[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
/*
* udevruler . c - simple udev - rule composer
*
* Reads the udev - db to get all currently known devices and
* scans the sysfs device chain for the choosen device to select attributes
* to compose a rule for the udev . rules file to uniquely name this device .
*
* Copyright ( C ) 2004 Kay Sievers < kay . sievers @ vrfy . org >
*
* This program is free software ; you can redistribute it and / or modify it
* under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by the
* Free Software Foundation version 2 of the License .
*
* This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful , but
* WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY ; without even the implied warranty of
* MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE . See the GNU
* General Public License for more details .
*
* You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along
* with this program ; if not , write to the Free Software Foundation , Inc . ,
* 675 Mass Ave , Cambridge , MA 0213 9 , USA .
*
*/
# include <newt.h>
# include <stdio.h>
# include <stdlib.h>
# include <stddef.h>
# include <ctype.h>
# include <time.h>
# include <unistd.h>
# include "udev.h"
# include "udev_lib.h"
# include "udev_version.h"
# include "udevdb.h"
# include "logging.h"
# include "libsysfs/sysfs.h"
# include "list.h"
# ifdef LOG
unsigned char logname [ LOGNAME_SIZE ] ;
void log_message ( int level , const char * format , . . . )
{
va_list args ;
if ( ! udev_log )
return ;
va_start ( args , format ) ;
vsyslog ( level , format , args ) ;
va_end ( args ) ;
}
# endif
static char * dev_blacklist [ ] = {
" tty " ,
" pty " ,
" zero " ,
" null " ,
" kmsg " ,
" rtc " ,
" timer " ,
" full " ,
" kmem " ,
" mem " ,
" random " ,
" urandom " ,
" console " ,
" port " ,
" "
} ;
struct device {
struct list_head list ;
char name [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
char devpath [ DEVPATH_SIZE ] ;
int config_line ;
char config_file [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes
Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for
the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has
no sysinfo().
o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the
udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices.
All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at
the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it.
o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename
a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add
the changed name to the db to match with the remove event.
NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the
hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too?
o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created
the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part
of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all
the functions used for node creation.
o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too.
Can we change the name?
o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution
and used it in udev-test.pl.
udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging
statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the
scripts here too?
o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause
'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to
print the major/minor values.
o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test
for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
long config_uptime ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
int added ;
} ;
2004-03-27 12:21:46 +03:00
static LIST_HEAD ( device_list ) ;
static int device_count ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
/* callback for database dump */
static int add_record ( char * path , struct udevice * udev )
{
struct device * dev ;
struct device * loop_dev ;
int i = 0 ;
while ( dev_blacklist [ i ] [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
if ( strncmp ( udev - > name , dev_blacklist [ i ] , strlen ( dev_blacklist [ i ] ) ) = = 0 )
goto exit ;
i + + ;
}
dev = malloc ( sizeof ( struct device ) ) ;
if ( dev = = NULL ) {
printf ( " error malloc \n " ) ;
exit ( 2 ) ;
}
strfieldcpy ( dev - > name , udev - > name ) ;
strfieldcpy ( dev - > devpath , path ) ;
dev - > config_line = udev - > config_line ;
strfieldcpy ( dev - > config_file , udev - > config_file ) ;
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes
Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for
the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has
no sysinfo().
o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the
udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices.
All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at
the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it.
o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename
a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add
the changed name to the db to match with the remove event.
NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the
hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too?
o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created
the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part
of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all
the functions used for node creation.
o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too.
Can we change the name?
o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution
and used it in udev-test.pl.
udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging
statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the
scripts here too?
o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause
'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to
print the major/minor values.
