I was on the train for 5 hours today and the TODO is almost empty :) So, at least four people wanted this feature, then here is a actual working patch. We may specify now in udev.conf: udev_rules="/etc/udev/" and udev will scan the whole directory for files ending with *.rules, sort it in lexical order and create our rule list from all of the files. A plain given file will still work and the same applies to the *.permissions. I sort the files in our usual linked list, cause klibc has no scandir().
2004-02-24 06:31:14 +03:00
[PATCH] add ability to have up to 5 SYSFS_ file/value pairs for the LABEL rule.
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
struct sysfs_pair {
char file[FILE_SIZE];
char value[VALUE_SIZE];
};
[PATCH] make struct config_device contain a struct device_attr instead of duplicating the mess.
2003-07-24 02:56:56 +04:00
struct config_device {
struct list_head node;
char bus[BUS_SIZE];
char id[ID_SIZE];
char place[PLACE_SIZE];
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :) > Hi, > as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods > given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule. > > A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys > are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few > changes: > > o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed > > o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID= > the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero > (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match) > > o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority > > o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device, > no node will be created > > > EXAMPLE: > > # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL > BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n" > > # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped > BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c" > > > The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here. > Please adapt your config and give it a try. > Here is a slightly better version of the patch. After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec. EXAMPLE: We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM. Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule. RULES: PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4" PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5" KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes" RESULT: Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes '' Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
char kernel[NAME_SIZE];
char program[PROGRAM_SIZE];
char result[PROGRAM_SIZE];
[PATCH] support SUBSYSTEM as a rule key This should make it easier to catch e.g all block or net devices with a single rule.
2004-11-12 08:52:55 +03:00
char subsystem[SUBSYSTEM_SIZE];
[PATCH] support DRIVER as a rule key Match with a rule against a device with a specific kernel driver.
2004-11-13 07:21:12 +03:00
char driver[DRIVER_SIZE];
[PATCH] fix permission handling logic Now we can handle wildcards properly within the permission file.
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
char name[NAME_SIZE];
[PATCH] experimental (very simple) SYMLINK creation > > here is a experimental symlink creation patch - for discussion, > > in which direction we should go. > > It is possible now to define SYMLINK= after the NAME= in udev.rules. > > The link is relative to the node, but the path is not optimized now > > if the node and the link are in the same nested directory. > > Only one link is supported, cause i need to sleep now :) > > > > 06-simple-symlink-creation.diff > > simple symlink creation > > reorganized udev-remove to have access to the symlink field > > subdir creation/removal are functions now > > udev-test.pl tests for link creation/removal Here is a new version with relative link target path optimization an better tests in udev-test.pl: LABEL, BUS="scsi", vendor="IBM-ESXS", NAME="1/2/a/b/node", SYMLINK="1/2/c/d/symlink" Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_node: symlink 'udev-root/1/2/c/d/symlink' to node '1/2/a/b/node' requested Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_path: created 'udev-root/1/2/c' Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_path: created 'udev-root/1/2/c/d' Dec 7 06:48:34 pim udev[13789]: create_node: symlink(../../a/b/node, udev-root/1/2/c/d/symlink)
2003-12-07 20:12:07 +03:00
char symlink[NAME_SIZE];
[PATCH] add ability to have up to 5 SYSFS_ file/value pairs for the LABEL rule.
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
struct sysfs_pair sysfs_pair[MAX_SYSFS_PAIRS];
[PATCH] simplify permission handling Initialize the defaults in udev_config.c instead of namedev.c. Replace macro by expanded code. Switch to mode_t instead of string value. Add and clarify some comments.
