2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
/*
* namedev . c
*
* Userspace devfs
*
* Copyright ( C ) 2003 Greg Kroah - Hartman < greg @ kroah . com >
2005-02-14 08:03:06 +03:00
* Copyright ( C ) 2003 - 2005 Kay Sievers < kay . sievers @ vrfy . org >
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
*
*
* This program is free software ; you can redistribute it and / or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
* Free Software Foundation version 2 of the License .
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful , but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY ; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE . See the GNU
* General Public License for more details .
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
* with this program ; if not , write to the Free Software Foundation , Inc . ,
* 675 Mass Ave , Cambridge , MA 0213 9 , USA .
*
*/
# include <stddef.h>
# include <stdlib.h>
# include <string.h>
# include <stdio.h>
# include <fcntl.h>
# include <ctype.h>
# include <unistd.h>
# include <errno.h>
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
# include <sys/wait.h>
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
# include <sys/stat.h>
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
2004-02-24 06:07:25 +03:00
# include "libsysfs/sysfs/libsysfs.h"
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
# include "list.h"
# include "udev.h"
2004-11-25 04:44:38 +03:00
# include "udev_utils.h"
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
# include "udev_version.h"
[PATCH] add udev logging to info log
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 05:14:16AM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 01:10:43PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:34:26PM -0600, Clay Haapala wrote:
> > > On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Chris Friesen spake thusly:
> > > >
> > > > Maybe for ones with a matching rule, you could print something like:
> > > >
> > > >
> > > Is the act of printing/syslogging a rule in an of itself?
> >
> > No, as currently the only way stuff ends up in the syslog is if
> > DEBUG=true is used on the build line.
> >
> > But it's sounding like we might want to change that... :)
>
> How about this in the syslog after connect/disconnect?
>
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: configured rule in '/etc/udev/udev.rules' at line 17 applied, 'video*' becomes 'video/webcam%n'
> Jan 15 05:07:45 pim udev[28007]: creating device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
> Jan 15 05:07:47 pim udev[28015]: removing device node '/udev/video/webcam0'
Here is a slightly better version. I've created a logging.h file and
moved the debug macros from udev.h in there.
If you type:
'make' - you will get a binary that prints one or two lines to syslog
if a device node is created or deleted
'make LOG=false' - you get a binary that prints asolutely nothing
'make DEBUG=true' - the same as today, it will print all debug lines
2004-01-16 08:53:20 +03:00
# include "logging.h"
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
# include "namedev.h"
2004-11-12 08:32:19 +03:00
# include "udev_db.h"
2003-07-17 12:24:51 +04:00
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
static struct sysfs_attribute * find_sysfs_attribute ( struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device , char * attr ) ;
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
/* compare string with pattern (supports * ? [0-9] [!A-Z]) */
static int strcmp_pattern ( const char * p , const char * s )
2003-11-24 08:14:33 +03:00
{
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( s [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) {
while ( p [ 0 ] = = ' * ' )
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
p + + ;
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
return ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) ;
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
}
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
switch ( p [ 0 ] ) {
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
case ' [ ' :
{
int not = 0 ;
p + + ;
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( p [ 0 ] = = ' ! ' ) {
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
not = 1 ;
p + + ;
}
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
while ( ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) & & ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' ] ' ) ) {
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
int match = 0 ;
if ( p [ 1 ] = = ' - ' ) {
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( ( s [ 0 ] > = p [ 0 ] ) & & ( s [ 0 ] < = p [ 2 ] ) )
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
match = 1 ;
p + = 3 ;
} else {
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
match = ( p [ 0 ] = = s [ 0 ] ) ;
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
p + + ;
}
if ( match ^ not ) {
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
while ( ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) & & ( p [ 0 ] ! = ' ] ' ) )
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
p + + ;
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( p [ 0 ] = = ' ] ' )
return strcmp_pattern ( p + 1 , s + 1 ) ;
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
}
}
}
break ;
case ' * ' :
if ( strcmp_pattern ( p , s + 1 ) )
return strcmp_pattern ( p + 1 , s ) ;
return 0 ;
case ' \0 ' :
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( s [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) {
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
break ;
default :
[PATCH] fix possible buffer overflow
On Tue, Jan 27, 2004 at 11:02:25AM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2004 at 07:28:03PM -0500, Adrian Drzewiecki wrote:
> > Looking over the code, I noticed something odd in
> > namedev.c:strcmp_pattern() --
> >
> > while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> > p ++;
> > return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> >
> > If the pattern string is invalid, and is not terminated by a ']', then 'p'
> > will point at \0 and p+1 will be beyond the string.
>
> Yes, I think you are correct.
>
> Hm, Kay, any idea of the proper way to fix this? I've attached a patch
> below, but I don't think it is correct.
>
> while (*p && (*p != ']'))
> p++;
> - return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + if (*p)
> + return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
> + else
> + return 1;
> }
> }
Sure, it's perfectly correct. I'm wondering how Adrian found this.
We can use the return 1 at the end of the whole function, and asking
for the closing ']' is more descriptive, but it does the same.
- return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
+ if (*p == ']')
+ return strcmp_pattern(p+1, s+1);
Patch is attached, that also replaces all the *s with s[0].
2004-01-29 06:00:51 +03:00
if ( ( p [ 0 ] = = s [ 0 ] ) | | ( p [ 0 ] = = ' ? ' ) )
2003-12-03 17:22:53 +03:00
return strcmp_pattern ( p + 1 , s + 1 ) ;
break ;
}
return 1 ;
2003-11-24 08:14:33 +03:00
}
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
/* extract possible {attr} and move str behind it */
static char * get_format_attribute ( char * * str )
{
char * pos ;
char * attr = NULL ;
if ( * str [ 0 ] = = ' { ' ) {
pos = strchr ( * str , ' } ' ) ;
if ( pos = = NULL ) {
dbg ( " missing closing brace for format " ) ;
return NULL ;
}
pos [ 0 ] = ' \0 ' ;
attr = * str + 1 ;
* str = pos + 1 ;
dbg ( " attribute='%s', str='%s' " , attr , * str ) ;
}
return attr ;
}
/* extract possible format length and move str behind it*/
static int get_format_len ( char * * str )
{
int num ;
char * tail ;
if ( isdigit ( * str [ 0 ] ) ) {
num = ( int ) strtoul ( * str , & tail , 10 ) ;
2004-03-02 10:17:59 +03:00
if ( num > 0 ) {
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
* str = tail ;
dbg ( " format length=%i " , num ) ;
return num ;
} else {
dbg ( " format parsing error '%s' " , * str ) ;
}
}
return - 1 ;
}
[PATCH] compatibility symlinks for udev
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 17:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 16:46 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Nice, I like it. It's a easy way to group device nodes of the same type,
> but coming from different kernel subsystems.
>
That's a good way of putting it, yeah.