o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test
for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
dev - > config_uptime = udev - > config_uptime ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
dev - > added = 0 ;
/* sort in lexical order */
list_for_each_entry ( loop_dev , & device_list , list ) {
if ( strcmp ( loop_dev - > name , dev - > name ) > 0 ) {
break ;
}
}
list_add_tail ( & dev - > list , & loop_dev - > list ) ;
device_count + + ;
exit :
return 0 ;
}
/* get all devices from udev database */
static int get_all_devices ( void )
{
int retval ;
device_count = 0 ;
INIT_LIST_HEAD ( & device_list ) ;
retval = udevdb_open_ro ( ) ;
if ( retval ! = 0 ) {
printf ( " unable to open udev database \n " ) ;
exit ( 1 ) ;
}
udevdb_call_foreach ( add_record ) ;
udevdb_exit ( ) ;
return 0 ;
}
struct attribute {
struct list_head list ;
int level ;
char key [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
} ;
2004-03-27 12:21:46 +03:00
static LIST_HEAD ( attribute_list ) ;
static int attribute_count ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
static int add_attribute ( const char * key , int level )
{
struct attribute * attr ;
dbg ( " add attribute '%s' " , key ) ;
attr = malloc ( sizeof ( struct attribute ) ) ;
if ( attr = = NULL ) {
printf ( " error malloc \n " ) ;
exit ( 2 ) ;
}
strfieldcpy ( attr - > key , key ) ;
attr - > level = level ;
list_add_tail ( & attr - > list , & attribute_list ) ;
attribute_count + + ;
return 0 ;
}
static int add_all_attributes ( const char * path , int level )
{
struct dlist * attributes ;
struct sysfs_attribute * attr ;
struct sysfs_directory * sysfs_dir ;
char value [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
char key [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
int len ;
int retval = 0 ;
dbg ( " look at '%s', level %i " , path , level ) ;
sysfs_dir = sysfs_open_directory ( path ) ;
if ( sysfs_dir = = NULL )
return - 1 ;
attributes = sysfs_get_dir_attributes ( sysfs_dir ) ;
if ( attributes = = NULL ) {
retval = - 1 ;
return 0 ;
}
dlist_for_each_data ( attributes , attr , struct sysfs_attribute )
if ( attr - > value ! = NULL ) {
dbg ( " found attribute '%s' " , attr - > name ) ;
strfieldcpy ( value , attr - > value ) ;
len = strlen ( value ) ;
if ( len = = 0 )
continue ;
/* skip very long attributes */
if ( len > 40 )
continue ;
/* remove trailing newline */
if ( value [ len - 1 ] = = ' \n ' ) {
value [ len - 1 ] = ' \0 ' ;
len - - ;
}
/* skip nonprintable values */
while ( len ) {
if ( ! isprint ( value [ len - 1 ] ) )
break ;
len - - ;
}
if ( len = = 0 ) {
sprintf ( key , " SYSFS{%s}= \" %s \" " , attr - > name , value ) ;
add_attribute ( key , level ) ;
}
}
2004-04-03 08:10:35 +04:00
sysfs_close_directory ( sysfs_dir ) ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
return 0 ;
}
static int get_all_attributes ( char * path )
{
struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev ;
struct sysfs_class_device * class_dev_parent ;
struct sysfs_device * sysfs_dev ;
struct sysfs_device * sysfs_dev_parent ;
char key [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
int retval = 0 ;
int level = 0 ;
attribute_count = 0 ;
INIT_LIST_HEAD ( & attribute_list ) ;
/* get the class dev */
class_dev = sysfs_open_class_device_path ( path ) ;
if ( class_dev = = NULL ) {
dbg ( " couldn't get the class device " ) ;
return - 1 ;
}
/* open sysfs class device directory and get all attributes */
if ( add_all_attributes ( class_dev - > path , level ) ! = 0 ) {
dbg ( " couldn't open class device directory " ) ;
retval = - 1 ;
goto exit ;
}
level + + ;
/* get the device link (if parent exists look here) */
class_dev_parent = sysfs_get_classdev_parent ( class_dev ) ;
2004-04-03 08:10:35 +04:00
if ( class_dev_parent ! = NULL )
sysfs_dev = sysfs_get_classdev_device ( class_dev_parent ) ;
else
sysfs_dev = sysfs_get_classdev_device ( class_dev ) ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
/* look the device chain upwards */
while ( sysfs_dev ! = NULL ) {
if ( sysfs_dev - > bus [ 0 ] ! = ' \0 ' ) {
add_attribute ( " " , level ) ;
sprintf ( key , " BUS= \" %s \" " , sysfs_dev - > bus ) ;
add_attribute ( key , level ) ;
sprintf ( key , " ID= \" %s \" " , sysfs_dev - > bus_id ) ;
add_attribute ( key , level ) ;
/* open sysfs device directory and print all attributes */
add_all_attributes ( sysfs_dev - > path , level ) ;
}
level + + ;
sysfs_dev_parent = sysfs_get_device_parent ( sysfs_dev ) ;
if ( sysfs_dev_parent = = NULL )
break ;
sysfs_dev = sysfs_dev_parent ;
}
exit :
2004-04-03 08:10:35 +04:00
sysfs_close_class_device ( class_dev ) ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
return retval ;
}
int main ( int argc , char * argv [ ] ) {
newtComponent lbox , run , lattr ;
newtComponent quit , form , answer ;
newtGrid grid , grid2 ;
char roottext [ 81 ] ;
char path [ NAME_SIZE ] ;
struct device * dev ;
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes
Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for
the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has
no sysinfo().