2004-11-29 15:44:01 +03:00
char owner[USER_SIZE];
char group[USER_SIZE];
mode_t mode;
[PATCH] udev - create all partitions of blockdevice Here is the first try to create all partitons of a blockdevice, since removable media devices may need to acces the expected partition to revalidate the media. It uses the attribute syntax introduced with the last %s{file} patch. I'm using this with my multi-slot-flash-card-reader: SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-SMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="smartmedia" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-CFC ", NAME{all_partitions}="compactflash" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MSC ", NAME{all_partitions}="memorystick" SYSFS{model}="USB Storage-MMC ", NAME{all_partitions}="multimedia" and I get: tree /udev/ /udev/ |-- memorystick |-- memorystick1 |-- memorystick10 |-- memorystick11 |-- memorystick12 |-- memorystick13 |-- memorystick14 |-- memorystick15 |-- memorystick2 |-- memorystick3 |-- memorystick4 |-- memorystick5 |-- memorystick6 |-- memorystick7 |-- memorystick8 |-- memorystick9 |-- multimedia |-- multimedia1 |-- multimedia10 |-- multimedia11 |-- multimedia12 |-- multimedia13 |-- multimedia14 |-- multimedia15 |-- multimedia2 |-- multimedia3 |-- multimedia4 |-- multimedia5 |-- multimedia6 |-- multimedia7 |-- multimedia8 |-- multimedia9 ... If needed, we can make the number of partions to create adjustable with the attribute?
2004-02-17 08:44:28 +03:00
int partitions;
[PATCH] add NAME{ignore_remove} attribute Some broken ide drivers are generating high event traffic, with add/remove events. With this attribute, it can be specified, that the node is always available. It may be used in conjunction with the new DRIVER= match to catch specific kernel device drivers.
2004-11-13 16:43:24 +03:00
int ignore_remove;
[PATCH] udev - fix debug info for multiple rule file config On Sat, Feb 28, 2004 at 09:56:32PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > Andrey pointed out that we don't print the right filename in the debug > output. Here is a fix for that. It applies on top of Andrey's symlink > patch, cause we are touching the same part of the code. The copy/paste devil catched me :) Here is a fixed one.
2004-03-02 09:28:51 +03:00
char config_file[NAME_SIZE];
[PATCH] add udev logging to info log On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:14:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:10:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Clay Haapala wrote: > > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Friesen spake thusly: > > > > > > > > Maybe for ones with a matching rule, you could print something like: > > > > > > > > > > > Is the act of printing/syslogging a rule in an of itself? > > > > No, as currently the only way stuff ends up in the syslog is if > > DEBUG=true is used on the build line. > > > > But it's sounding like we might want to change that... :) > > How about this in the syslog after connect/disconnect? > > Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/udev.rules' at line 17 applied, 'video*' becomes 'video/webcam%n' > Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: creating device node '/udev/video/webcam0' > Jan 15 05:07:47 pim udev[28015]: removing device node '/udev/video/webcam0' Here is a slightly better version. I've created a logging.h file and moved the debug macros from udev.h in there. If you type: 'make' - you will get a binary that prints one or two lines to syslog if a device node is created or deleted 'make LOG=false' - you get a binary that prints asolutely nothing 'make DEBUG=true' - the same as today, it will print all debug lines
2004-01-16 08:53:20 +03:00
int config_line;
[PATCH] fix permission handling logic Now we can handle wildcards properly within the permission file.
2003-12-04 05:33:58 +03:00
};
[PATCH] split out the namedev config parsing logic to namedev_parse.c
2003-12-03 05:38:30 +03:00
extern struct list_head config_device_list;
[PATCH] make struct config_device contain a struct device_attr instead of duplicating the mess.
2003-07-24 02:56:56 +04:00
[PATCH] Initial namedev parsing of config files .permission parsing works, .config needs more work.
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
extern int namedev_init(void);
[PATCH] big cleanup of internal udev api Here is the first patch to cleanup the internal processing of the various stages of an udev event. It should not change any behavior, but if your system depends on udev, please always test it before reboot :) We pass only one generic structure around between add, remove, namedev, db and dev_d handling and make all relevant data available to all internal stages. All udev structures are renamed to "udev". We replace the fake parameter by a flag in the udev structure. We open the class device in the main binaries and not in udev_add, to make it possible to use libsysfs for udevstart directory crawling. The last sleep parameters are removed.
2004-10-19 06:11:51 +04:00
extern int namedev_name_device(struct udevice *udev, struct sysfs_class_device *class_dev);
[PATCH] split out the namedev config parsing logic to namedev_parse.c
2003-12-03 05:38:30 +03:00
extern void dump_config_dev(struct config_device *dev);
extern void dump_config_dev_list(void);
[PATCH] Initial namedev parsing of config files .permission parsing works, .config needs more work.
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
#endif
Copy Permalink