> > Here's a patch against udev-030 that can help create compatibility
> > symlinks like /dev/cdrom, /dev/cdrom1 etc. The patch introduces a new
> > substitution type %C (for Compatibility) that can be used as follows
>
> I suggest using %e for enumeration here, cause "compatibility" can
> easily be misunderstood.
>
Good point, I've changed that.
> And we need a few lines added to the man page at udev.8.in :)
>
Done. I've also added an example.
Also, Kay pointed out offlist that the rules can be written to not
require a shell script; this actually works
KERNEL="sr*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="scd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="pcd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom", NAME="\%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="fd[0-9]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="floppy", NAME=\"%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
New patch is attached.
David
2004-09-11 08:04:13 +04:00
/** Finds the lowest positive N such that <name>N isn't present in
* $ ( udevroot ) either as a file or a symlink .
*
* @ param name Name to check for
* @ return 0 if < name > didn ' t exist and N otherwise .
*/
2004-11-06 16:28:01 +03:00
static int find_free_number ( struct udevice * udev , const char * name )
[PATCH] compatibility symlinks for udev
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 17:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 16:46 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Nice, I like it. It's a easy way to group device nodes of the same type,
> but coming from different kernel subsystems.
>
That's a good way of putting it, yeah.
> > Here's a patch against udev-030 that can help create compatibility
> > symlinks like /dev/cdrom, /dev/cdrom1 etc. The patch introduces a new
> > substitution type %C (for Compatibility) that can be used as follows
>
> I suggest using %e for enumeration here, cause "compatibility" can
> easily be misunderstood.
>
Good point, I've changed that.
> And we need a few lines added to the man page at udev.8.in :)
>
Done. I've also added an example.
Also, Kay pointed out offlist that the rules can be written to not
require a shell script; this actually works
KERNEL="sr*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="scd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="pcd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom", NAME="\%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="fd[0-9]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="floppy", NAME=\"%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
New patch is attached.
David
2004-09-11 08:04:13 +04:00
{
2004-11-06 16:28:01 +03:00
char filename [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
int num = 0 ;
struct udevice db_udev ;
[PATCH] compatibility symlinks for udev
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 17:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 16:46 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Nice, I like it. It's a easy way to group device nodes of the same type,
> but coming from different kernel subsystems.
>
That's a good way of putting it, yeah.
> > Here's a patch against udev-030 that can help create compatibility
> > symlinks like /dev/cdrom, /dev/cdrom1 etc. The patch introduces a new
> > substitution type %C (for Compatibility) that can be used as follows
>
> I suggest using %e for enumeration here, cause "compatibility" can
> easily be misunderstood.
>
Good point, I've changed that.
> And we need a few lines added to the man page at udev.8.in :)
>
Done. I've also added an example.
Also, Kay pointed out offlist that the rules can be written to not
require a shell script; this actually works
KERNEL="sr*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="scd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="pcd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom", NAME="\%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="fd[0-9]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="floppy", NAME=\"%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
New patch is attached.
David
2004-09-11 08:04:13 +04:00
2004-11-06 16:28:01 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( filename , name ) ;
[PATCH] compatibility symlinks for udev
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 17:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 16:46 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Nice, I like it. It's a easy way to group device nodes of the same type,
> but coming from different kernel subsystems.
>
That's a good way of putting it, yeah.
> > Here's a patch against udev-030 that can help create compatibility
> > symlinks like /dev/cdrom, /dev/cdrom1 etc. The patch introduces a new
> > substitution type %C (for Compatibility) that can be used as follows
>
> I suggest using %e for enumeration here, cause "compatibility" can
> easily be misunderstood.
>
Good point, I've changed that.
> And we need a few lines added to the man page at udev.8.in :)
>
Done. I've also added an example.
Also, Kay pointed out offlist that the rules can be written to not
require a shell script; this actually works
KERNEL="sr*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="scd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="pcd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom", NAME="\%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="fd[0-9]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="floppy", NAME=\"%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
New patch is attached.
David
2004-09-11 08:04:13 +04:00
while ( 1 ) {
2004-11-06 16:28:01 +03:00
dbg ( " look for existing node '%s' " , filename ) ;
memset ( & db_udev , 0x00 , sizeof ( struct udevice ) ) ;
2004-11-12 08:32:19 +03:00
if ( udev_db_get_device_byname ( & db_udev , filename ) ! = 0 ) {
2004-11-06 16:28:01 +03:00
dbg ( " free num=%d " , num ) ;
return num ;
}
[PATCH] compatibility symlinks for udev
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 17:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 16:46 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Nice, I like it. It's a easy way to group device nodes of the same type,
> but coming from different kernel subsystems.
>
That's a good way of putting it, yeah.
> > Here's a patch against udev-030 that can help create compatibility
> > symlinks like /dev/cdrom, /dev/cdrom1 etc. The patch introduces a new
> > substitution type %C (for Compatibility) that can be used as follows
>
> I suggest using %e for enumeration here, cause "compatibility" can
> easily be misunderstood.
>
Good point, I've changed that.
> And we need a few lines added to the man page at udev.8.in :)
>
Done. I've also added an example.
Also, Kay pointed out offlist that the rules can be written to not
require a shell script; this actually works
KERNEL="sr*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="scd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="pcd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom", NAME="\%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="fd[0-9]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="floppy", NAME=\"%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
New patch is attached.
David
2004-09-11 08:04:13 +04:00
2004-11-06 16:28:01 +03:00
num + + ;
if ( num > 1000 ) {
info ( " find_free_number gone crazy (num=%d), aborted " , num ) ;
return - 1 ;
}
2004-11-12 08:21:16 +03:00
snprintf ( filename , NAME_SIZE , " %s%d " , name , num ) ;
2004-11-06 16:28:01 +03:00
filename [ NAME_SIZE - 1 ] = ' \0 ' ;
}
[PATCH] compatibility symlinks for udev
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 17:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 16:46 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Nice, I like it. It's a easy way to group device nodes of the same type,
> but coming from different kernel subsystems.
>
That's a good way of putting it, yeah.
> > Here's a patch against udev-030 that can help create compatibility
> > symlinks like /dev/cdrom, /dev/cdrom1 etc. The patch introduces a new
> > substitution type %C (for Compatibility) that can be used as follows
>
> I suggest using %e for enumeration here, cause "compatibility" can
> easily be misunderstood.
>
Good point, I've changed that.
> And we need a few lines added to the man page at udev.8.in :)
>
Done. I've also added an example.
Also, Kay pointed out offlist that the rules can be written to not
require a shell script; this actually works
KERNEL="sr*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="scd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="pcd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom", NAME="\%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="fd[0-9]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="floppy", NAME=\"%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
New patch is attached.
David
2004-09-11 08:04:13 +04:00
}
[PATCH] udev - safer string handling - part two
As promised, here is the next round. We provide in addition to the
already used macros:
strfieldcpy(to, from)
strfieldcat(to, from)
the corresponding friends, if the size of the target is not known and
must be provided by the caller:
strnfieldcpy(to, from, maxsize)
strnfieldcat(to, from, maxsize)
and switch nearly all possibly unsafe users of strcat(), strncat(),
strcpy() and strncpy() to these safer macros.