o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the
udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices.
All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at
the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it.
o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename
a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add
the changed name to the db to match with the remove event.
NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the
hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too?
o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created
the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part
of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all
the functions used for node creation.
o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too.
Can we change the name?
o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution
and used it in udev-test.pl.
udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging
statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the
scripts here too?
o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause
'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to
print the major/minor values.
o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test
for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
long time_last ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
int count_last ;
newtInit ( ) ;
newtCls ( ) ;
newtWinMessage ( " udevruler " , " Ok " ,
" This program lets you select a device currently present "
" on the system and you may choose the attributes to uniquely "
" name the device with a udev rule. \n "
" No configuration will be changed, it just prints the rule "
" to place in a udev.rules configuration file. The \" %k \" in the "
" NAME key of the printed rule may be replaced by the name the "
" node should have. " ) ;
init_logging ( " udevruler " ) ;
udev_init_config ( ) ;
get_all_devices ( ) ;
lbox = newtListbox ( 2 , 1 , 10 , NEWT_FLAG_SCROLL | NEWT_FLAG_RETURNEXIT ) ;
/* look for last discovered device */
time_last = 0 ;
list_for_each_entry ( dev , & device_list , list )
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes
Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for
the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has
no sysinfo().
o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the
udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices.
All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at
the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it.
o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename
a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add
the changed name to the db to match with the remove event.
NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the
hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too?
o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created
the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part
of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all
the functions used for node creation.
o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too.
Can we change the name?
o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution
and used it in udev-test.pl.
udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging
statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the
scripts here too?
o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause
'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to
print the major/minor values.
o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test
for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
if ( dev - > config_uptime > time_last )
time_last = dev - > config_uptime ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
/* skip if more than 16 recent devices */
count_last = 0 ;
list_for_each_entry ( dev , & device_list , list ) {
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes
Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for
the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has
no sysinfo().
o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the
udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices.
All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at
the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it.
o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename
a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add
the changed name to the db to match with the remove event.
NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the
hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too?
o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created
the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part
of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all
the functions used for node creation.
o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too.
Can we change the name?
o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution
and used it in udev-test.pl.
udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging
statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the
scripts here too?
o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause
'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to
print the major/minor values.
o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test
for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
if ( dev - > config_uptime < time_last - 10 )
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
continue ;
count_last + + ;
}
/* add devices up to 10 seconds older than the last one */
if ( count_last < 16 ) {
newtListboxAppendEntry ( lbox , " --- last dicovered --- " , NULL ) ;
list_for_each_entry ( dev , & device_list , list ) {
[PATCH] netdev - udevdb+dev.d changes
Here is a patch to change the netdev handling in the database and for
the dev.d/ calls. I applies on top of the udevd.patch, cause klibc has
no sysinfo().
o netdev's are also put into our database now. I want this for the
udevruler gui to get a list of all handled devices.
All devices in the db are stamped with the system uptime value at
the creation time. 'udevinfo -d' prints it.
o the DEVPATH value is the key for udevdb, but if we rename
a netdev, the name is replaced in the kernel, so we add
the changed name to the db to match with the remove event.
NOTE: The dev.d/ scripts still get the original name from the
hotplug call. Should we replace DEVPATH with the new name too?
o We now only add a device to the db, if we have successfully created
the main node or successfully renamed a netdev. This is the main part
of the patch, cause I needed to clean the retval passing trough all
the functions used for node creation.
o DEVNODE sounds a bit ugly for netdev's so I exported DEVNAME too.