The last known remaining issue seems the use of sprintf() and
snprintf(). I will take on it later today or tomorrow.
2004-02-27 06:40:22 +03:00
static void apply_format ( struct udevice * udev , char * string , size_t maxsize ,
struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev ,
struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
{
[PATCH] get part of callout return string
Try this patch if you like, to get special parts of the callout output.
This beast works now:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
The callout returned string is separated by spaces and is
addressed by the "len" value of the 'c' format char.
Since we support symlinks, this my be useful for other uses of callout too.
introduce 'len number' for format chars
the first use is 'c'-the callout return to select a part of the output string like:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
(note: first part is requested by len=1, len=0 will return the whole string)
add a test to udev-test.pl
2003-12-16 09:54:38 +03:00
char temp [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
2004-03-04 11:54:13 +03:00
char temp2 [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
[PATCH] get part of callout return string
Try this patch if you like, to get special parts of the callout output.
This beast works now:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
The callout returned string is separated by spaces and is
addressed by the "len" value of the 'c' format char.
Since we support symlinks, this my be useful for other uses of callout too.
introduce 'len number' for format chars
the first use is 'c'-the callout return to select a part of the output string like:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
(note: first part is requested by len=1, len=0 will return the whole string)
add a test to udev-test.pl
2003-12-16 09:54:38 +03:00
char * tail ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
char * pos ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
char * attr ;
2004-02-28 17:53:25 +03:00
int len ;
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
int i ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
char c ;
[PATCH] better fix for NAME="foo-%c{N}" gets a truncated name
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:56:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:57:04PM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> >
> > Here is a patch for some new tests.
>
> Applied, thanks.
Here is a small improvement, which looks much better.
Hey Pat, thanks a lot for finding the recent bug, hope this one will
not break it again :)
2004-03-05 05:55:34 +03:00
char * spos ;
2004-03-11 12:37:18 +03:00
char * rest ;
[PATCH] better fix for NAME="foo-%c{N}" gets a truncated name
On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 04:56:34PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2004 at 03:57:04PM -0800, Patrick Mansfield wrote:
> >
> > Here is a patch for some new tests.
>
> Applied, thanks.
Here is a small improvement, which looks much better.
Hey Pat, thanks a lot for finding the recent bug, hope this one will
not break it again :)
2004-03-05 05:55:34 +03:00
int slen ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
struct sysfs_attribute * tmpattr ;
[PATCH] compatibility symlinks for udev
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 17:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 16:46 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Nice, I like it. It's a easy way to group device nodes of the same type,
> but coming from different kernel subsystems.
>
That's a good way of putting it, yeah.
> > Here's a patch against udev-030 that can help create compatibility
> > symlinks like /dev/cdrom, /dev/cdrom1 etc. The patch introduces a new
> > substitution type %C (for Compatibility) that can be used as follows
>
> I suggest using %e for enumeration here, cause "compatibility" can
> easily be misunderstood.
>
Good point, I've changed that.
> And we need a few lines added to the man page at udev.8.in :)
>
Done. I've also added an example.
Also, Kay pointed out offlist that the rules can be written to not
require a shell script; this actually works
KERNEL="sr*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="scd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="pcd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom", NAME="\%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="fd[0-9]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="floppy", NAME=\"%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
New patch is attached.
David
2004-09-11 08:04:13 +04:00
unsigned int next_free_number ;
2005-02-10 11:03:55 +03:00
struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev_parent ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
2004-01-14 05:34:33 +03:00
pos = string ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
while ( 1 ) {
[PATCH] fix test regressions
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 03:30:29AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:04:55AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 04:04:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Oh, and if you run the latest udev_test.pl, we have a bunch more tests,
> > > including a few that fail, if you were looking for something to do :)
> >
> > Will do it. We need to change apply_format(). I tries to expand the '%%'
> > with the next iteration over the string and removes the '%'.
The tests are all successful now.
If this patch breaks something else, we simply have too few tests :)
2004-04-22 04:49:44 +04:00
pos = strchr ( pos , ' % ' ) ;
if ( pos = = NULL )
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
break ;
[PATCH] get part of callout return string
Try this patch if you like, to get special parts of the callout output.
This beast works now:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
The callout returned string is separated by spaces and is
addressed by the "len" value of the 'c' format char.
Since we support symlinks, this my be useful for other uses of callout too.
introduce 'len number' for format chars
the first use is 'c'-the callout return to select a part of the output string like:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
(note: first part is requested by len=1, len=0 will return the whole string)
add a test to udev-test.pl
2003-12-16 09:54:38 +03:00
[PATCH] fix test regressions
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 03:30:29AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:04:55AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 04:04:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Oh, and if you run the latest udev_test.pl, we have a bunch more tests,
> > > including a few that fail, if you were looking for something to do :)
> >
> > Will do it. We need to change apply_format(). I tries to expand the '%%'
> > with the next iteration over the string and removes the '%'.
The tests are all successful now.
If this patch breaks something else, we simply have too few tests :)
2004-04-22 04:49:44 +04:00
pos [ 0 ] = ' \0 ' ;
tail = pos + 1 ;
len = get_format_len ( & tail ) ;
c = tail [ 0 ] ;
strfieldcpy ( temp , tail + 1 ) ;
tail = temp ;
dbg ( " format=%c, string='%s', tail='%s' " , c , string , tail ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
attr = get_format_attribute ( & tail ) ;
[PATCH] fix test regressions
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 03:30:29AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:04:55AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 04:04:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Oh, and if you run the latest udev_test.pl, we have a bunch more tests,
> > > including a few that fail, if you were looking for something to do :)
> >
> > Will do it. We need to change apply_format(). I tries to expand the '%%'
> > with the next iteration over the string and removes the '%'.
The tests are all successful now.