Can we change the name?
o I've added a UDEV_NO_DEVD to possibly skip the script execution
and used it in udev-test.pl.
udevstart is the same horror now, if you have scripts with logging
statements in dev.d/ it takes minutes to finish, can we skip the
scripts here too?
o The get_device_type() function is changed to be more strict, cause
'udevinfo -a -p /block/' gets a class device for it and tries to
print the major/minor values.
o bugfix, the RESULT value has now a working newline removal and a test
for this case.
2004-04-01 11:12:57 +04:00
if ( dev - > config_uptime < time_last - 10 )
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
continue ;
dbg ( " %s %i " , dev - > name , dev - > config_line ) ;
newtListboxAppendEntry ( lbox , dev - > name , ( void * ) dev ) ;
dev - > added = 1 ;
}
newtListboxAppendEntry ( lbox , " " , NULL ) ;
}
/* add devices not catched by a rule */
newtListboxAppendEntry ( lbox , " --- not configured by a rule --- " , NULL ) ;
list_for_each_entry ( dev , & device_list , list ) {
if ( dev - > added )
continue ;
if ( dev - > config_line ! = 0 )
continue ;
dbg ( " %s %i " , dev - > name , dev - > config_line ) ;
newtListboxAppendEntry ( lbox , dev - > name , ( void * ) dev ) ;
dev - > added = 1 ;
}
newtListboxAppendEntry ( lbox , " " , NULL ) ;
/* add remaining devices */
newtListboxAppendEntry ( lbox , " --- configured by a rule --- " , NULL ) ;
list_for_each_entry ( dev , & device_list , list ) {
if ( dev - > added )
continue ;
dbg ( " %s %i " , dev - > name , dev - > config_line ) ;
newtListboxAppendEntry ( lbox , dev - > name , ( void * ) dev ) ;
}
newtPushHelpLine ( " <Tab>/<Alt-Tab> between elements | Use <Enter> to select a device " ) ;
snprintf ( roottext , sizeof ( roottext ) , " simple udev rule composer, version %s, (c) 2004 can't sleep team " , UDEV_VERSION ) ;
roottext [ sizeof ( roottext ) - 1 ] = ' \0 ' ;
newtDrawRootText ( 0 , 0 , roottext ) ;
form = newtForm ( NULL , NULL , 0 ) ;
grid = newtCreateGrid ( 1 , 2 ) ;
grid2 = newtButtonBar ( " Select device " , & run , " Quit " , & quit , NULL ) ;
newtGridSetField ( grid , 0 , 0 , NEWT_GRID_COMPONENT , lbox , 1 , 0 , 1 , 0 , NEWT_ANCHOR_TOP , 0 ) ;
newtGridSetField ( grid , 0 , 1 , NEWT_GRID_SUBGRID , grid2 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 0 , NEWT_ANCHOR_TOP , 0 ) ;
newtFormAddComponents ( form , lbox , run , quit , NULL ) ;
newtGridWrappedWindow ( grid , " Choose the device for which to compose a rule " ) ;
newtGridFree ( grid , 1 ) ;
while ( 1 ) {
struct attribute * attr ;
newtComponent ok , back , form2 , answer2 , text ;
newtGrid grid3 , grid4 ;
int i ;
int numitems ;
struct attribute * * selattr ;
2004-04-03 08:10:35 +04:00
char text_rule [ 255 ] ;
[PATCH] first stupid try for a rule compose gui
On Mon, Mar 15, 2004 at 09:28:17PM +0100, Kay Sievers wrote:
> Here is a first simple and pretty stupid try to make a simple tool for
> composing of a udev rule.
>
> It reads the udevdb to get all currently handled devices and presents a
> list, where you can choose the device to compose the rule for.
>
> The composed rule is just printed out in a window, nothing else by now.
>
> Do we want something like this?
> Nevermind, I always wanted to know, how this newt thing works :)
Here is the next step, I still can't sleep and there are to many patches
pending to make something useful :)
Cause nobody wanted to play with me, I've made a screenshot.
The device list is sorted in alphabetical order now and if there are only
a few recently discovered devices, they are placed on top of the list.