If this patch breaks something else, we simply have too few tests :)
2004-04-22 04:49:44 +04:00
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
switch ( c ) {
2005-02-09 06:37:32 +03:00
case ' p ' :
if ( strlen ( udev - > devpath ) = = 0 )
break ;
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > devpath , maxsize ) ;
dbg ( " substitute kernel name '%s' " , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
break ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
case ' b ' :
if ( strlen ( udev - > bus_id ) = = 0 )
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
break ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > bus_id , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute bus_id '%s' " , udev - > bus_id ) ;
break ;
case ' k ' :
if ( strlen ( udev - > kernel_name ) = = 0 )
2003-12-23 06:13:19 +03:00
break ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > kernel_name , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute kernel name '%s' " , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
break ;
case ' n ' :
if ( strlen ( udev - > kernel_number ) = = 0 )
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
break ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > kernel_number , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute kernel number '%s' " , udev - > kernel_number ) ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
break ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
case ' m ' :
2005-02-21 15:44:39 +03:00
strintcatmax ( string , minor ( udev - > devt ) , maxsize ) ;
dbg ( " substitute minor number '%u' " , minor ( udev - > devt ) ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
break ;
2004-02-28 12:59:02 +03:00
case ' M ' :
2005-02-21 15:44:39 +03:00
strintcatmax ( string , major ( udev - > devt ) , maxsize ) ;
dbg ( " substitute major number '%u' " , major ( udev - > devt ) ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
break ;
case ' c ' :
if ( strlen ( udev - > program_result ) = = 0 )
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
break ;
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
/* get part part of the result string */
2004-02-28 17:53:25 +03:00
i = 0 ;
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
if ( attr ! = NULL )
2004-03-11 12:37:18 +03:00
i = strtoul ( attr , & rest , 10 ) ;
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
if ( i > 0 ) {
2004-03-04 05:16:35 +03:00
foreach_strpart ( udev - > program_result , " \n \r " , spos , slen ) {
2004-02-17 12:29:03 +03:00
i - - ;
2004-03-04 05:16:35 +03:00
if ( i = = 0 )
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
break ;
[PATCH] get part of callout return string
Try this patch if you like, to get special parts of the callout output.
This beast works now:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
The callout returned string is separated by spaces and is
addressed by the "len" value of the 'c' format char.
Since we support symlinks, this my be useful for other uses of callout too.
introduce 'len number' for format chars
the first use is 'c'-the callout return to select a part of the output string like:
CALLOUT, BUS="scsi", PROGRAM="/bin/echo -n node link1 link2", ID="node *", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
(note: first part is requested by len=1, len=0 will return the whole string)
add a test to udev-test.pl
2003-12-16 09:54:38 +03:00
}
2004-03-04 05:16:35 +03:00
if ( i > 0 ) {
dbg ( " requested part of result string not found " ) ;
break ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
}
2004-03-11 12:37:18 +03:00
if ( rest [ 0 ] = = ' + ' )
strfieldcpy ( temp2 , spos ) ;
else
strfieldcpymax ( temp2 , spos , slen + 1 ) ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , temp2 , maxsize ) ;
2004-03-04 11:54:13 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute part of result string '%s' " , temp2 ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
} else {
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > program_result , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " substitute result string '%s' " , udev - > program_result ) ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
}
break ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
case ' s ' :
2005-02-21 16:01:23 +03:00
if ( ! class_dev )
break ;
if ( attr = = NULL ) {
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " missing attribute " ) ;
2005-02-21 16:01:23 +03:00
break ;
}
tmpattr = find_sysfs_attribute ( class_dev , sysfs_device , attr ) ;
if ( tmpattr = = NULL ) {
dbg ( " sysfa attribute '%s' not found " , attr ) ;
break ;
}
/* strip trailing whitespace of matching value */
if ( isspace ( tmpattr - > value [ strlen ( tmpattr - > value ) - 1 ] ) ) {
i = len = strlen ( tmpattr - > value ) ;
while ( i > 0 & & isspace ( tmpattr - > value [ i - 1 ] ) )
i - - ;
if ( i < len ) {
tmpattr - > value [ i ] = ' \0 ' ;
dbg ( " remove %i trailing whitespace chars from '%s' " ,
len - i , tmpattr - > value ) ;
}
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
}
2005-02-21 16:01:23 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , tmpattr - > value , maxsize ) ;
dbg ( " substitute sysfs value '%s' " , tmpattr - > value ) ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
break ;
case ' % ' :
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , " % " , maxsize ) ;
[PATCH] fix test regressions
On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 03:30:29AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 17, 2004 at 02:04:55AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> > On Fri, Apr 16, 2004 at 04:04:42PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> > > Oh, and if you run the latest udev_test.pl, we have a bunch more tests,
> > > including a few that fail, if you were looking for something to do :)
> >
> > Will do it. We need to change apply_format(). I tries to expand the '%%'
> > with the next iteration over the string and removes the '%'.
The tests are all successful now.
If this patch breaks something else, we simply have too few tests :)
2004-04-22 04:49:44 +04:00
pos + + ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
break ;
[PATCH] compatibility symlinks for udev
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 17:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 16:46 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Nice, I like it. It's a easy way to group device nodes of the same type,
> but coming from different kernel subsystems.
>
That's a good way of putting it, yeah.
> > Here's a patch against udev-030 that can help create compatibility
> > symlinks like /dev/cdrom, /dev/cdrom1 etc. The patch introduces a new
> > substitution type %C (for Compatibility) that can be used as follows
>
> I suggest using %e for enumeration here, cause "compatibility" can
> easily be misunderstood.
>
Good point, I've changed that.
> And we need a few lines added to the man page at udev.8.in :)
>
Done. I've also added an example.
Also, Kay pointed out offlist that the rules can be written to not
require a shell script; this actually works
KERNEL="sr*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="scd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="pcd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom", NAME="\%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="fd[0-9]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="floppy", NAME=\"%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
New patch is attached.
David
2004-09-11 08:04:13 +04:00
case ' e ' :
next_free_number = find_free_number ( udev , string ) ;
if ( next_free_number > 0 ) {
2004-11-06 16:28:01 +03:00
sprintf ( temp2 , " %d " , next_free_number ) ;
[PATCH] compatibility symlinks for udev
On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 17:45 +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
> On Mon, 2004-09-06 at 16:46 +0200, David Zeuthen wrote:
>
> Nice, I like it. It's a easy way to group device nodes of the same type,
> but coming from different kernel subsystems.
>
That's a good way of putting it, yeah.
> > Here's a patch against udev-030 that can help create compatibility
> > symlinks like /dev/cdrom, /dev/cdrom1 etc. The patch introduces a new
> > substitution type %C (for Compatibility) that can be used as follows
>
> I suggest using %e for enumeration here, cause "compatibility" can
> easily be misunderstood.
>
Good point, I've changed that.
> And we need a few lines added to the man page at udev.8.in :)
>
Done. I've also added an example.
Also, Kay pointed out offlist that the rules can be written to not
require a shell script; this actually works
KERNEL="sr*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="scd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="pcd*", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="cdrom", NAME="\%k", SYMLINK="cdrom%e"
KERNEL="fd[0-9]", NAME="%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
KERNEL="hd[a-z]", PROGRAM="/bin/cat /proc/ide/%k/media", RESULT="floppy", NAME=\"%k", SYMLINK="floppy%e"
New patch is attached.