For those who want to have a look:
http://vrfy.org/projects/udev/udevruler.png
The patch applies on top of today's mmap() patch. The db format is
changed to have the file and line number of the applied rule. So it
should be easy to edit the matching rule with this beast. It compiles
with "make all udevruler".
2004-03-24 05:24:25 +03:00
answer = newtRunForm ( form ) ;
if ( answer = = quit )
break ;
dev = ( struct device * ) newtListboxGetCurrent ( lbox ) ;
if ( dev = = NULL )
continue ;
if ( dev - > config_line > 0 )
snprintf ( text_rule , sizeof ( text_rule ) ,
" The device is handled by a rule in the file '%s', line %i. " ,
dev - > config_file , dev - > config_line ) ;
else
strcpy ( text_rule , " The device was not handled by a rule. " ) ;
strfieldcpy ( path , sysfs_path ) ;
strfieldcat ( path , dev - > devpath ) ;
dbg ( " look at sysfs device '%s' " , path ) ;
get_all_attributes ( path ) ;
grid3 = newtCreateGrid ( 1 , 3 ) ;
form2 = newtForm ( NULL , NULL , 0 ) ;
grid4 = newtButtonBar ( " Ok " , & ok , " Back " , & back , NULL ) ;
lattr = newtListbox ( - 1 , - 1 , 10 , NEWT_FLAG_MULTIPLE | NEWT_FLAG_BORDER | NEWT_FLAG_RETURNEXIT ) ;
list_for_each_entry ( attr , & attribute_list , list )
newtListboxAddEntry ( lattr , attr - > key , ( void * ) attr ) ;
text = newtTextbox ( - 1 , - 1 , 50 , 2 , NEWT_FLAG_WRAP ) ;
newtTextboxSetText ( text , text_rule ) ;
newtGridSetField ( grid3 , 0 , 0 , NEWT_GRID_COMPONENT , lattr , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 0 ) ;
newtGridSetField ( grid3 , 0 , 1 , NEWT_GRID_COMPONENT , text , 0 , 0 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 0 ) ;
newtGridSetField ( grid3 , 0 , 2 , NEWT_GRID_SUBGRID , grid4 , 0 , 1 , 0 , 0 , NEWT_ANCHOR_TOP , 0 ) ;
newtFormAddComponents ( form2 , text , lattr , ok , back , NULL ) ;
newtGridWrappedWindow ( grid3 , " Select one ore more attributes within one section with the space bar " ) ;
newtGridFree ( grid3 , 1 ) ;
while ( 1 ) {
char rule [ 255 ] ;
int onelevel ;
int skipped ;
answer2 = newtRunForm ( form2 ) ;
if ( answer2 = = back )
break ;
selattr = ( struct attribute * * ) newtListboxGetSelection ( lattr , & numitems ) ;
if ( selattr = = NULL )
continue ;
rule [ 0 ] = ' \0 ' ;
onelevel = - 1 ;
skipped = 0 ;
for ( i = 0 ; i < numitems ; i + + ) {
if ( selattr [ i ] - > key [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' )
continue ;
if ( onelevel ! = - 1 ) {
if ( onelevel ! = selattr [ i ] - > level ) {
skipped = 1 ;
continue ;
}
} else {
onelevel = selattr [ i ] - > level ;
}
dbg ( " '%s' \n " , selattr [ i ] - > key ) ;
strfieldcat ( rule , selattr [ i ] - > key ) ;
strfieldcat ( rule , " , " ) ;
}
if ( skipped ) {
newtWinMessage ( " error " , " Ok " , " Please select only attributes within one section " ) ;
continue ;
}
if ( strlen ( rule ) > 200 ) {
newtWinMessage ( " error " , " Ok " , " The line is too long, please select fewer attributes. " ) ;
} else {
if ( rule [ 0 ] = = ' \0 ' )
continue ;
strfieldcat ( rule , " NAME= \" %k \" " ) ;
newtWinMessage ( " the rule to place in config file " , " Ok " , rule ) ;
}
}
newtPopWindow ( ) ;
}
newtPopWindow ( ) ;
newtFormDestroy ( form ) ;
newtFinished ( ) ;
return 0 ;
}