David
2004-09-11 08:04:13 +04:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , temp2 , maxsize ) ;
}
break ;
2005-02-10 11:03:55 +03:00
case ' P ' :
2005-02-21 15:48:10 +03:00
if ( ! class_dev )
break ;
2005-02-10 11:03:55 +03:00
class_dev_parent = sysfs_get_classdev_parent ( class_dev ) ;
if ( class_dev_parent ! = NULL ) {
struct udevice udev_parent ;
dbg ( " found parent '%s', get the node name " , class_dev_parent - > path ) ;
memset ( & udev_parent , 0x00 , sizeof ( struct udevice ) ) ;
/* lookup the name in the udev_db with the DEVPATH of the parent */
2005-02-21 15:48:10 +03:00
if ( udev_db_get_device_by_devpath ( & udev_parent , & class_dev_parent - > path [ strlen ( sysfs_path ) ] ) = = 0 ) {
2005-02-10 11:03:55 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev_parent . name , maxsize ) ;
dbg ( " substitute parent node name'%s' " , udev_parent . name ) ;
} else
dbg ( " parent not found in database " ) ;
}
break ;
2005-02-09 06:37:32 +03:00
case ' N ' :
if ( udev - > tmp_node [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " create temporary device node for callout " ) ;
2005-02-21 15:44:39 +03:00
snprintf ( udev - > tmp_node , NAME_SIZE , " %s/.tmp-%u-%u " , udev_root , major ( udev - > devt ) , minor ( udev - > devt ) ) ;
udev - > tmp_node [ NAME_SIZE ] = ' \0 ' ;
udev_make_node ( udev , udev - > tmp_node , udev - > devt , 0600 , 0 , 0 ) ;
2005-02-09 06:37:32 +03:00
}
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev - > tmp_node , maxsize ) ;
dbg ( " substitute temporary device node name '%s' " , udev - > tmp_node ) ;
break ;
2005-02-10 11:03:55 +03:00
case ' r ' :
strfieldcatmax ( string , udev_root , maxsize ) ;
dbg ( " substitute udev_root '%s' " , udev_root ) ;
break ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
default :
dbg ( " unknown substitution type '%%%c' " , c ) ;
break ;
}
2004-02-28 17:53:25 +03:00
/* truncate to specified length */
if ( len > 0 )
pos [ len ] = ' \0 ' ;
2004-03-10 06:50:15 +03:00
strfieldcatmax ( string , tail , maxsize ) ;
2003-11-24 09:25:13 +03:00
}
}
2004-11-12 08:20:22 +03:00
static int execute_program ( struct udevice * udev , const char * path , char * value , int len )
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
{
int retval ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
int count ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
int status ;
int fds [ 2 ] ;
pid_t pid ;
2003-12-16 09:38:18 +03:00
char * pos ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
char arg [ PROGRAM_SIZE ] ;
2004-10-07 10:20:39 +04:00
char * argv [ ( PROGRAM_SIZE / 2 ) + 1 ] ;
2003-11-21 17:48:01 +03:00
int i ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
2004-10-07 10:20:39 +04:00
strfieldcpy ( arg , path ) ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
i = 0 ;
if ( strchr ( path , ' ' ) ) {
pos = arg ;
while ( pos ! = NULL ) {
if ( pos [ 0 ] = = ' \' ' ) {
/* don't separate if in apostrophes */
pos + + ;
argv [ i ] = strsep ( & pos , " \' " ) ;
2004-09-14 17:50:38 +04:00
while ( pos & & pos [ 0 ] = = ' ' )
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
pos + + ;
2004-09-14 17:50:38 +04:00
} else {
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
argv [ i ] = strsep ( & pos , " " ) ;
}
dbg ( " arg[%i] '%s' " , i , argv [ i ] ) ;
i + + ;
}
2004-10-07 10:20:39 +04:00
argv [ i ] = NULL ;
dbg ( " execute '%s' with parsed arguments " , arg ) ;
} else {
argv [ 0 ] = arg ;
2004-11-12 08:20:22 +03:00
argv [ 1 ] = udev - > subsystem ;
2004-10-07 10:20:39 +04:00
argv [ 2 ] = NULL ;
dbg ( " execute '%s' with subsystem '%s' argument " , arg , argv [ 1 ] ) ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
}
2004-10-07 10:20:39 +04:00
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
retval = pipe ( fds ) ;
if ( retval ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( " pipe failed " ) ;
return - 1 ;
}
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
pid = fork ( ) ;
2004-01-27 11:40:12 +03:00
switch ( pid ) {
case 0 :
[PATCH] namedev.c whitespace + debug text cleanup
here is mainly a whitespace cleanup for namedev.c. I changed the
dbg_parse() output a bit for better readability:
current:
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:07.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:07.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:0b.0'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:0b.0'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: device id '2-1.1' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
becomes:
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '2-1.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: found id '2-1.1', 'video0' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
2003-11-21 05:37:01 +03:00
/* child */
2004-10-06 11:54:08 +04:00
/* dup2 write side of pipe to STDOUT */
dup2 ( fds [ 1 ] , STDOUT_FILENO ) ;
2004-10-07 10:20:39 +04:00
retval = execv ( arg , argv ) ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
2004-02-27 08:29:49 +03:00
info ( FIELD_PROGRAM " execution of '%s' failed " , path ) ;
2004-01-27 11:40:12 +03:00
exit ( 1 ) ;
case - 1 :
dbg ( " fork failed " ) ;
return - 1 ;
default :
[PATCH] namedev.c whitespace + debug text cleanup
here is mainly a whitespace cleanup for namedev.c. I changed the
dbg_parse() output a bit for better readability:
current:
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:07.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:07.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='00:0b.0'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1' id='00:0b.0'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: NUMBER temp='/2-1.1' id='2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:00:59 pim udev[25582]: do_number: device id '2-1.1' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
becomes:
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:07.1' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '00:0b.0' in '/2-1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: search '2-1.1' in '/2-1.1', path='/sys/devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:1d.1/usb2/2-1/2-1.1'
Nov 19 19:23:40 pim udev[26091]: do_number: found id '2-1.1', 'video0' becomes 'webcam%n' - owner='', group ='', mode=0
2003-11-21 05:37:01 +03:00
/* parent reads from fds[0] */
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
close ( fds [ 1 ] ) ;
retval = 0 ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
i = 0 ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
while ( 1 ) {
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
count = read ( fds [ 0 ] , value + i , len - i - 1 ) ;
if ( count < = 0 )
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
break ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
i + = count ;
if ( i > = len - 1 ) {
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg ( " result len %d too short " , len ) ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
retval = - 1 ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
break ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
}
}
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
if ( count < 0 ) {
dbg ( " read failed with '%s' " , strerror ( errno ) ) ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
retval = - 1 ;
}
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes
Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for
the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has
no sysinfo().
o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the
udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices.
All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at
the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it.
o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename
a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add
the changed name to the db to match with the remove event.
NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the
hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too?
o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created
the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part
of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all
the functions used for node creation.
o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too.
Can we change the name?
o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution
and used it in udev-test.pl.
udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging
statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the
scripts here too?
o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause
'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to
print the major/minor values.
o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test
for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
if ( i > 0 & & value [ i - 1 ] = = ' \n ' )
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
i - - ;
value [ i ] = ' \0 ' ;
dbg ( " result is '%s' " , value ) ;
close ( fds [ 0 ] ) ;
2004-11-05 15:16:56 +03:00
waitpid ( pid , & status , 0 ) ;
2004-03-11 12:36:12 +03:00
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
if ( ! WIFEXITED ( status ) | | ( WEXITSTATUS ( status ) ! = 0 ) ) {
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg ( " exec program status 0x%x " , status ) ;
2003-10-15 10:32:17 +04:00
retval = - 1 ;
}
}
return retval ;
}
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
static struct sysfs_attribute * find_sysfs_attribute ( struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device , char * attr )
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
{
struct sysfs_attribute * tmpattr = NULL ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
char * c ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
dbg ( " look for device attribute '%s' " , attr ) ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
/* try to find the attribute in the class device directory */
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
tmpattr = sysfs_get_classdev_attr ( class_dev , attr ) ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
if ( tmpattr )
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
goto attr_found ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
/* look in the class device directory if present */
if ( sysfs_device ) {
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
tmpattr = sysfs_get_device_attr ( sysfs_device , attr ) ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
if ( tmpattr )
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
goto attr_found ;
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
}
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
return NULL ;
attr_found :
c = strchr ( tmpattr - > value , ' \n ' ) ;
if ( c ! = NULL )
c [ 0 ] = ' \0 ' ;
dbg ( " found attribute '%s' " , tmpattr - > path ) ;
return tmpattr ;
}
static int compare_sysfs_attribute ( struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device , struct sysfs_pair * pair )
{
struct sysfs_attribute * tmpattr ;
2004-03-05 05:59:13 +03:00
int i ;
int len ;
[PATCH] Adding '%s' format specifier to NAME and SYMLINK
On Thu, Feb 12, 2004 at 05:34:57PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 10, 2004 at 09:14:20AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > this patch makes the format for NAME and SYMLINK a bit more flexible:
> > I've added a new format specifier '%s{<SYSFS_var>}', which allows for
> > the value of any sysfs entry found for this device to be inserted.
> > Example (for our S/390 fcp adapter):
> >
> > BUS="ccw", SYSFS_devtype="1732/03", NAME="%k" \
> > SYMLINK="zfcp-%s{hba_id}-%s{wwpn}:%s{fcp_lun}"
> >
> > I know this could also be done with an external program, but having this
> > incorporated into udev makes life easier, especially if run from
> > initramfs. Plus it makes the rules easier to follow, as the result is
> > directly visible and need not to be looked up in some external program.
> >
> > Comments etc. welcome.
>
> Oops, sorry I missed this for the 017 release. I'll look at it tomorrow
> and get back to you. At first glance it looks like a good thing.
>
> Oh, you forgot to update the documentation, that's important to do if
> you want this change to make it in :)
I took a part of the code and made a version that uses already implemented
attribute finding logic.
The parsing of the format length '%3x' and the '%x{attribute}' is a fuction now,
maybe there are more possible users in the future.
I've also added the test to udev-test.pl.
2004-02-17 08:36:34 +03:00
if ( ( pair = = NULL ) | | ( pair - > file [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) | | ( pair - > value = = ' \0 ' ) )
return - ENODEV ;
tmpattr = find_sysfs_attribute ( class_dev , sysfs_device , pair - > file ) ;
if ( tmpattr = = NULL )
return - ENODEV ;
2004-03-05 05:59:13 +03:00
/* strip trailing whitespace of value, if not asked to match for it */
if ( ! isspace ( pair - > value [ strlen ( pair - > value ) - 1 ] ) ) {
i = len = strlen ( tmpattr - > value ) ;
while ( i > 0 & & isspace ( tmpattr - > value [ i - 1 ] ) )
i - - ;
if ( i < len ) {
tmpattr - > value [ i ] = ' \0 ' ;
dbg ( " remove %i trailing whitespace chars from '%s' " ,
len - i , tmpattr - > value ) ;
}
}
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
dbg ( " compare attribute '%s' value '%s' with '%s' " ,
pair - > file , tmpattr - > value , pair - > value ) ;
if ( strcmp_pattern ( pair - > value , tmpattr - > value ) ! = 0 )
return - ENODEV ;
dbg ( " found matching attribute '%s' with value '%s' " ,
pair - > file , pair - > value ) ;
return 0 ;
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int match_sysfs_pairs ( struct config_device * dev , struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-12-23 09:31:35 +03:00
{
struct sysfs_pair * pair ;
int i ;
2003-11-27 04:45:05 +03:00
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
for ( i = 0 ; i < MAX_SYSFS_PAIRS ; + + i ) {
pair = & dev - > sysfs_pair [ i ] ;
if ( ( pair - > file [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) | | ( pair - > value [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) )
break ;
if ( compare_sysfs_attribute ( class_dev , sysfs_device , pair ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( " sysfs attribute doesn't match " ) ;
return - ENODEV ;
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
}
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
return 0 ;
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int match_id ( struct config_device * dev , struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
{
char path [ SYSFS_PATH_MAX ] ;
2005-02-21 16:01:23 +03:00
char * temp ;
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
2004-01-13 10:22:13 +03:00
/* we have to have a sysfs device for ID to work */
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
if ( ! sysfs_device )
return - ENODEV ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( path , sysfs_device - > path ) ;
temp = strrchr ( path , ' / ' ) ;
2004-02-12 12:25:28 +03:00
temp + + ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
dbg ( " search '%s' in '%s', path='%s' " , dev - > id , temp , path ) ;
2004-02-12 12:25:28 +03:00
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > id , temp ) ! = 0 )
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
return - ENODEV ;
2005-02-21 16:48:12 +03:00
return 0 ;
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
static int match_place ( struct config_device * dev , struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-11-13 05:08:19 +03:00
{
char path [ SYSFS_PATH_MAX ] ;
2005-02-21 15:45:33 +03:00
char * temp ;
2003-11-13 05:08:19 +03:00
2004-01-13 10:22:13 +03:00
/* we have to have a sysfs device for PLACE to work */
2003-11-13 05:08:19 +03:00
if ( ! sysfs_device )
return - ENODEV ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( path , sysfs_device - > path ) ;
temp = strrchr ( path , ' / ' ) ;
dbg ( " search '%s' in '%s', path='%s' " , dev - > place , temp , path ) ;
2005-02-21 15:45:33 +03:00
if ( strstr ( temp , dev - > place ) ! = NULL )
return 0 ;
2003-11-12 19:26:08 +03:00
2005-02-21 15:45:33 +03:00
/* try the parent */
temp [ 0 ] = ' \0 ' ;
temp = strrchr ( path , ' / ' ) ;
dbg ( " search '%s' in '%s', path='%s' " , dev - > place , temp , path ) ;
if ( strstr ( temp , dev - > place ) = = NULL )
return 0 ;
dbg ( " place doesn't match " ) ;
return - ENODEV ;
2003-11-19 17:19:06 +03:00
}
2004-11-29 15:44:01 +03:00
static int match_rule ( struct udevice * udev , struct config_device * dev ,
struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev , struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device )
2003-12-20 12:05:13 +03:00
{
2005-02-11 20:33:40 +03:00
if ( dev - > kernel [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check for " FIELD_KERNEL " dev->kernel='%s' class_dev->name='%s' " ,
dev - > kernel , class_dev - > name ) ;
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > kernel , class_dev - > name ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_KERNEL " is not matching " ) ;
goto exit ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
2005-02-11 20:33:40 +03:00
dbg ( FIELD_KERNEL " matches " ) ;
}
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
2005-02-11 20:33:40 +03:00
if ( dev - > subsystem [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check for " FIELD_SUBSYSTEM " dev->subsystem='%s' class_dev->name='%s' " ,
dev - > subsystem , class_dev - > name ) ;
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > subsystem , udev - > subsystem ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_SUBSYSTEM " is not matching " ) ;
goto exit ;
2004-11-12 08:52:55 +03:00
}
2005-02-11 20:33:40 +03:00
dbg ( FIELD_SUBSYSTEM " matches " ) ;
}
2004-11-12 08:52:55 +03:00
2005-02-14 03:46:05 +03:00
/* walk up the chain of physical devices and find a match */
2005-02-11 20:33:40 +03:00
while ( 1 ) {
2004-11-13 07:21:12 +03:00
/* check for matching driver */
if ( dev - > driver [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
2004-11-29 15:44:01 +03:00
dbg ( " check for " FIELD_DRIVER " dev->driver='%s' sysfs_device->driver_name='%s' " ,
dev - > driver , sysfs_device - > driver_name ) ;
2004-11-13 07:21:12 +03:00
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > driver , sysfs_device - > driver_name ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_DRIVER " is not matching " ) ;
goto try_parent ;
}
2005-02-14 03:46:05 +03:00
dbg ( FIELD_DRIVER " matches " ) ;
2004-11-13 07:21:12 +03:00
}
2005-02-11 07:21:03 +03:00
/* check for matching bus value */
if ( dev - > bus [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
if ( sysfs_device = = NULL ) {
dbg ( " device has no bus " ) ;
goto try_parent ;
}
dbg ( " check for " FIELD_BUS " dev->bus='%s' sysfs_device->bus='%s' " ,
dev - > bus , sysfs_device - > bus ) ;
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > bus , sysfs_device - > bus ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_BUS " is not matching " ) ;
goto try_parent ;
}
dbg ( FIELD_BUS " matches " ) ;
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching bus id */
if ( dev - > id [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check " FIELD_ID ) ;
if ( match_id ( dev , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_ID " is not matching " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
2005-02-14 03:46:05 +03:00
dbg ( FIELD_ID " matches " ) ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
2003-11-13 16:52:08 +03:00
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching place of device */
if ( dev - > place [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check " FIELD_PLACE ) ;
if ( match_place ( dev , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_PLACE " is not matching " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
2005-02-14 03:46:05 +03:00
dbg ( FIELD_PLACE " matches " ) ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
2003-11-13 05:08:19 +03:00
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
/* check for matching sysfs pairs */
if ( dev - > sysfs_pair [ 0 ] . file [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check " FIELD_SYSFS " pairs " ) ;
if ( match_sysfs_pairs ( dev , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_SYSFS " is not matching " ) ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
goto try_parent ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
2005-02-14 03:46:05 +03:00
dbg ( FIELD_SYSFS " matches " ) ;
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
2005-02-14 03:46:05 +03:00
/* found matching physical device */
break ;
2004-02-12 09:28:51 +03:00
try_parent :
dbg ( " try parent sysfs device " ) ;
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
sysfs_device = sysfs_get_device_parent ( sysfs_device ) ;
if ( sysfs_device = = NULL )
2005-02-11 07:21:03 +03:00
goto exit ;
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
dbg ( " sysfs_device->path='%s' " , sysfs_device - > path ) ;
dbg ( " sysfs_device->bus_id='%s' " , sysfs_device - > bus_id ) ;
}
2005-02-11 07:21:03 +03:00
2005-02-14 03:46:05 +03:00
/* execute external program */
if ( dev - > program [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
char program [ PROGRAM_SIZE ] ;
dbg ( " check " FIELD_PROGRAM ) ;
strfieldcpy ( program , dev - > program ) ;
apply_format ( udev , program , sizeof ( program ) , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ;
if ( execute_program ( udev , program , udev - > program_result , NAME_SIZE ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_PROGRAM " returned nonzero " ) ;
goto try_parent ;
}
dbg ( FIELD_PROGRAM " returned successful " ) ;
}
/* check for matching result of external program */
if ( dev - > result [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " check for " FIELD_RESULT " dev->result='%s', udev->program_result='%s' " ,
dev - > result , udev - > program_result ) ;
if ( strcmp_pattern ( dev - > result , udev - > program_result ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( FIELD_RESULT " is not matching " ) ;
goto try_parent ;
}
dbg ( FIELD_RESULT " matches " ) ;
}
/* rule matches */
return 0 ;
2005-02-11 07:21:03 +03:00
exit :
return - 1 ;
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
}
2004-10-19 06:11:51 +04:00
int namedev_name_device ( struct udevice * udev , struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev )
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
{
2004-10-15 07:36:07 +04:00
struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev_parent ;
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
struct sysfs_device * sysfs_device = NULL ;
struct config_device * dev ;
2004-10-15 07:36:07 +04:00
dbg ( " class_dev->name='%s' " , class_dev - > name ) ;
/* Figure out where the "device"-symlink is at. For char devices this will
* always be in the class_dev - > path . On block devices , only the main block
* device will have the device symlink in it ' s path . All partition devices
* need to look at the symlink in its parent directory .
*/
class_dev_parent = sysfs_get_classdev_parent ( class_dev ) ;
if ( class_dev_parent ! = NULL ) {
dbg ( " given class device has a parent, use this instead " ) ;
sysfs_device = sysfs_get_classdev_device ( class_dev_parent ) ;
} else {
sysfs_device = sysfs_get_classdev_device ( class_dev ) ;
}
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
if ( sysfs_device ) {
2004-10-19 06:11:51 +04:00
dbg ( " found devices device: path='%s', bus_id='%s', bus='%s' " ,
2004-10-15 07:36:07 +04:00
sysfs_device - > path , sysfs_device - > bus_id , sysfs_device - > bus ) ;
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( udev - > bus_id , sysfs_device - > bus_id ) ;
}
2005-02-21 16:48:12 +03:00
dbg ( " udev->kernel_name='%s' " , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
/* look for a matching rule to apply */
list_for_each_entry ( dev , & config_device_list , node ) {
dbg ( " process rule " ) ;
2004-11-29 15:44:01 +03:00
if ( match_rule ( udev , dev , class_dev , sysfs_device ) = = 0 ) {
2004-12-21 01:44:57 +03:00
2005-02-14 08:03:06 +03:00
/* apply options */
if ( dev - > ignore_device ) {
info ( " configured rule in '%s[%i]' applied, '%s' is ignored " ,
dev - > config_file , dev - > config_line , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
return - 1 ;
}
if ( dev - > ignore_remove ) {
udev - > ignore_remove = dev - > ignore_remove ;
dbg_parse ( " remove event should be ignored " ) ;
}
/* apply all_partitions option only at a main block device */
2005-02-21 15:45:04 +03:00
if ( dev - > partitions & & udev - > type = = BLOCK & & udev - > kernel_number [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' ) {
2005-02-14 08:03:06 +03:00
udev - > partitions = dev - > partitions ;
dbg ( " creation of partition nodes requested " ) ;
}
2005-02-06 02:13:18 +03:00
/* apply permissions */
if ( dev - > mode ! = 0000 ) {
udev - > mode = dev - > mode ;
dbg ( " applied mode=%#o to '%s' " , udev - > mode , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
}
if ( dev - > owner [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
strfieldcpy ( udev - > owner , dev - > owner ) ;
apply_format ( udev , udev - > owner , sizeof ( udev - > owner ) , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ;
dbg ( " applied owner='%s' to '%s' " , udev - > owner , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
}
if ( dev - > group [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
strfieldcpy ( udev - > group , dev - > group ) ;
apply_format ( udev , udev - > group , sizeof ( udev - > group ) , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ;
dbg ( " applied group='%s' to '%s' " , udev - > group , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
}
2005-02-21 16:48:12 +03:00
/* collect symlinks */
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
if ( dev - > symlink [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
2004-03-25 04:50:40 +03:00
char temp [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
2004-03-25 04:34:00 +03:00
2004-12-22 03:41:03 +03:00
info ( " configured rule in '%s[%i]' applied, added symlink '%s' " ,
2004-03-02 09:28:51 +03:00
dev - > config_file , dev - > config_line , dev - > symlink ) ;
2004-03-25 04:34:00 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( temp , dev - > symlink ) ;
apply_format ( udev , temp , sizeof ( temp ) , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ;
2004-03-11 12:39:53 +03:00
if ( udev - > symlink [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' )
strfieldcat ( udev - > symlink , " " ) ;
2004-03-25 04:34:00 +03:00
strfieldcat ( udev - > symlink , temp ) ;
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
}
2004-11-29 15:44:01 +03:00
/* rule matches */
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
if ( dev - > name [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
2004-12-21 01:44:57 +03:00
info ( " configured rule in '%s[%i]' applied, '%s' becomes '%s' " ,
2004-03-02 09:28:51 +03:00
dev - > config_file , dev - > config_line , udev - > kernel_name , dev - > name ) ;
2004-11-29 15:44:01 +03:00
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
strfieldcpy ( udev - > name , dev - > name ) ;
2004-11-29 15:44:01 +03:00
apply_format ( udev , udev - > name , sizeof ( udev - > name ) , class_dev , sysfs_device ) ;
strfieldcpy ( udev - > config_file , dev - > config_file ) ;
udev - > config_line = dev - > config_line ;
2004-12-20 03:31:56 +03:00
2005-02-21 15:45:04 +03:00
if ( udev - > type ! = NET )
2005-02-14 08:03:06 +03:00
dbg ( " name, '%s' is going to have owner='%s', group='%s', mode=%#o partitions=%i " ,
udev - > name , udev - > owner , udev - > group , udev - > mode , udev - > partitions ) ;
2004-11-29 15:44:01 +03:00
2004-12-20 03:31:56 +03:00
goto exit ;
2004-03-02 09:23:39 +03:00
}
2004-01-23 11:21:13 +03:00
}
[PATCH] udev - drop all methods :)
> Hi,
> as promised yesterday, here is a patch that drops the explicit methods
> given in the udev config and implement only one type of rule.
>
> A rule now consists only of a number of keys to match. All known keys
> are valid in any combination. The former configs should work with a few
> changes:
>
> o the "<METHOD>, " at the beginning of the line should be removed
>
> o the result of the externel program is matched with RESULT= instead if ID=
> the PROGRAM= key is only valid if the program exits with zero
> (just exit with nozero in a script if the rule should not match)
>
> o rules are processed in order they appear in the file, no priority
>
> o if NAME="" is given, udev is instructed to ignore this device,
> no node will be created
>
>
> EXAMPLE:
>
> # combined BUS, SYSFS and KERNEL
> BUS="usb", KERNEL="video*", SYSFS_model="Creative Labs WebCam*", NAME="test/webcam%n"
>
> # exec script only for the first ide drive (hda), all other will be skipped
> BUS="ide", KERNEL="hda*", PROGRAM="/home/kay/src/udev.kay/extras/ide-devfs.sh %k %b %n", RESULT="hd*", NAME="%1c", SYMLINK="%2c %3c"
>
>
> The udev-test.pl and test.block works fine here.
> Please adapt your config and give it a try.
>
Here is a slightly better version of the patch.
After a conversation with Patrick, we are now able to execute the PROGRAM
and also match in all following rules with the RESULT value from this exec.
EXAMPLE:
We have 7 rules with RESULT and 2 with PROGRAM.
Only the 5th rule matches with the callout result from the exec in the 4th rule.
RULES:
PROGRAM="/bin/echo abc", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-2"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-3"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-no-4"
PROGRAM="/bin/echo 123", RESULT="no_match", NAME="web-no-5"
KERNEL="video*", RESULT="123", NAME="web-yes"
RESULT:
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is 'abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='abc'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check PROGRAM
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: executing '/bin/echo 123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: execute_program: result is '123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: PROGRAM returned successful
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='no_match', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT is not matching
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: process rule
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for KERNEL dev->kernel='video*' class_dev->name='video0'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: KERNEL matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: check for RESULT dev->result='123', udev->program_result='123'
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: RESULT matches
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: found matching rule, 'video*' becomes ''
Jan 11 23:36:52 pim udev[26050]: namedev_name_device: name, 'web-yes' is going to have owner='', group='', mode = 0600
2004-01-13 08:39:05 +03:00
}
2003-10-20 08:56:21 +04:00
2004-11-29 15:44:01 +03:00
/* no rule matched, so we use the kernel name */
strfieldcpy ( udev - > name , udev - > kernel_name ) ;
2004-12-20 03:31:56 +03:00
dbg ( " no rule found, use kernel name '%s' " , udev - > name ) ;
2003-11-13 04:38:14 +03:00
2004-11-29 15:51:20 +03:00
exit :
2005-02-09 06:37:32 +03:00
if ( udev - > tmp_node [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
dbg ( " removing temporary device node " ) ;
unlink_secure ( udev - > tmp_node ) ;
udev - > tmp_node [ 0 ] = ' \0 ' ;
}
2003-11-12 19:26:08 +03:00
return 0 ;
2003-07-19 09:48:28 +04:00
}
